[00:00:01]
SO THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR COMING
[2024 Capital Bond Streets and Transportation Meeting on June 13, 2023]
TODAY.I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE BEFORE WE START, WE'RE THE ONE PERSON THAT'S GONNA GONE VIRTUALLY.
ONE OF OUR MEMBERS IS MORGAN, SO IT WORK TO GET HER ON.
I DON'T KNOW IF, UM, SHE IS ON OR NOT.
NO ONE IS, NO ONE IS ON, ACTUALLY.
OH, YOU KNOW, BUT I COULD BE WRONG.
AND CANDACE, CAN Y'ALL HEAR US? WHERE'S VIRTUALLY GOOD CHAIR.
SO, UH, LET'S JUST CHECK, MAKE SURE THE VIRTUAL, UH, ATTENDEES, THEY ARE HEARING US BECAUSE I THINK THEY HAVE SOME SORT OF PROBLEM.
UH, THREE ACTUALLY, UH, SHARON AND SUSAN, THEY'RE ALL ONLINE ACTUALLY.
UM, CAN YOU ALL ALSO SEE THE PRESENTATION? IF I CAN HEAR THEM, BUT, UH, NO.
CAN YOU ALL SEE IT NOW? CAN YOU CONFIRM PLEASE? SURE.
WANT ME? AND THE RECORDING IS IN PROGRESS, SO WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND START.
THE BOARD MEMBERS, UH, CONGRATULATIONS ON THE VICE CHAIR POSITION.
SO, UH, TODAY WE HAVE, UH, SOME PANEL THAT WE'RE GONNA PRESENT THE PRESENTATION.
IM NOT GOING TO PRESENT, BUT WE HAVE MOHAMMAD, OUR, UH, PROGRAM
[00:05:01]
MANAGER OVER ASSET MANAGEMENT.UH, WE HAVE A NEW PHASE TO DATE AT
THE ISN'T THAT OUR BRIDGES ARE SAFE, JUST BECAUSE
WHITE HERE, UH, WHO'S OVER THE ASSET MANAGEMENT, THE
UH, ITEM HASAN IS ON HIS WAY, AND, BUT WE HAVE ALSO ANOTHER, UH, PRESENTATION FOR THE TASK FORCE AT SIX 30.
SO HE'S PROBABLY GONNA JOIN THEM TO DO THE PRESENTATION, BUT WITH, THAT'LL TURN IT OVER TO RA AND DR.
THE PRESENTATIONS LOT EASIER,
SO I'LL START WITH AN OVERVIEW OF WHICH WE WILL COVER IN THIS MEETING DAY.
WE'RE GONNA BE, UM, INVENTORY PROJECTS TO BE ON THE INVENTORY, UH, BOND PROGRAM PROJECTS, CATEGORIES ON THE NEEDS, INVENTORY, PUBLIC WORK OVERALL NEEDS PUBLIC WORK, UM, MEET INVENTORY FOR COUNCIL
UM, THE ALLEYS NEED INVENTORY FOR COUNCIL DISTRICT, THE UNAPPROVED ALLEYS VERSUS APPROVED ALLEYS, UM, NEEDS ON THE INVENTORY, THE CITYWIDE PROJECT, UH, DEFINITION, THE CITY OF TOWERS, FABRIC, ROCK MASTER PLAN, AND THE BRIDGE PRIORITY LIST.
WE'RE ALSO GOING TO PROPOSE, UH, BUDGET, DIFFERENT BUDGET SCENARIOS.
SO WHAT'S THE, YEAH, SO WHAT'S THE NEEDS INVENTORY? THE NEEDS INVENTORY IS A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT, OH, PROJECT NEEDS, AND IT'S, UH, GONNA BE CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED.
SO YOU'LL BE SURPRISED IF YOU WILL SEE THOSE NUMBERS THAT ARE IN
PROBABLY THE, WE CARE GETTING UPDATED BECAUSE, UH, NEEDS INVENTORY NUMBERS ARE ALWAYS BEING SAME BECAUSE IT'S ALWAYS BEING UPDATED.
SO, UH, WE'RE GONNA CONTINUE, UH, ADDING PROJECTS.
UH, WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE UPDATING THE COST AND RANKING.
GONNA, UH, CONTINUE BEING ABLE TO FIND UNTIL WE FINALIZE, UM, THE LIST AND THE WORKFORCE BOND.
UH, PROJECTS ON THE NEEDS INVENTORY ARE RANK BASED ON THE TECHNICAL CRITERIA WE HAVE ALREADY COVERED IN THE PREVIOUS, UH, PRESENTATION.
AND I WILL NOT INCLUDED AS APPENDIX TO THIS PRESENTATION, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO REFER TO IT.
SO, UH, FOR CRITERIA, UM, CRITERIA FOR PROJECTS TO BE PLACED ON THE NEEDS INVENTORY.
SO, UH, I'M GONNA JUST CHECK BASED, BASED ON, UM, THE ASSET TIME.
SO FOR SIDEWALKS, UH, SIDEWALKS MASTER PLAN THAT WAS GRADED IN 2021, UH, IS, UH, CONSIDERED, UM, A NEED BECAUSE WE, WHAT WE ULTIMATELY WOULD LIKE TO IMPLEMENT THE WHOLE SIDEWALK PLAN.
UH, SO FOR STREETS, UH, ACTUALLY IT'S BASED ON THE PT I DATA THAT WE, UH, HAVE COLLECTED.
UH, THE PAVEMENT MODEL WE HAVE EXPLAINED, UH, IN OUR EARLIER, IS GOING TO BE RECOMMENDING THE TREATMENTS, UH, THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR PROOF PAVEMENT.
UH, LIKE RESURFACING AND RECONSTRUCTION, WHATEVER IS GOING TO BE RECOMMENDED FOR RESURFACING OR RECONSTRUCTION, IT'S GOING TO BE, UH, PLACED UNDERNEATH INVENTORY.
FOR ALLIE, IT'S THE VERY SIMILAR WAY TO STREETS.
UH, IT'S BASED ON THE PT DATA, UH, THAT WE COLLECTED.
AND ACTUALLY IT'S BOTH OF THE PAYMENT MODEL BEING USED FOR RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLEY WITH POOR CONDITIONS TO BE PLACED ON THE DIS INVENTORY.
HOWEVER, FOR UNIMPROVED ALLEYS, WHICH ARE THE GRAVEL OR THE DIRT ALLEYS, WE CONSIDERED ALL OF THOSE AS A NEED TO BE IMPROVED.
SO ALL OF THEM ARE ON THE NEED INVENTORY FOR BRIDGES.
UH, ACTUALLY, UH, YOU'VE SEE ONLY THE LIST OF THE BRIDGES THAT HAD THE
UM, ALSO THERE IS ONE OTHER SOURCE TO GET PROJECT COMPANY INVENTORY, WHICH THE THREE 11 AND THE SERVICE REPORTS, THE
[00:10:01]
SO FOR THESE INVENTORY CATEGORIES, I THINK WE TOUCHED ON THIS ONE PREVIOUSLY.UH, BUT TODAY OUR FOCUS IS GONNA BE ALEX S AND BRIDGES.
AND IN OUR NEXT MEETING, WE'RE GONNA TALK, START TALKING ABOUT FIXED LIFTING.
UH, JUST A REMINDER HERE, ALLIE'S, UH, UH, ARE, UH, ALI'S RECONSTRUCTION, WHICH ARE THE, UH, IMPROVED ALLEY AND THE UNAPPROVED ALLEY CONSTRUCTIONS.
UH, THAT, UH, THE IMPROVED ALLEY FOR COST CEMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 350, UH, SOLID FOR NEAR FOOT SIDEWALKS IS SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN, AND IT ALSO INCLUDES THE SIDEWALK COST SHARE PROGRAM, WHICH INCLUDES THE 50 50 PROGRAM AND THE SENIOR
AND THE BRIDGE SYSTEM ARE GONNA VARY BASED ON BRIDGE.
UH, NEXT, SO FOR PUBLIC WORKS OVER ONLY ON THIS, UH, ON THIS SLIDE, YOU WILL SEE, UH, EACH ASSET THAT IS MANAGED BY PUBLIC WORKS AND ITS PERCENTAGE NEED THE PERCENTAGE OF, UH, THAT ASSET ONLY INVENTORY OUT OF THE TOTAL NEED.
SO STREETS ARE APPROXIMATELY 48%, ALLEYS ARE 19%, SIDEWALKS ARE 30%, AND ARE ALMOST THREE.
SO THE TOTAL THAT, UH, YOU SEE HERE, IT MAKES, UH, THE OLD A HUNDRED PERCENT, UH, NEED THAT WE HAVE.
WHAT, UH, THIS IS AS OF TODAY'S DAY, CROSS TESTAMENT OR WHAT, YES, THESE ARE, UH, SNAPSHOT IN TIME.
ALL THE DAY WE'RE GONNA PROVIDE, IT'S ALL WITH A SNAPSHOT OF TIME.
IN A MATTER OF DAYS, IT MIGHT CHANGE, NOT DRAMATICALLY, BUT IT'S KIND.
FOR, UH, PUBLIC WORK NEEDS INVENTORY FOR COUNCIL DISTRICT.
SO HERE YOU PLACED BY COUNCIL DISTRICT AND BY, UH, SAID, UH, ASSET TYPE.
UM, AND THE, THE, WE ALSO HAVE, UH, SHOWED PERCENTAGE OF, OF, UH, NEEDS PER COUNCIL DISTRICT.
AND THAT WAY YOU CAN SEE HOW COUNCIL DISTRICTS HAVE DIFFERENT PERCENTAGE NEEDS.
AND THE LOWER, UH, UH, WAS ABOUT 2%, WHILE THE HIGHER, UH, WAS 9%.
AND, UH, THE TOTAL, UH, WAS ABOUT APPROXIMATELY 4.7 BILLION.
UM, HOWEVER, TO KEEP IN MIND, 4.7 MILLION BILLION IS ONLY CONSIDERING SIDEWALKS OF A HIGH PRIORITY UNDER THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN, NOT THE WHOLE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN, BECAUSE LIKE WE MENTIONED, THE PREVIOUS SLIDE IS TO, SO, AND FROM HERE, I WILL, UH, GIVE IT TO DR.
SO, UH, SO I'M GONNA COVER THE NEXT FEW SLIDES UP UNTIL THE BRIDGE SLIDE, THE DEFENDERS GONNA TAKE OVER.
SO WHAT YOU SEE ON THIS SLIDE IS BASICALLY A COMPARISON, UM, A PART CHART THAT SHOWS THE COMPARISON OF THE, UH, ESTIMATED CALLS BY COUNCIL DISTRICT.
AND ON THE XXI, YOU SEE, UH, THERE ARE, UM, THE COUNCIL DISTRICTS, UH, COLOR CODED FROM 1 3 14 ON THE Y ACCIDENT FOR BASICALLY THE PROTOCOLS FOR ALLEN, UH, NEEDS INVENTORY.
UH, THAT'S LIKE
BUT THIS IS JUST FOR THE S UM, FOR COMPARISON.
AND YOU CAN SEE ON THIS ONE, IT SHOWS THE VARIOUS DISTRIBUTION OF, YOU KNOW, FEES FOR, FOR ALLEYS.
THIS INCLUDES ALLS THAT ARE, YOU KNOW, IMPROVED HOURS THAT WE NEED TO IMPROVE, UM, UNIMPROVED ALLS.
SO IT'S A TOTAL, TOTAL COST WHERE IT VARIES BY BY DISTRICT.
AND YOU CAN SEE LIKE FOR, FOR DISTRICT A, UM, THE NEED FOR THAT IS, IT'S PROBABLY IS LOW COMPARED TO OTHER DISTRICTS WHERE, UH, COUNCIL DISTRICT 13 HAS THE HIGHEST NEED FOR ALI FOR ALI IMPROVEMENTS.
UM, THIS SHOWS A COMPARISON OF OUR CHART.
IT SHOWS A COMPARISON BETWEEN UNAPPROVED AND IMPROVED.
UM, AND, AND FOR, FOR IMPROVED ALLEYS SHOWS A A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF GETTING ABOUT CLOSE TO $1 BILLION.
AND THIS IS FOR ALL RECONSTRUCTION, UM, VERSUS A COMPARED VERSUS THE UNAPPROVED HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WHERE IT SHOWS ONLY ABOUT 333 MILLION, UM, FOR ME.
BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT THAT IS THE, UM, THESE ARE, THESE ALLEYS ARE ALL UNAPPROVED ALLEYS ARE ON THE KNEES INVENTORY,
[00:15:01]
UM, FOR, FOR, UH, IMPROVED FOR RECONSTRUCTION.SO WE PROVIDED A LIST OF, OF NEEDS FOR, FOR OUR VALUES AND, UM, THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU AND SPREADSHEET, I JUST WANT TO MENTION, I WANT, IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT, THAT THE RANKING OF THAT LIST IS BASED ON ANY POINTS OF THE TECHNICAL CRITERIA.
UM, SO, UH, PUBLIC WORKS IS STILL WAITING FOR THE, FOR THE REST OF THE POINTS WITH THE 20 POINTS OR PRIORITY OVERLAY AS WELL AS FOR EQUITY.
UH, SO ONCE WE GET THOSE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ANALYTICS AND, UH, BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, UM, WE WILL UPDATE THAT LIST.
SO THE LIST IS PROBABLY SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE CHANGE.
IT'S LIKE SHE HAS SAID IT, IT, ITS SNAPSHOT AND TIME.
UM, BUT WE DO HAVE THAT LISTING FOR ALL THE HOURS.
