[00:00:01]
ALL COMMISSION.JUST TIME FOR ASKED QUESTIONS.
SAID, UH, A LITTLE BIT OF TIME.
HERBERT HAS AGREED TO SERVICE TYPE CARE TODAY.
IT'S THE LAKE HIGHLANDS FAMILY WIDE SERVICE.
UH, THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THAT BEEN OUTDOOR WHERE IT WAS DUE TO THEIR SWIMMING POOL AREA.
AND THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE PLAN AND WHERE THE POOL IS GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
THAT THIS IS POST SITE PLAN, WHICH SHOWED THE EDITION OF THE BOARD AND THAT AREA AND STAFF PRESENTATION IS QUESTIONS? SORRY.
I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM YOUR, YOUR POINT VIEW ON THIS.
NO CHANGE TO CONFIGURATION TO THE PARKING.
NO CHANGE TO THE PARKING, CORRECT.
SIMPLY INSERTION OF A STORMING POOL IN A FORM OF THE INCIDENT.
AND IN FACT, UM, I THINK YOU GUYS, UH, WE SAW A MINOR AMEN TO THE SITE PLAN THAT CHANGED SOME THAT BACK ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO.
SO ALL THAT IS IN PLACE AND IT'S JUST THE ADDITION OF THE FLOOR.
THERE ARE TONY MAINLY THAT, YES.
WHAT'S THE DISTANCE FOR THE POOL? OH, IRONICALLY IT WAS OVER 200 FEET.
[00:05:01]
TO, TO THE NEAREST, UH, PROPERTY WIDE EVER.ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NEXT CASE PLEASE.
AND UH, THE REQUEST IS TO CREATE THIS, UH, A NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A POCKET BUILDING WITH A BELOW GRADE PARKING STRUCTURE SPACE AND CONTAIN.
AND THE STRUCTURE WILL BE CONTAINING SOME RETAIL USES.
IT'S IN, UH, PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUB-DISTRICT 1 64 SUB AREA A WITHIN PD 1 93.
IT'S JUST SHY OF FOUR AND A HALF ACRES AND IT'S IN COUNCIL DISTRICT 14 LOCATED TO ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FIELD STREET AND, UM, SOUTH OF, WELL, SOUTH OF SKI WAY.
UH, AND THE OFFICE, IT'S, IT'S A SINGLE OFFICE STRUCTURE, A SINGLE STRUCTURE THAT COMPRISED OF DIFFERENT PORTIONS, ONE PORTION BEING 13 STORIES, UM, WITH THAT PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE.
CONTAINMENTS GROUND LEVEL RETAIL, UH, PORTION, HAVING A 10 STORY AND ANOTHER PORTION BEING EIGHT STORY WITH BELOW GRADE PARKING STRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE AT ONE AND A HALF ACRE BEING PROVIDED.
YOU CAN SEE IT'S SURROUNDED BY, UH, OTHER PDS SUB-DISTRICTS IN 1 98 PD FIVE TO THE REQUEST.
SO THIS IS THE EXISTING SEXUAL PLAN AND THE AREA THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS IN CELLULAR AREA.
THIS IS THE POST DEVELOPMENT PLAN HERE.
THE OUTLINE IS THE LIST OF THE TOTAL STRUCTURE AND KIND TO GET SOME PERSPECTIVE ON HOW THIS IS ALL LOOKING.
UM, LOOKING WEST FROM FIELD STREET, YOU'LL SEE THE DIFFERENT LEVELS THEN FROM THE SOUTH TO THE NORTH AND THEN FROM THE NORTH LOOKING SOUTH AND IT'S STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.
QUESTIONS PROBABLY FOR MR. MOORE.
THIS BEING A D CASE RATHER THAN END CASE AND I CORRECT THAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVE IT.
YOU
SO THE OPEN SPACE IS GONNA BE ABOUT NINE, THE RELEASE.
THE OPEN SPACE WILL BE BEHIND THE BUILDINGS.
UM, IF YOU LOOK AT, WELL, THERE'LL BE PUBLIC ACCESS OR IS THIS OPEN SPACE JUST FOR THESE BUILDINGS? IT IS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS FAR AS WHETHER IT'S, IT'S SHOWN, IT'S ACTUALLY SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN TO BE IN THAT AREA.
UM, SO AS WHETHER IT'S OPEN TO PUBLIC OR NOT, I, I'LL HAVE TO ASK THAT.
AND IF WE HAVE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PD, WHAT DOES THE PD
[00:10:01]
REQUIRE? GIMME ONE SECOND.SO WITHIN THE PD THERE'S A MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIRED.
UM, THAT THERE IS, LET'S SEE, AN AREA COVERED BY TREES OR TREE CANOPIES ARE CONSIDERED AN OBSTRUCTED TO THE SKY.
UM, MAY NOT HAVE PERMANENT STRUCTURES EXCEPT STRUCTURES SUPPORTING PEDESTRIAN OR OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL USES.
UM, THEN, UH, PAVED AREAS, CLOSETS AND PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE ONE AND A HALF ACRES OF CONTIGUOUS OPEN SPACE MAY BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE OPEN SPACE.
UM, NONE OF IT REQUIRES IT TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND THERE'S THERE IT GOES ON WITH THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE OPEN SPACE.
UM, THAT WILL BE, THAT ARE NON-PERMANENT, BUT THAT WILL BE, UH, OF COURSE ADDRESSED AT PERMITTING AND NOT PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
YEAH, I'M JUST HAVING AN ORIENTATION PROBLEM WHEN I DRIVE TO, UH, CITY HALL.
IS THIS WHERE THE, THEY'VE ALREADY DONE THE DEMOLITION FOR THE UNDERGROUND PARKING LOT.
IS THIS WHERE THIS IS BEFORE THE PEROT MUSEUM? YES.
I JUST AM CURIOUS ABOUT PROCESS.
SO THEY START THAT THEN THEY CAN PUT IN FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLAN? YES.
UM, IN FACT, BECAUSE WHERE WAS I READING THAT NO DEVELOPMENT REQUIRE IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING SITE PREPARATION, UM, PAVING OR GRADING INSTALLATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, OPEN SPACE.
SO THERE'S A NUMBER OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED, UH, FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THAT'S WHAT WAS, WAS CONFUSING TO ME.
I KIND OF THOUGHT WHY HADN'T THIS COMING BEFORE US BEFORE ALL THAT GOT STARTED, YOU KNOW? CAUSE I WOULD THINK THEY'D BE DOING SOME OF THEIR EXCAVATION AND ANTICIPATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THE SECOND THING WAS TO THIS OTHER QUESTION, AND I KNOW IT WAS IN HERE, BUT I'VE FORGOTTEN.
WHAT IS THE PERCENTAGE OF GREEN SPACE AT THIS BUILDING? UH, I BELIEVE IT HAS TO DO WITH A TOTAL OF THE, OF THE ENTIRE AREA THAT, UM, LET'S SEE, IT'S AN ACRE AND A HALF OUTTA 10.8.
CASE NUMBER? CASE NUMBER, YES.
CASE YOU DON'T HAVE ON THAT ZONING.
[00:15:05]
THAT'S HOW ABOUT APPLICATION USE USES THE TERMINATION OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER EIGHT 90 CARE OF ALCOHOLIC NARCOTIC AND SIGN PATIENTS AND THE TERMINATION OF THE DESCRIPTIONS.SEVEN, SEVEN AND ONE BOULEVARD OF THE INTERSECTION.
IT IS SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF DALLAS.
THE CITY OF LANSTER SITE HAS, IT EXISTS TODAY AND IT IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, UH, FRONT UNIVERSITY HILLS FRONT WHEATON ROAD.
BEEN A GRAY ON THIS SIDE THAT YOU CAN'T DETECT FROM THIS.
HOPEFULLY WE'LL BE ABLE TO DETECT SOME PICTURES, UM, TO THE NORTH.
UH, SO THE NORTH, THE AGRICULTURAL USE IS A CHURCH THAT EAST, UH, THERE'S UNDEVELOPED HARD WATER THAT IS NOT PART ZONING REQUEST, BUT IT IS, UH, ANS AND THEN SOUTH ACROSS WHELAND IS HOMICIDE CITY LIMIT.
CITY LANCASTER, THERE'S OVERWHELMING CHARTER TO WEST.
AND LIKE I SAID, REQUEST USE DESIGN ALLOWS VARIATIONS RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
HE WOULD LIMIT USE FOUR UNITS AND, UH, JUST QUICKLY, UH, THE PUT IN PLACE TO ALLOW THE PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY REZONED TOF ONE, WHILE PROPERTY AND FORM CHAPTER ONE, EXCEPT IT ALLOWS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COURT OF CARE OF ALCOHOL NARCOTIC OR PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS THROUGH THE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSED TO TERMINATE BOTH.
AND SO, SO THIS IS ON UNIVERSITY HILLS.
THERE'S BIT A WALL GRADE, UM, INCREASE WHEN WE GET UP ABOVE THE STREET.
HOPEFULLY I'M GET ABOVE WALL HERE AND I'M LOOKING WEST THIS SIDE, UH, THEN IT FLOAT DOWN INTO NORTH.
SO IT'S UH, CREEKWAY FAR SOUTH.
LOOKING INTO THE TIME ACROSS THE STREET.
LOOKING BACK, UM, WEST, THAT'S ACTUALLY MOSTLY THE HARD CORNER.
UH, DOWN HERE ON THE LELAND CURRENT, UM, CURRENT STATUS OF WHEATLAND IS PRETTY NARROW AND THIS IS THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE GONNA GO LAST YEAR.
EXCUSE ME, WHERE ON WHEATLAND? AND THIS IS THE WESTERN, WESTERN WITH CHARTER SCHOOL.
THERE'S SIDEWALK ANDS THERE IN CHARTER SCHOOLS.
I'M LOOK, AND WE'RE GONNA GO BACK TO UNIVERSITY HILLS.
SO HERE'S UNIVERSITY HILLS' CHURCH ACROSS UNIVERSITY HILLS THERE.
AND I'M LOOKING BACK AT THAT BOTH PARKED CORNER.
UH, THESE ARE CITY OF LANCASTER PROPERTIES, UH, GENERALLY UNDEVELOPED AND THEN LOOKING SOUND ALREADY SOUTHEAST.
[00:20:01]
ACROSS NEWLAND OR EXCUSE ACROSS NEWLAND AND UNIVERSITY OF HILLS HERE ON DALLAS IN THE CITY WEST.UM, LANCASTER ON THE LEFT, UH, HARD FARMS ON THE RIGHT.
THERE'S UH, SOMETHING OF A, A FARM ARM USE, SORT THE SOUND AGRICULTURE.
NOW THIS IS, THIS IS ACTUALLY A ON LOOKING WEST FRONT CHARTER SCHOOL, CHARTER SCHOOL AND SUBJECT AROUND NOW BACK TO THE NORTH ADJACENT, UH, WHERE THEY'RE DOING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, UH,
AND A LITTLE, LITTLE MORE DETAILED LOCALLY, UH, PARKING BEHIND STRUCTURE REQUIRED BY CONDITIONS OF THE SIDEWALK.
JUST HAVE THESE EXISTING CONDITIONS P BE TERMINATED AND RESTRICTIONS TO BE TERMINATED.
AND I'VE ALREADY TAKEN THE DETAILS ON EACH OF THOSE.
AND AS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, IT USES ONE AS THE BASE.
UM, THEY, THEY VARY FROM THAT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE NEXT INCREASE IN, INCREASE IN DENSITY, UH, SHOULD THEY PROVIDE THAT.
UH, BUT THAT ALSO BRINGS ALONG THE FOUR 11 DESIGN STANDARD.
UM, WE'LL TALK ABOUT THE DESIGN.
SO THEY, 4.17, THIS THE STANDARD THAT I JUST MENTIONED.
SO ALL OF THOSE ARE THERE PLUS, UH, NO PARKING IN THE FIRST 30 FEET OF, UH, THE STREET FRONT FOOTAGE, UH, EXTERIOR LIGHTING THAT, EXCUSE ME.
SO THOSE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SOURCES MUST BE ORIENTED AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL COPIES ALSO COVERED IN FOUR POINT 11.
AND IT ALSO FALLS FOR THREE FURNITURE ON EACH FRONT.
SO THOSE ARE IN ADDITION JUST TO, UM, BIGGER PICTURE PART OF THE UT D UH, UT DALLAS, UH, MASTER AREA PLAN.
I PUT A TINY LITTLE BLUE, UH, PARCEL AREA IN THE SOUTHERNMOST PART.
UH, THAT'S OBSTETRIC PROPERTY, BUT IT IS IN WHAT'S CALLED THE U ONE OR EXCUSE.
UH, MAKES EXCUSES, UH, HIGHER IDENTITY ALL ALONG THE UNIVERSITY HILLS CORRIDOR AS WELL AS TO THE EAST UNIVERSITY STATION.
OF COURSE THIS IS STATION JUST HILLS.
AND SO MORE ON THE AREA CLAIM ALSO INCREASED DENSITY NEAR GUARD STATIONS AND ALONG THIS CORRIDOR.
THE URBAN EXCUSE COLUMN THAT I'M TRYING TO HIGHLIGHT VERY, UM, IS THE, IS THE, UH, LAND USE RANGE OR LOOKING FOR THE HEIGHT RANGE IN THE PLAN AND PROPOSAL.
SO BALANCE THE PLAN AND GOALS.
WE HAVE SOME CHANGES THE TOPIC THAT ARE RESULTS OF THE MEETING, MEETING LAST WEEK.
AND UH, SAT IS IN SUPPORT WITH THOSE.
UM, ADDED INCLUDED REFERENCE ONLY, UH, EXCUSE ME, INCLUDE REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL DESIGNS, NOT DESIGN STANDARDS, BUT JUST STANDARD FOR A DRIVE TO THE RESTAURANT IF IT WERE TO BE PROVIDED.
UM, REARRANGED HOW TIGHT INTERACT WITH THE BONUS.
UH, THE HEIGHT, THE BASE TYPE IN THE PV IS NOW 60 FLAT, UH, RATHER THAN IN THAN ONLY IN THE BONUS SCENARIO.
WHEREAS PREVIOUSLY ALL VARIATIONS TO AND ONE WERE TIED TO THE BONUS, WHICH, UM, COULD HAVE A HIGHER HEIGHT IN, UM, MASS HEIGHT IF YOU AND YOU WILL NO SCENARIO WHETHER NOT THAT DENSITY.
BUT, UH, EITHER WAY WE, WE WEREN'T HOW PIPES, I KNOW IT'S MORE DETAIL YOU NEED TO, UH, BUT THAT HAS BEEN DISTRIBUTED YESTERDAY.
UH, THE DETENTION POND, UH, THE BOTTOM FEATURES THE PACK, THE ACCESS, THE MAIN SIDE TALLER SCREEN.
UH, THEY, THEY CALL FOR EIGHT FOOT SCREEN ON THE US CENTRAL ADJACENCIES, BUT IT'S MOSTLY GONNA BE THE WEST, UH, SCREEN IT SOLID SCREENING, THEY FINE DRIVE THROUGH.
[00:25:01]
YOUR RESTAURANTS ARE ONE USE IS PROVIDED.UM, SPECIFYING TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE RETAIL AREA AND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL AREA AND SPECIFYING STREET ITEMS UNLESS BY PHOTO.
AND THIS IS NOT NECESSITATE CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT CLAIM.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVALS SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT.
CLAIMION HAVE QUESTIONS? MR. UM, MR. TE, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT.
AND CAN YOU, UM, IT HELP ME HELP, WELL IT HELP EXPLAIN FOR THE RECORD WHY WE HAVE THE 5% AFFORDABILITY ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
UM, AMONG OTHER THINGS, IT, IT IS SEEN AS AN INCREASE IN DENSITY.
UM, AND WHILE INCREASED DENSITY IS APPROPRIATE ALONG THIS ORDER, UM, IT IT HELPS US BE, OUR HOUSING INVOLVES BOTH BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL MARKET RATE HOUSING AND A SMALL AMOUNT OF, UH, MIXED INCOME HOUSING.
UM, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MBA CATEGORY, THIS IS THE MBA CATEGORY F.
AND SO WHAT THAT IMPLIES IS, UH, 61 TO 8% OF A FAMILY MEDIAN INCOME.
UH, SO THAT PROVIDES HOUSING TO THE PEOPLE IN THAT, UH, BRACKET WOULD ONLY 21 UNITS OUT OF 4 25.
UM, BUT LIKELY THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL IN PROVIDING STUDENT HOUSING, UH, PROFESSOR HOUSING RATHER LINKED TO THE UNIVERSITY.
AND UM, IT ALSO, IT TIES THE, IT'S AN INCENTIVE, IT TIES THE ADDITIONAL BONUSES INCLUDING DENSITY TO, TO THE INCOME.
