Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:01]

OKAY, NUMBER, NUMBER 1, 2, 2, 3.

1, 2, 2.

THIS IS LOCATED DISTRICT 7 25 CASE DISTRICT WITH SPECIFIC USE PERMIT SIX LAKE, A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2 0 7 5 FOR TOWER AND PER CELLULAR COMMUNICATION ON SOUTH FORM.

IT 5 1 7 ACRES.

SO THIS IS OUR SITE AS IT EXISTS TODAY IS AROUND AS WELL.

SO IT'S CURRENTLY DEVELOPED CHURCH AND WE'RE ACTUALLY CHURCH IN THE WEST, NORTHWEST NORTH, NORTHEAST AND EAST.

EAST.

SO INTERRUPT.

I DON'T THINK WE'RE SPENDING THE PRESENTATION ONLINE.

IS ANYONE ELSE I SHARED THE ROOM, BUT WEBEX.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONER POPKIN.

IT'S NOT SO I THINK ONLY ON OUR SCREEN.

I BET I CAN.

YES, PLEASE.

HOW ARE YOU? UH, THE AREA OF THE CLASS IS CURRENTLY THE R 7 1 5 DISTRICT AND HE'S CURRENTLY MEETING ABOUT AND TOWER COMMUNICATION COURSES.

SITE ALSO INCLUDE THE, THE S U OF FOR UH, U 6 0 8 AND THAT'S FOR FIVE PRIVATE SCHOOL CENTER AND S U P 2 0 7 5 FOR A TOWER MATTER, UM, ON SITE.

UH, ALTHOUGH THE RIGHTS FOR THE S U P 6 0 8 APPLIED, IT IS THAT THAT S U P IS SPLIT BETWEEN THAT AND NOT BE, UM, NO.

ANYWAY, UH, BECAUSE OF THIS T TERMINATE THAT S TOWER 10 IS PROPOSED TO REMAIN ON SITE FOR PLACE AND THE CURRENT ZONING CANNOT ALTER ITS CONDITION.

THE APPLICANT PROPOSED TO REDEVELOP THE SITE FOR RETIREMENT, HAS USES VISOR TIME, HAS, HAS A RESIDENT FACILITY, PRINCIPALLY DESIGNED PERSONS 55 PERIOD OF A OLD EXCUSE DOES NOT INCLUDE, AND NURSING HOMES HOSPICE CARE RELATED, WHICH THE APPLICANT PROPOSED TO TIE HEIGHT AND REDUCE THE TARGET TO PROVISION SOME HOUSING AND THE CONDITIONS.

ALSO DESIGN AREAS FROM FOUR SEVEN.

I'M GOING DOWN TO THE SIDE.

SO YOU'RE GOING ON SSON SOUTHWEST, DOWN ESSON.

OKAY.

SO RIGHT HERE, LEFT THE JUROR THAT EXISTS TODAY, THE SERVICE PARTY, THE CHURCH NOW OF FERGUSON AND WE WALK DOWN SOUTH AT STILL CHURCH TRAVEL MANAGER VISIT THIS CHURCH AND FARTHER DOWN THE, UH, SOUTH, SOUTH WESTERN PART THE LOT.

NOW I'M GOING LOOK AT SOME OF THE AROUND SEE, SEE CHURCH ACROSS THE WAY.

UH, A TREE AREA AND THERE'S MORE CHURCHES, UH, NORTH, NORTHEAST, LAST CROSS FURTHER HERE LOOKING AT OTHER ADJACENT.

IT'S A LIBRARY, UM, DIRECTLY THERE.

AND I'M LOOKING UPPER, DOING MY BEST ACROSS THE STREET.

AND THIS EXPANDS AS PART OF THE CHURCH THAT'S, UH, LASTS.

SO IN ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THIS IS WHAT PROPOSED.

IT DOES 1 MILLION RETIREMENT HOUSING USE AND OPEN SPACE WATER WEST.

UH, THAT HELPS EXISTING ONLY OPEN, OPEN SPACE.

SO THAT'S, YEAH, THERE PART.

AND THE DEVELOP CLAIM INCLUDES SOME IMPROVED ACCESSES, UH, FROM THE SIGN TO THE SIDEWALKS.

THOSE ARE CODED IN CONDITIONS AS WELL.

UH, THEY'RE DEPICTED HERE.

[00:05:01]

THAT'S VERY SMALL.

I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.

UM, SO I WILL COME IN ON ANY, UH, SPECIFIC, UH, STANDARD SHOULD SHE ASK.

UH, BUT THEY MODIFY MANY OF THE MF TWO BASE.

UH, THEY CAP THEIR DWELLING UNITS AT 1 64.

IT'S ACTUALLY LESS, UH, GENERALLY LESS DENSE THAN, UH, THAN WOULD BE 10 F TWO.

UM, THEY HAVE 36 FOOT BASE HEIGHT, BUT THAT WOULD INCREASE THAT BY 14 WITH THE M I H.

AND HE SET THE OTHER CONDITIONS OF, UM, TWO.

THE SAME MIXED INCOME HOUSING COMPONENT IS 20% OF UNITS YOU PROVIDE 51 6% FIVE, THAT'S 30 FOR UNITS WHEN WE, UH, APPLY FOR 1 64 UNITS.

AND IT ALLOWS THAT INCREASE IN HEIGHT TO 50 FEET, ZERO POINT POUND SPACES PER UNIT, UM, HELPS LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF, UH, SEARCH PARKING SURROUNDING, SURROUNDING THE FACILITY.

UH, OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS ARE GENERALLY THOSE FOUND IN ONE OR 4.107.

THAT INCLUDES INDUSTRIAL SCALE LIGHTING TRANSPARENCY, IMPROVED SILOS, UH, CROSSINGS AND DRIVEWAYS AND IMPROVED ACCESS POINTS.

UH, THOSE ARE ADDED TO THE PD SPECIFICALLY.

ADDITIONALLY, UH, TO FACILIT CHANGE STATE MOVEMENT BETWEEN FACILITY AND UH, PUBLIC GROUND.

UH, WE GOT 10% MINIMUM AMONG OPEN SPACE, UH, 0.5 SPACES PER REMAIN.

AND THEY DID ADD BEYOND THE ONE STREET FURNITURE, UH, ALONG FERGUSON.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

CONDITIONS.

QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS? OKAY.

MORNING.

IS THIS ITEM COMING OFF CONSENT NUMBER TWO? YES, IT'S NUMBER TWO IS I'M SURE.

IS THIS CASE, DO YOU HAVE A DATE FOR THE WHOLE? IT IS GONNA BE BRIEF TODAY.

OH, YOU WANT TO BRIEF? YES.

OKAY.

AND IT'LL BE HELD TO WHAT DAY? DO YOU KNOW? I HAVEN'T FIGURED THAT OUT YET.

OKAY, GOOD MORNING.

ITEM NUMBER TWO IS KZ 2 2 3 1 79.

THE REQUESTS AND APPLICATION FOR A C AS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT ON PROPERTIES AND AN ARE INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT, N A T THREE, A TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT.

IT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST LU BATTER DRIVE WEST OF DUCKLING MILL ROAD.

IT'S APPROXIMATELY 20.0328.

THIS IS, UH, AS I MENTIONED, IS BY A LOT BATTER.

IT'S A LONG LEAD BATTER ON THE SOUTHWEST OF DALLAS.

SO THIS IS AN ARROW MAP OF SHOWING, OF AREA OF REQUESTS SURROUNDING USES, UM, WITHIN, UH, THE AREA SURROUND SURROUNDING AREAS.

IT IS, UM, SO IT'S OFF THE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE INDUSTRIAL INSIDE ON THE NORTH ACROSS LU GUTTER.

THERE'S ALSO A CHURCH, UH, TEMPLE, UH, ACROSS THAT BETTER ON THE WEST SIDE.

THERE IS ALSO A MISSIONARY HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE ADJACENT ON THE WEST.

AND THEN THERE'S ALSO MISSIONARY HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR TRUCK SALES AND SERVICES ON THE EAST ADJACENT.

AND THEN THERE'S ALSO A MOBILE HOME PARK ALONG THE EAST.

AND THEN THERE'S SINGLE FAMILY, UH, VIEWS, AN UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE SOUTH OF THE AREA OF REQUEST.

SO THE AREA REQUEST IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND IS ZONED AN IR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT AND A T H THREE, A TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT.

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT TO ALLOW WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT.

SO THESE ARE, UH, SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS OF THE SITE ON WEST ROAD LOOKING SOUTHWEST, LOOKING SOUTHWEST LOOKING WEST, TRYING ADJACENTS PROPERTY, LOOKING SOUTH, LOOKING SOUTH AGAIN,

[00:10:03]

LOOKING SOUTHEAST, LOOKING SOUTHEAST AGAIN AND SURROUNDING USES, LOOKING SOUTHWEST ON LEADBETTER, LOOKING WEST, LOOKING NORTHWEST, LOOKING NORTH ACROSS LEADBETTER, LOOKING NORTHEAST, LOOKING EAST ON LEDBETTER ROAD AND LOOKING SOUTHEAST.

AND THEN THE DEVELOP STANDARDS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.

SO EXISTING IS AS I MENTIONED, IR AND T H THREE A AND THEY'RE PROPOSING CSS AND THEN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL QUESTIONS.

UM, AS BEST YOU CAN DETERMINE, DID THE T H THREE A, I'LL CALL IT BUFFER STRIPS, UH, PREDATE THE 1987 ZONING TRANSITION? YES.

SO, UM, I GUESS MY BROADER QUESTION IS, TELL ME WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT HOW AND WHY THAT CAME ABOUT FOR THAT I'M NOT CLEAR AS PER HISTORICAL.

UM, AREAS THAT I SAW WAS THAT, UM, ALL AROUND THE AREA WAS MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED SINCE I BELIEVE, SO IN AROUND 2001 IT WAS MOSTLY INDUSTRIAL.