SO THEN IS APPROPRIATE NOW TO MENTION, UM, CITYWIDE PROJECTS.
UM, ROBERT PEREZ, UM, ASSISTANT, UH, CITY MANAGER, UM, UM, PROVIDED A MEMO.
HE SENT A MEMO TO DESCRIBE WHAT CITYWIDE PROJECTS, UM, MEANT, UM, AND, AND CATEGORIZED AND CATEGORIZED WHAT A CITY, UH, CITYWIDE PROJECT ENCOMPASS.
AND THERE'S A, UH, THERE'S A LIST OF ATTRIBUTES THAT WE LISTED ON THIS SLIDE.
I'M NOT GONNA GO THROUGH EACH ONE, BUT ONE OF 'EM.
UM, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THIS MAJOR ROADWAYS AND ARTERIALS OR FAIRS, WHICH WE WILL DEFINITELY COVER.
UH, IN OUR NEXT MEETING, WE TALK ABOUT, UM, SOME STREETS, STREET, UM, STREET INVENTORY INVENTORY.
UM, ANOTHER CONSIDERATION IS THAT THESE CITYWIDE PROJECTS ARE, ARE, UM, THEY COVER MULTIPLE CONDITIONS, AND THAT'S ANOTHER PORTING, UH, CRITERIA.
SO, UH, THERE'S A LIST THAT, AND THEN A MEMO THAT WAS SENT OUT.
UM, I THINK WE PROVIDED A COPY OF THAT.
SO IF FOR PUBLIC WORKS, WHAT CITYWIDE PROJECTS MEAN TO US IS BASICALLY TWO CATEGOR SIDEWALKS AGREEMENTS.
WELL, FOR SIDEWALKS, OUR PRIORITY LIST IS BASED ON THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN.
AND, AND THIS SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN WE'RE DEVELOPED IN 2021, LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS.
UM, THAT PLAN, BASICALLY REC RECOMMENDS PROJECTS THAT WERE SCOPE AND BASICALLY PRIORITY RIGHT, PRIORITIZE.
UM, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE IN THIS MAP, ONE, ONE OF THE FOCUS FOR THIS MASTER PLAN WAS ACTUALLY DEVELOPING FOCUS AREAS.
THERE WERE 10 FOCUS AREAS, UM, UH, THROUGHOUT THE CITY THAT WAS IDENTIFIED.
IT WAS VETTED, INVESTIGATIONS WERE COMPLETED, AND PROJECTS WERE, WERE, UH, SCORED.
AND LIKE I SAID, THEY WERE, UH, LISTED AS WHAT WAS THE HIGHEST PRIORITY VERSUS THE LOW PRIORITY.
AND IN THIS AVERAGE, IT SHOWED THE SPACE DISTRICT OF WHERE THOSE FOCUS AREAS ARE.
SOME OF THOSE FOCUS AREAS, CROSS DISTRICTS, SOME DO NOT.
UH, SO BASED ON THE SOUTH WORLD MASTER PLAN, THE FOCUS AREAS ARE THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF PRIORITY TO ADDRESS, UM, YOU KNOW, TRIPPING HAZARDS, UM, TRIPPING HAZARDS, AND, YOU KNOW, OTHER HAZARDOUS THAT WAS IDENTIFIED THROUGH THAT, UM, THROUGH THOSE INVESTIGATION.
SO WE DID PROVIDE A LIST OF ALL, UH, SIDEWALKS THAT WERE HIGH PRIORITY.
THE SIDEWALK LIST CONTAINS THE REMAINING RECOMMENDED PROJECT THAT'S IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER, IS TO REMAIN RECOMMENDED PROJECTS I IDENTIFIED THAT WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE MINISTRY.
SO WHAT, IN THAT LIST THAT WE PROVIDED, IT BASICALLY SHOWS THREE CATEGORIES IN THE CATEGORIES THAT ARE THOSE LISTS, FOCUS AREAS, UM, MISSING S AND EXISTENCE OF IT.
SO, UM, I, I, I, I LOOKED AT HOW MANY PROJECTS THAT WERE, UH, THAT WERE RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FROM THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN, AND WHAT WAS REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED AS, AS PART OF THE BOND PROGRAM.
THERE WERE 49, UM, UM, A SIDEWALK PROJECT THAT WERE IN FOCUS AREAS.
THERE WERE 70, UM, SIDEWALKS PROJECTS THAT WERE, THAT WAS REMAINING IN FOR MISSING SIDEWALKS AND 69 FOR EXISTING S IT'S IMPROVED.
[00:20:01]
AND OUR NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.SO I WILL TURN, TURN THE BRIDGE PRIORITY BASED SLIDE OPEN VIDEO.
NO, I THINK WE'VE GOT TO THE SAME, RIGHT? YEAH.
SO THE SLIDE, UH, WE HAVE SOME OLD BRUISES PRIORITY AND THAT VOLUNTEER ADDRESS PROGRAM, THESE, UH, THESE BRIDGES WILL THE TYPICAL CRITERIA, UH, AND THIS WERE THE HIGHEST SCHOOL BRIDGES, UH, THOSE POINTS ARE, WE STOOD HERE AS WELL.
AND WE DID, UH, QUICK UPDATE, A SLIGHT UPDATE IN THE CRITERIA THAT IS MADE IN THE, OF THIS, UH, PRESENTATION AS WELL TO, BASED UPON RECOMMENDATION FROM THE, TO GIVE THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND COVER THE, WAS, UH, EXCEPTIONAL, UH, CONDITION OF THE BREEZE, THIS FORWARD
AND AGAIN, UM, AS A REFERENCE FILE THIS PRIOR, THIS WILL TO YOU AND ALL THIS FOUR PLUS SOLID, IT LIKELY PLEASE IT'S IN THERE.
UH, WOULD YOU PLEASE GO, UH, FORWARD TO THE, UH, TO THE SLIDE? YEAH, YEAH.
THIS IS THE MOST UPDATED TECHNICAL PROJECT, UM, HERE.
NUMBER FIVE, STRUCTURAL EVALUATION WAS ADDED.
WHAT DOES IS IT LOOKS INTO DEEPER THIS COMPONENT THAT THE BRACE AND EVALUATES, UH, WHAT'S THE INITIAL PART THAT SPECIFIC OR SO THAT GIVES THEM NO.
AND, UH, THAT HELPS US TO AND PRIORITIZE THOSE.
DO YOU WANT ME TO GO FORWARD OR BACK AGAIN? UM, BACK FORWARD.
SO WHEN IT COMES TO BUDGET, THAT'S MY FAVORITE PART, RIGHT AHEAD.
SO SOMETHING TO ELABORATE ON WHAT BRENDA MENTIONED ON THE BRIDGE, UH, TEXT ORDER STATE INSPECTS THE BRIDGES, RIGHT? UM, EVERY, I BELIEVE THEY INSPECT ALL THE BRIDGES IN THE CITY.
THEY GIVE US A REPORT BASED ON THAT REPORT.
WE, THEY SEVEN
THESE ARE MORE OF A FOUR OR 5, 5, 5 AND THEIR RANGE.
HOWEVER, WE DO ALSO HAVE A, A CONSULTANT THAT THEY DO THE MORE, UH, STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRIDGES BECAUSE TECHSTAR INSPECTION IS VERY GENERAL.
IF ONE COMPONENT OF THE BRIDGE IS BAD, THEY'RE GONNA RANK THEM BASED ON THAT COMPONENT ITSELF.
BUT MAYBE THE REST OF THE COMPONENTS ARE GOOD, BUT OUR CONSULTANT IS ACTUALLY LOOKING AT THE BRIDGES AND SEE WHAT'S GOING ON, WHAT TYPE OF, YOU KNOW, TREATMENT THEY NEED OR REPAIR OR STUFF LIKE THAT.
SO THE PRIORITY LIST THAT YOU, UM, UM, OBSERVE HERE THAT, UH, PRESENTATION WAS COMING FROM THE COMBINATION OF ALL THOSE FACTORS.
THE TEXT DO, THE CONSULTANT, AND OTHER TECHNICAL CRITERIA THAT BASED ON, SO LET'S DIVE INTO THE PROPOSED BUDGET SCENARIO.
UM, IF Y'ALL REMEMBER, OR YOU HAVE SEEN THE INITIAL PRESENTATION BY, BY BOND OFFICE, UM, I GUESS INITIALLY WHAT WAS DISCUSSED WAS THAT 485 MILLION IS THE PORTION FOR THIS FEE.
SO WE ARE HOPING THAT WE DON'T GET ANYTHING LESS THAN THAT.
WE, UH, ACTUALLY HAVE THAT BUDGET AS BASELINE FOR TWO DAYS THIS YEAR.
AND WE RUN THE MODEL OR P MODEL, NOT SCENARIOS BASED ON THE 25 MILLION IN INCREMENTS.
WHAT IF IT GOES DOWN OR WHAT IF IT GOES UP, RIGHT? IF WE RECEIVE MORE MONEY, THEN WE HAVE SOME SCENARIO IN BETWEEN.
AND IF IT GOES LOWER, THEN WE'RE GONNA HAVE ANOTHER SCENARIO.
SO THIS IS THE EXERCISE THAT WE DID HERE.
KEEP IN MIND, BRIDGE AND SIDEWALKS ARE THE CITYWIDE PROJECT, RIGHT? WE
[00:25:01]
SAID THAT, UM, I GUESS, UM, WE ALLOCATED SOME MONEY FOR THAT AS A PART OF THE, UM, THE BASE BUDGET, 25 MILLION FOR SIDEWALK AND 60 MILLION FOR BRIDGES.THE 60 MILLION COMING FROM THE FIVE OR TOP FIVE PROJECTS THAT THE TOP FOUR, TOP FOUR PRIORITY THAT WE HAD FOR THE BRIDGES.
AND THE SIDEWALK IS THE REMAINING OF THE, UM, SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN FOCUS AREA AS, AS SHA MENTIONED.
AND ALSO THE, UH, BASED ON THE HISTORIC DATA THAT WE HAVE, UH, FOR THE 50 50 COST SHARE PROGRAM AND ALSO THE SENIOR CITIZEN SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT, WE DON'T HAVE THAT DATA YET.
JUST WANNA, UH, PLEASE NOTE THAT THOSE ARE ASSUMPTIONS THAT WE ARE MAKING RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GONNA APPLY FOR, UH, COST IN THEIR, YOU KNOW, NEXT BOND PROGRAM.
BUT WE, BASED ON THIS THIRD DATA, WE ALLOCATED SOME MONEY FOR THAT.
WE CAME UP WITH THE $25 MILLION.
SO 25 PLUS 60 BECOMES 85, THE REST WILL BE THE BUDGET THAT WE'RE GONNA UTILIZE FOR THE STREETS AND ALLEYS SO FAR IS, IS THAT CLEAR SO FAR? OKAY.
SO THEN WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE NEEDS THAT WE HAVE IN THE CITY.
SO WHEN WE LOOK AT IT, IT WAS 70 SOMETHING PERSON STREET AND 20 SOMETHING PERSON ALLEYS OR NEED INVENTORY BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE THAT WE CALCULATE.
SO WE ROUNDED IT UP TO 80% FOR STREETS, 20% FOR ADDICTS.
AND AGAIN, WE ARE HERE TO HEAR FROM THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR THE NETWORK, RIGHT? BECAUSE, UH, MAYBE SOME COUNCIL DISTRICT, THEY MIGHT WANT TO WEIGH IN MORE ON THE ALLEYS COMPARED TO STREETS OR VICE VERSA.
SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU.
BUT FOR THE EXERCISE THAT YOU SEE HERE, WE ALLOCATED 80% OF THE BUDGET FOR STREET, 20% FOR ADS.
AND THAT'S WHY YOU SEE 320 MILLION FOR A, FOR THE STREET AND 80 MILLION FOR ADS.
AND THEN THE SCENARIO WENT, UM, FROM THE TOP OF IT, WE HAVE 25 MILLION LESS AND 50 MILLION LESS, RIGHT? WE TRY TO STAY WITH THE STREET PORTION AND DON'T REDUCE IT BECAUSE THE STREETS IS IMPORTANCE TO THIS, UH, RESIDENT.
UH, WE HAD SOME SURVEY BY CITY MANAGER BACK IN, UH, LAST YEAR I BELIEVE.
AND CITY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE STREET ALONG WITH PUBLIC SAFETY.
AND THAT'S WHY WE DON'T WANT TO REDUCE THE STREET PORTION THAT MUCH.
SO WE TRY TO STAY WITH THE 320 MILLION IN THE FIRST, UH, 25 MILLION SHORTFALL.
WHEN IT BECOMES TO 50 MILLION SHORTFALL, WE CHANGE IT FROM THREE 20 TO 300 MILLION.
WE REDUCE THE ALLEYS, UH, PROPORTIONATELY, UH, ALSO, BUT WE ALSO REDUCE THE BRIDGES AND ALSO
HOPEFULLY THAT THAT WILL BE THE CASE.
UH, WE IN INCLUDED MORE MONEY FOR THE SUITES AND ALLEYS, AS YOU CAN SEE, 340, 360, RIGHT? AND WE STAY WITH THE COST FOR SIDEWALK PLAN FOR THE BRIDGES.
KEEP IN MIND WE DO LOOK AT OTHER OPTIONS FOR SIDEWALK.
FOR EXAMPLE, WE DO HAVE A JOURNAL FUND TO FORM SOME OF THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN ON THE YEARLY BASIS.