SO IT, IT IS NOT, IT, IT IT IS AN APPROPRIATE REQUEST TO HAVE 5%, UM, UH, PORTABILITY.
EVEN THOUGH THIS CAME IN AS A TOTAL MARKET RATE REQUEST, CORRECT? IT, IT IS, IT'S, IT IS 95% THAT RATE, UM, AND THE REQUESTED INCOME CATEGORY BE 8% MAXIMUM IH IS APPROPRIATE, UH, GIVEN HOUSING AND BILLS FOR THIS TYPE OF CATEGORY.
AND THIS IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM RIGHT, IT'S WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE TO THE, THE LAST STOP OF DART.
CORRECT? I TOOK IT TO GET HERE TO GET DOWN
UM, AND IT AND IT WITHIN THE WALKING TRAIL AT U N TD, THE RUNNING SCREENS WALKING TRAIL, IS THAT NOT CORRECT? YOU DID ACCESS IT PRETTY EASILY.
AND DOES THAT WALKING TRAIL NOT END UP AT THE CITY HILLS REC CENTER? IT NO.
UH, AND IN TO THE NEXT DARK STATION, CORRECT? MM-HMM.
SO IT, IT, IT, THIS LOCATION PROVIDES WALKABILITY DENSITY AND AN ACCESS TO A VERY ACTIVE REC CENTER.
IS THAT NOT CORRECT? YES, IT IS VERY ACTIVE.
YOU SAW IT FIRSTHAND, CORRECT? YES.
UM, WE BASICALLY BARELY GOT SPACE.
UH, NEXT DAY THE HEIGHT, IS THE HEIGHT NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE U T D AREA PLAN THAT CALLS FOR FIVE STORIES AND, AND, AND HEIGHT AS A STANDARD? IT DOES.
SO THE U N T CALLS FOR TWO TO EIGHT STORIES ALONG THAT CORRIDOR.
UM, WE RECOGNIZE THIS IS ONE OF THE, THE FIRST PROJECTS IN THE SOUTH PART.
SO IT THIS TRANSITIONAL, SO IT'S LIMITED TO THE 60.
UH, BUT IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THE LONG TERM MASTER PLAN FOR, I BELIEVE IF I, IF I'M, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, WHEN YOU READ THE AREA PLAN FOR U TC, THE FOUR DALLAS AREA PLAN, PAGE 24, IT DOES STATE THAT IT SHOULD BE A FIVE.
IF YOU CAN HAVE, UM, A FIVE STORY HEIGHT AND BUILDING AND UP TO 10 STORIES, I THINK THAT'S ON THE NEXT PAGE.
AND THAT WILL CERTAINLY PLAY A ROLE INTO HOW PIPE AND, UM, OTHER STANDARDS HAVE EVALUATED IN FURTHER CASES ALONG THAT FORWARD.
SOMETHING THAT WE LOOKED AT VERY SERIOUSLY, UM, CONSIDERING THIS CASE.
AND SO IT'S NOT, IT IS AN INCREASE IN HIGH INTEREST OF PROPERTY THAT'S IN KEEPING WITH THE PLAN AND IN KEEPING WITH WHAT, UM, FURTHER ZONINGS WILL LYING DEAL ON.
SO ALONG THAT QUARTER WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHEATLAND AND AS WHEATLAND MOVES EAST, UM, YOU WILL SEE THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT.
WE SHOULD SEE THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT, IF NOT HIGHER, UM, BUILDING OPPOSED TO UM, TO THIS JUST ONE,
[00:30:01]
THIS LOCATION.AS WE GO UP, UM, AS WE GO UP UNIVERSITY HILLS, UM, EVEN ACROSS TO THE EAST, DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE STATION, THERE'S A LOT OF PROPERTY WAY IT COULD GO HIGHER THAN THE FIVE STORES.
THIS JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE FIRST OF THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT THAT IS GOING HIGHER THAN UH, SINGLE STORY, TWO STORY AND EVEN THREE STORIES.
IS THAT NOT CORRECT? UH, IS CORRECT.
AND THEN JUST JUST TO, TO TOP THAT OFF THROUGH THIS, THROUGH THE UM, THE WHEAT, THE WHEAT WHEATLAND ROAD, HALF OF IT IS DALLAS AND THE SOUTHERN HALF IS LANCASTER, CORRECT? YES.
SO WE ATCO, WHEATLAND IS ON THE FAIR, FAIR PLAN.
UH, WE CANNOT DICTATE CONTROL OR MONITOR WHAT THE CITY OF OF LANCASTER DOES WITH HOW THEY DEVELOP THAT ROADWAY, CORRECT? THAT'S SO BASED ON, ON WHAT WE ARE DOING AT THIS LOCATION, THIS IS THE BEST USEFUL PLAN AT THIS PARTICULAR SITE BASED ON THE AREA PLAN FOR U AND D D, THE DESIGN STANDARDS, THE REQUIREMENTS, THAT ALL CORRECT? YES.
CONDITION, THAT'S, THAT'S, YES.
AND THAT'S REFERRING TO STREET LIGHTING.
SO IT IS IN CODE, UM, AND THAT AND GENERALLY THEY HAVE TO DEDICATE ON GREENLAND, THEY HAVE TO UH, IMPROVE ON THEIR SIDE, UM, AND FURTHER CONDITION.
THEY HAVE CODE BUT IT DOESN'T SUPERSEDE NOR, UM, VERY PEDESTRIAN ALSO INCLUDED IN THE CONCERNS RE ACTUALLY REQUIRE SEATING AREA THAT'S CORRECT BETWEEN THE BUILDING SIDEWALK WHERE IT'S BEING INCLUDED ON YOUR, YOUR PLAN FOR THAT INTERVIEW.
SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE IS SPECIFIC PLAN FOR DRIVE PERIOD IS UM, NOT FINALIZED.
AND I THINK IT WOULD BE, UH, IF THEY CAN'T FIT IT INTO THIS SITE AS IT IS BUILT OUT, AS THIS IS BUILT OUT, THEY HAVE TO DO IT IN MY AMENDMENT.
UM, BUT THE CONDITION IS STILL GONNA REQUIRE THAT SPACE TO BE INCLUDED, UH, IN WHETHER IT'S THIS DEVELOPMENT OR MINOR.
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT STILL NEGOTIATION, UM, THE PD REQUIRES SIX SIDEWALK.
IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY IS THAT THAT'S, THAT'S ACTUALLY THE STREET.
UM, BECAUSE IT'S REPAIR CAUSE THEY'RE ACTUALLY ABOUT REPAIRS.
SO THAT'S GONNA BE COVERED UM, THROUGH THE, THE STREET DESIGN ANGLE.
AND THE CONDITIONS RETENTION THAT IF I RECALL CORRECTLY, UM, THE AMENITIES FOR THE OPEN SPACE JUST AS VAGUE THERE, VAGUE THERE ANY CERTAIN OF AMENITIES.
UM, THIS LANGUAGE THAT WE USE FOR INCLUDE, UM, IT'S GENERALLY INTERVIEW FRAUD TO LET THEM DESIGN HOW THEY, HOW THEY MIGHT WANNA, WE GOT, WE GOT OUR HISTORY STREET FURNITURE ON STREETS.
UM, SO THEY WILL HAVE LEEWAY TO INCLUDE UH, PATIO TRELLIS LATER ON WITH WIND.
UM, THAT'S LIKELY GOING TO BE IN THE, IN THE NORTHWESTERN PUT SPACE.
UM, BUT WE LIKE TO SAY WHAT CAN BE PUT IN, UM, SO THAT ITS, IT'S KIND OF CLEAR THAT OTHER THINGS CAN BE IN BUILDINGS.
I'M GONNA CHANNEL MR. KINGSMAN A LITTLE BIT HERE.
[00:35:01]
CARS WILL BE ELECTRIC.GIVEN THAT, ARE YOU CONCERNED THAT THE FOUR EV SPACES OUT 4 25 UNITS IS UH, NOT SUFFICIENT? NOTHING PRECLUDES THEM FROM PUTTING IN.
THEY MAY PUT IN AS MANY AS A DESIRE FOR, UM, THE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENCE ANDAND.
IT ALSO HAS ACCESS TO GUARD TO, IN, IN, EXCUSE ME, INCREASINGLY, UM, SHIFT.
UH, UH YES ON THE STUDY DEVELOPMENT PLAN HERE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PLAN, THERE'S A PARKING SUMMARY OF FIRST FOUR 20 MINUTES TOTAL.
THE NOTATIONS ON THE, I'LL CALL IT THE BODY OF THE PLAN ON THE BUILDINGS THEMSELVES COME TO 25.
I'M JUST CURIOUS THAT'S AN ISSUE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE WHITE BOX, THE GRAY BOX ON THE PARKING AND IF YOU ADD UP THE UNITS LABELED ON THE TWO BUILDINGS I 25, NO THAT IS GONNA BE CONTROL.
SO AND AND IT IS ON THE UNIT BASIS SO THEY, THEY'LL HAVE ABILITY.
UM, WE DON'T, WE DON'T SAY THAT IT MUST HAVE THE EXACT TIME LISTED ON THE PLAN.
NOW THAT THE BUILDING THAT HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REQUIRE CERTAIN ED DOCUMENT INFRASTRUCTURE, CAN WE MODIFY THOSE REQUIREMENTS IN PD AND I'VE BEEN TOLD YES AND I'VE BEEN TOLD NO.
UM, AND IF SO, IS THERE ANY, I GUESS IS THERE ANY RATIONALE FOR WHY YOU WOULD DO THAT IN THIS PLAN? CAUSE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THAT WE NOW REQUIRE BUILDING CODE ARE FAR EXCEED WITH THIS PLAN REQUIRE.
SO A PLAN LIKE THIS, UH, AND SO MAYBE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I BELIEVE WOULD REQUIRE 20% OF THE PARKING TO BE CAPABLE AND MAYBE COUPLE SPACES TO BE READY.
BUT THERE A BIG REQUIREMENT FOR CAPABILITY THAT IS NOT BEING MET IN THIS PROJECT.
THAT RETROFIT WOULD BE PROBABLY A SEVEN FIGURE RETRO GIVEN WHERE WE'RE IN TERMS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRENDS.
I GUESS I'D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND SA RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS PROJECT FROM THE BUILDING CODE WE ENDED IN MARCH THAT IT SHOULD JUST EXCLUDE THEM FROM THE BUILDING CODE.
OKAY, SO WHY ARE WE EVEN, AND SO I GUESS I'D TO THE WEIGH IN ON THAT, THAT THE QUESTION I ASKED MORE THAN ONE, WE'VE GOT MULTIPLE ANSWERS.
CAN WE IN THE PD CIRCUMVENT WHAT WE NOW REQUIRE IN OUR BUILDING CODE FOR ED PARKING INFRASTRUCTURE? THAT'S THE FIRST QUESTION.
I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE COULD COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, BUT I WILL DOUBLE CHECK UPSTAIRS AND GET A DEFINITIVE ANSWER FOR OKAY.
YEAH, JUST LIKE TO KNOW IS THAT UPWARD OR DOWNWARDS? YES SIR.
THEN MY SECOND QUESTION REALLY FOR THIS PROJECT IS WHY DO WE HAVE SO LITTLE, WHY DOES STAFF FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH IT BEING SO LITTLE PARKING INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT? THE THE, UH, INCLUSION WAS, EXCUSE ME, THE INCLUSION WAS THE INCLUSION OF THE REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION AS THAT THERE WAS A NUMBER THAT WE KNEW ABOUT, UH, BUT IT IS NOT INTENDED FROM, FROM BUILDING CODE.
SO, SO THE INTENT WAS TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS SOME NOT TO EXCLUDE WHAT WE HAVE TO PROVIDE.
THOSE ARE NOT EV READY, THESE ARE EV CAPABLE, THESE ARE ALL, THESE ARE RED, RED, THESE ARE EV READY, NOT EV CAPABLE.
SO AT A MINIMUM OF DAY ONE THEY HAVE TO BE.
SO IF THAT WAS THE INTENT TO SAY THAT AT DAY ONE THEY MUST NOT, THAT THEY CAN'T DO MORE FOLLOW UP.
[00:40:01]
SO AM I SAYING AM I DOING IT WRONG? YOU CAN TAKE A STEP BACK AND I EDUCATE US AND MEAN, LET'S SAY THAT NO E LANGUAGE WAS INCLUDED IN THIS.DOES THAT MEAN THAT THEY GET GET OUT JAIL THREE CAR HERE OR THEY STILL HAVE, THEY STILL HAVE TO MATCH THE BUILDING CODE.
SO WHAT, WHAT PERCENTAGE DO WE END UP GETTING? THEY STILL HAVE TO MEET THE BUILDING CODE, WHICH I DUNNO THIS.
OKAY, IT'D BE NICE TO KNOW THAT, RIGHT? CAUSE MAYBE THEY'RE GONNA PUT THAT A HIGHER PERCENTAGE THAN WHAT'S ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE PD.
AND IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW THAT WAY WE KNOW WHAT PUT IN HERE MAYBE AS AS COMMISSIONER PUSHED OUT THERE THAT MAYBE WE'RE LOWERING THE THRESHOLD HERE WITHOUT KNOWING.
WELL WHAT I WAS TOLD, AND I DUNNO THAT IS IF YOU'RE GONNA ALTER THE AMOUNT THAT YOU SHOULD REFERENCE THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT AND IN YOUR LANGUAGE THAT SAYS THAT CODE DOES NOT APPLY, THAT THIS VERSION APPLIES.
SO ARE YOU SAYING WELL, SO JUST, JUST JUST LIKE CAN STAY ON TRACK.
ARE YOU SAYING THAT IF YOU, INSTEAD OF SAYING THE A SPECIFIC NUMBER, YOU JUST REFERENCED THE EV CODE AS THAT IS WRITTEN TODAY.
I DON'T EVEN THINK YOU HAVE TO DO THAT.
WE NOW HAVE OUR BUILDING CODE.
WE DIDN'T REFERENCE, WE DIDN'T REFERENCE BUILDING CODE IN THE TEXT AND SO WE DIDN'T SAY THAT DOESN'T APPLY.
WE SAID HE, WE SAID ACCESSORY VEHICLE CHARGING STATION WITH PASSENGER X VEHICLES IS REQUIRED.
REFERRING, EXCUSE ME, REFERRING TO ZONING CODE.
WE HAVE A PROVISION AT THE END SHALL ISSUE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TO AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF A USE FULL COMPLIANCE, THIS CODE, CONSTRUCTION CODE ALL ORDINANCES RULES.
SO BY DEFAULT THAT MEANS, SO IF WE'RE LOOKING TO, ASSUMING, I THINK THIS IS A QUESTION WE PROBABLY NEED TO GET A RESOLUTION ON BECAUSE IT'S IT'S GONNA PROBABLY KEEP COMING UP.
LY HOW IF WE ARE PERMITTED TO MODIFY THE ED REQUIREMENTS THAT THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES, WHAT'S THE SUGGESTIVE LANGUAGE FOR DOING SO? I MEAN MY, MY GUESS IS WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO REALLY DO THAT CAUSE SHOULD WE HAVE A PUBLIC POLICY HAVE PEOPLE LIKE ME MODIFYING OUR BUILDING CODE BUT IT COULDN'T SHE MODIFY CAUSE I'VE BEEN MY HAND MODIFY PLUMBING.
WE'RE GONNA GET TO YOU JUST A MINUTE.
I MEAN IT'S KINDA LIKE YOU CAN'T PLUMBING OTHER SECTIONS OF BUILDING AND I DON'T SEE ALTERING EXEMPT BUILDINGS NOT THAT WELL I'M GUESSING THIS APPLICANT DOESN'T PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDING'S.
YEAH, LET'S GET THAT OUT BEFORE THE HEARING FOR SURE.
OKAY, I'D LIKE TO CLARIFY THE SAME THING.
IS THIS GOING TO BE EV CAPABLE AND I'M TALKING ABOUT ARE YOU MAKING A WHOLE PARKING LOT OR A WHOLE SECTION MORE CAPABLE THAN THIS 1%? YOU PUT 1% AND I WOULD THINK THAT IF THE BUILDING CODE, I THINK WE'VE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE, THREE TO 5%, THAT'S KIND OF WHAT COMMISSIONER KINGSTON HAD SORT OF SET AS OUR DEFAULT.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE BUILDING CODE IS, BUT SUPPOSE WHY COULDN'T YOU ASK IN A CERTAIN SITUATION TO GO UP.
BUT IF YOU'VE ONLY GOT 1%, HOW MANY, HOW MUCH CAPABILITY IS IN THERE? HOW DOES THE BUILDING CODE DEAL WITH BEING, HAVING THE CAPACITY SO THAT YOU'RE NOT RETRO THROUGH RIGHT.