AND THEN IN 2004 IS WHEN THE TOWNHOME, UM, SUBDIVISION WAS INCORPORATED.

I'M NOT SURE WHEN THE ACTUAL DISTRICT NOW IS THAT, IS THAT THE TH TWO TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE OR ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE TH THREE? THAT'S PART OF THE SITE, THE T H TWO.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF THE T THREE, THE TH TWO WERE AT THE SAME TIME.

OH, YOU THINK THEY WERE? YES.

OKAY.

SO 2004 AND I GUESS THAT BEING 19 YEARS AGO, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE RATIONALE WAS FOR PUTTING TH THREE ON THAT PROPERTY.

CORRECT.

IT'S MULTI OWNERSHIP.

SO IT MUST HAVE BEEN A CALL PUBLIC HEARING OR SOMETHING.

I, I'M NOT TOO SURE.

OKAY.

I DON'T SEE HOW IT COULD BE OTHERWISE UNLESS ALL THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS JOINED IN.

UM, HAVE YOU HAD ANY DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT REZONING THE IR PORTION TO CS AND LEAVING THE TH THREE PORTION ALONE? NO.

NO.

OKAY.

SO WE DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT HAS ANY INTEREST IN THAT AT ALL.

'CAUSE THE ORIGINAL REQUEST WAS TO CHANGE THE T H U TO I R AND BERMAN DEFERRED TO BE CSS AND FOR THE IR PROPERTY TO ALSO BECOME CSS.

OKAY.

SO IT SOUNDS LIKE THE APPLICANT'S FOCUS IS ON THAT TH THREE PROPERTY.

CORRECT.

AND REZONING THE NORTHERN PART OF THE PROPERTY WOULDN'T DO ANYTHING FOR OH, NO QUESTION.

QUESTION.

UH, GIVEN THAT THIS IS A STRAIGHT ZONE REQUEST FOR A STRAIGHT ZONE EXCHANGE TO SEE, UM, THAT WOULD MEAN IT WOULD OPEN UP FIRE BY GREAT MANY DIFFERENT USES, NOT JUST EVEN HE ASSUMED THAT WAREHOUSE USE IT WOULD OPEN UP, YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING.

I, I'M, I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED AS TO WHY STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THE STRAIGHT ZONING CHANGE TO CSS GIVEN THE NUMBER OF POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE INTRUSIVE USES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN CS HAVE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE BECAUSE, UM, SO THE SURROUNDING AROUND THE NORTH IS ALREADY IR AND THEN THE PORTION OF THE TH THREE, IT WOULD BE MORE THAN LIKELY IF THEY LEAVE, LEAVE IT AT TH THREE, IT WOULD BE A LANDLOCK PORTION.

SO YOU'RE MORE CONCERNED WITH THAT NEW LANDLOCK THAN THE, THE EFFECT ON THE, THEIR CLINIC SOUTH.

I MEAN, MOST OF THE USES IN COMMERCIAL, THEY DO REQUIRE THE R A R, WHICH IS, UM, RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY REVIEW, AND THEN THERE'S ALSO A 20 FOOT, UM, REQUIREMENT FOR THE REAR SETBACK ALONG IN RESIDENTIAL.

AND SO IT'S YOUR OPINION THAT 20 FOOT SETBACK WOULD BE ADEQUATE TO MITIGATE ANY POTENTIAL NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF A HEAVY COMMERCIAL USE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THEN THE, THE, AS I MENTIONED, THE RESIDENTIAL

[00:15:01]

AGENCY REVIEW.

OKAY.

THANK COMMISSIONER.

JUST A QUICK QUESTION TO FOLLOW UP ON COMMISSIONER YOUNG'S QUESTION.

SINCE THIS IS BEING HELD, I DON'T WANT TO ASK YOU TO GO TO GRAB , BUT UNDERSTANDING THE HISTORY OF HOW THIS TH THREE ZONING GOT THERE MIGHT BE HELPFUL AS WELL AS THE INDUSTRIAL AND CSS.

SO WHEN, WHENEVER THIS COMES BACK SUGGESTING, YOU SAID AN INORDINATE AMOUNT OF TIME ON THIS, BUT IF YOU'RE ABLE TO QUICKLY GET TO THE ZONING HISTORY, THAT WOULD BE ELIMINATED, YOU THINK BACK TO YOU COMMISSIONER.

UM, LOOKING AT THE AERIAL PHOTO, UH, IT LOOKS LIKE TO SOME EXTENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, BUT CERTAINLY ON THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST, THERE ARE HEAVY DUTY USES EXTENDING DOWNWARD INTO THE TH THREE A AREA.

UH, SEE WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOME COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING.

I CAN'T TELL WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON DOWN THERE, BUT THERE'S SOMETHING GOING ON ON THE SOUTH END OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THEN THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST.

DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA OF WHETHER THOSE ARE LEGAL NONCONFORMING USES OR ILLEGAL USES? NO, I'M NOT.

OKAY.

AND I'M, I'M TOLD BY PEOPLE IN THE AREA THAT THE MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE EAST IS INDEED A NON-CONFORMING USE.

YOU DON'T KNOW THAT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER? I KNOW ON THAT ONE THERE WAS AN S U P, UM, BUT I'M NOT TOO SURE WHAT THE S P WAS FOR.

OKAY.

SO ACTUALLY THERE IS, IT'S AN, IT'S AN S U P FROM MOBILE HOME PARK.

OKAY.

YEAH, THAT'S A, THAT'S A PORTION OF IT.

IT'S S U P 5 54 AND 3 98, WHICH, UH, HAS A PERMANENT TIMEFRAME.

SO IT'S POSSIBLE THAT S U P EXISTED BEFORE THE CS, SO WAS ESTABLISHED, THE CSS.

SO THERE, UH, YOU KNOW, IF WE LOOK AT OUR G I S MAP, AND UNDER THE CASE NUMBER FIELD, IT JUST SAYS TRANSITION AND IT GIVES THE DATE THAT 51 A WAS ADOPTED, THAT MEANS IT EXISTED.

I BELIEVE THAT MEANS IT EXISTED, UH, PRIOR TO 51 A.

UM, THE CS, THE S U P ONLY APPLIES TO A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY ZONE CSS.

ALL S U PS WERE CARRIED OVER IN THE ZONING PASSAGE.

OH, OKAY.

AND POINT OF INFORMATION THAT MOBILE HOME HAS BEEN THERE.

THIS IS THE FIRST LAND USE THERE IN THAT AREA, GOING BACK TO THE EARLY FIFTIES.

DEFINITELY.

ONE OTHER THINGS TO NOTE, JUST REAL QUICK, THE IR ZONING THAT'S ON THIS PROPERTY AND SOME OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, THAT'S ALSO A TRANSITION DISTRICT.

UM, BUT THEN I CLICK ON TH THREE A AND IT DOESN'T GIVE A CASE NUMBER OR THE, THE TRANSITION STATUS.

I'M NOT REALLY SURE WHEN THAT WAS ESTABLISHED.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER HARPER.

SO, UM, I NOTICED YOU VISITED THE PROPERTY.

COULD YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU, UM, SAW, UM, WHAT THE USE IS CURRENTLY OR WHAT, HOW THEY'RE USING THE PROPERTY FROM? UM, THE CURRENT YES.

THIRD AREA REQUEST? YES.

UM, RIGHT NOW, UM, WHEN I WENT, THEY WERE JUST, UH, REMOVING ALL, UH, TREES.

THEY'RE CLEANING.

CLEANING, THEY WERE CLEANING.

BUT THE LOCK PERMIT DO THEY HAVE FOR THAT TRAY GRADING AND REMOVAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, MR. MR. EARL, DID THEY HAVEING, DID THEY HAVE A PERMIT FOR I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANY GRADING, PERMANENT ENGINEERING APPROVAL.

THERE'S DEFINITELY NO PERMIT.

SO THERE, SO AGAIN, YOU, I'M SORRY.

SO EXHIBITS THE COMMISSIONER HARWOOD CONDITION, THEN WE'LL GO, YEAH, I'M FINISHED.

THAT, THAT WAS THE POINT.

YES.

SO CAN I, COMMISSIONER, SO MR. ERWIN, IF THEY'RE REMOVING TREES, DO THEY NOT HAVE TO MITIGATE THOSE TREE REMOVALS BEFORE THEY CAN DO ANYTHING? UM, IF THAT'S SOMETHING I NEED TO EXPLORE AS TO WHAT EXACTLY IS BEING REMOVED ON THE PROPERTY NOW IF THEY'RE GONE, NOW I HAVE TO IDENTIFY WHAT WAS ON THE PROPERTY AND TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY.

IS THAT CORRECT? TO ABILITY DETERMINE HOW TO PURSUE MITIGATIONS ON, AND I, I I, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, WHEN I DISCUSSED THIS CASE WITH THIS PARTICULAR APPLICANT, PRIOR TO MR. HERBERT'S ASSIGNMENT, THERE WAS A CONSIDERATION BEING MADE FOR, UH, LAND TO BE GIVEN TO THE CITY FOR GREEN SPACE AND PARK.

[00:20:01]

IS THAT, HAS THAT NOT BEEN DISCUSSED WITH YOU? THAT HAS NOT BEEN BROUGHT TO ME.

SO THEY, SO THEN THEY ARE, ARE YOU ARE REQUESTING THAT THE COMPLETE UTILIZATION WOULD BE TO CUT ALL THE TREES DOWN AND, OR I GUESS THAT WOULD BE A QUESTION? THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

APPLICANT, YES.

OKAY.

AND WITH THE, WITH THE, THE WAY THAT THE CITY EXPRESSES THE DESIRE TO REPLACE TREES THAT, THAT ARE CLEAR CUT, LIKE OF IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING THAT THIS PARTICULAR APPLICANT WOULD, WOULD NEED TO, TO CONSIDER BEFORE MAKE ANY CLEAR CUTTING AND, AND TREE MITIGATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED? ALL, ALL THESE, WE SHOULD HAVE PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR ANY PROJECT THAT GOES UP THAT INVOLVES TREE CLEARING.