ASIDE FROM THE BOND PROGRAM, UH, WE'RE ALSO HOPING THAT WE RECEIVE SOME EXCESS, UH, TAX REVENUE THAT DAR HAS THIS YEAR TO GET MORE MONEY FROM THEM TO ALSO INCLUDE FOR THE CYBER IMPROVEMENT AND 80 ADVANCES ALSO.
SO THAT'S WHY THAT WAS A RATIONALE BEHIND SETTING THE NUMBER FOR THE SIDEWALK OR OTHER SOURCE OF FUNDING ALLOCATED WITH THAT.
AND ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT COMPARED TO THE STREETS, UH, EVEN IF YOU WANNA GO BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE, THE PERCENTAGE OF THE STREETS THAT ARE IN THE NEEDS OF IMPROVEMENT IS NOT HIGHER THAN THE SIDEWALK IN THE CITY.
SO THAT WAS THE RATIONALE BEYOND, BEYOND THE ANALYSIS.
WITH THAT, WE'RE GONNA GET TO THE QUESTION AND ANSWER AND, UM, TAKE ANY QUESTION THAT YOU MAY HAVE OR IF OUR MEMBERS VIRTUALLY, THEY CAN ACTUALLY, UM, HAVE THE QUESTION ON THE CHAT BOX, WE CAN ADDRESS THEM, UH, TONIGHT ALSO IS, IS YOU REFERENCED THAT THE NEED IS GREATER PER STREETS VERSUS SIDEWALKS.
YOU INCLUDE, UH, THE PEDESTRIAN DEATH RATE AND THAT KIND OF FACTORY IN THERE AS YOU MAKE AN ALLOCATION RECOMMENDATION.
I THINK ONE, THE THING IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE DID THE CYBER MASTER PLAN AND CYBER MASTER PLAN IDENTIFIED WHAT ARE THE HIGHEST PRIORITIES IN THE CITY, RIGHT? AND THERE HAVE SEVERAL FACTORS.
ONE WAS THE PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION OR, UH, PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS SUCH AS SCHOOLS, UH, GOVERNMENT FACILITIES
[00:30:01]
ANDPART OF THE CYBER MASTER PLAN.
YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE AREAS THAT ARE UNDERSERVED AND BE, HAVE TO SERVE, RIGHT? AND SAFETY, PUBLIC SAFETY, YOU KNOW, THERE IS A MISSING SIDEWALK HERE AND THERE'S A SAFETY DEPOSIT.
THERE'S THIS POOL WALKING WHERE KIDS ARE WALKING ON THE STREET, RIGHT ON THE SIDEWALK.
SO THE ACCOUNTANT FOR ALL THOSE THINGS AT THE PART OF THE SIDEWALK MESS AND WHEN THEY RANK THEM.
AND SO THAT SHOULD TAKE CARE OF ACTUALLY, UH, THAT SIDE WIDE GAP, IF YOU WILL.
SO, BUT DOES THAT INCLUDE, SAY THERE'S A PARTICULAR INTERSECTION, YOU KNOW, YOUNG AND WHATEVER, UM, THAT YOU'VE HAD A NUMBER OF DEATHS THERE THAT'S IN THE OVERLAY IN THAT, RIGHT? BECAUSE, UH, THE SAFETY POINTS, THE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY POINTS THAT ARE 10 POINTS, UH, THEY ARE, UH, SPECIFIC, UH, FOR THE PEDESTRIAN FATALITY IS ONE 10 POINTS.
ACTUALLY THE HIGHEST POINT YOU GET FOR PEDESTRIAN FATALITY.
HOWEVER, YOU GET FIVE POINTS IF IT'S A HIGH INJURY AREA, AND THEN ZERO POINTS, IF NOT, OKAY, THANK.
SO, UM, NEXT TIME YOU TALK ABOUT THE COUNTS PERSON'S INPUT OR PREFERENCE.
SO IF ONE, IF YOU THINK THAT THERE'S AN AREA ON, UM, SLIDE SIDEWALK NEST AND THAT'S NOT PRIORITY AREA, HOW WOULD THAT BE? WELL, UM, I, WHILE WE ARE ACTUALLY BRINGING UP THAT SLIDE, I THINK THIS IS SLIDE 13.
SO THIS IS THE FOCUS AREA THAT CAME FROM THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN WHEN IT WAS IMPLEMENTED BACK IN 2021, RIGHT? MM-HMM.
YOU KNOW, THE FIVE CRITERIA THAT THEY HAD, OR SIX, I BELIEVE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 CRITERIA THAT THEY HAVE.
UH, THEY LOOKED AT THOSE CRITERIA AND THEY IDENTIFY THE FOCUS AREA, RIGHT? AGAIN, FOR EXAMPLE, ACTIVITY AREA, UH, WHICH COME FROM THE TRANSPORTATION, UH, POLICY, WHICH IS, UH, TELL US, UH, THE STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN.
UH, IT COMES FROM THAT, THE CITIZEN REQUEST ALSO, YOU KNOW, UM, WHICH IS PART OF THE RANKING FOR THE, NOT FROM THE MASTER PLAN, BUT, UH, SAFETY EQUITY AND PLACES OF PUBLIC A ACCOMMODATION.
SO BASED ON THAT, THEY CAME UP WITH THIS.
ASIDE FROM THESE FOCUS AREAS, THERE ARE HIGH PRIORITIES ALSO THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP, BUT THERE ARE HIGH PRIORITIES.
IF YOU GO TO THE SERVER MASTER PLAN GIS WEBSITE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE RED IS COLOR CODED AND THE RED MEANS THE HIGH PRIORITY.
AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE ARE THE HIGH PRIORITY SIDEWALKS NOT BEING THE PART OF FOCUS AREA, BUT STILL IN THE HIGH PRIORITY.
SO EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT ACTUALLY HAS A HIGH PRIORITY.
AND ALSO THE, AS FAR AS I REMEMBER, THEY ALSO HAVE FOCUS AREA, COUNCIL DISTRICT, FOR EXAMPLE, 12 HAS FOCUS AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DISTRICT, AS YOU CAN SEE.
BUT ALSO IN ADDITION TO THAT, THEY HAVE ALSO HIGH PRIORITY SIDEWALKS.
AND THAT'S A PART OF THE SO HIGH PRIORITY.
MY QUESTION, YOU TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME HOW THE COUNCIL PERSONS
WHERE IS NOT THE, WELL THIS, THIS IS ACTUALLY FROM 2021, NOT TO 2021.
WE ADOPTED THE SABA MAAN, RIGHT? I GUESS FOR THE SAKE OF THE BOND PROGRAM, YOU ALL, THEY'RE PRESENTING YOUR DISTRICT AND IF YOU FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, FOR YOUR DISTRICT, SABA IS MORE IMPORTANT COMPARED TO ATS, FOR EXAMPLE, OR STREET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THEN YOU TELL US, OKAY, IN ADDITION TO THESE SIDEWALKS, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK BECAUSE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEED ON THIS DISTRICT AND THAT DISTRICT.
AND WE CAN ADD IT TO THE LIST THAT WE ALREADY HAVE.
BUT WE ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT WE HAVE TO BALANCE THE BUDGET AT THE END OF THE, UH, DAY RIGHT? TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, THE ADVOCATED BOND FOR ALL THE COUNCIL DISTRICTS ARE FAIR TO, UM, YOU KNOW, SOME EXTENT.
AND THAT'S THE THING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM Y'ALL.
AND WE CAN KNOW THAT THERE ARE MORE PRIORITIES WE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR ABOUT WHEN THAT'S THE THING WE'VE PROVIDED THE LEASE.
UM, NOW THAT YOU HAVE A LEASE, WE'RE GONNA DISCUSS IT TONIGHT.
YOU HAVE ALL THE WAY, I THINK TILL AUGUST 22ND, UM, I BELIEVE, OR JULY, WE WE'RE GONNA HAVE ANOTHER MEETING IN JULY.
WE HAVEN'T ESTABLISHED A DATE YET.
UM, BUT LET'S SAY FOR EXAMPLE, MID JULY, IF YOU HAVE THAT, IF YOU CAN TELL US BY END, THAT WOULD BE GOOD.
IF NOT, UH, WE CAN PROBABLY, UH, HAVE IT BY AUGUST ALSO.
BUT I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT, UM, SOON
[00:35:01]
AS YOU KNOW, UH, IT IS THE HIGH PRIORITY FOR YOUR DISTRICT.CAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO BE, YOU KNOW, UH, WE'RE, WE'RE WORKING ON A TIMELINE ON MANY THINGS AND FORTUNATELY THE TIMELINE IS CHANGING.
SO SOMETIMES WE CAN, WE THINK WE HAVE UNTIL JULY, BUT WE MIGHT NOT OUT OF A SUDDEN IT'S LIKE DECIDING DATE.
WE HAVE TO GET THE INFORMATION IN RIGHT NOW BECAUSE OF OTHER FACTORS.
SO FOR THAT, I WOULD RECOMMEND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
HOW WOULD YOU, THAT INFORMATION THROUGH THE CHAIR, I BELIEVE IF YOU CONSOLIDATE ALL THE THINGS THAT THEN IS YEAH, WE CAN PROBABLY GATHER BECAUSE YOU NEED TO, YOU NEED SOME TIME TO DISCUSS YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, TO DISCUSS YOUR, YOU KNOW, DISTRICT.
YOU GOTTA MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE ARE HAPPY, RIGHT? WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU'RE PROVIDING.
SO ONCE YOU HAVE THE LIST, AND YOU CAN PROBABLY GO THROUGH THE CHAIR COMPUTATION, SAY, OKAY, THIS IS MY PRIOR RELEASE FOR SIDEWALK, THIS IS MY PRIORITY LIST FOR STREET.
AND THEN CHAIR CAN COMMUNICATE WITH US AND UM, CONSOLIDATE ALL THE DATA AT THE SAME TIME.
MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL COUNCIL MEMBER COOPER WERE ASKED GET A PRIORITY.
IS THAT NOT THE CASE? I'M NOT SURE.
I HAVE TO CONFIRM THAT WITH, UH, I DUNNO BOSS IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT, UH, OR NOT, BUT I GUESS MY TAKE WAS THAT THE SUBCOMMITTEE WILL BRIEF TASK FORCE AND TASK FORCE WILL, UH, PROVIDE THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO, UH, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE THE ONE THAT THEY DECIDE, UH, ON THE LIST ANYWAYS, THAT THEY RIGHT.
UM, MORE EFFICIENT COUNCIL MEMBER BRIGADE PIGMENT FOR A LIST OF THEIR PRIORITIES.
UM, BUT SAYING THAT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
SO, NO, I DON'T KNOW IF IT HAPPENED OR NOT.
I HAVE TO VERIFY THE BOND OFFICE'S PLAN THEY'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR A WHILE.
UH, LIKE I REACHED OUT TO THEM AND SHE HAD A PRIORITY LIST THAT RESIDENTS, THEY HAD ALREADY COMBINED THE SPREADSHEETS OF, UH, STREET AND, BUT EVERY SINGLE STAFF RESIDENTS WERE REQUESTING THE MEETING THAT THEY'VE BEEN GATHERING FOR THE LAST YEAR.
SO SHE, THAT MIGHT BE ANOTHER WAY TO REACH OUT.
ANOTHER THING I CAN ACTUALLY, UH, MAYBE SUGGEST IS THAT, YOU KNOW, Y'ALL ARE REPRESENTING YOUR COUNCIL DISTRICT ANYWAYS, YOU CAN TALK TO YOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS AND IF THEY HAVE ANY, UH, SUGGESTION FOR ANY, ANY, UM, PROJECTS, THEN YOU CAN INCLUDE IT IN YOUR LIST AND SEND, THIS IS MY PRIORITY
THAT COULD HAPPEN THAT WAY TOO.
BUT THERE ARE BOND MEETINGS THAT ON TOMORROW EVENING, ALL OTHER WAY TO GET DIRECT RESIDENTS AND YOUR PERSON, THEY'RE ALSO MM-HMM.
SO MY COUNCIL MEMBER HAD A LIST OF NOT PRIORITIES, BUT FOR PEOPLE WHAT THEY HAD SAID.
SO IF COUNCIL REALLY AS COUNCIL MEMBERS STAFF WHO WOULD BE HELPFUL IF THEY COULD PRIORITIZE THOSE FOR THE COUNCIL SO THAT WE WOULD HAVE THEM, AND WE WOULD LOOK TO SEE IF THEY'RE ON THE LEFT, NOT THEN TURN IT OVER TO THE LARGER COMMITTEE AND BACK TO THE COUNCIL BECAUSE WILL MAKE THE COUNCILMAN MAKES THAT FINAL DECISION.
BECAUSE JUST FOR YOUR EDUCATION, YOU GET A, YOU GET A LIST LIKE THAT.
AS A COUNCIL MEMBER, YOU'RE THINKING TO YOURSELF, OKAY, WELL MAYBE THIS IS THE HIGHEST PRIORITY, BUT THIS IS THE GREATEST PROBLEM WE HAVE IN OUR DISTRICT, ACCORDING TO PEOPLE WHO'VE CALLED.
RIGHT? AND SO THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO SWAP THAT OUT FOR SOMETHING ELSE IF IT IS A DIFFICULT DECISION, RIGHT? SO THE MORE INFORMATION THAT WE CAN GIVE THEM BETTER, THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO MAKE DECISION THINGS WILL CALLED BELOW THE LINE SAW ON SOME OF THE DATA THAT WE RECEIVED, UH, AND ABOVE THE LINE LINE, WE HAVE TO MOVE IT BELOW THE LINE.