THIS IS REFERRING TO READY TO READY OR FUNCTIONING EASY.
YEAH, THE ACTUAL FUNCTIONING ONE.
OR OR ANYTHING ELSE IN, DON'T YOU THINK IT SHOULD SAY IF YOU ARE DOING LESS THAN 1%, WHICH IS WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING AND I'M NOT SURE MY COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, I UNDERSTAND WHY YOU NEED TO PUT THE 1% WHEN THERE'S A BUILDING CODE THAT WOULD BE LET'S SAY SPECULATIVELY 3% AT THE MINIMUM.
BUT EVEN IF YOU DID THAT, EVEN IF YOU WENT BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT, LET'S CALL IT 3%, CAN YOU ALSO SAY BUT HAVE CERTAIN MORE CAPABLE BECAUSE ONE OF THE EXPENSES IS
[00:45:01]
THE RETRO DUTY AND IF WE'RE NOT DEALING WITH, I HEARD THE SAME ARTICLE AS COMMISSIONER YOUNG TODAY ABOUT EB AND HOW THERE'S A REAL DEAR OF THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH CHARGING SESSIONS AND THEY'RE FINDING THAT ALREADY.AND SO I GUESS I FEEL THE SAME WAY.
WHY AREN'T WE ANTICIPATING THE NEED THAT IF WE MEET THE BUILDING CODE ON THE READY BUT WE HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF CAPACITY ALSO.
LET ME SEE WHAT I CAN LET, LEMME SEE IF I CAN BLOW THAT DOWN.
UM, BUT IT DOES, IT DOESN'T VARY FROM THE, THE ANY OF THE STANDARD AREA IN THE BUILDING CODE.
SO WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT THE PRESENCE OF THE ZONING CODE DEFINITION OF CHARGING STATION AND HAS A MINIMUM CAPACITY FOR THAT.
SO YOU DON'T SEE HAVING TWO DIFFERENT THINGS LIKE READY WHEN THE BUILDING OPENS BUT THE CAPACITY SET UP WITHIN THE BUILDING TO ADD MORE IT'S THAT'S THE, THE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS TO BUILD THERE.
SO THEY HAVE A CODE FOR THAT TOO, BUT OKAY, CAN WE SEE THIS BUILDING EVERY READING RIGHT NOW WE CAN SET THE, WE CAN ONLY ORDINANCE, SO IT DEPENDS FOR MULTIFAMILY FOR INSTANCE, IT DEPENDS ON THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND THEN THERE'S A FIXED NUMBER FOR IN READY WHICH IS UP TO TWO AND THERE IS A BIG NUMBER PERCENTAGE CAPABLE.
SO IF YOU HAVE MORE THAN 2060, THE PARKING SPACES, 20% OF THE TOTAL PARKING SPACES MUST BE E EV CAPABLE PER THE BUILDING.
YOUR FIRST ONE A MINIMUM TWO, RIGHT? A MINIMUM OF TWO READY.
BUT THE 20% CAPABLE AND THE 20% IS ACROSS THE BOARD, IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S BASED ON THE PARKING PROVIDER BUT 20% OF WHATEVER THE PARKING REQUIREMENT IS.
OKAY, THAT'S SO SO ARE WE SAYING THAT THE ASK IN THIS PD PD IS GREATER THAN WHAT THE BUILDING CODE SAYS? BECAUSE IF YOU'RE SAYING THE BUILDING CODE SAYS THAT TWO MUST BE READY AND THIS IS ASKING FOR SIX TO BE READY THEN IT STILL WOULD WE'RE ASKING FOR MORE.
WE'RE ASKING FOR MORE ON AT THE ONSET AND THEN HER BUILDING CODE IT MUST BE 20% CAPABLE, CORRECT? YES.
SO BASICALLY IF THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN IS ASKING FOR MORE THAN WHAT BUILDING CODE IS REQUIRED, BUT ISN'T IT ASKING FOR PART OF, FOR RETAIL, NOT MULTIFAMILY, IT'S FOR BOTH BUT IS THE TWO FOR EVERY MULTIFAMILY YOU JUST READ MULTIFAMILY COUNTY? CAUSE THIS WHAT I HAD, I HAD HERE TWO IS FOR EVERY MULTIFAMILY BUT THIS IS A COMPONENT.
TWO IS CAN I THINK WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO IS YOUR FIFTH VOLUNTEER TO DO AN ANALYSIS OF THE CODE HERE AND CREATE THE WHOLE CHART'S ON THE PD AND THE ARE.
MAYBE MAYBE AFTER WE GET THIS CHART WE SEE IT'S STILL ON CONSENT.
WELL YOU KNOW WHAT IF HERE'S THE DEAL IF, IF THAT MUCH OF A CHALLENGE JUST REMOVE IT AND GO WITH BUILDING CODE AND BELIEVE IT ON CONSENT.
LET'S, LET'S SEE WHAT UH, I MEAN IF YOU WANT ANYONE CAN TAKE YOUR OWN CONSENT BUT AT THIS POINT IT'S STILL ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MAYBE ONCE WE GET THIS NOBODY WILL WANT TO TAKE OWN CONSENT THIS POINT.
IT'S STILL ON CONSENT UNLESS WANTS TO TAKE IT OFF.
UH, YOUR HONOR, I'LL BE FORGIVE FOR A COUPLE OF RHETORICAL QUESTIONS, BUT WHY WOULD THIS BODY WANT TO WEIGH IN ON UH, TOPICS THAT ARE NOT RELATED TO LAND USE THAT ARE CLEARLY DEFINED THE BUILDING CODE.
WHAT BENEFIT WOULD WE WEIGH IN ON? THANK YOU MR. HARRIS.
WELL LET ME UH, WAS ABOUT MAKE A CLEAR STATEMENT.
I WANT, UM, ASSUMING THAT MR. MOORE SAYS THAT WE CAN BURY FROM THE BUILDING AND ASSUMING FURTHER THAT WE DON'T WANT TO INADVERTENTLY THE NUMBER DOWNWARD
[00:50:01]
BOTH AS TO THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE AND AS TO THE BUILDING CODE THAT MIGHT BE IN THE FUTURE.WOULD IT MAKE SENSE TO SAY FOUR SIX OR WHATEVER NUMBER OR THE NUMBER REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING CODE, WHICHEVER IS LARGER? OH THAT'S A GREAT, THAT'S A GREAT SENSE ISN'T IT? YEAH THAT'S
I THINK THAT'S VERY WELL I GUESS AND THIS MIGHT BE COVERED BY WHATEVER CHART YOU DO, IS THERE A REASON THAT THE NEW BUILDING BREAK THEIR PROPERTY CONTAINED ABOUT SEVEN ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND AND THEY DO HAVE A PROPOSED LAND? YOU SAYING? UH, HISTORICALLY A MOTOR VEHICLE STATION? OF COURSE THIS IS A REQUEST FOR GENERAL ZONING SO THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES AT ALL ALLOWED.
NOW FOR CONSISTENCY REVIEW, THIS IS IN THE EAST COOPER UM, LAND USE STUDY AREA AND IT IS AREA THREE TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
IT IDENTIFIED THIS AREA AS BEING EITHER GREEN OPEN SPACE, HOWEVER IT ALSO SHOWS THIS TRACK ON THEIR MAP AND BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES FOR THE AREA.
THERE ARE A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE VICINITY AND THAT UM, THIS PROPERTY, WHICH I'LL SHOW YOU HERE ON THIS AREA MAP AS YOU SEE IT UNDEVELOPED, BUT YOU SEE ALL THE RESIDENTIAL ABUSES THAT ARE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST AND THE SOUTHEAST.
THOSE ARE ALL IN THE MOBILE DISTRICT.
AND THEN THE INSTITUTIONAL USE ACROSS DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOL WE HAVE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES SINGLE WITH SOUTHEAST AND EAST AND THEN ON CAT CORNER TO THE SITE OFF, THERE'S OF COURSE AN ENVELOPE TRACK THE REQUEST AND THEN THE CITE FOR Z 2 2 39 WHICH WAS THE WAREHOUSE REQUEST THAT LAST MONTH.
NOW UM, THIS IS JUST THE ZONING HAVE IDENTIFYING ALL THOSE SURROUNDING PLANNED USES AND UH, ZONING THAT I MENTIONED AND NOW WE LOOK AT THE PHOTOS OF THE SITE, THAT BEING SUB TWO SECTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S UNDEVELOPED.
I DON'T SEE MY PHOTOS CHANGING, I DON'T, I DUNNO WHY THAT HAPPENED BUT IT'S JUST UNDEVELOPED ALL ACROSS.
AND THEN THESE ARE THE SURROUNDING USES, THE MOBILE USES TO THE SOUTH UM, AUSTIN ROAD.
THIS IS ADJACENT TO THAT UNDEVELOPED THE SUBJECT SITE.
THERE ARE SIMILAR USE THERE AND THEN THE SCHOOL ACROSS THE STREET, THE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE, THE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY TO NORTH AND THEN THERE'S THE SITE FOR THE WAREHOUSE USE WAS THERE.
AND THEN SO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DISTRICT, THEY DO HAVE PRODUCED FROM SETBACKS AND THEN THEY DO ADDITIONAL SETBACKS.
SO FOR EXAMPLE THAT ONE TWO STYLE THAT IS SURROUNDED AS NEED I RESIDENTIAL AND DESPITE
[00:55:01]
THE SMALL LENGTH OF THAT PROPERTY, THEY WOULD BE THE FIRE TO PROVIDE A 20 FOOT SIGN SETBACK ON THAT SECTION IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN UM, THERE SETBACK DUE TO RESIDENTIAL.THEN THE HEIGHT OF COURSE IS IN TO THE PEOPLE OR SO HOWEVER THEY DO HAVE TO CONSENT WITH RESIDENTIAL SLOPE.
THE I MEANS THEN ADDITION THE ABOVE COVERAGE, TRANSITIONAL HISTORY THAT MAINTAIN THESE CASES AND CROP LIVESTOCK.
UM, SINGLE FAMILY ROLE IS WHAT IT'S TYPICALLY CONTAINING.
SO ABOUT 10% BLOCK COVERAGE, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM FOR THE DISTRICT, THAT WOULD BE THE 60% DISTRICT.
NOW AS FAR AS THE LAND COMPARISON GOES, I'VE HIGHLIGHTED COMPARISON FROM THE DISTRICT CR DISTRICT, HOW MANY OVERALL PERMITTED USES AND THEN YOU SEE I HIGHLIGHTED DISTRICT HAD THE MOST USES PERMITTED SO YOU'LL SEE USE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS SERVICE USES THAT ACTUALLY HAS DUCTION IN INDUSTRIAL AND THEN UM, IT HAS AN INCREASED BY LONGINGS IN OFFICE AND LARGELY SERVICES ACTUALLY.
NOW WHY ALL THESE ADMITTED BY THE DESCRIPTION OFFER DESCRIPTIONS AND THESE VOLUNTEER PRESCRIPTIONS ACTUALLY TO SENIOR DISTRICT OF THEM? UH, NO, I'M SORRY, MORE THAN HALF OF ARE USES DISTRICT AND THEN WERE BROUGHT IN UH, THIS IS PROBABLY FROM MR. VALEZ, I SAW HIM HERE EARLIER.
I MEAN YOU SEE IT, YES, THERE'S EXCLUDED AGRICULTURE, IS THAT CORRECT? YES.
THERE'S EXCLUDED AGRICULTURAL THAT'S THAT GIVES DOWN TO THE CR.
IT HAS A SINGLE FAMILY RIGHT NEXT TO IT.
SO STRAIGHT ZONING CHANGE GOES THROUGH THAT WILL OUT KEYS COULD NO BE SINGLE ANY REALISTIC DEVELOPMENT THAT CAN GO ON THAT PROPERTY AND THAT GIVEN, GIVEN THE SETBACK CONCERN THE OF THAT PROPERTY I THINK THERE IS,
[01:00:01]
THERE'S A COMBINED UM, ROCK CONTINUITY FRONT YARD SET ACTS OF 50 FEET ON THE FRONT YARD AND THEN 20 FEET FOR THE SIDE YARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE RESIDENTIAL OF EITHER SIDE.SO THAT WOULD BE THE MAJORITY THAT LONG AND AND THE PART THAT SOUTH I SUPPOSE THE VERY BOTTOM ARE THOSE SINGLE ADJACENT, THESE TWO LOOK LIKE SINGLE FAMILY VOLUNTEER, MY CURSOR RIGHT, THE LONGER RED THAT THAT'S ALL THESE, THESE ARE ALL, I BELIEVE THAT THESE ARE ALL HOMES AND PRIOR COMMISSIONER WE'LL TO NUMBER SIX.
OKAY, CAN WE SEE THE PRESENTATION? WE CAN 1 8 2 2 3 1 2 7.
THIS IS AN APPLICATION SERVICE THAT THAT'S CURRENTLY IN RESEARCH CURRENTLY TEXAS LAND COMPANY THAT'S OPERATING WITH AN OFFICE HOUSE, UH, CERTIFIC OCCUPANCY.
THEY'RE REQUESTING TO HAVE A CONTRACTOR'S MAINTENANCE WHICH IS PERMIT IN THE CSS RESIDENTIAL J AND NOT MEANS UM, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME FACILITY, THE STORAGE CONTRACTORS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN NORTHWEST EAST FREEWAY.
HERE'S AN AREA MAP SHOWING THE DEVELOP NATURE OF THE SITE AND THERE ARE OTHER HERE ON THIS SECTION OF THE BODY WHICH SEEMS TO HAVE SEVERAL AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE HERE.
UM, THERE ARE MULTIPLE COS FOR ANY KIND OF VEHICLE ENGINE REPAIR OR AUTO SURFACE CENTER USES HERE, BUT THIS IS THE SITE OF THE CURRENT UM, LANDSCAPE COMPANY AND THEY DO WANT TO STORE ITEMS BOTH HERE IN THE REAR.
THEY CURRENTLY HAVE ITEMS STORED AND THEN HERE IN REQUIRE UM, AND USE SOME MATERIALS.
NOW THE SITE ITSELF AGAIN IT HAS TO REPAIR SERVICE CENTER ALL THROUGHOUT PROPERTY AND THEN HAVE ADDITIONAL REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE INDUSTRIAL INSIDE AND PRIVATE BUS TO THE EAST YOU HAVE SHOWROOM HOUSE, THE CONTRACTORS MAINTENANCE ARE 70 AND VEHICLE EAST SERVICE CENTER AND VEHICLE OR REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND BOTH THE SOUTH YES WE HAVE OFFICE SHOWROOM USE WHICH SHOWN ME THIS AREA HERE IS A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT SITE THE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY FROM SITE AND THAT'S WHERE YOU PC THOSE MATERIAL MATERIALS IN THE STORE THERE.
SO SINCE THEY THE OUTSIDE STORAGE OF MATERIALS FOR THE CONSIDERED A CONTRACTOR'S MEETING SIR, AND THIS IS THE SECOND PART OF PROPERTY THAT DOES INCLUDE ALL THOSE STATEMENTS DEALS FOR AUTO SERVICE CENTER AND REPAIR AND THIS IS THAT FORM AND THE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR, I WAS NOT ABLE TO ACCESS THAT
[01:05:01]
CLOSE FEET AT THAT SECTION.THIS IS A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY BUT I HAD TO ACCOUNT GOOGLE BOARD TO SHOW REVIEW THAT SITE AND THEN YOU ARE SURROUND USE, SO MOSTLY OFFSHORE HOUSE OR RELATED TO VEHICLE OR AUTO SERVICE CENTER AND THEN THIS IS THE OTHER CONTRACTOR 10 71 JUST TO SEE RIGHT THERE.
AND THEN THIS IS MORE OFFICER LOWER HOUSE TO THE SOUTH, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD TO I DISTRICT O CS THEY'RE QUITE SIMILAR IN REALITY THIS IS REALLY A REDUCTION OF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS WHEN IT COMES TO THE MAXIMUM DENSITY HEIGHT AND THOSE ARE THE MAJOR THINGS I GUESS THE SIDE, YOUR YARD IS REDUCED BUT ONLY NOVEMBER, NONE IN THIS AREA.
BUT OVERALL MAJOR REDUCTION IN HEIGHT, IT CAN BE NOTED AS WELL AS THE DENSITY OR UM, F FA R WHICH IS NOW LIMITED.