THE TREES ARE THE SITES DISTURBED, SO NOW WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHAT WAS THERE.

OKAY.

UM, THEN, THEN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH MR. UH, ERWAY, UM, MS. GARZA, MR. RIGHT.

YEAH.

MS. GARZA, UM, I'M HORRIBLE.

I APOLOGIZE.

SO WOULD THERE BE ANY CONSIDERATION WITH THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION TO, UM, ADD ENOUGH BUFFERING TO WHAT THEY WAS ANY CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO ADD ENOUGH BUFFERING TO PROTECT THE RESIDENTIAL PROXIMITY, UM, THAT IS ALREADY THERE OR ANY, ANY, ANY WAY TO PROTECT THE, THOSE RESIDENTS FROM GOING BACK INTO THE, THE TRUCKS, FROM GOING COMMERCIAL TRUCKS, GOING BACK INTO THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD OPPOSED TO GOING STRAIGHT OUT TO LUKE 12, NO WEST LED BETTER, WHICH IS ROUTE 12TH TO PREVENT THE, THE, THE, THE TRUCKS.

WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION ABOUT ANYTHING TO PREVENT THE TRUCKS FROM GOING DOWN DUNVILLE ROAD OPPOSED TO, UM, GOING NORTH, UM, TO, UH, WEST LED BETTER AND, AND, AND, AND GOING EITHER EAST OR WEST ON LED BETTER? NO.

OKAY.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, MS. CAR, THE, WHAT LOOKS LIKE A COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE SIDE IN THE MOBILE PARK, THEY DON'T HAVE AN S U P, I MEAN THEY WOULD, IF THAT IS COMMERCIAL, THEY PEOPLE PARKING, WHICH CERTAINLY APPEARS TO BE FROM AN ARROW HAND, HAVE AN SUV BECAUSE 500 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL, DO WE KNOW IT'S NOT ON THE LIST? IS THAT IT'S CODED HEAVY MACHINERY IN A CLIP, BUT THAT DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE WHAT WE'RE DOING.

NO, I'M NOT AWARE.

COMMISSIONER.

NO.

MR. IWIN, JUST TO BE CLEAR, SINCE THAT IS VACANT RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY, IT IS AN OFFENSE ON THE CITY CODE FOR THEM TO CUT DOWN PROTECTED TREE WITHOUT PREVIOUSLY GETTING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT.

IS THAT RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

WHETHER IT WAS RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL.

OKAY.

SO, UH, IF THERE ARE PROTECTED TREES COMING DOWN AND NO PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED, THAT'S A PROBLEM WHETHER THEY LATER MITIGATE OR NOT? CORRECT.

THANK YOU FOR MR. OR HAS, UH, LOTS OF PRACTICE GOING BACK AND DOING THAT KIND OF WORK.

ARTICLE 10 DOES HAVE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE AND ALLOWS HIM TO GO BACK AND USE HISTORICAL PICTURES AND A WHOLE ENTIRE PROCESS.

MR. USE, HE'S A FORENSIC SHOW.

HE LEFT HIS HOME TODAY.

YEAH.

AND HE BROUGHT UP HIS, HIS, UM, OVERCOAT FOR THE SPY LAST.

ANY LAST QUESTIONS ON THIS PROJECT? COMMISSIONERS.

OKAY, WE'LL KEEP GOING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

DO WE KNOW, SO YOU'LL SET THE DATE WE'LL AT, AT, GOT IT.

SO SUSTAIN DISTRICT THREE AND WE'LL GO TO DR.

.

GOOD MORNING.

UM, ITEM C 3 180 9, A RENEWAL AND AMENDMENT OF SPECIFIC NUMBER 23 8

[00:25:02]

FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A GENERAL MERCHANDISER FOOD STORE THAT IS LESS THAN, UH, 3,500 PER FEET.

UH, THE PROPERTY IS ON RR ORIGINALLY THE STREET HAS A E ONE LIQUOR CONTROL ON, UH, AND IT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST CAMP WISDOM ROAD, EAST OF MARK MARTIN FREEWAY.

AND IT'S 0.34 ACRES.

IT'S IN FAR SOUTHWEST DALLAS.

UM, AS YOU CAN SEE ON BURIAL THE PROPERTY, LIKE ON THE, OH, I'M NOT SHARING.

OKAY, I'M JUST GONNA LIKE CHUCKLED THROUGH THE SLIDES JUST FOR THE PEOPLE ONLINE, BUT I ALREADY SAID ALL OF THESE THINGS.

SO WE WERE HERE, UH, I APOLOGIZE.

UM, THE PROPERTY, UH, HIGHLIGHTED IN, UM, BLUE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A TWO UNIT LOW RETAIL STRIP.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE UNIT TO THE LEFT.

THAT'S THE ONE THAT'S, UH, GONNA SELL THE ALCOHOL OR IT'S ALREADY SELLING THE ALCOHOL.

IT'S SURROUNDED BY A GAS STATION THAT ALSO HAS AN S UT FOR ALCOHOL SALES UN DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST TO THE NORTH.

A COMBINATION OF, UM, BUSINESS COMMERCIAL IN THE HOTEL MOTEL ACROSS THE STREET TO THE SOUTH, UM, AND ORDER RELATED USES RETAIL AND A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY DEVELOPMENT BY THE, THE BACKGROUND.

UH, THE PROPERTY HAD AN S U P BACK IN 2015.

THAT'S WHERE IT WAS RESOLVED FROM D P ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY.

BUT THAT S U P EXPIRED IN 2017.

THIS SS U P THAT'S BEING, UM, RENEWED TODAY, WAS INITIALLY APPROVED IN 2019.

IT WAS RENEWED ONCE IN 2021 AND THIS IS THEIR THIRD.

BASICALLY SS U V.

THEY HAVE A CO SINCE 2014.

UH, AS I SAID, IT'S A ONE STORY BUILDING IS LESS.

THE BUILDING ITSELF IS LESS THAN, UH, 3,500 SQUARE FEET.

IT HAS TWO UNITS AND IT'S A JAR MERCHANDISE FOOD STORE.

UM, THE UNIT TO THE RIGHT TO THE EAST, UM, IS CURRENTLY VACANT.

UM, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A WIDER ANGLE OF BOTH THE PROPERTY AND THE GAS STATION.

THIS IS THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST GAS STATION TO THE WEST.

UM, THIS IS ACROSS THE STREET, UM, ACROSS THE STREET.

THE S C P CONDITIONS REALLY, UM, NORMAL.

UM, OUR, THEY ARE ASKING FOR THREE YEARS WITH, UH, FIVE YEAR ORDER RENEWALS.

UM, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN.

THEY PROPOSE ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGES USUALLY WITH RENEWALS.

UH, KIND OF LIKE GO ALONG WITH THE EXISTING SITE PLAN ON THE RECORD.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THEY THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT FOR YEAR FOR, UH, AND THEN ELIGIBILITY FORMATTED RENEWALS FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER BLAIR? UM, ARE YOU AWARE THAT THERE IS A LOT OF, UM, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD, UM, UH, UH, HANGING OUT IS A, IT'S A HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT AREA AND THE HOMELESS, THEY CAN'T HANDLE OUT OF THAT LOCATION? NO.

OKAY.

I, I LIKE, YEAH, IT'S NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO THE S HARD TO MAKE A RATIONALE AND THE CONNECTION BETWEEN.

ALRIGHT, I CAN LET, LET ME SEE IF I CAN CONNECT THE DOTS THEN.

UM, THERE IS A SEVEN LETTER RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO IT THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME TYPE OF ISSUE.

SO THAT'S THE LAND USE IS, IS A GOOD USE.

THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THIS PARTICULAR LAND BASED ON, ON THE, THE, THE, THE OPERATION OF SEVEN 11 NEXT DOOR AND THE OPERATION, WHICH AT THIS LOCATION, SEVEN 11 DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME, UM, TYPE OF BEHAVIOR AND ACTIVITY AS THIS PARTICULAR, UM, UM, LOCATION IN IT IS NOT A, NOT A GOOD USE OF LAND TO, TO ALLOW MORE LIQUOR CELLS WHEN THEY ARE NOT OPERATING IN A FASHION THAT IS COMMUNITY FOCUSED OPPOSED TO BRINGING IN ACTIVITIES THAT ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.

YOU MADE THE OPPOSITE POINT.

PROBABLY THAT, THE ONE THAT YOU WANTED TO SAY BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IN THE COMMUNITY DOES NOT

[00:30:01]

NEED, UM, ACTUALLY AGAIN, THE LAND USE IS THE SAME LAND USE NEXT DOOR AND IT BASICALLY GOES BACK TO OPERATOR AGAIN.

OKAY.

OTHER COMPLAINTS? I WOULD SAY.

THANK YOU.

THIS CASE IS ON CONSENT.

I'M GONNA TAKE IT OFF.

TAKE IT OFF.

OKAY.

MM-HMM.

, THAT'S IT.

IT HAS FALLEN APART.

UH, COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, PLEASE.

UM, THE REPORT, THEY APPLIED FOR THEIR BACK IN JANUARY, BEFORE JANUARY.

DID THEY, DID THEY TAKE THE WHOLE, UH, IT, IT STAYED A LITTLE BIT IN THE QUEUE, SO IT TOOK A LITTLE BIT TIME TO BE ASSIGNED TO ME.

I WILL GIVE THAT AND WE KNOW ABOUT THAT TOO.

AND IT DID, UH, TAKE A LITTLE BIT TO HAVE THE CONVENIENCE STORE LICENSE INSPECTION.

OKAY.

ONE MORE QUESTION.

WHEN THESE COME UP FOR AUTO RENEWAL, DOES THE STAFF CHECK THE STATUS OF THE 12 FOR AUTO RENEWALS? BECAUSE THE RECOMMENDATION HERE IS FOR THEM TO GET AUTO RENEWAL.