AND JUST TO, THAT'S PROBABLY WHY I SAY THIS.
THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO MOVE THAT BULLET, THE COUNCILMAN BELOW THE LINE.
AND THAT STREET THAT THEY TOOK OUT IS SOMEBODY'S FAVOR.
NO, THAT'S A VERY VALID POINT.
I JUST WANNA ADD SOMETHING FOR SIDEWALK THEN I, BECAUSE I SAID YOU WANNA SEND A LIST FOR SIDEWALK, MIGHT BE GOOD PRACTICE TO WAIT TO SEE THE LIST FOR STREETS THAT ARE KNOWN TO BE KNOWN FOR RECONSTRUCTION BEFORE YOU DECIDE ON OFFENDING SOMETHING FOR SIDEWALK.
BECAUSE WE ADDRESS A LOT OF SIDEWALKS THROUGH STREET RECONSTRUCTION TOO.
SO THIS IS, ASIDE FROM THIS ONE, WE DO ADDRESS, UH, SIDEWALK WITH THE THREE THREE INFECTION.
SO MANY OF SIDEWALKS ARE GONNA BE UNDER THE BUDGET FOR STREET AS WELL.
[00:40:01]
PLUS THIS, THAT LEADS ME TO MY NEXT QUESTION.THERE'S SECTION, UH, LIKE ON MY DISTRICT WHERE MY RESIDENCE WANT THE BY CLAIMS TO BE ON THAT STREET FOR BUDGET PURPOSES.
IS THE BIKE LANE BUDGETED FROM THE STREET OR FROM THE SIDEWALK? I BELIEVE THE BIKE LANE, UH, WILL FOLLOW ON THEIR TRANSPORTATION.
I THINK THEY'RE GONNA PROBABLY BRIEF YOU ON THAT.
UM, CAUSE YOU WANNA ADD SOMETHING TO THIS, UH, QUESTION.
OH, UM, FOR BUDGET, WHERE IS BIKE LANE? OKAY, SO THE, MY PLAINS, THE STANDALONE PROJECT IS GONNA BE OUR PACKAGE, HOWEVER, THAT WILL BE BY PLAINS.
THAT WILL BE PART OF THE, THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE.
THE CONSTRUCTION OR SOME OF THE, UH, WE'RE OVERLAYING WE WOULD BE OVERLAY.
SO THE, THE IDEA IS THAT WE'RE, UM, SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO FINISH UP THE, UH, BY LANE PLAN SO THAT WHATEVER IS BEING DECIDED ON WHATEVER PROJECT THAT WE'RE GONNA HAVE IN THE 20, 24 MONTH, WHETHER IT BE STANDALONE OR PART OF THE PROJECT, WILL COMPLY WITH THE, UH, THE, THAT WE'RE, UM, I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION ON STREET CLASSIFICATION.
IT'S ONE OF THE HERE, ARTERIAL STREETS, COLLECTIVE STREETS, RESIDENTIAL STREETS.
ARE THOSE THE THREE CATEGORIES? I, UH, MY QUESTION IS, UM, THE TERM THOROUGHFARE, IS THAT A DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION OR ROFER? UH, AGAIN, WE HAVE, UH, ROFER RULE HERE, KIM SITTING DOWN.
UM, SO THE ROFER, AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND, IS A COMBINATION OF COLLECTORS AND, UH, ARTERIAL.
KIM, YOU WANNA ADD SOMETHING TO THE CITY OF DALLAS'S? LONG RANGE ROADWAY PLANNING DOCUMENT? SO WE PLAN, I MEAN, LIKE THIS, IT'S THE BIGGER NETWORK.
THERE'S LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET, AND THEN THAT GETS BROKEN INTO DIMENSIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS.
SO THESE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS, OKAY, WHICH ARE THE, THE PRIMARY ARTERIALS AND THINGS LIKE THAT DOES, UM, I'M GONNA, IF ASK MY QUESTIONS THAT I KNOW FULLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
BUT, UM, ONE OF THE REQUESTS THAT MY RESIDENTS HAVE ON MLK FROM FAIR PARK DOWN TO HIGHWAY IS THEY WANT THAT TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A THOROUGHFARE AND THEY WANT STREETS AND BY CLAIMS. AND SO BOULEVARD STYLE THAT, SO, OKAY, SO THAT'S, WELL, IT'S A, OKAY, SO SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT PROJECT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, UH, MARTIN LUTHER CAME FROM FAIR PART TO CEDAR IT AND CEDAR CRACK, RIGHT? SO WE ARE, UH, SUBMITTING A FEDERAL, UH, VACATION FOR THE, UH, SAFE ROUTES FOR ALL THAT WOULD BE COMING UP HERE NEXT A FEW WEEKS.
AND THE SCOPE OF THAT PROJECT WILL BE TO FIX, UM, ALL THE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS AND POTENTIALLY ADD PIPELINE INTO IT AND UPGRADE THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY FUNDED AS PART OF, WE'RE TAKING ALL THE WAY, MATTER OF FACT, IT HAS TO HIGHWAY 5 45 ALL THE WAY TO, UM, IS, UM, THERE A WAY OR PASS CONCEPTS ON THAT? UM, ONCE, I MEAN, BECAUSE THIS IS GONNA BE A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS, UH, WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO GO THROUGH, UH, THE FEDERAL PROCESSS, WHICH MEANS THAT WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO HAVE A ROBUST, UH, OUTREACH PROGRAM.
AND A LOT OF PEOPLE, AND EVERYBODY WILL HAVE, IF IT'S A SEPARATED BIKE LANE OR HOW WIDE THE SIDEWALKS, SO THERE'S ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING.
SO I MEAN, ALL THAT PART OF THE, UH, UH, OUTREACH THAT WE WILL BE ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY WITH, BECAUSE THIS IS A, UH, IMPORTANT PROJECT, UH, FOR SEVERAL REASONS.
BUT, UM, THIS IS WHY IT IS, UH, IT WAS RANKED SO HIGH LAST TIME.
UNFORTUNATELY, ACCESS WAS MY STOCK.
SO, UM, I ACCESS FEDERAL HIGHWAY ACCESS COULD BE SUBMITTED, SHOULD BE, WE SHOULD SCORE WELL ON IT.
AND, UH, HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET THE, UH, REQUEST, BE THE SAME PROCESS THAT USED FOR CAESAR SHOWERS AND THEY REDID THAT.
IT WAS A ROBUST, UM, PARAGRAPH.
IT WAS DONE BY IS ONE AND IT, AND SO IF YOU'LL GO DOWN, SEE OUR S FROM DOWNTOWN, THAT'S OKAY.
AND, AND YOU'LL SEE THAT THE SIDEWALKS ARE, ARE WIDER.
THERE'S KIND OF A LITTLE ROUNDABOUT THING IN THE MIDDLE, LIKE, AND ON AND ON AND ON.
THAT PROBABLY IS A SIMILAR PROCESS IF THERE WAY, LIKE I'LL ADD ANYWHERE OR WHERE I CAN LOVE TO STAY UP TO DATE OR, I MEAN, YOU CAN EMAIL ME.
I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THE THING ABOUT IT IS THIS, SO HERE'S THE THING AGAIN, LIKE THIS SUPPORT LIKES TO SAY IS, THE GOOD NEWS IS YOU'LL HAVE FEDERAL PLANS.
THE BAD NEWS IS YOU HAVE FEDERAL FUNDS.
SO, UM, EVEN THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY APPROVES IT IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR.
[00:45:01]
EARLIEST THAT WE CAN LAY OUR END ON THESE FEDERAL PLANS WILL BE ALMOST A YEAR AND A HALF.SO, SO THEN LET ME ASK YOU THIS, BECAUSE FOR
IT'S BEING CONSIDERED FOR THIS FEDERAL PROJECT.
IT'S, UH, BEING CONSIDERED FOR IF WE GET START MONEY, UM, MY RESIDENT WOULD LIKE THAT TO BE A, WHICH OF THOSE TAKES THE LEAST AMOUNT OF TIME FOR NEXT THAT IT WOULD BE DONE.
SO THEY CAN FEEL LIKE WE'RE, YEAH, LET, LET US BE CLEAR ON WHAT THE SCOPE IS.
SO WHAT WE'RE SUBMITTING IS NOT ANY CONSTRUCTION ALL, OK.
SO WHAT WE'RE SUBMITTING IS THE UPGRADING THE PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AS WELL AS THE FIVE, ALRIGHT, WHICH MEANS THAT ANYTHING PRIMARILY, UH, ON THE HER SIDE OR BEHIND THE PER IS WHAT'S GONNA BE GRADED.
AND THEN WE'RE GONNA SEVERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS THAT WILL BE GRADED.
MATTER OF FACT, I HAVE ONE, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT'S ALREADY FUNDED.
SO WE'RE WORKING ON THE DESIGN RIGHT NOW, BUT THAT ARE A COUPLE OF, COUPLE OTHER ONES THAT ARE FUNDED AND WILL BE PART OF THAT, UH, PROJECT.
AND THEN, UH, IF YOU GO WEST OF THE HIGHWAY, UH, THAT SEGMENT OF, UH, MLK IS ON OUR HIGHWAY HIGH INJURY NETWORK AND, UH, UH, OF THAT STREET, UH, BEFORE YOU GET THE CAESAR CEDAR BRIDGE, CEDAR VESSEL, UM, THERE IS ONE TYPE OF SIGNAL THAT HAS A VERY HIGH RATE OF ACCIDENTS.
SO, UH, THAT IS PART OF THE PROJECT.
UM, THEN ALSO THERE WILL BE A, UH, CLOSER, IF I WENT, IF YOU WILL, UH, EVENTUALLY SEEING WHAT WE CAN DO TO, UH, SEE IF WE CAN EXTEND THE BIKE LANES ACROSS THE BRIDGE THROUGH LINKED UP WITH THE UHTRAINING ON GAPS OF THE BRIDGE.
SO, UM, SO LIKE I SAID, IT IS, IT IS A ROBUST SCOPE OR THAT PURPOSE, BUT THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY IS NOT PART OF THAT SCOPE.
SO IF THE ROADWAY NEEDS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED, THAT'S WHERE, UH, ACTUALLY THE BOND, UH, MONEY WILL GO OR AT LEAST, YOU KNOW, MAKE SOME PROVISIONS FOR.
SO IS THIS RECENT IS THE PROCESS WE BOTH FOR JUST EXPORT THE DATA, WE CAN SORT IT BY SCORE, THE HIGHEST SCORE IS GONNA HAVE A COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
AND FOR US, AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS POSSIBLE FOR PRIORITY, WE LOOK AT THE TOP NUMBER UNTIL WE GET TO REALITY IS TALKING ABOUT A BUDGET FOR SIDEWALK SIDEWALKS OR BUDGET SCREEN, AND THEN WE TALK ABOUT COUNCIL VERSUS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT THAT EXPERIE HOME? YEAH, I MEAN, IF I'M DOING IT PERSONALLY, I'M NOT SAYING, I MEAN, DON'T LET MY INDIAN INFLUENCE WHAT'RE TRYING.
I'M, I WOULDN'T AND IT'S NOT A GOOD, SAY, SAY FOR EXAMPLE, TRANSPORTATION.
WE PREPARE SEVERAL CATEGORIES AND THEN WE PUT IN, UM, SIGN WAY.
I WOULD SAY I'LL GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS AND SEE WHAT THAT DOES FOR MY PRIORITY ENTIRE IZATION.
I'LL DO, THEN I'LL GO OUT THERE AND SAY, OKAY, IF THIS, IF I CHOOSE WITH THIS ONE HERE, MY CREATING A GAP, MY CLOSING GAP, MAYBE NUMBER ONE IS STILL A TWO MILE, THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
HOWEVER, NUMBER FIVE IS THE ONE THAT IS CLOSING A GAP AND ADDRESSING.
SO THAT'S WHERE WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO SAY IS LIKE, OKAY, YEAH, MAKES SENSE IF WE APPROACH IT DIFFERENTLY.
SO IT'S, THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING IS THAT IF I'M DOING IT, HOW I WILL DO IT IS I WILL DO AN INTUITIVE PROCESS IN ORDER TO KIND OF GET THE OTHER END.
YOU GO, YOU KNOW, TALK TO THE COUNCILWOMAN AND SAY, WE COUNCIL MEMBER SAY, OKAY, HERE'S OUR FINDINGS, HERE'S IF WE DID IT EXACTLY BY THE EVALUATION REGARD CRITERIA, HERE'S WHAT WE'RE SEEING AFTER EITHER WE DROVE IT OR WE LOOKED AT IT AND SAY IT IS COVERING CERTAIN GAP WOULD OR GIVING US THE, UM, MOST BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS.
I'D LIKE TO USE THE ECONOMIC APPROACH IN
SO THESE AREN'T SOMETHING THAT I WOULD, I'M DOING THIS.
SO COURSE IT'S NOT MY SHOW TONIGHT, SO NO, GEEZ, BY ALL MEANS,
[00:50:01]
TRAFFIC LIGHTS, ASSUMING THAT IS PART OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION, OLD TEAM 30 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE REPLACED.JUST TO MAKE SURE, JUST JUST TO MAKE SURE WE ARE GONNA STAY THE TOP ON THE TOPICS THAT WE HAVE TONIGHT, TONIGHT ONLY, WE'RE GONNA TALK ABOUT ALLEYS, SIDEWALKS, AND BRIDGES.
SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE STREET, THAT'S ALL DIFFERENT GALLERIES.