IT DID PROVIDE ANY RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE BEING VOLUNTEERED BY AGAIN THAT ELIMINATED SEVERAL THESE CATEGORIES AND COMBINED WITH THE KEY DESCRIPTIONS, STAFF DOES FEEL THAT THE OVERALL SAFE CLAIM USES THAT ARE COMMITTED NOW CATEGORIES INCLUDING THAT CONTRACTORS MAINTENANCE ARE ALL OF THOSE DO HAVE SOME REQUIREMENT EITHER FOR A CITY USE PERMIT OR RESIDENTIAL ENCY REVIEW TO THEY WILL BE GAUGE AS FAR AS THEIR GREATNESS OR REQUIRE FURTHER ACTION BY UM, THE CITY INITIATIVE CITY COUNCIL.
LIKE LET'S SAY THEY DECIDED TO INSTALL SOMETHING UM, BEYOND OR MAINTAIN MORE SAND GRAVE MATERIALS THAT WOULD REQUIRE T P.
ADDITIONALLY THIS USED CONTRACTORS MAY CONCERN AS REQUIRE STREAMING TO BE SURROUNDED THE SITE AND SCREENING HAS TO BE ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 51 A ARE SCREENING REGULATIONS REQUIRED SO PUT SOLID IN NATURE UM, AS BE OF SOME PROOF MATERIAL BE WOOD OR FIRM AND SUCH.
SO THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT.
THIS IS THE SAND SALES AND STORAGE AND IT WOULD REQUIRE AN S P, THIS IS FACILITY FORTOR AND SELLING SAND.
THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY PROPOS AT THIS TIME.
THEY WOULD NOT BE FOR STORM AND SELLING WOULD BE FOR USE IN THEIR ACTUAL LENDING BUSINESS AND THEY STILL HAVE NOW IN MY REPORT I DID NOTICE THAT MY PARKING SECTION REFERRED TO WAREHOUSE PARKING RATIOS.
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY I THAT, BUT THIS IS AN OFFICE SHOWING WAREHOUSE USE.
THEY'RE REQUIRED TO BACK PER CODE SO THE OFFICE SHOW WAREHOUSE PORTION WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN UM, FOR THE OFFICE SECTION, ONE FLOOR AREA FOR THE SPACE.
THEY HAVE THE SPECIFICATIONS THERE AND THEN THE PROPOSED REQUIRED ROOM SPACE FOR THOUSAND SQUARE FEET SITE AREA, EXCLUSIVE EXCLUSIVE PARKING AREA.
SO WHEN THEY GO IN FOR THEIR CO FOR THIS, IF USE IT DOES GET THROUGH THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO DEME WHICH SECTIONS OF BOTH EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE CEO THAT THEY HAVE AS WELL AS THE C AND WHY THAT PROPOSED.
WHAT AREAS ARE BEING USED FOR EACH PROPERTY WOULD BE THE CONDITION PILES MATERIAL PROBLEM, THE CARS AND ALL THAT IS THERE IS IS THIS UM, BUSINESS OFFERING WAY HERE THE SAME WAY I DON'T CONCERN AT THIS POINT I DID CONTACT BOTH CO
[01:10:03]
HISTORY AS FAR AS UM, ANY ON MATERIALS OR OVERFLOW MISMANAGEMENT MATERIALS AND SUCH AND SO I'M NOT AWARE THAT BUT THIS UM, LADIES ABOUT SIX FOOT SPRAY, THAT'S RIGHT AND THERE WERE NO LIMITATIONS.NOTHING IF YOU LOOK AT OTHER OPEN STORAGE CATEGORY FOR ADJUST OUTSIDE REMAIN LIMITATIONS AS TOTING OR UM, AREAS THAT SETBACK OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO RE THE STORAGE OF THOSE ITEMS OUTSIDE THAT THIS DOES NOT HAVE THAT REQUIRES SCREENING AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AND SO REQUIRED.
DID YOU HAVE ANY CONCERNS? I WENT THROUGH THE LIST THAT WERE MADE AFTER THE ZONING CHANGE GOES PUBLIC SCHOOL? YES, JUST LOOKING AT UM, DEFINITELY IN THE TIP OF MY REVIEW I WAS NOT CONCERNED USES I THINK THAT UM, THEY'LL PROBABLY, THE REMAINING USES ARE PRETTY MUCH APPROPRIATE AND SOME RARE EXCUSES THAT NEED SCHOOL ANY UM, THE CASE IS ZOOM 2 2 3 0 1 50.
THE APPLICATION IS FOR UH, THE GENERAL IS ON REQUEST FOR AN RR RETAIL DISTRICT ON PROPERTY EXAMINES AS CR COMMUNITY REFILL DISTRICT WITH DATE RESTRICTIONS.
IT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST LINE OF SOUTH CAL HILL ROAD SOUTH OF EAST REDFORD LANE.
UM, IT IS ON THE SOUTH OF DALLAS AS MENTIONED IT IS ALONG SOUTH RO HILL ROAD.
IT'S JUST SOUTH OF REDFORD LANE.
UH, DONIQUE MAP AROUND THE AREA, UH, IT IS ON DEVELOPED TO THE NORTH IS CS ON THE SOUTH, IT'S ALSO UNDEVELOPED, IT IS N OA AND THEN ADJACENT TO THE EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
AND THEN UH, TO THE WEST ACROSS SOUTH ACROSS ROAD HILL THERE IS UH, GOING ON CONSTRUCTION OF A JOURNAL MERCHANDISE OR FOOD STORE DOZEN 3,500 SQUARE FEE WITH A MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING STATION.
THE ERICA IS CURRENTLY AS I MENTIONED AS THE OUR COMMUNITY DISTRICT AND THERE THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON SITE.
THE CURRENT, OUR COMMUNITY RETO DISTRICTS SIGN DOES NOT ALLOW THE PROPOSED VEHICLE DISPLAY CELLS AND SERVICE USE.
THEREFORE THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO RESUME TO AN R OUR REGIONAL RECALL DISTRICT WITH WHICH PERMITS TO USE SUBJECT TO A RESIDENTIAL AGENCY REVIEW AS SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS AND IT'S MENTIONED, UH, THE SIDE DOES HAVE AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, UH, MORE OF ON THE
[01:15:10]
THE NORTH.UM, THERE IS AN UNDEVELOPED UH, PROPERTY THEN CS AND THEN UH, TO OUR, THE NORTH NORTHWEST ACROSS RED BIRD LANE IT'S ALSO UNDEVELOPED.
AND THEN ACROSS SOUTH, UH, CORO, UH, LOOKING TO THE WEST, IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND THEN TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THAT PROPERTY IT'S ALSO UM, DEVELOPED AND THEN UH, TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE PROPERTY, UM, IT IS DEVELOPED AND THEN SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, UM, SO THE EXISTING AS IS CR UM, AND THEY ARE PROPOSING AN RR, THERE ARE EXISTING DIG DESCRIPTIONS TO DO WITH THIS REQUEST, THE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO THEIR REVIEW CR AND THEN INSTANCE BETWEEN THE CR AND RR.
OH, WOULD YOU EXPLAIN TO ME, I HEARD A COUPLE THINGS.
YOU SAID THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CR AND RR AND WHY THEY, WOULD YOU SAY THAT? YES, SO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CR IS THAT THE CR DOES NOT ALLOW A VEHICLE DISPLAY CELLS AND SERVICE.
SO THAT'S WHY THERE ARE QUANTIT REQUEST PR RRR WHICH DOES ALLOW THAT USED, BUT WITH A UH, RESIDENTIAL UH, AGENCY.
OKAY, WHAT'S A RESIDENTIAL AGENCY? SO, UH, THAT UH, WELL IS IT'S UH, SO THIS WILL BE ALLOWED WITH SUBJECT TO RESIDENTIAL AGENCY REVIEW FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION AT PER, SO THE PROCEDURE FOR REPORTING SYSTEM IS QUICK AND EASY TO USE.
SIMPLY GO ONLINE TO DALLAS POLICE.NET.
SO IT'S LIKE A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BUT FOR THE
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, WE MEAN THE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE ON IT WITH THE CURRENT ZONING, THEY'RE NOT ADDING ANY KEY RESTRICTIONS? CORRECT.
DO YOU HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT SOME OF THE PRETTY INTENSE USES THAT COULD BE BY UNDER, GIVEN THAT RESIDENTIAL CAR WASH? A LOT OF THOSE USES TO ME ARE SEEM VERY PROBLEMATIC.
THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH IS ALREADY C CS AS WELL, SO IF THAT'S A HIGHER CAPACITY AND THEN, UM, BECAUSE OF PROPERTY IS UH, CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING PATTERN EXISTING ON THE PRINCIPAL WIDTH OF A HUNDRED FEET, THAT CAN SUPPORT A MORE DISTRICT, RIGHT? YES.
UM, THERE'S A OFF THE PROPERTY ITSELF, I, THERE'S A HOME SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON THAT PROPERTY CURRENTLY.
AND IN YOUR YOU SAID THAT THEY GONNA USE THAT EXISTING BUILDING, UM, TO OUT OF IS THAT SINGLE FAMILY HOME HAS TO BE REDEVELOPED WITHIN THE OPERATE HOURS.
SO THEN WE'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH, UH, SECTION TO MODIFY IT FOR, FOR THE USE THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.
ANY DECEMBER EIGHT, THE NEXT CASE IS Z 2 23 1 65.
[01:20:01]
APPLICATION IS FOR MU ONE DISTRICT ON PROPERTIES AND ACR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT.ON THE ROAD WAS THE SOUTH LINE PAST ROAD, IT'S AS A ALONG THE LANCASTER CORRIDOR IN THE SOUTH DALLAS.
UH, THIS IS UH, AERIAL MAP OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN, UH, ZONING AROUND THE, THE PROPERTY.
SO ADJACENT TO THE, TO THE WEST.
UM, IT IS CURRENTLY AS WELL CR HOWEVER THERE IS SINGLE FAMILY AND THEN TO THE EAST, UM, IT'S ALSO CR UH, HOWEVER IT IS UNDEVELOPED TO THE NORTH IS UM, ALSO UNDEVELOPED.
AND THEN THERE IS AN OUT SERVICE CENTER ON THE NORTHEAST AND THERE'S A VEHICLE DISPLAY FILLED AND SERVICES ON THE SOUTH WEST, I MEAN SOUTHEAST.
AND THEN ON THE SOUTH OF THE ADJACENCY THERE IS A CURRENCY OF CHURCH.
AND THEN UM, ALONG THE WEST THERE'S ALSO T H R UH, A DISTRICT AND AS I MENTIONED THE R 7.5 DISTRICT, WHICH IS ALSO UH, FOR SINGLE FAMILY.
UH, BACKGROUND ABOUT THIS PROPERTY AS I MENTIONED IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND IS DONE CR COMMUNITY RETAIL.
THE APPLICANT ENTERED PRESENT IN MV ONE NIXON DISTRICT TO ALLOW A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBER PROPERTY BACK IN 2015.
THERE TION PERMIT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY ISSUED FOR THIS SITE.
THE SUM OF THE SITE CODES, UH, THIS IS THE SIDE LOOKING STAFF AND THEN TO THE STAFF AS I MENTIONED, IS ALSO UNDEVELOPED IN COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY.
UM, IT'S ALSO CR HOWEVER THERE IS UM, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ONTO THOSE TWO UH, PROPERTIES AS I MENTIONED, UH, TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE PROPERTY ACROSS HAM AND THEN TO THE LOOKING EAST ON HAM.
AND THEN, UH, SOUTHEAST IS ALL ESTIMATE UNDEVELOPED AND THEN LOOKING SOUTH ON FORDHAM.
UM, AS MENTIONED, THOSE TWO HOMES RIGHT THERE, UH, THEY ARE SINGLE UH, FOUND HOMES HARBOR THE ZONE FOR THOSE TWO PROPERTIES ARE CR INTERESTING THAT AND THEN UH, TO THE WEST, UNDER NORTH WEST AND THEN ON THE STANDARDS.
UM, SO THE EXISTING CR AS MENTIONED 15 FEET THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING UH, ANATOMY WHICH IS ALSO TAKEN.
HOWEVER, UM, IF A BLOCK IS DIVIDED BY TWO OR MORE ZONING DISTRICT, THE FRONT YARD FOR THE ENTIRE BLOCK MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DISTRICT WITH THE GREATEST FRONT YARD REQUIREMENT.
AND UM, BECAUSE THERE IS, YOU MENTIONED UM, ART, THE DISTRICT WITH DISTRICT IS AN R 7.5, SO THE FRONT SUFFOLK IS WILL BE 25.
AND THEN BETWEEN THE CR AND THE, CAN YOU MAKE THAT, OH LIANA, IF YOU HIT, IF YOU HOLD DOWN CONTROL AND THEN SCROLL FORWARD THAT THERE ARE ONES THERE,
UH, UNDER RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY.
SO, AND THEN, UM, SO THIS PROPERTY IS UNDER THE DALLAS CHILD LAN RECORDER STATION AREA CLIMB.
SO THE SITE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA AROUND THE TWO DARK STATIONS ALONG LANCASTLE CORRIDOR THAT HAVE EXPERIENCED BIG DECLINE, THE COST OF CLIENT EMISSIONS LAND SITE TO BE URBAN MIXED USE AND URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH WILL INCORPORATE NEW HOUSING OPTIONS AS WELL AS NEW COMMERCIAL JOBS OPPORTUNITIES AND PROVIDING LEASE TO CASTLE APPROVAL.
I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THIS GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY AND THE UNDERLAND CR OKAY.
DO THEY HAVE A LEFT TO STAND ON IN COMPLAINING
[01:25:01]
ABOUT THIS SINCE IT'S ALREADY CR I MEAN CAN THEY OPPOSE THIS IF THEY'RE KIND OF IN, IN A COMPATIBLE ZONE? YEAH, I GUESS SO.BUT THEY, OKAY BECAUSE THIS IS JUST FOR A ZONING CHANGE, THEY DON'T, THEY HAVEN'T SUBMITTED ANY KIND OF CONCEPT PLAN OR NOT? NOT THAT I KNOW OF.
HOW DID THAT GET TO BE? SINGLE, SINGLE FAMILY COULD BE ON NO, THAT'S THE REASON WHY THEY'RE DON'T TO TO ADD YOU.
YEAH, BUT I'M JUST SAYING, I MEAN THAT'S INTERESTING.
NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT THOSE CR AND THAT'S OKAY, IT'S NOT, YEAH, SO THEY JUST DID IT I THOUGHT IN THE NOTES THAT SAID THERE'S NEVER BEEN ANY COMMERCIAL USE HERE.
SO IT'S LIKE MY PUNCH IS THAT SOMEONE MAY WANNA ME IS THAT SOMEBODY JUST SLAPPED A ZONING CODE ON THIS AREA WITHOUT OH INTEREST THE AREA AREA MAP THAT I FOUND THERE WAS A HOME SINCE THE THERE SINCE LIKE 1950.
EXCUSE ME, NINE DISPOSED BY COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT.
UH, ARE THERE ANY UPDATES ON NUMBER NINE OR BRIEF MR. IT'S BEEN BRIEFED BEFORE.
UM, WE HAVEN'T DONE THE UPDATES OR ANYTHING SINCE WE RE-ADVERTISED IT WITH CONSIDERATION FOR TH THREE.
UM, I HAVE A PRESENTATION READY FOR THAT BUT IT'S REALLY JUST UH, ADDS THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE TH THREE DISTRICT WHICH ARE IN THE REPORT.
UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS STILL DENIAL AS IT PUBLISHED ON THE DOCKET.
UM, BUT WE COULD BE OPEN TO A TH THREE IF THE APPLICANT WERE TO VOLUNTEER FEE RESTRICTIONS SIMILAR TO WHAT HAS BEEN DONE SIMILAR, SIMILAR CASES RECENTLY.
UM, AND I HAVE THOSE IN MY BACK POCKET IF WE NEED TO LOOK AT THAT.
HAVE YOU HAD CONTACT WITH, OKAY, I HAVE.
IS THAT POSSIBLE IN TERMS OF JURISDICTION? THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.
UM, I THINK THIS CASE IS MORE UM, OR WHERE WE LEFT OFF WAS MORE DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE COMMISSIONER.
UNFORTUNATELY SHE HAS BEEN OUT OF POCKET, SO UM, THAT'S KIND OF THE CURRENT STATUS I GUESS VERY COMMISSIONER, NO QUESTION AM I RIGHT THAT BLOCK CONTINUITY WILL APPLY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING THE BLOCK HAS DUTY THAT THEP WOULD MATCH, COULD MATCH THE EXISTING R SO IT WOULDN'T CREATE A DISRUPTION ON THE BLOCK? THAT'S CORRECT.
IN THE SAME WAY THAT D WOULD CAUSE HE REQUIRES 25 FEET BACK WHERE RESIDENTIAL IS ONLY 20 FEET BACK.
GOT AND NUMBER 10 WILL BE, WILL ALSO BE HELD.
OH TO AUGUST 3RD YOU SAID AUGUST 3RD? YES.