I THINK THEY'RE HAVING TROUBLE.

I THINK SO.

I THINK SO.

I HAD THIS CONVERSATION WITH THE, OUR RENEWAL TEAM.

I THINK SO WE CHECK, WE WAIT FOR THAT AND THEN WE THE SECOND.

YES.

THANK YOU.

SURE.

SO, UM, UM, THIS QUESTION'S KIND OF GENERALLY, BUT WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT LAND USE AND WE SEE THAT THERE'S URINE, WIND USAGE ALREADY BEING UTILIZED NEXT DOOR ACROSS THE STREET, ACROSS THE HIGHWAY, TWO BLOCKS DOWN, UM, ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK AT THOSE OTHER USES TO MAKE OUR DECISION? SURE, BUT I WOULD SAY LOOK AT THE COMP COMPATIBILITY AND, UH, THE IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDINGS.

AND YOU HAVE LIKE, THAT'S WHY WE DO, LIKE, WE LOOK AT THE SURROUNDINGS AND ESTIMATE WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THIS PARTICULAR LAND USE THAT WE HAVE ON THIS SITUATION.

THANK YOU.

QUESTIONS? OKAY.

FOUR.

YES.

UH, ITEM NUMBER FOUR, UH, C 2 12, 2 37.

UM, IS AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 5 43 TO ALLOW REMODEL ABOUT THOSE SPACE AREAS FOR, UH, TWO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

UM, J L LONG MIDDLE SCHOOL IN WOODROW WILSON HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS, UH, THE AREA IS A BIG BLOCK FOUNDED BY PETER AVENUE, PAUL AVENUE, COTON LANE, AND NORTH GLASGOW DRIVE.

IT'S APPROXIMATELY, IT'S A LITTLE BIT OVER 18 ACRES.

UH, IT IS IN, UH, EAST DALLAS.

UH, AS YOU CAN SEE ON , UM, BOTH SCHOOLS, THEY SHARE THE SAME CAMPUS.

JAIL LONG IS ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE.

VI WILSON IS SOUTH.

UH, WEST SIDE IS SURROUNDED BY A COMBINATION OF MULTI-FAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX USES AND THEN BY A PARK TO THE SOUTHWEST AND AGAINST, UH, ZONING DISTRICTS.

A COMBINATION OF D E N F OF A LITTLE D AND THEN R DISTRICT.

IT'S A BIG CAMPUS.

I HAVE TOOK LIKE PROBABLY A HUNDRED PICTURES.

I'M NOT GONNA PUT ALL OF THEM.

I JUST FOCUSED ON THE AREA WHERE THERE ARE CHANGES.

SO THE MAIN CHANGE WILL BE AT THIS CORNER, BASICALLY BETWEEN PAUL'S AND, UH, COVINGTON LANE.

THAT'S THE PARKING LOT, UH, THAT BELONGS TO JAY LONG THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO REMODEL.

SO THIS IS THE CORNER.

UM, THIS IS A VIEW FROM COVINGTON TO SEE THE ENTIRE FACADE OF THE SCHOOL.

THIS IS JAIL LONG.

THIS IS BASICALLY THE PARKING LOT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, UH, ACROSS THE STREET.

MULTI-FAMILY, A BETTER VIEW OF THE ENTRANCE INTO JAIL.

LONG MOVING A LITTLE BIT ON COVINGTON, THE SAME.

ANOTHER VIEW OF THE PARKING LOT.

YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A CURB CUTTING HERE.

THE PROPOSAL IS TO TAKE THIS CURB CUT AWAY AND CREATE A NEW ONE ON, UH, POLICY FURTHER DOWN ON COVINGTON LANE.

'CAUSE I FEEL LIKE ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE MORE IMPACTING THIS SIDE.

I DON'T FEEL THIS IS HOW IT IS.

IT'S IMPACTING MORE THE COVINGTON LANE SIDE.

UM, THIS IS THE WOODROW WILSON AND I THINK IT'S A SHARED ATHLETIC FIELD WHERE THEY'RE PROPOSING TO ADD FOUR UH, LIGHT POLES FURTHER, UH, SOUTH ON COVINGTON LANE.

THIS IS ANOTHER VIEW OF THE ATHLETIC FIELD.

THEY'RE PROPOSING TO ADD TWO ON EACH SIDE OF THE FIELD.

AND THIS IS ANOTHER MORE WIDE VIEW OF COTON LANE TO SEE THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY USES AND HOW, UH, CLOSE THEY ARE AND HOW NARROW CURRENT IS.

AGAIN, ACROSS THE STREET.

SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

THIS IS

[00:35:01]

THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS JAIL LONG.

THIS IS THEIR PARKING LOT WITH THE CURB CUTTING HERE.

THEY, THERE USED TO BE A MULTITUDE OF, UH, PORTABLE STRUCTURES.

THIS IS THE ATHLETIC FIELD, THE PROPOSAL, AND I HAVE 'EM.

AND THIS IS AS BRIEF.

YOU, UH, RECEIVED, UH, A REVISED LAST NIGHT.

THE ONLY CHANGE FROM THE, FROM WHAT'S IN THE DOCKET IS A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN.

SO THIS IS JUST TO SEE SIDE BY SIDE THE PROPOSED AS BRIEF.

UM, AS I WAS SAYING, THE, THE CURB CUT ON COVINGTON IS BEING ELIMINATED RERO TO PAUL'S.

THE PARKING LOT IS BEING REMODELED.

TAKE AWAY A FEW PARKING SPOTS TO GAIN A LOT BIGGER PRACTICE FEEL, BUT THAT'S NOT GONNA BE TWO MONTHS SENSES GONNA BE AN OPEN SPACE.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, ALL THE PORTABLES, ALMOST ALL OF THEM, ONLY THREE ARE, UH, A REMAINDER ON THE SITE, ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

AND THEN, UM, WHAT ELSE? OH, THE NOTE IN ON THE JAIL LONG, UH, SURFACE LOT SAYS THAT THAT PARKING SHOULD BE USED FOR WOODROW WILSON HIGH SCHOOL.

UH, AND THEN ON THE ATHLETICS FIELD, I DIDN'T LIKE THIS RED DOT BECAUSE THEY'RE VERY TINY.

THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE CORE PROPOSED, UM, LIGHT POLES.

UM, THE T M P, THE T M P THAT WAS APPROVED WITH, UH, WITH A PD WAS MORE, WAS FOR BOTH OF THEM, BUT MORE FOCUSED ON WOODROW WILSON.

IN THE MEANTIME, THEY SUBMITTED, UH, REVISIONS TO THAT TO STAFF.

THE, THE PROPOSED ONE IS LOOKING MORE INTO HOW IT'S GONNA AFFECT THIS CHANGE IS GONNA AFFECT THE CIRCULATION ON JAIL LONG.

UM, THIS IS WHAT IS BEING SHOWN.

BASICALLY THE BUSES ARE GONNA BE MORE FOCUSED ON POLICY IN COVINGTON NORTH RATHER THAN THE COVINGTON MAINTENANCE, UH, SHARED WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY.

THE PD CONDITIONS I HIGHLIGHTED IN BETWEEN THE CHANGES FROM THE DOCKET YOU RECEIVE THESE CONDITIONS.

UH, YESTERDAY, UM, VERY GOOD IMPROVEMENTS FROM UH, WHAT IS IN THE DOCKET.

THE CHANGES ARE REVISED FLOOR AREA TO AFFECT THE PORTABLES.

IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A, IT WAS A LITTLE BIT COUNTERINTUITIVE FOR ME.

WE DIDN'T USE TO INCLUDE THEM NOW WE DID.

SO THAT'S WHAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, IT DOESN'T IMPLY ANY ADDITION TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS.

IT'S JUST THE, THE WHOLE UH, MATCH WITH THE PORTABLES, UH, REVISED PARKING TO REDUCE FROM 5 38 TO FIVE 14 SPACES TO ACCOUNT FOR WHAT IS BEING LOST WITH THE PARKING LOT AT THE JAIL LONG.

UM, RESERVE MANAGED PARKING SUPPLY.

THE NOTE, UH, ADDITION OF EV CHARGING STATIONS, UH, ADDITION OF MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR MINIMUM 20 PARKING SPACES FOR MICRO MOBILITY AND ONE CHARGING OUTLET FOR THOSE.

UM, THE T MT LANGUAGE IS FURTHER, UM, UPDATED TO, UH, BASICALLY SAY THAT THE REVISIONS ARE GONNA BE DONE IN MARCH, 2026.

UM, NOW FOR THE LIGHT STANDARDS, THE REQUEST IS TO HAVE 80 FOOT HIGH POLES.

THE CLAR, THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION TO SAY THAT R P S DOES NOT APPLY ONLY TO FALLS.

UM, HOURS OF PREPARATION ARE CHANGING, ARE CHANGED FROM WHAT'S IN THE DOCKET.

UM, AND IT'S BASICALLY SIX DAYS, WEEK 6:00 AM TO 9:00 PM THEY LIMIT THE USE OF THE ATHLETIC FIELDS TO STUDENTS OF THE TWO CAMPUSES.

UH, AND THEN, UM, THERE'S A CONDITION TO SAY THAT THE HOURS FOR ALL OUTDOOR LIVES BASICALLY APPLY THE SAME ON THE TERM CAMP CAMPUS.

UM, THEN THE PD PROPOSES FOR THIS ITIES FOR THREE AREAS.

I WOULD SAY THAT TWO OF THEM ALREADY EXIST, WHICH IS GREAT.

UM, ADDITION, THE REVISED ONE ADDITION OR CHANGED ONE FOR TRASH CAN ON COVINGTON LANE BIKE RACK FOR THE 10 BICYCLES CAN COME TOWARDS THE MICRO MOBILITY REQUIREMENT.