TRANSPORTATION GONNA BRIEF ON THAT ONE VERY IN DETAIL, BUT, UH, THAT'S COMING UP NEXT TIME, RIGHT? IS THAT PART OF THAT PART OF STREETS? IT COULD BE PART OF THE STREET CONSTRUC AND ALSO THEY HAVE THE STANDALONE TRAFFIC PROGRAM.
AND SO FROM THE STANDPOINT OF AMENITIES, RIGHT? SO SIDEWALKS TO ME, THE RECONSTRUCTION, WHEREVER YOU CAN GET SIDEWALKS, UM, HOW DO YOU GUYS PUT ALL OF THIS STUFF TOGETHER FROM THE STANDPOINT? LIKE IT'S ALL, IT'S ALL GOTTA TIE TOGETHER, RIGHT? A STREET IS IF YOU RECONSTRUCT A STREET AND YOU'RE GONNA GET SIDEWALKS, HOW IS ONE ALLOCATED TO ONE PROJECT VERSUS HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT AMOUNT THAT IS? SURE.
I GUESS WHAT IS MISSING IN THIS DISCUSSION IS THAT THE OVERLAY POINTS THAT WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED THAT YET.
AND, UH, THE, I GUESS THE REASON BEHIND IT IS THAT, YOU KNOW, ALL THE DEPARTMENTS THEY NEED TO SUBMIT THEIR NEEDS AND THEN THEY OVERLAY EVERYTHING TOGETHER, RIGHT? SO THE CITY DOESN'T, THE BOND OF IT DOESN'T HAVE ALL THE NEEDS IN PLACE TO OVERLAY THEM.
SO THAT OVERLAY ACTUALLY CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THESE CONCERNS ACTUALLY FOR US AS PART OF, UH, PLANNING PURPOSES ALSO, RIGHT? LET'S SAY OUR LEASE IS COMPLETE AND EVERYONE IS AGREED ON, YOU KNOW, WHAT NEEDS TO GO IN THE BOND PROGRAM.
ONCE WE DO HAVE THE LEASE, AFTER THE BOND, ONCE WE WANT TO PLAN IT AND SAY, OKAY, WHICH PROJECTS CLOSED AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION AND ALL THESE THINGS, WE ALSO LOOK AT THAT.
SAY, OKAY, WE ALREADY HAVE ONE CYBER PROJECT HERE AND WE HAVE A STRAIGHT PROJECT HERE.
MAYBE WE CAN, YOU KNOW, PUT 'EM AT THE SAME TIME AND THEN GO THROUGH THE LIST FOR ANOTHER PROJECT, UH, DOWN THE ROAD.
I GUESS ONE THING THAT I WANT TO MENTION HERE IS THAT, UH, THE RANKING THAT WE PROVIDE YOU IS A NUMBER, RIGHT? IT COULD BE 40, 41, 42, BETWEEN 41 AND 42.
NOT BE HOW MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE, BUT FOR YOU, MAYBE IT'S A LOT DIFFERENT, RIGHT? BECAUSE THAT'S THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS THAT YOU KNOW BETTER THAN ASKED.
AND IF YOU DECIDE TO STAY WITH 42, BUT AFTER 42, YOU DON'T WANT 43, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU RATHER HAVE 40, 40 OR 41.
IT'S UP TO YOU BECAUSE THOSE NUMBERS ARE JUST VERY MARGINAL ANYWAYS.
I'M ASSUMING YOU MAY NOT SAY, OKAY, IF THE PROJECT IS HUNT AT A STORE OF HUNDRED OR NO, FORGET ABOUT THAT.
TYPICALLY IT DOESN'T HAPPEN THAT WAY BECAUSE IT'S VERY, YOU KNOW, LONG RANGE OF THE NUMBERS, BUT THE NUMBERS ARE NUMBERS ANYWAY DOWN BELOW.
SO YOU CAN CHOOSE WHAT NUMBERS TO GO BY BASED ON YOUR NEEDS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND ALSO, UM, AS MARA MENTIONED ON THE WEBSITE, WE ALREADY PROVIDED YOU GUYS THE EXCEL FILE OF THE LEASE OF ALLEY SIDEWALKS AND BRIDGES.
SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO DOWNLOAD ANYTHING ON THE WEBSITE.
YOU ALREADY HAVE THE UPDATED ONE WITH THE COST AND EVERYTHING AND THE SCORE.
SO YOU SEE THE SCORE ON THAT ONE ALSO.
SO YOU JUST HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SCORES AND THROUGH THE LIST, SEE WHAT IS WHAT, UM, WHAT ARE THE PRIORITIES, AND THEN LOOK AT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND SEE DO THEY MAKE SENSE FOR YOU OR NOT.
AND IF THEY DON'T, THEN WE CAN DISCUSS.
I THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE NOT SORTED IN ORDER SORTED, I THOUGHT IT WAS.
SO YOU CAN SORT THEM IF THEY'RE NOT, BUT WE THOUGHT WE SAW THEM BASED ON THIS SCORE.
YEAH, NO, IT WAS, THEY ARE NUMBERED THE, SO THEY ARE NUMBERED BASED ON PRIORITY OUT OF 80 POINTS.
FOR EXAMPLE, ALLEYS NOT FOR BRIDGES.
FOR BRIDGES AND SIDE SIDEWALKS ARE POINT NUMBERS BECAUSE THEY ALREADY INCLUDED A HUNDRED HUNDRED POINTS.
SO FOR, FOR, UH, SIDEWALKS AND FOR BRIDGES, THESE ARE FINAL AND THEY ARE RAMPED.
HOWEVER, FOR, UH, FOR, FOR ALLEY OUT OUT OF 80, THEY ARE ALSO RAMPED.
SO NUMBER ONE BEING TOP PRIORITY, HIGHEST, AND NUMBER N WHATEVER WAS, I THINK IT WAS 4,600 SOMETHING THAT WAS THE LOWEST.
SO, BUT THE SCORE COLUMN I THINK IS NEXT TO THE COST, RIGHT? I THINK NEXT TO THE COST SCORE.
AND ALSO THERE ARE TAX FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT.
SO WE HAVE, WE ALSO CREATED SOME KIND OF ANALYSIS FOR COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND GAPS FOR COUNCIL DISTRICT QUESTION.
I DON'T THINK THEY HAVE TAX COUNCIL DISTRICT.
[00:55:01]
ACTUALLY HERE, WE'LL PULL IT UP HERE.MAKE I GONNA STOP THE RECORDING.
HOWEVER, UH, I'M NOT SURE IF IT WAS THE ONE THAT WAS, UM, SENT TO, CAN PULL IT UP TO, COULD YOU PUT THAT IN THE MEETING? SO SEND THAT LINK.
I CAN DEFINITELY, UH, ADD IT AS AN ACTION ITEM AFTER THIS MEETING AND SEND YOU THE ONE THAT HAS THAT, BECAUSE WE ALREADY CREATED TAB FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT WITH SOME KIND OF ANALYSIS ALSO FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT TO SHOW THEIR, UH, PERCENTAGE OF IMPROVED VERSUS UNAPPROVED OUT.
WE DID THAT TOO FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT.
UH, I THOUGHT I SENT THAT, UH, OR I THOUGHT WE SENT THAT, UH, PROBABLY SENT ANOTHER FILE THAT DIDN'T GET SORTED YET.
SO, UH, SIDEWALK FOR SIDEWALKS AND ALLEYS AT WHAT? NO SIDEWALKS AND, UH, BRIDGE, WE DON'T HAVE, UH, WE DIDN'T SORT BECAUSE THEY'RE CONSIDERED CITYWIDE.
SO THE REASON WHY THEY'RE NOT SORTED FOR CAPITAL DISTRICT, WE'RE CONSIDERED THE CITYWIDE.
HOWEVER, FOR S THERE ARE CONS, THEY'RE GONNA BE FOR COUNCIL DISTRICT BUDGET.
THAT'S WHY WE REPORTED THEM OUT.
SO, AND I'LL SHARE THAT FOLDER WITH YOU AFTER THIS.
UH, SO FIRST YOU'RE SENDING, UH, A SPREADSHEET THAT HAS THE TOTAL ON IT.
I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT, YOU KNOW, SOMEWHERE ON THE SPREADSHEET IF IT'S INCLUSIVE OF ALL 100 POINTS OR IF IT'S ONLY 80, SO THAT THERE'S SOME WAY WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT TO KNOW SURE IF IT'S COMPLETE.
AND ANOTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS, UM, I UNDERSTAND SORT OF CONCEPTUALLY THIS IDEA THAT THE CITY NEVER STOPS UPDATING ITS MEETINGS, RIGHT? WE'RE LIVING AND IT JUST KEEPS GOING, GROWING.
BUT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS EXERCISE, DOES IT EVER LIKE, JUST PAUSE FOR A SECOND.
THE REASON WHY I ASKED IS, AND I'M SURE IT'S THE SAME WITH OTHER PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY HAD ZOOM MEETINGS WITH NEIGHBORHOODS, PHONE CALLS, STUFF LIKE THAT, WANTING TO KNOW IF THEIR PROJECT IS LIMITED, RIGHT? AND SO PRIOR TO THIS EVENING, MY ASSUMPTION IS THAT EVERYTHING HAPPEN.
SO IF I SAY TO SOMEBODY, OKAY, WELL IT LOOKS LIKE THIS IS WHERE YOURS IS LINING UP.
HOW, HOW DO I ACTUALLY KNOW OTHER THAN JUST SAYS IT COMPULSIVELY CHECKING IT RIGHT.
EVERY DAY, RIGHT? TO SEE, CAUSE YOU DON'T WANNA TELL LIKE ONE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS ESSENTIALLY LIKE, OH YEAH, IT'S TOTALLY COOL, IT'S ON HERE AND I FAST FORWARD A COUPLE WEEKS AND RIGHT, RIGHT.
IT'S A VERY VALID, UH, UM, QUESTION AND COMMENT.
I GUESS WHAT I CAN SAY HERE IS THAT FOR THE STREET'S PROBABLY GONNA BE COMPLETE BECAUSE AT THE TIME, HOPEFULLY EVERYONE HAS THEIR ASSETS IN SYSTEM.
AND AGAIN, IT'S NOT ONLY OUR DEPARTMENT, RIGHT? THERE ARE OTHER DEPARTMENTS THAT THEY NEED TO GET THEIR ASSETS SORTED, RANKED, SCORED AND EVERYTHING, GET IT TO THE OVERLAY PROCESS, RIGHT? SO WE DID OUR SHARE AND WE CREATED WHATEVER WE HAD, BUT SINCE THE OVERLAY IS NOT READY, WE STAY WITH 80 POINTS.
BECAUSE AT THIS POINT WE DON'T HAVE THAT.
RIGHT? ONCE THE OVERLAY HAPPENS AND THEY ADD 10 POINTS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, A AGAIN, I DON'T EXPECT THE WHOLE LIST TO GONNA CHANGE BECAUSE THE, THE CHANGE IS VERY MARGINAL PROBABLY TO THAT POINT, BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 10 POINTS IN THE EQUITY AND 10 POINTS WERE OVERLAY AND OVERLAYS ARE CERTAIN AREAS OF TOWN THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SOME PROJECTS GATHERING TOGETHER.
UM, NOT OBVIOUSLY, BUT REGARDLESS, I I'M, I'M WITH YOU.
I HUNDRED PERCENT AGREE THAT, YOU KNOW, I WISH WE HAD THAT OVERLAY SCORE BY NOW, BUT UNFORTUNATELY WE DON'T HAVE IT.
UH, KEEP IN MIND WE'RE STILL RECEIVING EMAILS FROM RESIDENTS SAYING THAT I NEED MY SWITCH COMING.
SO THEY NEED, I MENTORING THIS AS WE'RE SPEAKING, YOU KNOW, TODAY WE SEE THIS WEEK AND IT'S CONSTANT.
IT COMES, COMES IN ALL THE TIME.
SO WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT ONCE YOU RECEIVE A SCORE, IT'S 100, YOU WOULD CONSIDER IT FINALIZED UNLESS YOU SPECIFICALLY NEGOTIATED BETWEEN YOU MAYBE THE DISTRICT OFFICE AND WE ARE JUST SWAPPING OUT, YOU KNOW, AN INTRA DISTRICT PROJECT ONE FOR THE OTHER RIGHT? VERSUS SWAPPING OUT SOMETHING FROM SOMEBODY ELSE, RIGHT? RIGHT.
ONE, SOME PROJECTS ARE CITYWIDE GROUP, BUT THAT'S STORY.
BUT FROM THE COUNCIL DISTRICTWIDE PROJECTS, UH, ONCE WE, WE ARE DONE WITH OUR RANKING AND SCORING AND EVERYTHING IS, YOU KNOW, UH, COMPLETE, THEN THIS IS OUR RECOMMENDED LEADS TO THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS.
UH, THAT POINT, THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS, UH, MAY TWEAK IT MAY ADD TO, IT MAY REDUCE IT, BUT AGAIN, FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE'S A BALANCE,
[01:00:01]
RIGHT? WE CANNOT GET, LIKE SAY FOR EXAMPLE IF ONE COUNCIL DISTRICT WANT TO ADD 20 MORE PROJECTS IN THE LIST, WE CANNOT SAY OKAY, WE GOTTA ADD 20 FROM HERE AND TAKE 20 FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT, RIGHT? I MEAN UNFORTUNATELY IT'S NOT WORKING WITHIN YOUR DISTRICT.YOU CAN ADD SWAP, BUT KEEP THE BALANCE OF THE COST.