DO YOU ANY INFORMATION ON NUMBER 10? ANY QUESTIONS ON 10? NO.
[01:30:03]
OKAY, CAN YOU SEE THE PRESENTATION? YES.THIS IS A NEW SPECIFIC USE DEPARTMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT LIMITED TO THE RESTAURANT.
HAD PRIOR SERVICE ON JUST OVER A ACRE, THERE BEEN NO CHANGES TO REQUEST FOR MATERIAL SINCE A UM, MAY 18TH HEARING WHERE IT'S HELD AND NOT BRIEFED.
THEY HAVE TWO 20 DEGREES OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED ON APRIL 16TH, 2021, WHICH IN THOSE TWO SUITE 19 20 19 22 3 MILL AVENUE, THEY OCCUPY A TOTAL FLOOR AREA 3,820 SQUARE FEET AND THEN THE HALF AND PATIO AREA OF EIGHT 50 SQUARE FEET.
PD NUMBER 8 42 DEFINES THE HOURS ESTABLISHMENT PERSONAL USE THAT OPERATE AND THE APPLICANT OPERATION HOURS FOR THE REST TO OPERATE UNTIL MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN NORTH GREENVILLE, SOUTH AT WARM STREET AND GREENVILLE AVENUE AND THERE WE ARE, THAT'S THE SUBJECT.
TWO SUITES, UM, LOCATED SOUTH OF THAT INTERSECTION ON GREENFIELD AVENUE AND THE PROPERTY CONTAIN MULTIPLE RETAIL PERSONAL SERVICE EXCUSES CURRENTLY.
AND THEN TO THE NORTH WE HAVE ADDITIONAL GENERAL FOOD STORE, ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS WITH BAR RESTAURANT, CLEAN ELECTRICAL TO THE NORTH AND THEN TO THE EAST OF SURFACE PARKING AND OFFICE TO SOUTH BEVERAGE WITH EIGHT HOUSE.
UM, A RESTAURANT WITHOUT DRIVE THROUGH WHICH WEST? WELL WE HAVE A INCLUDING ESTABLISHMENT BY SUV ON SITE HERE, DRIVE FROM AVENUE AND THESE ARE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
WE HAVE GENERAL MERCHANDISER, FOOD STORE TAVERN WITH LATE HOURS AND ADDITIONAL RESTAURANT USES.
THIS IS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FORUM HUGO.
AND THEN IT IS TIED, WHICH IS ALSO THE PART TAVERN PART OF THIS FALL.
AND THEN THE REMAINDER OF THE SUITES HERE ON THE SITE AND THEN LOCATED SOUTH ON ALTA AVENUE GREENVILLE INCLUDING AN SV FOR ANOTHER.
THERE IS PARKING ACROSS GREENVILLE TO THE BEST AND THEN THERE WAS A STARBUCKS THAT COMING UP WHEN I ARRIVED.
AND THEN ON THE, THIS IS THE ADJACENT TO THE EAST AND TO THE EAST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ACTUALLY IS IN OFFICE DISTRICT.
AND THEN ADJACENT UH, RESIDENTIAL THESIS LOCATED POST, THIS IS THE PROPOSAL TO BE SITELINE, IT IDENTIFIES THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AND THEN TWO SPECIFIC SUITES EXHIBIT THE PATIO SECTION THAT'S OUT THE STATUS IN THE FRONT ALONG GREEN AVENUE.
UM, IT ALSO IDENTIFIES THAT HERE THE PATIO AREA IS NOT BEING PARKED AND IT'S BECAUSE IT IS AN UNCOVERED PATIO BASED WHAT THEY ARE REQUESTING FROM THIS SUV BASED OFF OF WHICH MEANS THAT THEY NOTED PATIO WITHOUT ANYTHING PROVIDING TOWARDS FOR SITE PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR TWO YEARS, IT SHOWS THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,670 AS SHOWN PLAN.
THIS CONDITION SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED EXTERIOR PATIO AND THEN IT IDENTIFIES THE HOURS OF OPERATION AS BEING UNTIL 2:00 AM SUNDAY AND THE USE OF THE OUTSIDE BEING LIMITED BETWEEN THOSE LATE HOURS OF MIDNIGHT TO 2:00 AM OTHER TIMES IT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO USE THOSE.
SO THERE WAS A CRIME REPORT WHICH I REQUESTED FROM D P E AND HE SHOWED THREE CALLS FROM THE TIME PERIOD OF JANUARY 1ST, 2021 TO ACTUALLY, UM, TO PRESENT.
I HAD A REVISED AND DOUBLE CHECKED ON IT AND THERE WERE GONNA DO A CALLS STILL AND ONLY THREE CALLS THAT MADE GUARDIAN PROPERTIES IN 19 20 19 AVENUE.
THERE ARE ADDITIONAL FOR HOURS
[01:35:01]
OF ESTABLISHMENT, THESE ARE ITEMS THAT HE'S TAKING INTO ACCOUNT WHEN THEY'RE CONSIDERING MAKING THEIR RECOMMENDATION ON THIS REQUEST.THE NUMBER OF CITATIONS, THE NUMBER OF CITATIONS THAT YOU RELEASED FOR NOISE APPOINTMENTS, VIOLATIONS, STUDY THE ESTABLISHMENT PD HAS REPORTED NONE.
I DOUBLE CHECKED THE CODE COMPLIANCE AT THIS TIME.
YOU WEREN'T ABLE TO TELL ME THERE BEEN ANY RELATING TO NOISE.
THEY WOULD BE SEARCHING THE ITEM AND CASE IS CALLED OFF THAT THE NEXT REPORT AND THE NUMBER OF ARREST PUBLIC INTOXICATION COMMON ASSOCIATED WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT.
THERE HAVE BEEN NONE THE NUMBER OF T C VIOLATIONS.
I DID RESEARCH THAT THROUGH THE STATE WEBSITE THERE HAVE BEEN NONE AND THERE PERMITTED IS UP TO DATE AND THE NUMBER OF VIOLENT CRIMES ASSOCIATED WITH ESTABLISHMENT.
THERE IS A COPY SHOWING THAT IT'S UP TO DATE.
THE LAST ONE THAT WAS THE FILE MATERIALS, IT SHOWED EXPIRING AND SINCE WE JULY, UM, SO STAFF IS TWO SITE AND CONDITIONS.
THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THOSE AREAS.
IF THERE'S ANY ISSUES COVERING OR EXISTING PERMITS WHICH ARE STILL UN THEY HAVE NOT COMPLETED, THEY WILL REQUIRED TO, UM, TO COMPLETE THAT PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS AND FOLLOWING LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AREAS THAT YOU REQUEST.
FEW QUESTIONS MR. I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS.
UH, STARTING WITH YOU JUST WANT OVER THE FACTORS.
UM, FOR THE ADDITIONAL FACTORS FOR SGP ON OR PD EIGHT TWO, UM, WHY WERE THOSE NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR, UM, BRIEFING IN THE DOCKET? I DID NOT PUT THEM IN THE DOCKET AND AS SOON AS I REALIZED THAT I HAD, YES.
UM, AND THEN THE CASE REPORT HAS A PARKING ANALYSIS THAT SUGGESTS THAT THE PATIO, WHICH IS 150 SQUARE FEET, WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE REQUIRED PARKING, BUT THEN THE PARKING ANALYSIS ON THE SITE AND DOESN'T INCLUDE THE PATIO.
AND THEN IT COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT YOU NEED THREE SPACES, BUT REGARDLESS OF HOW YOU DO THE MATH, WHETHER YOU INCLUDE THE PATIO SPACES OR NOT, IT DOESN'T ADD UP TO THREE.
HOW DID YOU ARRIVE AT THREE SPACES NEEDED? SORRY.
UM, I DO REALIZE THAT THE WAY THAT I DESCRIBED IT IN THE PARKING SECTION WAS A COMPUTER AND WRAP THE REPORT.
IT DOES SEEM LIKE THE PATIO IS BEING PARKED, BUT IT'S NOT.
SO IT'S BASED ON THE INTERIOR FLOOR SPACE ONLY, WHICH IS 3,820 SQUARE FEET.
AND THEN WHEN YOU ADD THE REST OF THE SUITES ON THE PROPERTY, THE TOTAL OF 105 SPACES, WHICH IS ALSO BROKEN DOWN ON THE SITE, THEN IT IS ALSO QUANTIFYING ALL THOSE RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS LISTED WITHIN THE SAME BUILDING IN THE DIFFERENT SUITES.
AND THAT IS THE TOTAL REQUIREMENT.
BUT IF I ACTUALLY GET OUT CALCULATOR AND DO THE MATH, THEN THE RESTAURANT SPACE WOULD BE 5,152 SQUARE FEET FOR ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS AND THEN THESE TWO COMBINED WOULD BE 38 20.
IF YOU INCLUDE THE PATIO IT'S 47 46 70, WHICH GETS ME THE 98 22 FOR RESTAURANTS.
SO IF IT'S PART TO CODE, THAT'D BE 98 SPACES.
RIGHT? UM, SO ULTIMATELY THE 105 SPACES THAT ARE AVAILABLE, IT WILL BE THERE TO BE, TO ENSURE THAT THEY NEED COKE IN SOME WAY OF PROVIDING THE REQUIRED PARKING AT PERMIT.
BUT SO WE'RE NOTING ON THE PLAN DONE FOR SEVERAL OTHER CASES THAT HAVE PARKING LIKE THIS, THAT THEY ARE UTILIZING THE PARKING AGREEMENT, PARKING THAT'S, UM, NEARBY THE CASES SITE THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.
BUT HOWEVER, THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO, THEY HAVE A PARKING WELL, ITS OF THEM, ESPECIALLY WITH THE PARKING SITUATION TO BE CODE REQUIREMENT TO ENSURE THAT THEY CAN LEAVE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
BUT GRANTED AN S DOES NOT GUARANTEE THEM TO ACTUALLY OBTAIN A CO AND OPERATE THAT USE.
THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.
SO HOW MANY SHOES TO PROVE THAT THEY NEED THE LEGAL PARKING FOR THAT ENTIRE, BUT ESPECIALLY THE BEST
[01:40:01]
YOU CAN SAY, AREA IS UP TO THEM.THAT THAT DOESN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION.
MY QUESTION IS, WHEN I LOOK AT THE CASE REPORT AND THE SITE PLAN, THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME SORT OF CONCLUSION THAT 103 SPACES ARE NEEDED FOR THESE BUILDINGS, BUT WHEN I ACTUALLY DO THE MATH, IT COMES OUT TO 112 OF YOUR PARKING AT PATIO.
AND SO WHEN YOU GUYS DID THE MATH AND YOU CONTEMPLATED TO BE PARKED.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OTHER SEVEN SPACES? IF THERE'S FIVE AVAILABLE, WHY? WHY ISN'T THAT MATH THAT CAUSE AND I'M GONNA SAY THIS IS AN ISSUE ON ALL OF THESE CASES, THAT THERE'S A DISCREPANCY IN WHAT THE CASE REPORT SAYS, WHAT THE CASE REPORT FINDS, WHAT THE SITE PLAN SHOWS.
IT'S LIKE THERE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE AN EFFORT TO GO THROUGH AND ACTUALLY DO THE MATH AND FIGURE OUT HOW MUCH PARKING YOU NEED.
AND IF THE CASE REPORT SAYS ONE THING AND THE SIDE PLAN SAYS ANOTHER AND WE PASS THE SSTP, WHAT HAPPENS THEN? IT WILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE PARKING CAUSE WHAT I CAN SAY IS THAT AS A STAFF MEMBER, WE ASSESS THE CASE, WE DO THE RESEARCH, WE PULL THE COS, WE CHECK THE PARKING.
IF WE MADE A MATH ERROR, I APPRECIATE YOU WE'RE TELLING US.
WE ARE GLAD TO GO BACK AND REASSESSING.
LOOK FOR THOSE SEVEN PARKING SPACES.
DEFINITELY PARKING ON MULTI SUITE COMPLEX HAZARD.
ITS ISSUED ESPECIALLY GROUNDING SQUARE FOOTAGES AND CAN LEAD TO FRACTION OF DIFFERENCES IN THE OUTCOME OF WHAT IS REQUIRED PARKING.
THOSE HAVE TO BE LOOKED AT IN TOTALITY ORDER TO IDENTIFY THE FINAL PARKING REQUIRED.
NOW WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THESE TWO SPECIFIC SEATS, WE WOULD USE EXACTLY WHAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS THAT'S BEING PROPOSED AS REQUIRED TO PARK BY CODE AND STATE THAT ON THE SITE 10 AGAIN, IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE REQUEST, BETWEEN THE REPORT, BETWEEN THE PRESENTATION THAT I SHOWED YOU OR THE SITE PHONE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LET STAFF KNOW.
AND AS PROFESSIONALS WE WILL TAKE THAT BACK, WE'LL REVIEW IT, WE'LL DEVISE IT, WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT IT'S THE BEST INFORMATION THAT'S AVAILABLE.
BUT THOSE DISCREPANCIES, THEY DEFINITELY WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING THAT THEY WOULD GET AWAY WITH.
IT WOULDN'T BE GRANTED A VARIANCE OF SEVEN SPACES CAUSE IT BE AN ERROR AT ZONING.
THEY WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE BASE CODE.
AND SO WHEN THEY CAME IN WITH FCO AND WHEN THEY CAME IN AND SAID, I HAVE MY, AND THE SITE PEN SAYS I ONLY HAVE TO PROVIDE AS MANY SPACES, THAT'S INCORRECT.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, BENEFITS CONDITIONS AND THE CONDITIONS THAT HAVE AND AT THE END OF THE DAY REQUIREMENTS THAT WHAT THEY HAVE TO BE HELD TO AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S OUR JOB TIME, ANY ERRORS.
UM, SECOND QUESTION, I THINK YOU HAD SAID YOU CHECKED YOUR CODE AND THEY SAID THERE'S NO EXISTING VIOLATION.
I'M TOLD THE CODE HAS AN OPEN CASE REGARDING THE PARKING LOTS THAT ARE UM, PARKING, THOSE PARKING SIDES THAT ARE THE EAST.
WELL THERE ARE THREE PARKING LOTS THAT ARE PART OF THE PARKING FOR THIS SIDE.
AND I'M TOLD BY CODE COMPLIANCE THEY HAVE AN OPEN CASE REGARDING THOSE LAWS.
THE ADDRESSES THAT THEY USED TO SEARCH THE HISTORY FOR ME WERE SPECIFIC TO THESE TWO SUITES FOR THE AREA OF REQUEST.
WELL I UNDERSTAND THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE TOTALITY OF THE ENTIRE FIELD SITE, MULTIPLE SPEEDS ON THIS ONE BLOCK AND THEIR REMOTE PARKING.
THAT'S PROBABLY LOCATED ON SEPARATE BLOCKS THAT THE CURRENT FORM THEN I'M NOT CERTAIN WHICH ONES HAVE THE CODE HISTORY, BUT IT'S DEFINITELY NOT THE AREA OF REQUEST.
WELL I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING IS WHEN YOU DO A CODE SWEEP THAT'S PART OF THIS, DO YOU ALSO CHECK THE LOTS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THEIR PARKING AGREEMENTS? AND IF NOT, NO.
AND WE HAVE SPEAK TO THE RATIONAL HOURS.
THE BARGAINING IS NOT TIED TO THE HOURS THE BARGAINING.
SO THEREFORE THEY WILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH PARKING CANNOT.
WELL I'M NOT SURE THAT, BUT UM, SHE ANSWERED MY QUESTION.
OK, MR. COMMISSIONER? UH, YEAH,
[01:45:01]
MY QUESTION IS JUST AS A CLARIFICATION, SO HAVING OUTDOOR SPEAKERS ON AN OPEN PATIO TO MIDNIGHT IS ACCEPTABLE UNDER THE CODE IN THIS LOCATION.IS THAT CORRECT? SEVEN DAYS SEE A PROVISION THAT RESTRICTED THEM.
Y'ALL HAVE AND WHAT WE HAVE COMMONLY SEEN AMONG PEOPLE IS THAT THEY RESTRICT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENTS, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT I BROUGHT THE APPLICANT'S ATTENTION CAUSE THEY WEREN PREVIOUSLY.
UM, THEY WEREN PREVIOUSLY TO SCRIPTING THAT AND SO WE REQUESTED THAT THEY DO RESTRICT IT IN SIMILAR NATURE TO OTHER LATE HOURS ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE VICINITY DUE TO THE RESIDENTIAL FREQUENCY OF THE SOUTHEAST.
SO IS YOUR REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT TO BE 10 O'CLOCK OR WHAT? 10:00 PM OR NO, IT'S TO LIMIT THE LATE HOURS OPERATION COMING OUTSIDE SEEKS.