AND THEN A CONDITION TO PROHIBIT AMPLIFIED SOUND BETWEEN 7:00 PM AND 7:00 AM AT NINE.

THIS BEING SAID, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A REVISED EXHIBIT A, WHICH IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REVISED EXHIBIT B, THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND REVISED CONDITIONS AS BRIEF.

VERY MUCH QUESTIONS.

MR. YOUNG? UH, YES FOR MR. NAVAREZ.

I SAW HERE EARLIER.

OH, HE HAD THE MEETING AT NINE 30.

SAID HE SAID HE'S GONNA COME BACK.

I APOLOGIZE.

ALRIGHT, WELL I HIM ONE 30.

OKAY.

THANK YOU FOR THAT HEARING.

COMMISSIONER CAR.

THE, I HEARD THE BUILDING CODE, INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE CHANGING, EVOLVING ABOUT SPACES.

IS THE GENERAL BUILDING CODE REQUIRING SPACES, SCHOOLS?

[00:40:02]

OH, I THINK SO.

I'LL, I'LL GO BACK AND INTO THAT.

I THINK IT'S, WE, LEMME CHECK.

DOES GST HAVE A POLICY THAT THEY WANNA INCLUDE EV PARKING SPACES AT EVERY CAMPUS BY 2030? I, I WOULD, I WOULD THINK SO.

WE, WE'VE BEEN CONSTANTLY INCLUDING THIS IN PDS AND I WOULD REQUIRE MORE THAT WOULD TRUMP DOES, I THINK IF UM, IS THE MOST RESTRICTIVE THAT APPLIES.

SO I WOULD SAY THAT THIS IS A MINIMUM ONE.

SO BASICALLY IT'S GONNA BE FOR THE BUILDING.

UM, MR. GRAY ONE CLARIFICATION ON THE LIGHTING STANDARDS, THE FOUR POLES THAT ARE GREATER IN HEIGHT.

THERE'S A, UM, PROVISION THAT SAYS THOSE EVENTUAL PROXIMITY SLOPE DOES NOT APPLY TO THE LIGHTS THAT'S CAPTURED WITHIN THE FOUR ATHLETIC STANDARDS, CORRECT? IT'S ONLY INTENDED TO APPLY TO THOSE FOUR POLE.

YES.

YES.

JUST YES.

YEAH.

AND THANK FOR THE CLARIFICATION BECAUSE RATHER, I MEAN, I, I DON'T THINK IT WOULD'VE, UH, GOT ISSUES OF UH, BI, BUT IT'S GOOD.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE, OKAY, WE'LL GO CASE FIVE AND SIX.

GOOD MORNING.

UH, MORNING.

PLEASE KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN UP.

YOU CAN SEE IT.

WONDERFUL.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

SO THIS IS THE COMBINED BRIEFING FOR CASES Z 2 12 2 9 8 AND Z 2, 2 3 3 2.

I WOULD LIKE TO JUST ADVISE C P C THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES MADE TO THIS, THESE TWO CASES SINCE YOU LAST SAW 'EM IN AUGUST.

SO THESE APPLICATIONS WE HAVE ARE BOTH FOR A C S COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT WITH CONSIDERATION OF AN M U ONE EXCUSE DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTY IS OWNED IN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.

CURRENTLY, THERE ARE TWO AREAS OF REQUEST.

BOTH ARE LOCATED ON THE NORTH LINE OF ROAD, NORTHEAST OF L B J AND THE FIRST IS APPROXIMATELY 51.88 ACRES.

THE SECOND IS JUST OVER TWO ACRES.

HERE'S THE APARTMENT LOCATION OF THE SITE SOUTHEAST AND THEN HERE'S AN P MAP SHOWING YOU THOSE TWO PARCELS.

SO THE LARGER REQUEST BY THE 2 98 THAT CONTAINS OVER 50 ACRES.

AND THEN THE SMALLER SITE THAT FARMS ALONE DATA THERAPY, WHICH IS WHERE THEY PROPOSE TO HAVE A FUEL STATION AND MERCHANDISER FOR FOOD STORE.

THERE IS A ZONING MATCH SHOWING THAT THOSE TWO PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY AGRICULTURAL TO NORTH.

WE DO HAVE AN INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT THAT HAS THE RESTRICTIONS, WHICH I'LL SHARE WITH YOU LATER.

AND THEN FURTHER TO THE NORTH WE DO HAVE ADDITIONAL AG AS WELL AS TO THE WEST WHERE WE HAVE A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL AND PUBLIC PARK USES AND SOME UNDEVELOPED LAND.

THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH WITH THE IR RESTRICTION.

THE FEED RESTRICTIONS PREVIOUSLY HOUSED THE CASH PLANT, BUT UPON MY SITE VISIT, IT DID SHOW THAT THAT PROPERTY WAS FOR SALE.

SO I'M NOT AWARE OF WHETHER OR NOT IT'S CURRENTLY BEING OPERATED.

PRIOR TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, THERE IS ADDITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY USES AND THEN TO THE SOUTH WE HAVE AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT.

BOTH OF THOSE ARE UNDEVELOPED.

SO FOR 2 9 8, THAT'S THE LARGER OF THE TWO UH, REQUEST AREAS.

THIS IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED LAND THAT AND IT HAS SIGNIFICANT NATURAL FEATURES RUNNING THROUGH THE LAND.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A SITE WITH ANY PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE CSS DISTRICT AND HAS EXPRESSED A PARTICULAR INTEREST IN WAREHOUSE OR OTHER COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES THAT ARE PERMIT PERMITTED BY THE REQUESTED DISTRICT FOR 3 3 2 MORE SPECIFICALLY, THEY HAVE THIS GOAL OF DEVELOPING THE SITE WITH THE GENERAL MERCHANDISER FOOD STORE ING STATION, WHICH IS PERMITTED BY RIGHTS IN THE PROPOSED CSS DISTRICT.

[00:45:01]

HOWEVER, IT'S ALSO PERMITTED IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND NEW DISTRICT AND IT WOULD ALLEVIATE THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE ANY OTHER NON-COMPATIBLE USES AT THIS SITE.

SO THE REASON ONLY NEED TO, YOU WOULD STILL PERMIT THEM TO DEVELOP IT AS THEY'RE SEEKING TO, BUT IT WOULD REMOVE ANY NON-COMPATIBLE USES OR AREA PLANS AND USES FOR COMPATIBILITY PURPOSES.

SO THE CSS DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY ALLOWS SEVERAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES THAT COULD HAVE MAJOR IMPACTS ON THE ADJACENT NATURAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING A PART OF THE FLOOD PLAIN AND SURROUNDING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES.

ALTERNATIVELY, AS I MENTIONED, THE M U ONE DISTRICT WILL ALLOW 'EM TO BUILD OUT ONE SIDE IF THEY ALREADY HAVE MORE CEMENTED WITH THE PROPOSED LAND USE AND THEN PERMIT THE REMAINING ACREAGE TO BE DEVELOPED.

A VARIETY OF LAND USES THAT ARE MORE CONSISTENT WITH BOTH THE AREA PLAN AS WELL AS THE NATURAL FEATURES OF THE AREA AND THE SURROUNDING LAND USES THAT EXIST.

HERE ARE THE SURROUNDING LAND USES IS THIS SIDE WHERE ACTUALLY USES THE, THE PROPERTY ITSELF.

WE'RE LOOKING AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY.

SO THE GREATER ON EIGHTH GRADE, YOU SEE THE ZONING SIGN LOCATED RIGHT THERE ON THE FENCE.

AND THEN THIS IS AS WE TURN RIGHT ONTO DADDY FERRY LOOKING NORTHEAST ONTO THE SITE.

AND THESE ARE THE SURROUNDING LAND USES.

THIS IS OFF OF DADDY FERRY LOOKING EAST.

THERE IS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD THERE WITH SEVERAL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT WERE BUILT PRIOR TO THE FIFTIES.

AND THIS IS WHAT THEY CURRENTLY ARE RUNNING, LOOKING OVER TO THIS METAL FENCING THAT SEPARATES THAT IR DISTRICT FROM THESE, UH, RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.

AND THEN THIS IS THAT CEMENT OR CONCRETE BATCH PLANT THAT WAS PERMITTED IN THAT IR DISTRICT.

AND YOU CAN SEE AT THE TIME OF MY IT WAS FOR SALE AND THAT'S JUST A VIEW INTO THAT PROPERTY.

AND NOW THIS IS, UM, ANOTHER VIEW OF THE SITE CLOSER TO THE SMALLER SITE.

NOW WE'RE AT THE I 20 INTERSECTION OF D FERRY AND I'M TAKING IT BACK TO THE WEST SIDE OF D FERRY TO LOOK AT THOSE ADJACENT AND USES AGRICULTURAL NATURE OR UNDEVELOPED, FOLLOWED BY THE PUBLIC PARK.

BEAUTIFUL PARK.

YOU HAVEN'T BEEN OUT THERE.

UH, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE EXISTING AA DISTRICT.

AN OBVIOUS, UH, CHANGE AS THE SETBACKS.

OF COURSE AA IS MEANT TO BE LARGE OPEN LOTS THAT ARE USED FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND UH, AGRICULTURAL USES.

AND THOSE SINGLE FAMILY USES OR LOT SIZE IN GENERAL HAS A MINIMUM ACREAGE, UH, REQUIREMENT.

AND FOR THAT REASON, THESE LOTS ARE OPEN AND GIVE A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY FOR, FOR WIDE OPEN SPACES, BUT THAT ALSO INCLUDES KEEPING THOSE WIDE OPEN SPACES BY HAVING LARGE SETBACKS.

SO THAT WOULD BE CHANGED WITH BOTH THE CSS AND THE M ONE DISTRICT AS PROPOSED.

NOW THE DENSITY OBVIOUSLY IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BECAUSE THE CSS DISTRICT, THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL USE IS PERMITTED, BUT THERE ARE, UM, FLOOR AREA RATIO REQUIREMENTS FOR THE VARIETY OF USES THAT ARE PERMITTED.