AND THEN I HAVE UH, UM, YOU KNOW, WHAT TIME THE COMMITTEE AT SEVEN 30, I BELIEVE IT'S UH, THAT'S FOR WANNA MAKE SURE THAT NO SIX 30 IS OUR 1 0 1 PRESENTATION, BUT SEVEN 30 IS THE ONE THE CHAIR GOES TO TASK.
UM, I HAVE SIMILAR ROUND WHAT'S ON BEVERLY SECOND EVERYBODY.
SO, UM, LOOKING AT THE UNIMPROVED AND IMPROVED ALLIE, AND I'M SORRY I MISSED THIS POINT.
YOU'VE GOT ABOUT A THIRD, YOU KNOW, A THREE TO ONE KIND OF NUMBER WITH, WITH ALL'S THAT ARE UNIMPROVED VERSUS NEEDING RECONSTRUCTION, WILL YOU ALLOCATE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY BASED ON THAT PERCENTAGE FOR ALLIE'S DEDICATED FOR RECONSTRUCTION VERSUS ALLIE'S NEEDING? UM, I IMPROVED THEIR UNIMPROVED BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME THAT YOUR, UM, CRITERIA ARE THE SAME.
DOES, DOES ONE GET MORE MONEY VERSUS THE OTHER? OR DOES UNIMPROVED GET MORE MONEY BECAUSE THERE'S SOME GREATER NEED? THEY'VE NEVER IMPROVED? NO, I GUESS WE HAVE TWO TECHNICAL CRITERIA.
ONE TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR BOTH, AT LEAST IMPROVE AND UNIMPROVED, RIGHT? OKAY.
IMPROVED AND UNIMPROVED, UH, ARE YEAH, THEN HAVE TECHNICAL CRITERIA.
UH, HOWEVER BUDGET ALLOCATION MIGHT BE DIFFERENT.
AND THAT'S WHY WE TRIED TO SHOW, UM, WE TRIED TO SHOW PERCENTAGE NEED OR IMPROVE VERSUS UNIMPROVED JUST TO BUILD THAT UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT'S PROBABLY GONNA BE MAKE MORE SENSE TO DO IS ALLOCATE MORE MONEY BASED ON THE NEED.
IF WE GO BY, YOU KNOW, UH, I GUESS ONE THING I CAN SAY HERE IS THAT WE, BASED ON TECHNICAL CREDIT, WE'RE GONNA SORT THE UH, AD IS BASED ON THIS SCORES, RIGHT? RIGHT.
WE'RE GONNA SAY THIS IS FROM HUNDRED ALL THE WAY TO, FOR EXAMPLE.
AND ALONG THE WAY SOME OF THEM ARE IMPROVED, SOME OF THE WRONG, NOT IMPROVED, BUT BASED ON THE TECHNICAL CRITERIA, THEY HAVE A SCORE.
SO IT IS UP TO THE SUB-COMMITTEE MEMBER TO CHOOSE IF THEY WANNA ADD MORE UNIMPROVED OR IMPROVE OR THEY WANT TO STAY WITH THE SCORING THAT THEY'RE RECEIVING ON THE LIST, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.
SO THE SUBCOMMITTEE MAKES A RECOMMENDATION TO THAT.
THE COMMITTEE, WE ARE COMMENDING ALL THE LIST OF THE PROJECTS REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE UNAPPROVED OR IMPROVED AS FAR AS FOR THE A, NOT TALKING ABOUT THE TREATMENT.
BUT FOR ADDINGS, SINCE WE HAVE ONLY ONE TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR BOTH OF THEM, IT WILL BE ONE LIST FOR ALL THE ALLEYS, UH, THAT WE HAVE.
AND THAT LIST WILL INCLUDE THE SCORING.
SO, UM, I WAS LOOKING AT DISTRICT TWO DISTRICTS, HOW MUCH LARGE SECOND HALF OF THAT SAME QUESTION REFLECT THESE CHARTS REFLECTING EVERYTHING ON THE NEWS LIST IN IT'S ENTIRELY, WHETHER IT'S FIVE POINT AND LET THE C REFLECT THAT MADE DISTRICT THREE HAS A WHOLE BUNCH OF 95 POINT PROJECTS, A BUNCH OF IS THE WAY FOR US TAKE THE FIRST PART THEN IF I UNDERSTOOD IT CORRECTLY.
SO WHY SOME OF THEM ARE HIGHER, SOME OF THEM ARE LOWER, RIGHT? THAT WAS ONE QUESTION.
THEY SEEM TO DISPROPORTION RIGHT, AND AND THAT'S TRUE BECAUSE SOME DISTRICT THEY HAVE MORE ADD SOME DISTRICT THEY HAVE LESS ADD.
UH, FOR EXAMPLE, DISTRICT 14, AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THEY HAVE LESS ALLEYS AS TO DISTRICT 13.
BUT DISTRICT 13 IS MORE OF A, YOU KNOW, UH, THE DISTRICT 14 IS MORE OF A COMMERCIAL THING THAT YOU DON'T SEE THAT MUCH, THAT MANY ALLEYS.
BUT DISTRICT 13 IS VERY RESIDENTIAL TYPE OF DISTRICT THAT YOU SEE MORE ALLEYS.
SO THE MORE ALLEYS YOU HAVE, THE HIGHER YOUR NUMBER OF THE
[01:05:01]
NEEDS WILL BE.SO THAT EXPLAINS THAT, UH, CHANGE.
BUT WHAT WAS THE SECOND QUESTION? I'M SORRY.
PART IS THE, YOU KNOW, THIS REFLECTS THE HIGHER FIVE POINT, RIGHT? WE KNOW WE RARELY SPEND 80% RESPOND, SO IT FEELS LIKE WE SHOULD BE FOCUSING THAT ON THE ENTIRE RIGHT.
AND WE LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT BEAUTIFUL FIND THAT THERE ARE SOME DISTRICTS THAT HAVE THE BUDGET, RIGHT? HOW DO WE I CAN, I THINK, I THINK WHAT WHAT OUR PLAN IS, UH, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE PLANNING TO DO FOR
THAT WAY WE MAKE SURE EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT IS GETTING, SO, SO FOR EXAMPLE, IN IN JUST THE, UH, THE CASE YOU'VE JUST MENTIONED, LET'S SAY THE TOP HUNDRED PRIORITY, I'M NOT SURE I'M JUST SAYING AN EXAMPLE THAT TOP HUNDRED PRIORITY ONE OF THE COUNCIL DISTRICTS HAD NO, NO ALLEYS OR ONLY ONE TWO ALLEYS ABOVE THE TOP HUNDRED PRIORITY FOR THE WHOLE CITY TO AVOID THAT SITUATION WHERE THAT COUNCIL DISTRICT IS NOT GONNA ADDRESS ANY ALLEYS.
WE'RE GONNA, WE WERE THINKING TO DO THE SAME THING FOR ALL AND STREETS IS TO SET, UM, A MINIMUM PERCENTAGE PER COUNCIL DISTRICT AND THEN THE REST OF IT WILL BE BASED ON THE NEED PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE THAT YOU SEE HERE.
SO THAT AT LEAST SHOULD ADDRESS THE HIGH PRIORITY FOR THAT COUNCIL DISTRICT AND THEN THE REST OF IT GONNA BE, UH, GOING, GOING TO BE DIVIDED BASED ON THE NEED AND THE REST OF THE PRIORITY, YOU KNOW, RANKING WELL.
SOMETHING ELSE THAT I CAN ADD MAYBE HERE IS THAT, UM, YEAH, THE RATIONALE PROBABLY SHOULD BE BASED ON THE NEEDS, RIGHT? UM, LOVE TO GET AS MUCH AS I CAN FIND IT.
SO, BUT I ALSO WANT TO BE EQUITABLE TO SOME DISTRICTS MAY HAVE BEEN LEFT MM-HMM.
I DON'T KNOW HOW TO YES, QUANTIFY THAT.
I GUESS ONE OF THE REASON THAT THE CITY IDENTIFIED THE CITYWIDE PROJECT WAS JUST THAT REASON TO BE HONEST, BECAUSE, UM, YOU KNOW, SOME, THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOME OF THE THOROUGH STREETS ARE SIGNIFICANT THAT IF IT COMES OUT OF THE DISTRICT, THEN IT MAY NOT BE FAIR TO THAT DISTRICT BECAUSE IF THERE IS A BIG TRADE RUNNING THROUGH YOUR DISTRICT AND THE CONSTRUCTION COST OF IT IS $10 MILLION OR $20 MILLION AND YOU MAY HAVE ONLY 40 MILLION FOR A DISTRICT, THEN HALF OF THAT ALLOCATED MONEY GOES TO ONE PROJECT.
AND IS IT FAIR? IT'S NOT FAIR THAT THAT'S WHY THE CITY DECIDED THAT, YOU KNOW, IF THE PROJECT IS SIGNIFICANT, THEN THEY'RE GONNA TAKE IT TO THE CITYWIDE PERSPECTIVE THAT THEY TAKE IT OUT OF THE COUNCIL DISTRICT TO BE FAIR WITH ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBER, ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND COUNCIL DISTRICTS SAYING THAT, OKAY, MAYBE WE NEED TO LOOK AT THOSE BIG ITEMS SEPARATELY AS A CITYWIDE AND THE REST OF THEM ARE DISTRICT.
UM, ANOTHER THING IS THAT, YOU KNOW, REGARDLESS WE HAVE A PAVING MODEL FOR STREETS AND FOR ALEX, THE GOAL OF THE CITY SHOULD BE TO ADDRESS, UM, TO IMPROVE THE NETWORK OF THE CITY, RIGHT? TO IMPROVE THE CONDITION OF ALL DISTRICTS IF IT'S POSSIBLE.
OR, AND SOME DISTRICTS THEY HAVE A BETTER QUALITY DISTRICT, SOME DISTRICTS THEY HAVE A LOWER QUALITY, UM, STREETS, RIGHT? AND TYPICALLY IT HAS BEEN THE CASE ALL THE TIME THAT WE HAVE LOOKED AT THE CITYWIDE NET AND WHAT THE PAVING MODEL THAT WE HAVE A CONSULTANT FOR IT IS RECOMMENDING AS A PART OF MODELING ANALYSIS AND SAY, OKAY, IF YOU SELECT THESE STREETS THAT IT WILL GET YOU THE BEST, YOU KNOW, OPTION FOR THE MONEY THAT YOU'RE INVESTING.
AND BECAUSE IT INCREASE THE P C I YOUR PAYMENT CONDITION INDEX FROM HERE TO HERE, RIGHT? AND THAT'S THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THIS, UM, EXERCISE IN PAVING MODEL TO COMMEND TO US WHAT IS THE BEST OPTION FOR THE FUNDING THAT WE HAVE.
AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE RUNNING DIFFERENT SCENARIOS TO SEE WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS.
AND THEN, SO DID I UNDERSTAND THAT
[01:10:01]
THE FUNDS WILL NOT BE ALLOCATED, LIKE EACH DISTRICT, DISTRICT ONE HAS X DOLLARS, DISTRICT TWO HAS X DOLLARS, DISTRICT THREE IS, WE'RE NOT GONNA BE THAT WAY.IT'S GONNA BE BASED ON SCORES IN EACH DISTRICT COMPARATIVELY TO THE REST OF THE CITY.
UM, NOT, NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT BECAUSE AGAIN, THE CITY IS ACTUALLY FINALIZING THAT.
WE'RE NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT THERE YET, TO BE HONEST, UH, BECAUSE THAT, THAT'S A DISCUSSION BETWEEN ALL THE DEPARTMENTS AND THE CITY AND THE BOND OFFICE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.
BUT THE THING IS THAT, UM, CITYWIDE PROJECT IS DIFFERENT, RIGHT? WE JUST, YOU KNOW, UM, ADDRESSED THEM AS A CITYWIDE PROJECT.
WE'RE GONNA LIKE GET SOME MONEY FOR THE CITYWIDE PROJECT.
I THINK, UH, IT WAS ON THE CHART THAT YOU SAW THAT THAT, YOU KNOW, 28 OR 2020 FIRST PERSON OF THE TOTAL NEEDS IN THE CITYWIDE PROJECTS, RIGHT? SO REGARDLESS WE HAVE TO HAVE SOME SORT OF RATIONAL HOW WE'RE GONNA ALLOCATE THE MONEY TO EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT ONCE WE SUBTRACT THE CITYWIDE FROM THE REST OF THE POT.
AND THE REST WOULD BE WHATEVER THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE NEEDING, RIGHT? SO THE THING IS THAT YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT IT AGAIN, ONE ARGUMENT IS THAT, OKAY, THE REST, LET'S SAY FOR EXAMPLE, 80% OF THE 400 MILLION WILL BE 320 MILLION FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT DIVIDED BY 14, EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT GONNA GET THE SET PORTION OF THE ONE.
ANOTHER SCENARIO IS THAT WHAT ARE THE NEEDS AND COMPARISON IN EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT? IF ONE CAN, FOR EXAMPLE, THIS IS A GOOD, YOU KNOW, INDICATION.
WHAT IS EQUITABLE HERE? SHOULD WE GIVE THEM ALL SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY OR SHOULD WE GIVE MORE MONEY TO THE ONE WHICH HAS MORE NEEDS? AND THAT'S SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION.
I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT WHAT THAT'S SAYING.
WELL, I MEAN IF THEY'RE NINETIES, UM, OR YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE SCORING AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CONDITION AND NEEDS, RIGHT? THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
THIS IS ONLY NEEDS THAT THE NEEDS IS THAT WHATEVER NEEDS IMPROVEMENT IS THAT MUCH MONEY ON THIS CHART.