SO BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR HOWEVER SPEAKERS TO REGULAR TIME AND OPERATIONS OF THEIR BUSINESS.
BUT FOR THE LATE HOURS WE HAVE FOR THE RESTRICTED.
SO YOU'VE RESTRICTED IT TO MIDNIGHT? YES.
YOUR RESTRICTION IS TO MIDNIGHT AS OPPOSED TO TWO O'CLOCK.
THIS CLOSE TO RESIDENTIAL STAFF FOUND THAT TO BE APPROPRIATE COMPARISON TO THE GUY ESTABLISHMENT THE CITY.
IS THAT WHAT IT IS TODAY? THE SPEAKERS I BELIEVE ARE ARE THEY ON UNTIL MIDNIGHT TODAY? THAT WOULD, THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE A QUESTION.
SO THEY CURRENTLY ARE OPERATING UNTIL WHAT HOUR? NINE HOURS OF OPERATION.
SO THE S U IS TO GET THEM PAST MIDNIGHT? CORRECT.
SO DO THEY CURRENTLY HAVE AN S U THAT PERMITS ANYTHING PAST MIDNIGHT? NO.
SO WHEN THEY'RE REQUESTING, THEY'RE REQUESTING AN S U TO ALLOW THEM TO OPERATE FROM WELL MIDNIGHT TO TODAY AFTER SO WHAT ARE THEIR CURRENT HOURS? THEY OPERATE NORMAL.
THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T REQUIRE ANY SPECIAL PERMITS.
SO THEY'RE ALLOWED TO OPERATE AT MIDNIGHT.
GREEN AVENUE ONLY IDENTIFIES A TIME AT MIDNIGHT.
SO AT MIDNIGHT IS WHEN YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL PERMITS BEFORE THAT YOU'RE ALLOWED TO OPERATE.
THEY'RE CURRENTLY OPERATING UNTIL MIDNIGHT.
NO, THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE AGAIN, A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT AS FAR AS DO WITHOUT REGULATION BY THE WAY, I THINK WE'RE, WE ARE GONNA HOLD CASE QUESTION I'M SURE OVER THERE, UH, YOUR HONOR, MENTAL NOTES NOTES.
DO YOU KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY PROPERTIES THAT CURRENTLY HAVE ACTUALLY, DO YOU HAVE ANY PROPERTIES WITH OUTDOOR SPEAKERS IN THIS AREA? AND IF SO, HOW LATE ARE, DO THEY CURRENTLY HAVE PERMISSION TO DO THAT? UM, THE LAST THREE YEARS AND UM, WHAT'S, THEY HAVE THOSE ESTABLISHMENTS AND THEY ARE TALKING AT, I BELIEVE HE WAS AT MIDNIGHT AS WELL.
SO I CAN GO BACK AND PULL THOSE AND SHOW YOU THE ADJACENT CONDITION AND IT'S JUST REALLY IMPORTANT FOR PARENT STAFF.
THAT IS, THAT IS WHY CONDITION QUESTION.
UM, I, I WANNA UNDERSTAND THE PATIO.
MY UNDERSTANDING FROM YOU IS THAT ANY PATIO STRUCTURE THAT IS THERE IS NOT PRIMARILY, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.
WITH COMPLIANCE AND OUR LEAN COURT DIVISION, THEY DID TELL ME THAT THERE WAS A PERMIT REQUEST.
I DID FIND THAT PERMIT REQUEST, IT IS ON CUSTOMER.
THEY DID NOT PROCEED, RECEIVE COMMENTS ON CORRECTIONS THAT WERE NEEDED TO THEIR PLANS.
THEY DID NOT PROVIDE THOSE REVISIONS.
IT WAS STILL PENDING IN THE MIDDLE OF REVISIONS BASED ON THOSE COMMENTS.
[01:50:01]
THEY WERE FLAG FOR HAVING THEIR UM, THEIR PERMIT, I MEAN SORRY, THEIR PATIO STRUCTURE.AND THEN FOR COVERING THAT PATIO STRUCTURE, THEY WERE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR THE PERMIT, WHICH THEY DID, BUT THEY WERE FLAGGED PRIMARILY DUE TO THE COVERING OF THE PATIO.
THEY REMOVED THAT COVERING AND THEY FEEL THAT THAT ISSUED THE FULL CONFINE.
HOWEVER, THERE'S STILL PENDING OF NOT HAVING THE RULING PERMIT FOR INSTRUC TO BEGIN WITH.
AND THEN NOW WE SEEN THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO US THAT THERE IS A, ON THAT THE DETERMINATION LIKELY THAT IS AND NOT HOWEVER THAT TERMINATION STILL HAVE TO BE MADE PERMIT REVIEW AND THEY STILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH ISSUES LOCATION AND THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE OVERALL, IT'S ANTED EQUAL STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME AND THEY NEED TO COMPLY WITH THAT DIRECTOR.
THIS IS APPROXIMATELY SQUARE IS AN AREA ZONING SURROUNDED BY AND NORTH AND RESTAURANTS TO EAST, UH, COFFEE SHOP AND
THIS IS THE TALKING ABOUT FROM THIS IS ALLEY, UM, THIS IS FURTHER THE PARKING LOT SURROUNDING WEST.
THIS IS ACROSS, THIS IS FROM ALLEY PATIO AND THE ALLEY THAT THIS IS BACK, UH, AGAIN, THE BACK OF PROPERTY.
LOOKING FURTHER, THIS IS UM, THE EXISTING SUV SITE PLAN AND THIS U WAS, I DUNNO SOME OF THE SLIDES AND I ALWAYS HAD A BACKGROUND SLIDE, WHICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT.
SO, UM, THIS PROPERTY USED 10, THESE SUVS IS 2011 AND IT WAS APPROVED FIRST THREE YEARS AND THEN IT WAS APPROVED SUBSEQUENTLY FOR TWO YEAR, ONE YEAR AND THREE YEAR PERIOD THAT SAID TO EXPIRE IN MAY, BUT LEAST SUBMITTED IN TIME.
UM, SO THERE WAS IN BETWEEN ALL OF THESE, THE, THE BUILDING CHANGED THAT.
THEY CHANGED THE OPERATOR A FEW TIMES.
SO UNFORTUNATELY I GOT THIS AFTER I SCHEDULED IT AND I WAS WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT TO UPDATE THE SITE TO SURE SHOW THE CURRENT SITUATION ON THE SIDE.
CAUSE EVERY TIME YOU SUBMIT A RENEWAL, LIKE OBVIOUSLY WE DO OUR, UH, DUE DILIGENCE AND WE CHECK KIND OF LIKE IT WAS THE SAME AND I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T KEEP IT UP.
THEY DO HAVE A CO FROM 2017 THEY, THEY CHANGED, UH, THE OPERATORS SINCE EXAMPLE, LET THE APPLICANT ADDRESS THAT.
SO MY POINT IS THAT IN ALL OF THESE RENEWALS, THE, THE SITE PLAN WAS NEVER UPDATED.
THERE WAS ONE OF THE FIRST SUVS, UH, THESE ARE THE PICTURES THAT WE WENT THROUGH.
AND NOW GOING BACK TO THE SIDELINE.
SO THIS IS BASICALLY THE SIDELINE THAT WAS EXISTING.
I WAS LOOKING AT IT AND I, THE PANEL CONFIGURATION CHANGE, AND THIS IS ACTUALLY GOING BACK AND LOOKING INTO THE AERIAL PHOTOS FROM GOOGLE.
THIS WAS, THIS CORNER HERE WAS ALWAYS A BUILDING OF SOME SORT.
[01:55:01]
EITHER IT WAS JUST A WALL, IT ALWAYS HAD A STRUCTURE IN HERE.IT'S JUST THAT AGAIN, THE CONFIGURATION AND THE PATIO CHANGED WITH EACH DAY EACH.
SO THIS IS THE MOST UPDATED SITE THAT THEY SUBMITTED.
AND I INCLUDE IN THE PACKET LIKE THE LAST MINUTE.
BUT IT IS TRUE, WHEN WE CHECKED THE COMMAND AND THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOU TO REACHED OUT.
SO IN THE MEANTIME YESTERDAY THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED THIS AND I WANTED TO BRIEF IT TO YOU.
UH, FIRST THE PATIO, THEY SAY IT'S 420 SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS A VERY, VERY SMALL WHAT IT USED TO TAKING A PORTION FOR THE 88 GRANT COUNTY STAYED THE SAME.
THIS PORTION HERE WAS ALWAYS COUNTED PARKING BUILDING, THEY HAD DOORS AND THEN THE REQUIRED OBVIOUSLY FOLLOW THE TWO.
WE WILL BE LIKE A REQUIRED 33 PARKING SPACES.
THEY USED TO HAVE 32, THEY HAVE 12 GIVEN SPACES ON SITE AND THEY HAVE A PARKING PROPERTY FOR, FOR THE REST OF THE TIME.
UH, THIS IS A BETTER EXPLANATION FROM, SO AGAIN, I LOOKED INTO, WE CHANGED CONDITIONS LAST TIME.
I WAS INTENDING TO FIRST U P AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
THERE WAS, THERE WAS A MISTAKE WHEN WE DID THEP LAST TIME TWO YEARS AGO.
SO NOW I'M CORRECTING ALL OF THOSE, WHICH ARE BASICALLY OUR INTENT WAS TO OBVIOUSLY CORRECT THE SQUARE P OBVIOUSLY TO THE FAMILY FOR TWO FOR TWO YEARS.
AND ALL OF THESE THAT'S IN THIS GREEN TYPE OF COLOR IS WHAT WAS IN THE SUV CONDITION.
ANYWAYS, JUST THAT I WAS LOOKING AGAIN IN ONE OF THE FOUR I WAS LOOKING AT WRONG.
THE PREVIOUS SUV HAD THE HOUR 3:00 PM BUT IT ALSO SAID THAT ALL CUSTOMERS MIGHT BE THE PROPERTY BY TWO 15.
SO NOW WE'RE CORRECTING TO SAY 2:00 PM AND IT'S STILL TWO 15 AS IT USED TO BE.
AND THEN IF IT WAS HERE THE LAST TIME IS NOT PREVIOUS VERSION.
SO THEY CANNOT HAVE ALL THOSE OUTDOOR, LIKE THOSE ARE COMPLET.
THE PATIO IS BY 2:00 PM AT 2:00 AM UM, THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO OUTDOORS, UH, PARKING CLASSIFICATION THAT, SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS, DO YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF WE GOT YESTERDAY.
THIS IS, THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE PATIO.
YOU SEE UM, WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY? YES, IF YOU ARE LOOKING IN INDICAT, THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE FROM HERE, PROBABLY THE VISIBLE APPROACHING, I WAS LOOKING ON GOOGLE UP TO LIKE, WAIT 2005.
IT EVEN WAS LIKE AN NEIGHBORHOOD MASON WALL BEFORE WHEN THIS WAS A HOUSE.
SO I ASKED THE APPLICANT IF THEY CAN GO BACK AND SEE IF THEY EVER HAVE LIKE IF YOU CAN FIND A PERMIT TO SEE THAT THEY HAVE SOME SORT OF RIGHT FOR THE YEAH, AND THEN EXACTLY I WAS THINKING THE MEANS HAVE TO CLEAR, SEE CORNER HERE, THIS IS THROUGH, SO THAT'S FINE.
SO I WOULD ALSO, I LOOKED BACK AND THEY HAD BUILDING PERMITS THOUSAND 5,017 FOR ALL THE OF THE PATIO.
SO AGAIN WAS NEVER ASSUME UM, AREA SECTION.
SO BUSINESS THERE BEFORE THERE WAS FEET ON, THEY HAD LIKE RAMP, THEY DIDN'T, THEY DIDN'T HAVE A COPPER AND THEIR RAMP WAS ON THIS SIDE, BUT THEY STILL HAD PLANTERS.
SO THIS CORNER WAS ALWAYS BUILT WITH SOMETHING WALL PLANTERS.
THEY HAVE UM, THEY HAVE THIS RAMP ON THIS, WHICH OTHER THAN APPEARS TO BE BUT
[02:00:01]
WAS THEY GO RIGHT AND THE DISABILITY, DOES THE PATIO CONFORM THE SITE? YES.THAT'S, THAT WAS, THAT WAS OUR INTENT.
SO I CHECKED, I CHECKED THEY CHECKING YOUR INTENT THIS MORNING, WE KEEP ON GOING BACK AND THAT'S WHAT, THAT'S WHAT PROMPTED US TO HOLD IT LAST TIME THERE, THE FORMER, YOU SEE WHAT I'M LIKE, OK, PATIO GOES.
THE SITE LINE AND THE DOCK DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THAT.
IF THE PROBLEM ADOPTED IS THAT THIS ONE SAYS, SAID THE PATIO HAS IT, THEN THE COMMISSIONER BROUGHT LIKE, OH THAT'S CORRECT.
SO THIS IS WHAT'S NOW WE ONLY DIRECTED THE NUMBER TO SAY ADJUSTED.
NO, THE LAYOUTS FROM YOUR SLIDE TO THE SITE PLAN THE SITE PLAN THE DOCKET, PATIO EXISTING ONE.
UH, SORRY, SUPPOSED TO SAY CHANGES.
THAT THAT WAS WHAT THAT THAT WAS THE CHANGE FROM, AGAIN, THAT'S WHY WE HELD IT LAST TIME.
CAUSE I CAUGHT THE FACT THAT I SHOULD BE ABLE TO, I ACTUALLY, THERE THERE IS UH, WORTH.
SORRY, I TOLD NO PROBLEM BUT BE PROPOSED.
IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR A CR DISTRICT, LL AND A CS.
CAN'T SEE THE PRESENTATION ONLINE.
UM, ANYHOW, SO THIS IS, THIS IS A POSITION FOR CR, IT'S ON HASKELL'S 5,000 SQUARE FEET.
I'M GONNA SKIP AHEAD TO SUMMARY.
RECOMMENDATION IS STILL DENIAL AS REQUESTED, UM, OR DENIAL OF THE CR, APPROVAL OF THE N S IN SCR.
BUT I WILL SHOW THE DE RESTRICTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE, UM, AND I SHOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO ZOOM IN.
BUT POINT BEING IS THIS IS A BIT OF A BREAKDOWN OF USES, UM, THAT ARE ADDITIONAL UH, WITH CR UH, BEING ON THE RIGHT, THE HEAT RESTRICTION BEING IN THE MIDDLE AND ON THE RIGHT I PUT AS, WHICH IS, EXCUSE ME, WHAT WE'RE, UH, RECOMMENDING.
SO ADDITIONAL USES ARE HERE SHOWN ADDITIONAL USES BETWEEN CR AND NS ARE NOT MENTIONED BY THE VR ARE SHOWN IN YELLOW HERE.
GREEN ARE IN BOTH MS AND CR AND RED ARE NOT IN MS. EXPLICIT BY, SO YOU WANT SCROLL THROUGH MAYBE CAUSE IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO READ, BUT IF ANYONE HAS ANY SO YELLOW OR ADDITIONAL, SO THIS PAGE ONLY HAD A COUPLE AND THESE WEREN'T THE DOCK THAT I DIDN'T WANT GIVE A LITTLE ANALYSIS FOR YOU GUYS, WHICH IS PARTIALLY WHY I ASKED THAT PEOPLE IT UM, I DUNNO IF SLOWLY THEN LAST THING YOUR HONOR USES, SURELY THIS IS REASONABLE.
[02:05:09]
SO THAT IS IS THE, DOES ADD A NUMBER OF USES.MANY ARE, UH, BYP, JUST A REMINDER THAT PROPOSED, THE PROPOSED USE IS A PERSONAL SERVICE USE.
SO WITH THAT SAID, THAT'S RECOMMENDATION STILL, UM, AN AS TO MEET THE STATE BILLS THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE USE AND UH, BE RESPECTFUL OF THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL.
ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS? MR. MR? IT'S BUILT OUT.
IT'S BUILT OUT, UM, KIND OF LIKE A SMALL OFFICE BUILDING, IT'S ZONE OFFICE.
UM, I THINK IT, IT, IT PRESENTS AS AN OFFICE.
I THINK THAT IT ATTEMPTED TO, TO MOVE, UH, THE MEDICAL FACILITY, PERSONAL SERVICES INTO THEIR MEDICAL CLINIC.
I BELIEVE THIS IS PERMITTED ALREADY THAT THE PERSONAL SERVICE SIGN, THE, THE SALON AND SELF SELF CARE ASPECT IS NOT REMAIN YET.
UH, BUT IT PRESENTS AS, AS EITHER AN OFFICER CLINIC YOU CAN I ASK THAT POORLY? DID THE EXISTING ZONING IS A COMBINATION OF L THREE AND A CS DISTRICT AND THE APPLICANT QUESTION AGREEMENT DOWN TO THE CR.