THE HEIGHT OVERALL WOULD CHANGE TO, YOU KNOW, BEING 24 FOOT MAXIMUM TO 45 FEET IF THE CSS DISTRICT OR UP TO 120 IF THEY HAD A MIX OF USES AND QUALIFIED AS A MIXED USE PROJECT UNDER THE M U ONE DISTRICT.

HOWEVER, THERE ARE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES THAT WOULD STILL, UM, IMPOSE UH, RRP S ONTO THE SET.

SO THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT, BUT IT IS SUCH A LARGE AMOUNT OF ACREAGE AT AN EITHER SCENARIO THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BUILD UP TO A REALLY GOOD HEIGHT.

NOW THE LOCK COVERAGE, AGAIN, THE A GAVE DISTRICT IS ALL ABOUT THAT WYOMING SPACE AND HAVING THAT GREEN SPACE.

SO IT'S A VERY, VERY LOW BOTTOM COVERAGE OF 10% FOR RESIDENTIAL OR 25% FOR NON RESIDENTIAL.

AND BOTH THE PROPOSED DISTRICTS ARE GOING UP TO 80.

ONE THING I DIDN'T MENTION ON THE DENSITY FOR THE ENDING, ONE THAT'S IN LIEU IS THAT OF COURSE IT PERMITS RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH IS IN LINE WITH NOT ONLY THE SURROUNDING LAND USES BUT ALSO THE AREA PLANS

[00:50:01]

AND OF COURSE OUR NEED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO ENCOURAGE MORE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

NOW OTHER SPECIAL STANDARDS THAT APPLY ARE FOR THESE TO STRUCTURES IN BOTH THE PROPOSED AND BEACON MOON DISTRICTS.

THERE ARE PROVISIONS FOR VISUAL INTRUSION AND THEN URBAN FORM SET BACK INTO POWER SPACING FOR THE TELE STRUCTURES IN THE DISTRICT.

OVERALL, IT IS THE PRIMARY USES THAT ARE PERMITTED THAT HAVE EVEN LARGER VARIETY OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE THREE DISTRICTS AND WHAT I'VE JUST DESCRIBED IN THOSE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WHICH WERE PRETTY LARGE TO BEGIN WITH, YOU KNOW, AGRICULTURAL, AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY ARE THE TWO USES ALLOWED EXISTING TODAY IT WERE TO BE CHANGED TO A CSS DISTRICT.

WE'D BE OPENING UP A VERY LARGE TRACT OF LAND THAT HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO THE FLOOD CREEKWAY SYSTEM TO HEAVIER COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE USES.

OF COURSE, IT WOULD ALLOW A VARIETY OF SUPPORTING RETAIL PERSONAL SERVICE USES IN OFFICE THAT WOULD BE SUPPORTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

BUT IF THEIR GOAL IS TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH COMMERCIAL BUSINESS SERVICE USES WITH WAREHOUSES AND OTHER LARGE FORMAT INDUSTRIAL USES THAT CAN HAVE POTENTIAL NEGATIVE, UM, IMPACT ON THIS AREA OVERALL THAT YOU DO, WHAT DISTRICT PROVIDES A GOOD BALANCE BETWEEN THAT AND GIVES THEM A VARIETY OF PROSPECTIVE LAND USES? SO WHEN THE APPLICANT WHO IS SELLING THIS PROPERTY AND TRYING TO OBTAIN ZONING SO THAT THE SITE IS A BETTER, MORE, UM, EASY TO DESCRIBE ACCESSIBLE LAND USES IS WHAT THEY SEEM TO BE GOING AFTER.

AND IN MY OPINION FOR THIS AREA, OF COURSE WITH THE AREA OF LAND OF CONSIDERATION AND DESCRIBING LAND USES, MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION IS THAT AND ANYONE THAT'S STRICT MAKES MORE SENSE.

THESE ARE THE ADJACENT DE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.

THE RESTRICTIONS ARE A GOOD MECHANISM TO ENSURE THAT WE QUALIFY A PROPOSED DISPARATE BY REMOVING POTENTIALLY IN COMPARABLE USES OR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

HOWEVER, THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT'S EVER REQUIRED BY STAFF.

IT IS A NEGOTIATION MECHANISM THAT IS USED THROUGH C P C AND COUNCIL WITH THE APPLICANTS.

FURTHERMORE, THE STAFF'S OPINION, IT DOES OPEN UP AN AREA TO THAT BASE ZONING DISTRICT AND ALLOW FOR THE FURTHER DEGRADATION OF THE OVERALL ZONING IN THE REGION.

AND THIS IS BECAUSE THE RESTRICTIONS ARE A SEPARATE MECHANISM THAT CAN BE ALTERED AND MEMORY PHASE PEOPLE LEAVE AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THINGS ARE BEING CHANGED.

AND WHAT WE HAVE TO LOOK AT AT THE END OF THE DAY AS STAFF MEMBERS A LOT OF THE TIME IS WHAT WAS THE BASE RECOMMENDATION IF THEY APPROVED AN IR DISTRICT, AN IR DISTRICT MUST BE COMPATIBLE AND OR SUITABLE FOR THIS AREA.

IT MUST BE WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTED AT THE TIME.

AND THEN THAT'S WHY I SAY IT CAN LEAD TO FURTHER DEGRADATION OF THE BASE SELLING FOR THIS AREA, FOR THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO WHILE MAYBE A GOOD, UH, MECHANISM FOR MAKING ARGUMENTS FOR, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO FINISH A CASE AND NEGOTIATE DOWN, IT CAN ALSO CAUSE ISSUES OVERALL.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SEEING HERE IS THE APPLICANT FEELS THAT IT'S SUITABLE TO ENCOURAGE FURTHER INDUSTRIAL ZONING HERE, DESPITE NOT MEETING THE AREA OF FUND RULES OR SURROUNDING LAND USAGE.

THEY FEEL THAT BECAUSE THERE IS THIS EXISTING OTHER DISTRICT TO THE NORTH THAT IT SHOULD BE SUITABLE TO HAVE A CSS DISTRICT, ANOTHER INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO THE SOUTH OF MUCH LARGER ACREAGE OPPORTUNITY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND STAFF JUST DOES NOT AGREE.

SO FOR CONSISTENCY REVIEW PURPOSES TO SHARE WITH YOU THOSE AREA PLANS, AS NOTED IN THE REPORTS, THERE'S THE I 23 CORRIDOR OR LAND USE PLAN, WHICH SHOWS THESE PROPERTIES AS BEING USED, THE DISTRICT TWO AND SHOWS THAT THEY ARE AS RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL AREAS.

IT ALSO IDENTIFIES THE SURROUNDING AREAS HAVING SIGNIFICANT NATURAL IN SPACE OR DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF THE PRAIRIE CREEK AND TRINITY RIVER HAVING, UH, SENSITIVITY.

SO THE PROPOSED DSS DISTRICT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER AS CALLED FOR BY THE PLAN.

THERE ARE NO INDUSTRIAL USES PERMITTED OR RECOMMENDED IN THIS SUBDISTRICT TWO.

HOWEVER, THERE IS AN APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR THEM IN MAJORITY OF DISTRICT ONE, WHICH IS TO THE SOUTHEAST OF I 20 ON BOTH SIDES OF BONNIE VIEW ROAD.

THIS IS NOT THIS AREA AND BECAUSE OF THAT, THAT RECOMMENDS TO KEEP THOSE MISTRIAL USES IN SUBDISTRICT ONE AND HAVE THIS MORE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD BASED.

UM, IN SUB DISTRICT TWO, WHICH IS WHERE WE'RE LOCATED, WE'RE LOOKING AT, FOR THAT REASON, STAFF RECOMMENDS

[00:55:01]

NEW ONE DISTRICT WHICH WOULD BALANCE THE EXISTING LAND USES AND PROPOSED COMMERCIAL NATURE THAT'S SUGGESTED TO BE ADDED BY THIS FIRM.

THEY WILL ALSO PROMOTE THE INVESTMENT ENTITY CASE PUBLIC PARK TRAIL SYSTEM, WHICH IS THE GREAT COMMUNITY FOREST GATEWAY PARKING HORSE TRAILS AND IT WOULD BE RESPECTFUL OF THE LOW DENSITY SINGLE OF THE VICINITY FOR THAT REASON.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ON THESE TWO CASES IS DENIAL OF THE CSS DISTRICT BECAUSE THOSE SPIRIT PLANS DO NOT SUPPORT THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING.

THERE IS RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY AND GIVEN NATURAL FEATURES AND TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL INSTEAD IN LIEU OF A CSS DISTRICT WHO COMMEND APPROVAL OF A M U ONE DISTRICT.

ANY THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER BLAIR? UM, MR. MUNOZ, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE, THE VERY IN DEPTH, UM, PRESENTATION OF BOTH 2 98 AND 3 32.

I HAVE THREE QUESTIONS, UM, AND I'M, I'M NEED TO TAKE THEM SEPARATELY INSTEAD OF DOING THEM TOGETHER.

UM, AND 2 98, WELL, WITH BOTH OF THEM WERE YOU AWARE THAT, WELL, I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION AND, AND, AND CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT, UH, MR. COPER HAD CHANGED THAT THE DIRECTIONS HAD BEEN CHANGED FROM A CSS TO A M U ONE IN BOTH LOCATIONS AND THAT THE RESTRICTIONS WERE OFFERED UP, UM, IN BOTH LOCATIONS.

SO YOU, UH, AS I NOTED AT THE START OF MY PRESENTATION, THERE HAVE BEEN NO AMENDMENTS TO THESE CASES.

OKAY.