NEEDS, UM, ADDING NEEDS IMPROVEMENT INVENTORY OR COUNCIL DISTRICT, THAT MEANS IN THIS DISTRICT 13, WE NEED THAT MUCH MONEY TO ADDRESS ALL THOSE END REGARDLESS OF THE RANKING OF IT.
YOU KNOW, THAT MIGHT BE HUNDRED AND THAT MIGHT BE 400 NO FOUR OF THEM.
HUNDRED AND THE REST OF THEM BETTER.
AND THESE ARE ALL THE EXERCISES THAT WE TAKE INTO THE ACCOUNT.
LET'S SEE WHAT, WHAT IS WHAT, BUT I GUESS REGARDLESS IF THIS IS THE NUMBERS, RIGHT, IF THIS IS THE REALITY, SHOULD WE EQUAL THE MONEY FOR EACH COUNCIL DISTRICT OR SHOULD WE DIVIDED PER NEEDS? AND I'M SURE AT THAT POINT ALL THE COUNCIL, YOU MAY HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION BASED ON YOUR DISTRICT NEEDS.
BUT THAT'S THE THING THAT WE HAVEN'T FINALIZED IT YET.
UH, AT THIS POINT, CAN I ADD HERE THAT WHAT I JUST MENTIONED ABOUT SETTING THE MINIMUM SHOULD ADDRESS THAT ISSUE BECAUSE WE SELECT PRIORITY.
WE'RE SELECTING BASED ON RACKING REGARDLESS OF THE, YOU KNOW, CITY, UH, COUNCIL DISTRICT.
HOWEVER, WE, WE ARE, WE ARE ALSO NOT LEAVING NO COUNCIL DISTRICT WITH NO, UH, YOU KNOW, PROJECTS TO BE ADDRESSED BY SETTING A MINIMUM BUDGET.
SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE THINKING FOR ALLEYS AND FOR, UH, FOR STREETS, LOCAL STREETS.
ONLY BECAUSE LOCAL STREETS ARE PROBABLY GONNA BE NOT CONSIDERED CITYWIDE AND ARE GONNA BE PER COUNCIL DISTRICT ARE GONNA, UH, GET THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE UP OF THE BUDGET, UH, EQUAL FOR ALL COUNCIL DISTRICT.
AND THE REST IS GONNA BE BASED ON THE RANK.
BUT AGAIN, WE ARE FINALIZING ALL THESE THINGS.
I MEAN, WE ARE NOT SET, IT'S NOT SETTING IN STONE SAYING IN THIS IS THE, UH, FUNDING.
CUZ WE HAVE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS AND THE BOTTOM OFFICE ON THE PROCESS OF THE ALLOCATED MONEY.
AND HOPEFULLY IN THE FUTURE WE CAN PRESENT IT TO YOU ALL.
WE GONNA ALLOCATE MONEY BASED ON THE NEEDS OR BASED ON THE COUNCIL DISTRICTS FOR SURE.
APPRECIATE YOUR, UH, GRADING AGAIN, JUST FIVE COMING FROM ONE OF HISTORICALLY, UM, YOU KNOW, GIVING EVERY CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT.
I DON'T REALLY THINK IT'S AN OPTION IN PLAY HERE.
BUT THAT BEING SAID, YOU YEAH, THOSE PARAGRAPHS DON'T TELL US YOUR EXACTLY WHAT YOU WERE SAYING, LIKE OF THOSE NEEDS AS FAR AS THE RATING OF THEM.
BUT WITHIN THE RATINGS IN THAT OVERALL LIST, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, YOU KNOW, THEIR EQUITY IS BUILT INTO THAT SCORING TO SOME DEGREE, CORRECT? WELL AGAIN,
[01:15:01]
WHEN WE OVERLAY THE EQUITY AND THEN WHEN THAT SHOWS UP, YEAH.THE EQUITY SCORE, THEY GET MORE SCORES FOR THE EQUITY.
SO OUR EXPECTATION THAT OUR NEEDS THAT ARE CURRENTLY HIGHER WITH THAT SCORE, WITH THAT SCORE ADDED.
SO WE WILL HAVE, BECAUSE THE SCORES WILL AS OTHER DISTRICTS WHO WILL NOT SCORE HIGH WILL DIAL AS.
SO WHEN WE LOOK AT OVERALL LIST ONE'S, SOME SERVED DISTRICTS WILL BE PUSHED UP TO SOME DEGREE BY THE, WILL IT BE ENOUGH? LET'S A QUESTION.
BUT I THINK EVEN STILL AT THE END OF IT, IT'S NOT GONNA WIND UP.
I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF EVERY DISTRICT HAVING A MINIMUM, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT MINIMUM, MINIMUM WOULD BE LIKE 90% OF WHAT PEOPLE WOULD BE.
I THINK THAT'S A CONVERSATION TO HAVE AS AN APPROPRIATE, I ACTUALLY THINK IT WAS REALLY GOOD THAT RECEIVED THE NUMBER OF THE EQUITY SCORE IN THERE SO THAT SINCE THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'M USING IT, WE ALL HAVE A SENSE OF HOW THAT ACTUALLY IMPACTED THIS MORNING.
I HAVE ONE IN REGARDS TO BRIDGES.
SO MY UNDERSTANDING, UM, ABOUT THE WAY BRIDGES WAS BRIEFED FROM THE BEGINNING IS THAT THESE ARE SAFETY ISSUES.
SO THERE'S REALLY, THERE'S NOTHING TO DISCUSS AROUND THE BRIDGES.
THAT AMOUNT IS SET TO, TO DECIDE.
CAUSE THIS ISN'T COSMETIC MEDICAL SAFETY, RIGHT? SO THEN, UM, THE OTHER QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE FOR DR.
DEREK, UM, YOU'VE MENTIONED A COUPLE TIMES ABOUT REMAINING PROJECT, AND I WANNA MAKE CERTAIN THAT I UNDERSTAND WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A REMAINING 2017 BOND, OR I THINK, YOU KNOW, COUNCIL STILL APPROVES PROJECTS FROM LIKE THE 2012 BOND AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THOSE REMAINING PROJECTS.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FUNDING, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REMAINING PROJECTS AS PART OF THE MASTER PLAN.
IT'S CAUSE WE ALREADY, THE, THE PUBLIC WORKS ALREADY THAT PROJECTS THAT WE, UM, WENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION, THEY'RE ALREADY COMPLETED AND MAY, SOME MAY BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SOME THAT MAY BE ALREADY PLANNED TO GO UNDER CONSTRUCTION THIS YEAR.
SO THE REMAINING PROJECTS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT DIFFERENCE THAT'S WE ALREADY COMPLETED YEAH.
AND SOME OF THOSE PROJECTS COULD HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY A 2017 BIND MM-HMM.
SO IF IT WAS STILL FUNDED, LIKE IF THERE WAS AN IDENTIFIED PROJECT IN 2017 FOR WHATEVER REASON AND PHIL HADN'T BROKEN GROUND ON IT, IF IT WAS A PART OF THE 2017 PLAN, IS IT NOT FUNDED BY THE 2017 PLAN? THERE'S SOME PROJECTS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY BOND FUNDS.
THE REMAINING BOND FUNDS THAT WAS AVAILABLE FROM THE 2 20 17.
I'M SORRY, ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THE SIDEWALK? YEAH, THE MASTER PLAN OH CAN ACTUALLY WOULD APPLY TO, SHE'S TALKING ABOUT THE REMAINING PROJECTS VERSUS THREE LOCATION.
SO I'M NOT SURE IF I UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTION ON WHEN WE DID THIS IN 2017, YOU HAD A LIST OF S AND THIS WOULD'VE BEEN WHETHER IT WAS SIDEWALKS CAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE THE SIDEWALK.
SO WHETHER IT'S A SIDEWALK OR IT'S A STREET OR IT'S AN ALLEY, THERE WERE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED FOR THE 2017 BOND.
IF YOUR PROJECT THAT IDENTIFIED THE 2017 BOMB, IT'S NOT CONSIDERED A REMAINING PROJECT, RIGHT? NO, IT WAS FUNDED.
UNLESS, UNLESS THERE IS A PROJECT THAT THE FUNDING, WE HAVE PROBLEM MM-HMM.
FOR EXAMPLE, AS YOU KNOW, UM, 2017 WHEN THEY PLAN IT WAS LIKE 2015 PROBLEM, RIGHT? THE COST WAS ASSOCIATED WITH 2015 AND THE COST IS A YEAR NOW.
SO MANY PROJECTS ARE, YOU KNOW, OVER BUDGET FOR THAT EVENT.
IS THERE SOME WAY OF KNOWING THAT? BECAUSE I GUESS THE REASON WHY IS IF YOU'RE IN A CONVERSATION WITH THE RESIDENT AND THEY'RE SAYING, WELL WE WERE PROMISED THIS WAS GONNA HAPPEN IN 2017, WHY HASN'T IT HAPPENED? AND MY RESPONSE TO TO NOW WOULD I'VE BEEN LIKE, WELL THAT JUST MEANS IT HASN'T MADE IT IN THE SCHEDULE.
BUT IF THEY TOLD YOU WHAT WAS FUNDED IN 2000, RIGHT? NO, I GUESS WHAT WE HAVE PROVIDED TO YOU RIGHT NOW IS ALL BASED ON THE LEASE, NOT NOT THE REMAINING OF 2017.
WE HAVE BEEN AN IDENTIFIED 2017 BY 2017, BUT IF IT'S NOT DONE, WE WRAPPED UP INTO THE 20, WE CAN IDENTIFY THAT.
BUT I'M PRETTY SURE WHAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED IS NOT PROJECTS AT THE PART OF 2017 BOND.
AND THEN THE, UH, THE UH, QUESTION I HAVE IS ABOUT THE 50 50 SIDEWALK AND HOW YOU INCORPORATE
[01:20:01]
THAT PLANNING INTO IT.AND THE REASON WHY I ASK IS BECAUSE, UM, UM, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THE 50 50 PROGRAM RUNS OUT OF FUNDS PRETTY EARLY ON IN THE YEAR, OR AT LEAST IT GETS ADVOCATED BASED UPON CONSTITUENTS APPLYING FOR IT.
AND YET AT THE SAME TIME, UM, YOU COULD BE TALKING ABOUT ANY NUMBER OF NEIGHBORHOODS, FRANKLY INTERSPERSED ALL THROUGHOUT THE CITY, UM, WHEN YOU COULD HAVE A GROUP OF NEIGHBORS COMING TOGETHER AND THEY'LL HIT AT THE CITY AT THE SAME TIME AND SAY, HEY, LET'S DO THE 50 50.
THAT'S JUST ONE GLOBALIZATION.
BUT IF YOU HAVE A NEIGHBOR THAT'S HOUSE IS KIND OF IN THE MIDDLE OF IT, I MEAN IF THEY DON'T HAVE A, IT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS, DON'T ALWAYS HAVE THAT DISCRETIONARY INCOME.
SO HOW DO YOU KIND OF ADJUST OR MAKE PLANS AROUND, LIKE HOW DO WE GO ABOUT ASSUMING THAT THIS PROJECT CAN BE MET BY THE 50 50 PROGRAM IF YOU DON'T KNOW IF THE HOMEOWNER REALLY HAS IT? WELL, I GUESS I GUESS TO TRY TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, AND I THINK IT'S, IT'S A MATTER OF LOOKING AT OUR, THE WAY WE, THE WAY WE FIGURE HOW WE'RE GONNA ESTIMATE, YOU KNOW WHAT WE MEAN FOR THE 50 50 IS BASED ON HIS HISTORICAL RECORDS.
AND WE, WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW, IN THE LAST, THE PAST FIVE YEARS, IT TOOK US ABOUT, YOU KNOW, MAYBE 400 FROM AVERAGE THAT WE GOT A REQUEST AS FAR AS REQUEST FOR THE 50 50.
AND WE LOOKED AT THAT BASED ON OUR CURRENT COST.
YOU KNOW, HOW MUCH THEY, SO THAT'S HOW WE ALLOCATE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE CERTAIN AMOUNT OF BUDGET IS WE'RE GOING TO DO FOR THE 50 50 FOR THE 20 FOR THE 2024 BOND FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.
THAT'S HOW WE, SO SENIOR THAT'S, WE HAVE SENIOR PROGRAM.
THE SENIOR PROGRAM ACTUALLY IS, UM, PROGRAM FOR SENIOR CITIZENS WHO ARE HOMEOWNERS AND WE ACTUALLY PAID A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE COST.
WHAT'S THE AGE VERSUS 50? 50? 50.
WHAT'S THE AGE QUALIFICATION? THEY HAVE TO BE A SENIOR CITIZEN.
SO I GUESS THE AGE QUALITY OF 65 AND HOW WE, UH, I GUESS VERIFY AS IS THROUGH, THROUGH, YOU KNOW, TEXT TAX RECORDS.
DOES IT HAVE TO BE THE PHONE OWNER OR THE RESIDENT KONG? IT HAS TO BE THE PHONE OWNER AT 65 PROGRAM THAT LET'S JUST SOMEWHERE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE OR NO, WE DON'T REALLY ADVERTISE THAT, RIGHT? NO, YOU DON'T.
SO WE SAY THAT TO PATIENT THAT THAT'S A
WHAT WOULD, IF I SAID THAT TO RESIDENT, WHAT WOULD THEY DO NEXT? WHAT WOULD BE THEIR NEXT STEP? THEY ACTUALLY CALL OUR SIDEWALK POOL, UM, PRISCILLA
SO THEY CALL UP OUR SIDEWALK TEAMS AND SAY, LOOK, I'M, I'M A RESIDENT, UM, I HAVE ISSUES WITH MY, WITH MY SIDEWALKS.