UM, DOES THAT MATTER? THE ZONING CROSS? IT'S, THERE'S A, THERE'S A LOT GOING ON IN TERMS OF THE ZONING HERE.
SO FRONT OF THIS PROPERTY IS LO LOCAL OFFICE.
SO IT'S PART WITH BUILDING IT RIGHT? THEN THE REAR 20 SOMETHING B IS CS ACROSS VILLE IS CR UH, THE HAS ITSELF HAS IT OFFICE, UM, IT'S GOT CR UH, THERE'S AND THEN THE MULTIFAMILY IS JUST TO THE NORTHWEST.
BUT THERE IS, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION SPECIFICALLY IS CR ACROSS A*****E.
GENERALLY THE USE OF THAT THE IS PROPOSED TO EXCLUDE YOUR VOTES.
PROBABLY THE MORE INTENSE USE OF THAT WOULD BE WITHIN UM, CR DISTRICT.
THAT WHICH I RECALL MORE USE OF.
I WOULD SAY THAT THEY GOT MANY OF THE MOST INTENSE USES, UH, WOULD CONCUR WITH THAT ASSESSMENT.
THEY LEFT IN SUB INCLUDING THOSE THAT UM, REQUIRE OR PERMITTED BY RIGHT HAND BUT OUT.
UM, S U AND BUT THE, THE, IF I WAS, I WAS, I DON'T KNOW IF I WAS RUNNING BE TO SAY WHICH ONCE I WALK IN AND OUT, UM, IN PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL, UM, THE MOST INTENSE ONES HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
UH, BUT THAT SAID SOMETIMES THE MOST ELEGANT WAY TO TO DO ZONING IS TO NOT, THEY CHOOSE EVERY SINGLE PARCEL IS A VERY SMALL PARCEL.
AND ALTHOUGH WE TAKE OUT MANY OF THE MORE INTENSE USES, IT IS NOT NECESSARILY GOOD LANDED POLICY FOR ONE PARCEL IS ANOTHER.
UH, OBJECTION NOW FOR OUR RECOMMENDATION.
OKAY, THANK YOU MR. AND UM, YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL, UM, CORRESPONDENCE, CORRECT? NO, NO.
UM, I, I UH, CONDUCTED THIS ANALYSIS TO SAY HERE ARE THE CHANGES BETWEEN THE DISTRICT, UM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ALTER TO BE RESTRICTIONS IN ANY FURTHER WAY.
AND THEY, THEY STATED, YOU KNOW, THAT'S REALLY IT.
I THINK YOU PROBABLY ON THE, IN THE LOOP UPON THAT.
IS IT, UM, YOU RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE SURROUNDING, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S, THANK YOU.
UH, MR. I SEE A TERM AT THE BOTTOM.
[02:10:02]
GSM TRYING TO INSIDE COMMERCIAL PARKING ME REALLY QUICKLY CHECK, UH, COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT OR RETAIL AM USE.THEY THEY DID, THEY DIDN'T STRIKE THOSE SUVS ARE REQUIRED FOR SOME SUVS ARE BY RIGHT FROM NOT, NOT AT ALL EVIDENCE, NOT NOT ALL EVIDENCE.
THANK SO ADDITIONAL USE AND SOME OF ANY, OKAY SO THIS IS D 2 12, 2 97 APPLICATION FOR CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT R A DISTRICT ON EAST LINE BERRY ROADS ON LJ ABOUT 7.28 ACRES.
JUST THAT LJ UH, HERE THE CITY, UH, FROM SOUTHEAST YOU RIVER CREEK ON THE EAST YOU CAN SEE ATON AT THIS TIME.
UH, THERE'S NATURAL SPACE IS A EAST AND IT'S PART OF A LARGER UH, AREA, UH, THERE.
AND SO ONLY ACCESS OFF THE UM, SO THE NORTH PROPERTY AND THEN THE CORRIDOR AREA CREEK WAY THE EAST, SOUTHEAST, UH, ACROSS DOWN THERE'S UNDER ACROSS PROPERTY.
PROPERTY CURRENTLY A WAREHOUSE UNDER CSS.
MR. CS DISTRICT ALSO ALLOWS OTHER COMMERCIAL LINE ABUSES THAT ARE ASSESSED AS HAVING TANGIBLE LAND USE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES.
AND IT'S TO MORE INTENSE GIVEN THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROPERTY APPROPRIATE ZONING, ZONING, ZONING THAT DOWN ON THE SIGN.
I THINK I'M ON TEXT PROPERTY HERE, BUT THIS IS ABOUT STORY LINE, THE NAIL LEFT.
SO FLIP AROUND, THERE IS A LOT OF TREE COVER ALONG THERE.
UH, THERE'S A MIX OF DIFFERENT THINGS ON THE SOUTH SIDE.
THERE WAS EYES THERE AND IN THE AERIALS THERE'S A DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR UH, ROAD AND HERE WE'RE, THAT'S ACTUALLY NORTHWEST.
THERE'S A HOME ON THE LEFT LOOKING BACK SOUTH.
MAJOR VALUE BARRIER THAT'S FARTHER TOWARDS THE NORTH WHERE ONE OF THE HOMES EXISTS AND THEN DOWN PROPERTY.
SO OUR 10 ACROSS THE WAY AND THEN THIS IS ACTUALLY BE A HUNDRED FEET NORTH OF THE PROPERTY THAT CHAIN.
UH, BUT IT'S NOT, IT'S NOT ACTUALLY WJ.
SO NO STANDARDS, UH, BASE STANDARDS FOR R 10 AND CS.
OBVIOUSLY THE R 10 IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN 10.
THE CS ADMITTEDLY CS IS GONNA BE LIMITED LOCALLY BY BLOCK BASED TIME MOVING IN.
RPS UM, STILL NEEDS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE UH, INTENT STANDARDS ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF BLOCK COVERAGE.
IT'S NOT ESTABLISHED ANY AREA SITE AND AS A RESULT,
[02:15:01]
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS DENIAL.UH, JUST TO FURTHER FOLLOW UP, UM, PLAN TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS ALSO THE I 23 WAY COURT LAND USE PLAN.
THIS IS DISTRICT TWO PLAN AND OUR PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY HERE, KIND THE BOTTOM OF THIS AREA JUST HIGHLIGHTED.
UH, THAT ACTUALLY IS CALLED FOR BY PLAN AS THEY UNDEVELOPED AGRICULTURAL AREA.
UH, GENTLE OPEN SPACE, PLACES THAT SIGNIFICANT AREAS AND THIS IS OF UH, I BELIEVE THE RANK FOR COMMERCIAL, UH, WHITE INDUSTRIAL, OTHER PARTS OF THE PLAN.
UH, NOT NECESSARILY IN THIS TYPE DISTRICT BUT SPACE IS ALLOTTED WITHIN THE, THE OVERALL CORRIDOR COURT THAT KIND UH, USE.
SO THAT IS JUST ANOTHER UH, SUPPORT TO QUESTIONS THE SCREEN.
THIS APPLICATION IS C2 THREE APPLICATION TRACK C, PD NUMBER SEVEN AND NUMBER SEVEN, WHICH BOTH ARE CONTROLLING THE LAND USE OF A VEHICLE.
USE THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE STORAGE AREA FOR THE VEHICLE AUCTION STORAGE USE AND TAKE UP SOME ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
THE OF THE AREA THE AMENDMENTS CONVERT EXCESS PARKING INTO THAT ADDITIONAL STORAGE AREA.
CREATED AN INTERIOR LOADING AND UNLOADING ZONE FOR THE TRAILERS TO NO LONGER BE OPERATING IN THE PUBLIC RED LIGHT AND OPEN INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY ON THE SHIELD LANE THAT IS CLOSER TO THE INTERSECTION OF LAKESIDE.
THE PROPERTY IS JUST UNDER SIX AND A HALF ACRES.
PROPERTY IS NORTH OF PROPERTY LAKE AND THAT WAS LONGFIELD AIRPORT.
AND HERE'S THE ARROW MAP SHOWING THAT SUBJECT SITE LOOKS TO THE PARKING LOT CAUSE EXACTLY IT'S WITH AP STRUCTURES ON SITE INCLUDING THE OFFICE, THE OPERATION OF THAT VEHICLE OPTION USE AND THAT OPERATED ON THIS SUBJECT SITE.
AND THEN PROPERTY TO THE NORTHEAST ARE ZONED UH, MY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT.
THEY HAVE UTILITIES TO THE SOUTHEAST.
WE HAVE TRACK TWO TO THE 30 USES TO SOUTHWEST.
WE HAVE TRACK 2 8 37 AND THEN TO NORTHWEST TRACKS 1997 SCHOOL LOCATED DIRECTLY IN LANE.
I WERE ZOOMING IN
SO THAT'S THE OFFICE STRUCTURE.
AND THEN THIS IS THEIR EXISTING VEHICLE STORAGE AND PARKING AREA.
SO THAT'S PART OF THE AREA THAT THEY NEED CONVERTING TO ADDITIONAL STORAGE AREA.
AND ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THEY'RE FENCING THE OFF OPERATING THE MOST SECURE STORAGE AREA FOR VEHICLES.
AND THIS IS AT THAT INTERSECTION OF LAKEFIELD UM, AND SHIELD.
NOW YOU KNOW THE SURROUNDING LANE IS THIS IS UM, LIKE AN AUTO REPAIR PLACE THAT APPARENTLY IS KINDA PART OF THE OPERATION.
YOU CAN SEE THE ALLIANCE THROUGH SIGN ON THE BUILDING THAT MATCHES THE REMAINDER OF THE VEHICLE OPTION.
THE REPRESENTATIVES SPOKE TO THE APPLICANT AND THAT IS
[02:20:01]
NOT A PART OF THE ACTUAL VEHICLE OPTION.IT'S NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE U THAT DIRECTLY THERE OR ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPAIR SECTION AND IN CLOSEST TO THAT EXISTING DRIVEWAY FOR THE SUBJECT SIDE VEHICLE.
SO NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT EQUAL ROOM FOR CHARTER SCHOOL.
THEY'RE STILL PENDING THEIR BEST REVIEW WAITING ON THE, FROM THE ORDER TO CONTINUE TO CITY PLAN COMMISSION.
AND THIS IS ADJACENTLY WAREHOUSE USES MULTI-FAMILY GARBAGE, THE SOUTHWEST A CELL TOWER AND THEN DETAILED USES THAT ARE ACROSS RIGHT IN FRONT OF BOTTOM LANE.
THIS IS THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE INITIATING APPLICATION BACK IN 20 12, 20 13.
AND YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE AREA FOR STORAGE HERE IN THE CENTER AND THEY HAD SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PARKING ALL LINES SITE WITH ALL OF THIS REPAIR SCREENING FROM LAKEFIELD AND GEL LANE.
AND THEN PARK ROAD IS WHERE IT TURNS INTO THEIR REPAIR CENTER WHICH IS
BUT ALL THIS SECTION WAS FREE FROM SHE WILL BE INFIELD AND THEN THERE WAS ADDITIONAL NEED UH, THAT AMENDED WAS MADE.
THEY INCREASED THE STORAGE CARRY AGAIN AND UM, NOT AGAIN FOR THE FIRST TIME THEY INCREASED THE STORAGE CARRIER THE FROM SOBRIETY FOR AMENDMENT WHICH WAS ENOUGH CAUSE THEY NEEDED TO APPLY FOR A POOL AMENDMENT TO RECONFIGURE THE VEHICLE.
AND THAT'S WHY HERE TODAY, NOW THIS IS UH, THE EXISTING FOR THE INCREASE THE STORAGE AREA.
THIS IS UM, FOR THE RENEWAL BACK IN 20 17 20.
THE INCREASE THAT STORAGE AREA AND NOW IS AGAIN AN INCREASE THAT STORAGE AREA.
AND HERE THEY'RE OPENING UP THIS, I'M SORRY THIS IS BUT THEY A NEW NEW PLAN.
I'M SO SORRY I DID NOT HERE IT SHOULD BE THE ONE THAT'S IN YOUR ABOUT AND ON THAT PROPOSED SITE MEMO, IT SHOWS ACTUALLY I YOU TO PULL IT UP REAL QUICK SO CAN DO YOU MIND IF I LET UP? SO CAN DISCUSS THAT ACTUALLY HAVE SCREEN RIGHT NOW THE PLAN THAT WAS IN THE DOCKET FOLDER.
ALL THE PLANS AND WHAT THE CASE REPORT, I'M SORRY I FILLED IN MY, IN THAT POWERPOINT BUT UM, THERE WERE SOME DETAILS ABOUT THE ACCESS POINTS THAT WE WERE DISCUSSING RIGHT DOWN TO THE WIRE OF HAVING THE CASE PUBLISHED IN THE C C DOCKET.
AND WHAT WE CAME TO REALIZE WAS THAT THIS SECTION HERE, EXISTING ACCESS CLAIM, THEY HAD TOLD ME THEY WOULD RESTORE THE CURB AND SCREEN IT ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS FOR THE S P P.
BUT THEY AREN'T COLLECTING TO DO THAT.
THEY ARE ASKING TO JUST PUT NO ACCESS SIGN, CHAIN IT OFF.
THEY'RE GONNA HAVE THIS SECURITY FENCE HERE FOR THEIR EXPANDED INVENTORY STORAGE, NO PARKING AT ALL HERE.
ALL PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED ACROSS AT 34 11 SHEILA LANE.
AND SO THAT'S GOING TO MEET THE PARKING STANDARDS AND AS LONG AS THEY DO THAT FINE BUT THE INVENTORY STORAGE AREA WILL BE SIGNIFICANT.
YOU SEE HERE THIS WHOLE SECTION IS NEW AND WILL BE FULLY FENCED OFF AND SECURED, WHICH IS WHAT THEY'RE SEEKING TO DO WITH THIS AMENDMENT AND AS WELL AS INCREASING STORAGE AREA.
BUT ONE STIPULATION THAT REQUIRED WAS TO INCLUDE THE LOADING AND UNLOADING OF THOSE SEMIS WITHIN THE SITE.
STAFF WOULD PREFER TO SEE THAT THEY REARRANGED THE STORAGE AREA AND FENCE TO ALLOW THEM TO NOT OPEN UP HIS DRIVEWAY THROUGH THE CLOSEST TO SHIELD LANE ON THE WEST SIDE SIDE OF THE DRY LAKE SHIELD LANE WOULD CAUSE MAYBE SOME SUB TRAFFIC CONCERNS AS FAR AS THE TRAFFIC POINT OF THE SCHOOL AND COMING OUT OF HERE WITH THE SEMIS CONSTANTLY.
AND THEN OVER HERE INSTEAD CREATE SOME SORT OF A SLIP, A SLIP STREET COMING THROUGH HERE TO EXIT HERE.
AND THEN WE KIND OF, WE LOOKED AT IT AND ASSESS THAT WE MOVE.
THEY WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO TRAVEL NORTHBOUND ON PARK ROAD WHICH WOULD KEEP HIM AWAY FROM THIS INTERSECTION HERE AND STOP ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OR TRAFFIC.
BUT THE APPLICANT WAS UNWILLING
[02:25:01]
TO REARRANGE THE SECTION.SO STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE INCREASE IN THE INVENTORY STORAGE AREA BUT ONLY UNDER THE PROPER MAINTENANCE OF THE SITE DESIGN.
AND THESE DRIVERS WE DON'T IT'S APPROPRIATE TO ADD THIS OVER HERE WITH THE PERFECTLY FUNCTIONING.
IF YOU DID SEE THE PICTURES OR VISIT THE SITE, THIS SCREEN HERE THAT WAS ESTABLISHED BETWEEN 12 TO 13 BY APPRECIATING S U IT SENSE IT'S A VERY GOOD SCREENSHOT THAT THEY ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE.
THERE'S NO NEED TO DISRUPT IT, ESPECIALLY IF THEY NOT INTEND TO INSTALL THE SAME IN THE PREVIOUS ENTRY WAY THAT THEY DON'T PLAN TO FULLY CLOSE OFF.
SO ULTIMATELY WHILE WE CAN SUPPORT THEM, WE DON'T SUPPORT THIS SET TIME HERE.
WE WOULD EXPECT TO SEE THIS CLOSED.
THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY, THE TRAFFIC FLOW COMING THROUGH THE PROPERTY, THEIR FENCE MOVED OVER THE STORAGE AREA, THE LINE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPACE TO THE TRAILERS TO BE ABLE TO TURN TO THIS SECTION TYPE OF THE EXISTING DRIVE LANE ENTRANCE AND GO NORTH ON PARK ROAD RATHER THAN, I MEAN DOWN WESTWARD ONTO WITH.
SO THE STAFF APPLICATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SUBJECT TO THE UM, WE, I'M SORRY WE JUMPED BACK THE BOARD.