UM, ALRIGHT, UH, LET ME, UH, ASK MR. UM, NO IRWIN, UH, WE AND MR. IRWIN, I, WE HAD A PRE CONVERSATION, UH, OUT IN THE HALLWAY, BUT JUST FOR THE, JUST TO PUT IT ON THE RECORD, DID YOU HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THIS PARTICULAR APPLICANT ABOUT, UM, UH, GIVEN A 22 ACRE, UH, CONSERVATION AREA IN BOTH 2 98 AND 3 32, SAY FOR CERTAIN I'VE HAD THE CONVERSATION, THE ITSELF CONVERSATION, UM, BUT WE DID WITH THE CASE THAT WAS SOUTH OF 20, THE CASE THAT WAS SOUTH OF 20, THERE WAS A CONVERSATION ABOUT CON CONSERVATION EASEMENT THAT WE, THAT CASE DID NOT MOVE FORWARD, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.

BUT, AND THIS IS THE SAME APPLICANT, IT'S JUST ONE IS NORTH 20 AND ONE IS SOUTH 20, CORRECT? YES, I BELIEVE SO.

SO IF THE APPLICANT WAS PROVIDING A CONSERVATION EASEMENT TO DONATING 22 ACRES OF THAT, UM, MS. MUNOZ, CAN YOU PUT BACK UP YOUR, YOUR PICTURE WHERE YOU HAD THE, THE, UM, THE, THE WHERE THE GREENS, WHERE ALL THE TREES AND WHAT, WHAT AREA OF THE, THE DEVELOP OF THE APPLICANT'S CASE WAS BEING DEVELOPED FOR ME PLEASE, AND I APOLOGIZE THAT, THAT YOU DIDN'T GET THE SAME MEMO THAT I GOT.

IT SURE WOULD'VE MADE LIFE EASIER HERE.

IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S TAKING LOAD.

YEAH, THERE IT GOES.

HERE WE GO.

I'M SHARING IT.

I HOPE IT LOOKS AND, OKAY, SO WILL YOU SEE WHERE THE, THE CREEK IS AND THAT, THAT WHERE GOES DOWN? YEAH, ALL THAT.

WOULD THAT NOT BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE 22? THAT, THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED THE PART OF THE 22 ACRE, UM, CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND, UM, THE,

[01:00:01]

THE AREA OF, OF CONSIDERATION FOR BOTH 2 98 AND, AND WELL, ESPECIALLY 2 98, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT 3, 3 2, IT WOULD BE IF IT WAS CONSIDERED AS A U ONE, UM, UM, I JUST, OKAY.

UM, MS. MUNOZ, I UNDERSTAND THAT, THAT THE DEED RESTRICTIONS WERE SUBMITTED TO YOU GUYS TUESDAY, SO YOU HAVEN'T GOTTEN THOSE YET.

UM, THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

I, I THINK I, I I KNOW WHAT I NEED TO DO IN ORDER TO MOVE, IN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE, WE'RE GONNA HOLD THIS CASE THESE TWO CASES BOTH DATE, DATE, UM, OCTOBER THE SECOND, THE SECOND BRIEFING IN OCTOBER 7TH BRIEFING IN OCTOBER.

YES, PLEASE.

UM, MS. MUNOZ, I WILL HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH YOU AND THE APPLICANT SO THAT WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.

IS THAT FAIR? IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU PLEASE? OF COURSE.

THANK YOU.

I APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU.

OCTOBER 19.

I WANT YOU GUYS' TIME HERE.

OCTOBER 19TH.

MM-HMM.

COMMISSIONER QUESTION I'LL ASK.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? WE'LL GOING.

OKAY, PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU CAN SEE MY SCREEN.

NOT YET.

OKAY.

YES.

OKAY.

JUST TO UPDATE YOU, THIS CASE WAS PREVIOUSLY BRIEF ON JULY 6TH, BUT THERE ARE SOME REVISIONS SINCE THAT DATE ON AUGUST THE SEVENTH PM IN EXHIBIT, A REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWING A PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS DATE WITH A SIXTH ADE AT THE EASTERN SHEILA LANE FRONTAGE.

PLEASE FORGIVE MY ERROR IN MY REPORT WHERE I CONFUSED MY EAST FROM MY WEST.

FURTHERMORE, THEY PROPOSED AMENDED SITE PLAN, UM, ITEMS. THEY'RE SHOWING THE EXISTING 21 CEDAR ELM TREES RUNNING ALONG SHEILA LANE ALL ACROSS DOWN TO THE WEST SOUTH ON SOUTHWARD ON LAKEFIELD BOULEVARD FRONTAGES.

BUT THEY INCLUDE PROPOSED PARKING LOT SCREENING AT A HEIGHT OF THREE FEET ALONG BOTH STREET FRONTAGES.

HERE IS THE REVISED PLAN AND I MARKED IT UP AND INCREASED THE SIZE HERE FOR YOU TO SEE THAT NOW THAT TRUCK TRAFFIC IS ENTERING ON LAKE VIEW AND ENTERING THE SITE HERE AS PREVIOUSLY SUGGESTED, BUT NOW THEY'VE GOTTEN THE GREEN LIGHT TO TURN LEFT HERE ONTO SHEILA, RATHER THAN COMING OUT OF STEP.

HAD PROPOSED THROUGH A SLIP ROAD ALONG THE INSIDE OF THE INVENTORY STORAGE AREA AND ACCESSING THIS WHAT IS NOW PROPOSED AS EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY.

THAT IS A NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SHEILA FRONTAGE.

INITIALLY, STAFF HAD PROPOSED FOR THEM TO EXIT THIS WAY HEAD NORTHBOUND, BUT THAT WAS NOT SEEN AS THE ALTERNATIVE.

INSTEAD IT WORKED WITH MR. NEVAREZ.

THE APPLICANT FORCE OUR COMMISSIONER TO COME UP WITH THIS PLAN.

HE'S BEEN ACCEPTED BY ALL PARTIES.

SO NOW SUB TRAFFIC WOULD ENTER LAYFIELD AND WHO DECIDES COME INTO THIS WAITING AREA THAT IS FREE OFF WITH A SECURITY FENCE, 16 HEIGHT, THERE IS A CUL GATE AND DON'T THINK THAT'S ENOUGH MANEUVER SPACE FOR A SEMI AND THEN THEY COME OUT ONTO SHEILA LANE, TURN LEFT TO EXIT.

THOSE ARE THE CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST.

AND S RECOMMENDATION IS STILL FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT, UM, TO THE PLAINTIFF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 37, SUBJECT TO REVISED COMMISSIONS WITH THE REMOVAL OF THAT REQUIREMENT FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THAT EXISTING SS C P AND RENEWAL FOR THE VEHICLE OPTION STORAGE USE FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWALS FOR ADDITIONAL FIVE YEAR PERIODS SUBJECT TO THIS REVISED SITE PLAN AND REVISED CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

QUESTIONS?

[01:05:04]

NO QUESTIONS.

WE'LL GO TO NUMBER EIGHT.

THIS ONE HAS BEEN READ BEFORE 1 0 5.

YES IT WAS, BUT IT HAS ONE VERY TWO VERY MINOR UPDATES IF YOU WANT TO, I CAN PLEASE.

UM, JUST THREE SLIDES I HAVE, WHICH ARE BASICALLY CORRECTIONS FROM, UM, SOME UNSOLVED ISSUES LAST TIME.

SO THE SITE PLAN WAS REVISED TO ADD THE, THE WALK-IN PRE COOLER.

UM, I WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT TOLD US THAT THEY HAD PER, THEY HAVE PERMITS FOR THAT, UH, FOR THE PAST FEW YEARS.

IT'S OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

SO THAT'S THE REVISION TO THE SITE PLAN.

AND ALSO, UM, THE UNCOVER PATIO IS SHOWING THE CORRECT, THE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN WAS 800 FEET, NOW IS 7 0 4.

AND THEN, UH, THE CONDITIONS ARE REVISED TO INCLUDE A PROVISION TO PROHIBIT, UM, TO PROHIBIT THE ROOFTOP PATIO TO HAVE LATE HOURS.

SO THESE ARE THE TWO CHANGES.

THIS IS AN AREA WHERE YOU CAN SEE THIS.

THERE WAS A DISCUSSION LAST TIME, SO I WANTED TO PLEASE, CAN YOU JUST REFRESH ME? I JUST LEFT THE, SINCE OUR JULY MEETING CONCERN ABOUT THE WALK IN COOLER WAS THE, WASN'T ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, BUT IT WAS EXISTED.

YES.

AND, AND THERE WAS ALSO, UM, A CONCERN THAT IT IS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE ALLEY.

OKAY.

UM, AND THEN KIND LIKE TALKING UNEXPECTED BECAUSE THERE ARE LIKE MM-HMM.

CONFLICT ON ANOTHER ONE.

SHE HAS A ON 14 I THOUGHT SO IT WAS JUST, UM, YOU SEE THERE ARE LIKE FOUR UNITS IN THAT YEAH.

IN THAT BUILDING AND WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS THE, FOR THIS UNIT.

UM, WHEN I DID MY SITE VISIT, I NOTICED ALL OF THOSE, BUT I ALSO DIDN'T KNOW IS IT FOR THIS UNIT OR NOT.

AND THE APPLICANT CONFIRM IT'S FOR THIS UNIT AND IT'S PERMANENT AND IT'S OUTSIDE OF THE, IT'S A REALITY.

ANYWAY.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

YOU, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE? COMMISSIONER'S NUMBER EIGHT, HOLD IT.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT, THIS IS NUMBER EIGHT.

UM, ABOUT A MONTH.

OCTOBER THE SECOND.

NO, THE FIRST MONTH.

OCTOBER IT'S NINE, SEVEN.

ANY QUESTIONS ON NINE? I CAN, UH, IF YOU WANT, I CAN BRIEF 10.

10 IS GONNA BE HELD UNDER ADVISEMENT TO SEPTEMBER 21ST.

OKAY.

AND NO BRIEFING.

AND NO BRIEFING.

OKAY.

UH, NUMBER 11 IS ALSO GONNA BE HELD THROUGH SEPTEMBER 21ST.