WE'LL HAVE SOMEBODY DRIVE THERE.
WE TRY TO, YOU KNOW, TAKE A LOOK AT IT WHETHER INSPECTOR OR THE MANAGER AND THEN THEY WILL BASICALLY DRAW UP OUR COST ESTIMATES AND THIS IS HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST.
IF YOU'RE A A SENIOR CITIZEN, THIS TOTAL COST WILL BE PAID BY THE CITY, YOU KNOW, BUT THERE'S A WAIT LIST.
SO WE HAVE, UM, SIGNIFICANT WAIT LIST RIGHT NOW.
WHAT WE LOOK, WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS, UH, WHAT NOT NINE MONTHS BACKLOG THAT'S DUE WITH THE VARIOUS REASONS CAPACITY, UM, THE, THE, YOU KNOW, THE POPULARITY OF THE PROJECT.
SO WE, WE TRY TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE THOSE, THOSE, THOSE THOSE, YOU KNOW, WE TRY TO GO THROUGH THAT, THAT CAN AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE.
UM, BUT WE HAVE A GREAT SIDEWALK TEAM WHO, YOU KNOW, MANAGE THAT.
IF THERE'S ANY, ANY CONCERNS, ISSUES.
UM, ONE THING I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THOUGH IS WE DO REQUIRE, ONCE SOMEONE GETS, UH, SIGNED UP FOR THE 50 50 OR THE SENIOR SENIOR LIST, UM, WE DO REQUIRE DEPOSIT UPFRONT, BUT WE'RE RETHINKING THAT, WE THINK RETHINKING THAT STRAT STRATEGY BECAUSE THE WAIT, THIS IS ALL AND COSTS DUE, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THE INFLATION, THE, THE COST DUE DUE THINGS.
SO WE'RE THINKING JUST WAIT UNTIL, YOU KNOW, NOT, NOT REQUIRING THE DEPOSIT FRONT, BUT WAITING UNTIL WE GET TO A POINT WE WERE READY TO DO THE WORK.
AND THEN WE'LL ASK FOR A DEPOSIT.
IT DOES, BUT IF SENIOR SOLICIT, THEY DO NOT PROVIDE A DEPOSIT.
AND HOW WOULD THEY GET THE PHONE NUMBER FOR SIDEWALK? UH, IT'S ON OUR WEBSITE.
UM, THEY CAN GO TO OUR WEBSITE UNDER SIDEWALK.
UM, UH, IMPROVEMENTS OF SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE, THE
THEY CAN CALL 2 1 4 9 4 OH IF YOU WANT THE NUMBER MA? YES.
SO THEY CAN CALL 2 1 4 9 4 8 4 1 2 5 4.
THE SAME NUMBER IN THE LAST TWO ARE 27, EITHER 4 4 4 84 5.
[01:25:03]
YEAH.I DID WANT TO ADD MS. BARN SENIOR AND THE 50 50, WE DO HAVE SENIORS THAT SIGN UP, UM, THAT WANT TO GET ON THE WAIT LIST.
BUT ONCE WE PROVIDE THEM A COST ESTIMATE, WHEN YOU THINK OF CONSTRUCTION COST, YOU THINK OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS.
SOMETIMES IT'S NOT AS MUCH AS THEY ANTICIPATE THE ESTIMATE WILL BE.
AND THEY DECIDE TO GO THROUGH THE COST SHARE PROGRAM INSTEAD.
SO WE DO HAVE, YOU KNOW, SOME SENIORS OR INFO.
SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND PAY HAVE POCKET.
DOES THAT AFFECT THE TIME WITH WHICH THE SIGN OFF WOULD BE FIXED? UM, THE COST PROGRAM WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT QUICKER BECAUSE THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, WELL I KNOW AS FAR AS THE DEPOSIT, THAT MIGHT BE A LITTLE, THAT MIGHT CHANGE UP A BIT, BUT IT'S MORE SAYING, HEY, I'M READY.
I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND GET ALL THAT.
THAT'S VERSUS THE SENIOR ONE WE'RE, WE'RE WAITING FOR.
UH, SO WE COULD COVER THE COST.
UH, CHAIR KIRK HAVE ONE QUESTION AND THAT WAS HOW ARE THE, UM, CI CITYWIDE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN REGARDS TO THE SIDEWALK? FOR EXAMPLE, MY UNDERSTANDING IS SIDEWALK, IT'S ALL CITYWIDE.
IF THE ARTS DISTRICT HAVE REACHED OUT TO HER BECAUSE OF A PARTICULAR SIDEWALK ON PEARL WHERE THERE'S, UM, SOME TREES AROUND THE CENTER AND THEN IT'S DOING THIS LIKE CARLSTONE THING OR WHATNOT.
IF, IF THERE'S A PROJECT THAT'S IMPORTANT TO YOUR DISTRICT OR SOMEBODY THAT'S REACHED OUT TO YOU, YOU CAN'T FIND IT.
LET'S SAY IT'S SPECIFIC TO SIDEWALK.
SHE DOESN'T WANT EVERYBODY FOLLOWING UP WITH THE CHAIR.
SO WHO DO YOU WANT US TO ASK THOSE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ABOUT? IT'S POSSIBLE THAT'S INCLUDED, BUT WE JUST DON'T KNOW HOW TO ACCESS THE INFORMATION.
CAUSE SOME OF THE SIDEWALKS ANYWAY, HENRY WANT US TO DO THAT.
IF IT'S A SIDEWALK SPECIFIC QUESTION, WE HAVE A SIDEWALK TEAM ACTUALLY HERE.
UH, SO WE, WE CAN REACH OUT TO THEM ANY, ANYTIME.
UH, THE, I THINK THE BEST THING IS TO FIRST SEE IF THEY ARE ON THE SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN ANYWAYS.
IF NOT, AND AGAIN, IF THE SIDEWALK IS KIND OF LIKE A HAZARD, THE SITUATION THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS, IF WE DON'T ADDRESS, IF WE'RE NOT GONNA WAIT FOR THE BOND, YOU HAVE A STREET OPERATION, THEY GO THERE, YOU GET TEMPORARY MAINTENANCE.
KEEP IN MIND, CITY ORDINANCE, UH, SAYS THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SIDEWALK.
WHATEVER THE MONEY WE PUT FOR THE SIDEWALK.
JUST BECAUSE WE WANT TO IMPROVE SIDEWALKS FOR THE WALKABILITY OF IT.
CAUSE WE KNOW THAT NOT EVERYONE CAN AFFORD MAINTAINING THE SIDEWALK.
AND UM, BUT AGAIN, ANY HAZARD ARE THE SITUATION.
ANY SITUATION THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, PLEASE REACH OUT TO OUR TEAM AND WHERE THEY MIGHT BE LOOKING IN THE ARTS DISTRICT, THAT WOULD BE YOU, RIGHT? FOR ANY DISTRICT IN THE CITY? UH, WE CAN, WE CAN REACH OUT TO US.
I MEAN IN TERMS OF LIKE PROPERTY IN THE ARTS DISTRICT, ISN'T THAT THE CITY? UM, AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW OUR DISTRICT IS THE CITY, BUT AN OUR DISTRICT THAT, THAT HAVE DIFFERENT ENTITIES AND THERE SOME OF THEM ARE OPERATING BY THE PRIVATE ENTITY.
ACTUALLY MAYBE THE CITY OWNS THE LAND, BUT THE PRIVATE OPERATOR IS OPERATING IT.
UM, BUT AGAIN, I MEAN IF THERE'S ANY HAZARD ARE SITUATION THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, WE, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW FOR SURE.
AND YOU CAN DO THE THREE ONE REQUEST ALSO THAT COMES TO OUR, YOU KNOW, UH, SO, SO THAT'S ESSENTIALLY PARKS.
I MEAN, SO IF A PARK HAS SIDEWALKS, THE CITY IS THE OWNER TO YOUR QUESTION, SAME TYPE THING.
WHO, WHO IS THAT? IS THAT WHO PAYS FOR THE PARKS, PARKS, THE SIDEWALKS IN THE PARK? OR IS THAT YEAH, SOMETIMES PARKS DEPART.
HAVE THEY HAVE THEIR OWN FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENT ON THE SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS OR STUFF LIKE THAT THAT THEY MAINTAIN? SOMETIMES WE PUT SOME MONEY AND PROVIDE MAINTENANCE.
UH, BUT AGAIN, YEAH, FOR THE PUBLIC PROPERTY, WE UNDERSTAND IT THAT THIS IS THE PUBLIC ENTITY'S RESPONSIBILITY.
I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT KEEP BEING TOLD THE THREE 11 THINGS THAT GET ONE CALLS MORE OF THEM ON THE LIST, BUT IF WE HAVE SOMETHING, I THINK IF IT'S THE ENTIRETY OF THE STREET THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE, HOW DO YOU WANT US TO REPORT THAT? PICK AN ADDRESS.
ANY ADDRESS, AND JUST SAY IT IS FROM THIS STREET TO THIS TREATMENT.
THREE INTERSECTION WILL BE THE BEST.
BUT HOW ME PUT THAT PIN? BECAUSE IF I GO TO THREE 11, IT'S ASKING FOR A SPECIFIC LOCATION OR ON THE APP YOU MEAN? YEAH, YOU CAN.
OH, SO JUST PICK UP ANY, ANY ADDRESS EXACTLY.
THIS IS THE ADDRESS AND IN THE NOTES PUT UP.
AND IN ADDITION TO JUST INFRASTRUCTURE, IF WE FEEL THAT IT'S CAUSING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, YOU CAN, IF YOU ALSO NOTE THAT THEY DO RESPOND TO THOSE QUICKER.
I'VE HAD MINE RESPONDING TO QUICKER WHEN IT'S THE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISSUE, RATHER ISSUE TELEPHONE POLES, SIDEWALK,
[01:30:01]
THEY'RE NO, THEY'RE GONNA TELL YOU IT'S COURSE PROBLEM.THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A COORDINATION WITH
QUESTION, ARE THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN BRING THIS VIRTUALLY, ARE THEY ABLE TO HEAR ANY OF WHAT WE'RE SAYING? WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO CHECK RIGHT NOW IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
FOR THE, FOR THE VIRTUAL PEOPLE.
I'M GONNA CHECK THE CHAT PORTION TO SEE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY GET OUT OF THE RECORDING SESSION.
I'LL GET BACK WITH YOU JUST A SECOND AND WE CAN GET RID OF THE SHARE BECAUSE WE ARE NOT SHARING ANYTHING ANYMORE THAT READY? OKAY.
UM, IS THAT THE PRESENTATION? NO.
HOW DO YOU GO GET OUT OF, OKAY.
DON'T NEED THIS PRESENTATION ANYMORE DOWN HERE SO WE CAN HOW DO YOU MAKE IT LARGER? I THE GO, YOU KNOW.
IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS IN THE CHAT? UH, I GUESS, UH, JUST IT SECOND? YEAH.
THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS ON THE CHAT SECTION.
SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS FROM THE VIRTUAL AWARD SAYS THAT, DOES THE NUMBER ONE TO 12 INDICATE THE ORDER IN WHICH THE SIDEWALK WILL BE ADDRESSED? ONE TO 12? I'LL, I'LL READ IT AGAIN.
DOES THE NUMBER ONE TO 12 INDICATE THE ORDER IN WHICH THE SIDEWALKS WILL BE ADDRESSED FOR THE MASTER PLAN? OH, NO, NO.
THE, THE, THE QUESTION WE'RE GONNA PROVIDE THE WRITTEN, UH, ANSWER TO ALL THE CHAT QUESTION THAT YOU ALL HAVE IT LATER ON, BUT FOR THE SAKE OF DISCUSSION IS THESE ARE THE 12 FOCUS AREAS ONLY? NO, IT'S NOT THE ORDER OF ADDRESSING ANY SIDEWALK FOLLOW BACK.
I THINK THE CHAT WILL STAY, BUT WE, WE ARE ALSO RECORDING THE PRESENTATION.
UM, WE'RE GONNA KEEP EM AND WE'RE GONNA ADDRESS THEM IN FORMAT.
SO FOR THE VIRTUAL BOARD, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
WE'RE GONNA GO OVER THE CHAT AND WRITE ALL THE QUESTIONS YOU PROVIDE THE ANSWERS TO Y'ALL.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL CAN TALK OR NOT, BUT WE DON'T HEAR YOU GUYS IF YOU'RE TALKING YEAH, THIS IS NOT ABLE TO, I DON'T KNOW WHY WE NEED TO FIGURE THIS ONE OUT.
HOW TO UNMUTE AND BE ABLE TO TALK.
LET ME SEE IF WE CAN, CAN YOU TRY TO SEE IF YOU CAN TALK NOW? WE'RE STILL MUTED BY OTHERS.
WE UNMUTED EVERYONE, RIGHT? UM, WE'RE GONNA FIGURE THIS ONE OUT.
UM, AND THEN FOR THE NEXT TIME WE APOLOGIZE.
I DON'T KNOW WHY IT IS, IS NOT LETTING YOU GUYS TALK.
[01:35:02]
WE APOLOGIZE FOR THAT, THAT YOU COULDN'T ACTUALLY, UH, BE A PART OF DISCUSSION, BUT WE'LL MAKE IT HAPPEN FOR THE NEXT TIME.