WE ALSO RECOMMEND THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE TWO CONTROLLING PLANS FOR THE REQUEST ANY LONGER.
THAT IS A VERY UH, TEDIOUS, UH, METHOD OF REVIEW.
IT CAN CAUSE LOTS OF CONFUSION, LOSS OF ROOM FOR ERRORS BETWEEN BOTH STAFF AND BEHALF OF HIM.
AND IT'S ALSO VERY COSTLY WHEN YOU HAVE TO GET EVERY TIME THEY WANT TO DO EITHER MINOR AMENDMENT AMENDMENTS, IF THEY HAVE ANY ISSUES THEY HAVE TO MAKE LIKE TODAY BOTH THE PE AND THE S ONE OF THOSE CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS.
SO STAFF RECOMMENDED THAT THEY WRITE A PROVISION THAT THEY IS REQUIRED, NO DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED.
IF THEY END UP USING A DIFFERENT LAND USE THAT'S PERMITTED UNDER TRACK TWO C REGULATIONS OF D 37, THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WITH THE REGULATIONS OF 37 AND THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COMPLY UPON REGULATIONS OF PD 37 WITH AN S P.
THEY'RE JUST ALLOWING THE BY CP AND ANY REGULATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE S STP REQUIREMENTS.
SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL FOR A FIVE PERIOD ELIGIBILITY RENEWALS FOR ADDITIONAL SUBJECT TO REVISED SITE PLAN.
RECOMMENDED REVISED PLAN AND I SAID YES.
ARE YOU AWARE I CONTINUING TO WORK WITH MR. BALDWIN AND THE COMMUNITY TO WORK FOR A SITE PLAN, ADDRESS COMMUNITY CONCERN ABOUT THE INTERACTION OF THE OFFITE, UM, ACROSS ADEQUATE SPACE FOR ALL THIS ACTIVITY TO AS POSSIBLE AND WAS NOT AWARE I FULLY SUPPORT THAT.
OBVIOUSLY THAT DOES ALIGN WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE WE MAKE THE SAME OBSERVATIONS UPON INSPECTING THE SITE AND WE HAVE RECEIVED FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY HEARING AS WELL.
THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC.
SO WE DO WANT TO END THAT OFF AND MAKE SURE THAT AS THIS CONTINUES TO GROW IT'S DONE SO RESPONSIBLE MANNER THAT WON'T THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY THAT THAT DRIVEWAY IS USING.
AND I JUST WOULD SAY THAT I HAD NOT HEARD ANY OF THIS.
UM, SO I'M HAPPY TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE OR THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS WITH YOU COMMISSIONER CARPENTER AND MAKE SURE THAT WE PRESENT THE BEST CASE FOR OUR NEXT C C.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MOTION WE KEEP GOING.
[02:30:30]
GREENVILLE, UM, ITS SURROUNDED, YOU CAN SEE ON THE AREA BY RESTAURANTS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH PARKING SUBSTATION TO THE EAST ACROSS FROM UH, GREENVILLE ARE RESTAURANTS AND RETAIL AND NORTH STORE MAP ACROSS THE STREET.AND THEN UM, CR UM, SO THIS SITE USED TO HAVE A SPECIFIC DETERMIN THAT EXPIRED IN JANUARY, 2022.
UM, AND THAT WAS APPROVED THAT IT HAD IS THE SAME, THE SAME OWNER JUST THAT THEY UH, THEY THEY HOURS FOR A PERIOD OF TIME.
THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED WITH BIGGER STUDENT THAT IS USED HAS, WELL THE SITE, THE WHOLE PROPERTY, UH, DEVELOPED THE BIGGER BUILDING THAT IS DIVIDING THESE FEES VIA ITSELF AS A RESTAURANT AND THEN AN UNCOVERED PATIO ON THE SIDEWALK.
THIS IS THE VIEW ON THE STREET IS FORWARD THAT YOU SEE IN YELLOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE EAST, THERE'S ANOTHER PROPERTY, THERE'S ANOTHER RESTAURANT AND YOU, THE PATIO'S NOT ACCESSIBLE FROM THE INSIDE AND BELONG TO THIS RESTAURANT BUT CAUSE ONE BUILDING THEY'RE ABLE TO EXTEND BACK.
SO THIS PATIO IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ROOFTOP BELONG ACROSS COMBINATION OF RESTAURANTS.
UM, THIS IS THE PREVIOUS PLAN I JUST ASKED.
UM, THE S CONDITIONS IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT IT USED TO BE BEFORE.
UM, IT'S THE SAME AS BY PROBABLY 2:00 AM.
UM, THIS WAS THE USED TO BEING A PREVIOUS THE REPORT.
I DO KNOW IF THEY HAVE ONE THAT AND CONFIRM LIKE THE DAY OF THE REPORT DON'T HAVE THERE, THERE'S NO GONNA BE A CONDITION ABOUT THAT AND HAVE CONDITIONS FOR PATIO AND THEY'RE QUESTIONS.
UM, YOU SAID THAT THIS IS THE SAME APPLICANT WHO HAD THE UH, THE UM, S IN THAT EXPIRED JANUARY 8TH, 2022 AND THE SAME OPERATOR.
WHAT DO YOU BASED THAT ON? I THINK SO.
BUT I WILL LET, THAT'S MY ASSUMPTION.
I WILL LET THE APPLICANT ADDRESS THAT.
I FOUND THE SAME EARLIER, SAME APPLICANT.
WELL I NOTICED THAT THE CASE REPORT DOESN'T HAVE THE LIST OF THE OWNERS OF THE OPERATOR THAT YOU REALLY HAVE AND THIS OPERATOR'S 14 HOUSE, WHICH IS NOT WHO HAD IT BEFORE I WAS BEFORE.
SO I'M TRYING UNDERSTAND WHY THIS IS SOME SORT OF CONTINUATION APPLICATION.
I JUST MADE A COMMENT THAT THEY USED TO, THERE USED TO BE AN S U BEFORE.
THIS IS A NEW S U AND UM, THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN S U FOR LATE HOURS BETWEEN JANUARY, 2022 AND NOW, AND RIGHT NOW THEY'RE NOT OPERATING LATE HOURS.
THEY DON'T HAVE, YES WE DO HAVE THE OWNERS AND KNOW
[02:35:01]
THE OFFICERS.I SAW THAT, BUT USUALLY THERE'S, THERE'S ALSO THE OPERATOR OPERATOR THAT I WAS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND DOES THIS INFORMATION COME FROM THE APPLICANT OR WHERE DOES THIS COME FROM? NO, IT IS ASSUMPTION RIGHT NOW.
UM, AND THEN IT DOES HAVE A ROOFTOP THAT I UNDERSTAND IS IT'S BEING USED BY DIFFERENT OPERATOR.
WHAT STAFF'S THOUGHT ABOUT HAVING ANY ROOFTOP, UM, CONDITIONS IN THE S CAUSE THE BUILDING UNDER ROOFTOP THAT COULD EASILY BE CONFIGURED DUTIES USE BY THIS HAPPENING? WELL IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT IN THE CONDITIONS, I WOULD SAY THAT UH, LATE HOURS ARE NOT ALLOWED BUT WE PUT IN THE CONDITIONS.
SO THE WAY I LOOK AT THE U RIGHT NOW, THERE ARE NO LATE HOURS OR UH, A LOT OF YOU WOULD CALL PATIO.
OKAY, I CONFIRMED WITH THE APPLICANT AND THERE IS NO WAY TO ACCESS FROM THE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THE PATIO.
SO THE PATRONS OF THIS ESTABLISHMENT DON'T HAVE ACCESS OR SERVICE ON NATHANIEL.
HE'S NOT HERES, IT'S LIKE YOU WOULD HAVE A MULTI MULTISTORY BUILDING.
YOU ONLY HAVE THE FOR THE FIRST FLOOR, NOT ON THE FLOOR.
WHERE DOES IT DOESN'T, IT'S NOT, IT'S NOT IN THERE.
AND CAN WE WANT THE CONDITION THAT THE ROOFTOP IS PROHIBITED BUT IT'S AGAIN, IT EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE NOT ACCESSIBLE ROOFTOP HOURS OF OPERATION FEE.
OH, THEY DON'T HAVE THE SAME WITH THE WALK.
THEY DON'T HAVE A, THEY'RE CONDITIONS PICTURE ATION ALLEY.
I WOULD, UH, SO I, MY I WALK THE ENTIRE ALLEY AND ALL OF THAT.
THE ALLEY, UM, BASICALLY SAID ONLY HALF OF THE PROPERTY.
LEMME SHOW YOU IN HERE BY MY ASSESSMENT.
YOU SEE THIS IS THE ALLEY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
SO I, I WAS ABLE TO, THERE WAS, THERE WAS A DELIVER TRUCK, THERE WAS DELIVER IN THE ALLEY.
I WAS ABLE TO WALK THROUGH, I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING AND LOOKED AT THE, I LOOKED AT THE BURIAL LAST NIGHT.
AGAIN, IT DOESN'T SHOW ANYTHING IN THE ALLEY.
UM, I THE TO GO CHECK AGAIN, BUT I DID OK I MY ATTENTION CAUSE I HAD THE SAME LIKE WHY IS THIS ALLEY HERE? I WALKED IT, I PICTURE THIS SIDE TIMES I THIS SIDE WHEEL THAT ALLEY ON THE OTHER PART OF THE WALL ABANDONED.
THEN THIS ONE HERE, IT DOESN'T SHOW.
THAT'S BACK OF WHY MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PERMANENT STORAGE STRUCTURE ALLEY BECAUSE YOU SEE THE ALLEY IS HERE.
THAT'S, THAT'S WHY I THE GOOGLE MAP CLASS, MY, IT SHOWS, IT'S SHOWS CLEAR ON THE ALLEY.
IT DOESN'T SHOW THE STRUCTURE.
NOT LIKE CONTEMPORARY ONE HIGHLIGHTED.
SO I KNOW IF HERE IT, IT'S A BIG PARKING LOT THE BACK.
SO I, IF HERE I, AND THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING, I CAN SEND THIS COMPLIANCE AND GO THE OTHER HALF OF THAT IS THE ALLEY GOING THROUGH THAT PARKING LOT THAT, THAT'S NOT PARKING LOT.
DOES THE ALLEY BEEN ABANDONED THERE? THERE'S NO ALLEY THERE.
I DUNNO IF IT WAS EVER ALLEY THERE.
CURRENTLY THERE'S NO CITY OF DALLAS, NO.
THE PROPERTY LINES THAT BASICALLY FORM THE L
[02:40:01]
UM, MR. N YES, I WAS GONNA TAKE A LUNCH BREAK.FIRST OUT WHICH, UH, CASE NUMBER? LAST CASE NUMBER OR 1 25, UH, LAWS AND LASSO.
THOSE THREE ARE LISTED AS ARTERIALS ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN, BUT THEY ARE CURRENTLY, LASSITER IS BUILT OUT AS A TWO LANE ROAD.
LAWSON IS BUILT OUT AS MORE OR LESS A THREE LANE ROAD, TWO LANES WITH FREQUENT TURN LANES.
COMMUNITY RETAIL IS A FAIRLY HIGH TRAFFIC GENERATOR.
ARE YOU CONFIDENT THAT THE EXISTING, NOT THE PLAN, BUT THE EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CAN ACCOMMODATE THE TRAFFIC THAT THE EXISTING YES AND WELL, UM, YES.
HOWEVER, UH, WE ALREADY HAVE PLANS FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO BE INSTALLED HERE ALONG WITH BREAKS THROUGH THE ENTIRE INTERSECTION.
AND WE'VE BEEN COLLECTING FUNDS OUTSIDE OF ZONING.
UM, SO KINDLY ASKING CONTRIBUTIONS BEGGING AND DAVID, THE WORD YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS BEGGING APPROXIMATELY, UH, 45% SO FAR.
UH, AND THOSE ARE, UH, NON-COM COMMITMENTS, BUT ALREADY CHECKS THAT ARE SITTING IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT FROM, UM, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES DOWN THE STREET.
THERE'S ONE ZONING CASE THAT REQUIRES THEIR CONTRIBUTION.
I BELIEVE IT WAS RYAN'S CASE ON LASSETER.
SO THEY'RE COMING IN WITH ANOTHER 25%.
THE REMAINING PERCENT WOULD BE COLLECTING FROM, UM, THE TWO, THE TWO DEVELOPERS AT THIS CORNER MM-HMM
AND THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT HAS COMMITTED TO, UM, COMPLETE THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.
SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, UM, I I BELIEVE THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE SUFFICIENT BASED ON MANY SETTINGS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE, ARE SUFFICIENT FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC, BUT WOULD NOT SUFFICE FOR WHAT OUR WHAT OUR ALREADY PLAN CONDITIONS OR PROJECTS UNDER RELEASE.
BUT WE HAVE A MITIGATION PLAN.
BUT SO THAT DEALS WITH THE INTERSECTION, BUT THE, THE STREET LINKAGES, UH, ARE THE TWO-LANE ON LASSER AND THE THREE LANE ON LAWSON SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT.
THEY, UH, ALL THE STUDIES THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED SHALL THAT LAS WILL HAVE TO BE UPGRADED TO ITS ULTIMATE CONDITIONS.
REGRETFULLY, WE HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO REQUIRE ANY DEVELOPER TO IMPROVE BECAUSE THEY DON'T EXCEED THE ONE THOU THE MINIMUM 1000.
AND SO, UM, REGRETFULLY THE ONLY MECHANISM THAT THE CITY HAS IS ONE, THEY'LL BE PUT IN AN INCIDENT BOND PROGRAM WILL UPGRADE LAS TO WHAT IT SHOULD BE DOING.
WHAT YOU'RE TELLING ME IS THOSE LASSETER WILL OPERATE UNDER SUBSTANDARD CONDITIONS IF WE PROVE THIS DEVELOPMENT.
BUT I WANNA WARN THE COMMISSION THAT IF AGAIN, WE'VE SEEN IT MANY TIMES WITH THE CHICKEN AND THE EGG, UM, DO WE, THE THE CITY WILL NOT WANT TO PROVE ER UNTIL WE HAVE, UM, WHETHER THAT'S AN APPROPRIATE WAY OF DOING DISTANCE.
THAT'S JUST THE REALITY OF THINGS.
BUT FOR BETTER WORDS, WE HAVE TO FACTOR INTO OUR EVALUATION OF THIS CASE THAT WE'RE GONNA DUMP TRAFFIC ON THE LAS THAT HE CAN'T REALLY SUPPORT FOR THE WHOLE, THE WHOLE COMMUNITY UNTIL SUCH TIME THE WHOLE COMMUNITY, THAT WHOLE AREA AS A WHOLE HAVE, UH, IT SHOULD BE ON A MAJOR NEEDS INVENTORY BECAUSE LASSITER AND LAWSON, THEY HAVEN'T CURB NO BETTER THAT THE WHOLE AREA HAS NO CURB, NO BETTER, THE WHOLE AREA SUBSTANDARD.
BUT BUT YOU CAN'T HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT.
I GET WHAT I, I I WANT TO SAY THOUGH THAT THERE ARE, I HAVE IT IN EXHIBIT THAT SHOWS ALL THE DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE ALREADY UNDER REVIEWED ON LASTER AND I, I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THE CITY WILL BRING THIS UP TO ESTABLISHED VERY SOON AFTER, UM, PEOPLE ACTUALLY START MOVING HERE AND INCLUDING MANUFACTURED HOMES AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, HIGH DENSITY, THOUSANDS OF THANK YOU.
[02:45:10]
OKAY, IT IS, UH, 1231 AND WE'RE GONNA BRIEF THE LAST CASE.MS. MUNOZ, PLEASE NUMBER, UH, NUMBER 17.
I'LL LET THE RECORD FOR LIKE THE COMMISSIONER HAWK HAS A CONFLICT ON THIS ITEM AND IT'S NOT LOGGED ON.
HI EVERYONE SEEING MY PRESENTATION FOR C 2 23 1 64? WE CAN.
SO THIS IS AN APPLICATION TO AMEND PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 3 36, WHICH CURRENTLY PERMITS OUR 75 A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT USES.
I ASKED IF THE APPLICANT, THEY HAVE A COMMUNITY MEETING.
THEY HAVEN'T DONE SO, SO WE'RE NOT GONNA EVEN, WE'RE GONNA HOLD IT TO, UH, YOU HAVE A DATE NOW OR AT THE HEARING.
JENNIFER, DID YOU HEAR THAT? YES, I HEARD THAT.
ALRIGHT, WELL THEN COMMISSION'S 1233.
AND THAT CONCLUDES THE BRIEFING OF THE DALLAS CITY PLAN COMMISSION.
LET'S FINISH OUR LUNCH AND WE'LL COURT YOU.