SEPTEMBER UHHUH, SEPTEMBER 21ST.

WE'RE STILL ON NINE, SO WE'LL ON NINE TO 12.

YES.

TO THE NEXT ONE.

NINE.

AN APPLICATION

[01:10:01]

PERMIT FOR MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING ON PROPERTY FOUND C S D ONE MARSH SURFACE DISTRICT WITH THE D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY ON THE NORTHLINE SILVER BROUGHT IN THE DRIVE CF ON GROVE.

IT'S 1.2 ACRES.

IT IS LOCATED OFF OF CF POND, SOUTHEAST DALLAS.

UH, IT'S THE SITE, UH, AERIAL VIEW.

AND SO AS FOR AS FOR THE SURROUNDING USES, THERE'S MOTOR VEHICLE VIEW STATION, VEHICLE DISPLAYS, SURVEILLANCE AND SERVICE TO THE NORTHEAST.

UH, THERE'S SOME VEHICLE DISPLAYS, SALES AND SERVICE IN THE EAST, AN UNDEVELOPED PARCEL.

UH, CROSS , THE SOUTHEAST SINGLE FAMILY TO THE SOUTH AND SOUTHWEST.

AND THERE'S MACHINERY, HEAVY TRUCK EQUIPMENT OR CHART SALES AND SERVICE HAVE BEEN REQUESTS AND THE AREA REQUEST IS CURRENTLY BUILT OUT AS A SERVICE PARKING FACILITY.

AND ZONE C AS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT, UM, YOU USE A MOTOR VEHICLE COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING IS PERMITTED BY RIGHT IN THE, THE DISTRICT, BUT IT REQUIRES AN S U P WITHIN 500 SQUARE, EXCUSE ME, 500 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WHICH THIS PROPERTY B AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A SIGN PLAN WITH A COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING FACILITY, FORCING TRUCK PARKING SPACES SURROUNDED BY FENCE ACCESS FROM SILVERADO DRIVE, COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING WITH DEFINED 51 A AS A FACILITY FOR THE TEMPORARY DAILY OR OVERNIGHT PARKING OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES AS A FINE IN THE USE OF REGULATIONS FOR A TRUCK STOP AND OR MOTOR VEHICLES WITH TWO OR MORE REAR AXLES SUCH AS TRUCKS, TRUCK TRACTORS, AND SIMILAR VEHICLES FOR NO CHARGE OR, OR FEE.

REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THAT FEE IS BEING CHARGED INDEPENDENTLY OR ANY OTHER USE ON THE LOT.

DEPARTMENT IS NOT ACCESSORY TO A MAIN USE ON THE LOT WORDY BUT IMPORTANT.

UM, SO TO GET DOWN TO THE SITE, THE SITE SILVERADO, UM, WITH SOME TRUCK PARKING ON IT RIGHT NOW.

UM, THIS IS ALSO MORE OF THE SITE BY LOOKING WEST.

NOW WE'RE LOOKING NORTH.

THAT'S GONNA BE, UM, THAT'S ACTUALLY, THAT'S GONNA BE BEYOND THE ENTRANCE FOR THOSE SITE'S.

GONNA BE A DIFFERENT, UH, FACILITY.

NOW.

THIS IS RIGHT LOOKING IN, I THINK THE, UH, DRIVEWAY AND THIS IS THE EAST MOST PART OF THIS SITE WITH TRUCKS AND KIND OF THE WHOLE, THE WHOLE LENGTH OF THE SITE GOING OVER TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE AS IT'S USED TODAY, LOOKING SOUTH, UH, WEST DOWN IN COLORADO MEANS THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO, TO YOUR LEFT.

UH, THIS PROPERTY IS UNDEVELOPED CSS WITH BE UNDEVELOPED AND THAT THERE'S COMMERCIAL TRUCK PARKING OVER THERE TO THE EAST WITH THE, UH, SOUTHERN PROPERTY RIGHT TO MY LEFT.

IT'S THE ADJACENCY OF THE RESIDENTIAL USE AND THE, UH, PROPOSED USE ON THE RIGHT.

UM, AND UH, ACROSS SILVERADO IS RESIDENTIAL USE.

THERE, UM, ENTRANCE THROUGH THAT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT NOW RUN BACK, UH, THIS IS KIND OF A FLY OVER THE SILVERADO AS CF ON TRUCK, TRUCK USE.

THAT'S OTHER ONE.

IT'S A TRUCK STOP EXISTS TODAY.

UH, IT IS PAST THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SIGN THERE, I GUESS I NOTED.

UH, BUT THAT'S, UH, AFTER THE ENTRANCE OF THIS PROPERTY.

UM, HERE'S THE SIDE PLAN AS IT'S PROPOSED, UH, THEY ENTER FROM SILVERADO AND THERE'S 14 SPACES ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY AND FENCE AROUND THE EXTERIOR PROPOSE THE CONDITIONS, UH, PER TYPICAL REQUESTING TWO YEARS ELIGIBILITY FOR TWO YEAR ADMIN AT THAT POINT.

UM, THE LIGHTING LIMITATION, UH, THAT POINTS AWAY.

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, UH, PARKING AREAS SCREEN WITH AN EIGHT FOOT HIGH AND SOLID SCREEN FENCE.

AND THE OTHER TYPICAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS DENIAL.

THANK YOU, SIR.

QUESTION COMMISSIONER BLAIR, UM, AS YOU SAW, UH, UM, MR. PETTY YES.

UM, WERE YOU AWARE THAT THERE WERE, UH, THAT THERE WAS AN ACTIVE CODE VIOLATION BEING PURSUED ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY? THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, YES.

ARE YOU AWARE THAT THIS, THIS PROPERTY IS

[01:15:01]

PART OF THREE ADDRESSES ALL CONNECTED TO THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER? YES.

AND ARE, UH, WERE YOU AWARE, WERE YOU AWARE THAT TWO OF THE THREE ALL HAVE THE SAME CODE VIOLATIONS? UH, YES, I BELIEVE SO.

AND THAT TWO OF THE THREE ARE ALSO, UM, IN ONE STEP, UH, BEFORE GOING TO COMMUNITY PROSECUTION FOR THE CODE VIOLATIONS.

AND UM, SO I KNOW I'M GOING TO IT.

UM MM-HMM.

FOR LINE, THAT WAS ONE OF THE, I I I I PUSHED MY LIMITS.

THANK YOU.

UM, SO MR. PEPPY, UM, IN ORDER TO, TO MAKE THIS, IF, IF, IF THE APPLICANT WANTED TO MAKE THIS SITE WORK, UM, WOULD NOT THERE BE CONSIDER THANK YOU.

THAT'S BEST PICTURE IN THE WORLD.

UM, THAT PICTURE IS WORTH WITHOUT WORDS, THAT'S SILVERADO, CORRECT? YEAH.

UH, ROAD ON OUR LEFT IT SILVERADO AND HAS SOME CURVED GUTTERS? NO, NOT.

AND IT'S NOT CONDUCIVE FOR TRUCK TRAFFIC, CORRECT? CORRECT.

YEAH.

AND THAT, THAT ROAD LEADS SILVERADO LEADS RACE STRAIGHT TO CLEAVER ROAD, CORRECT? YES.

QUARTER MILE LONG ROAD.

OKAY.

UM, I THINK THAT THAT'S ENOUGH.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONER YOUNG.

FOLLOWING UP ON COMMISSIONER BLAIR'S QUESTIONS.

DOES THIS SITE HAVE A CO OF ANY COMMENT? NO, THIS SITE DOES NOT HAVE A CO NO.

AND THAT IS ITSELF A VIOLATION OF THE CODE A CO FOR WHAT? A CO FOR ANYTHING SMELTING FOR ANYTHING COUNTY DOES NOT REQUIRE COS BUT , BECAUSE I WANTED TO IN THE COMMENT AND YOU KNOW, I ALWAYS SAY THAT, THAT IF THE CO WOULD BE FOR THE USE THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED.

LIKE WHAT DO YOU ISSUE THE SEAL BASED ON? AND THEN IF THERE IS A VIOLATION AND THEY'RE COMING FOR THE GENERAL ZONING CHANGER FOR THE S U P, IT'S THERE.

THEY'RE SHOWING US, YOU SEE, I'M TRYING TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE, SO WE NEED TO ALWAYS BALANCE THAT.

ALRIGHT, WELL HOW, HOW LONG HAS THE USE BEEN IN, IN PLACE? IT'S BEST, YOU KNOW, UH, UP THE, SO I ACTUALLY, THESE TAKE PICTURES TAKEN A LONG TIME AGO.

UM, I WANT TO SAY THESE ARE TAKEN ONE AND A HALF YEARS AGO WHEN I TOOK THESE PHOTOS RATHER HIM BACK CONDITION PEN UP HERE? SIMILAR.

UM, AND THEN, WELL, I'M MORE INTERESTED IN GOING BACK FURTHER.

I GOTCHA.

TWO YEARS AGO, 22 YEARS AGO.

MM-HMM.

, JUST SOME HISTORICAL AREA.

RIGHT.

THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT UP THE, SO THOSE PICTURES THAT YOU'RE SEEING WERE FROM THEN, UM, THIS AREA I BELIEVE IS FROM THE 20 20 19 OR 2020.

SO IT LOOKS LIKE THE GAS IS PRETTY RECENT IN, IN THE FULLNESS OF TIME.

YES.

OKAY.

UM, AND THERE IS NO, WELL THE, THE ONLY USE ON THE LOT AT PRESENT IS THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES.

THAT'S SO THAT'S NOT ACCESSORY TO ANY OTHER MAIN UNITS? AN INDIVIDUAL LOT.

YES.

SO IT'S, I DON'T SEE IT AS ACCESSORY BECAUSE IT'S ON ONE LOT OR WHETHER WAS PRESENT ON THAT LOT AND WE TALKED ABOUT IN THE DEFINITION, UM, OF NORTH