Dec 07, 2023 City Planning Commission

[00:00:01]

OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.

GOOD.

A GOOD MORNING.

COMMISSIONERS.

DISTRICT ONE.

DISTRICT TWO.

DISTRICT TWO.

SHE'S HERE.

PRESENT.

DISTRICT THREE.

PRESENT DISTRICT FOUR.

VACANT.

DISTRICT FIVE.

PRESENT.

DISTRICT SIX.

PRESENT.

DISTRICT SEVEN.

DISTRICT SEVEN.

DISTRICT EIGHT HERE.

DISTRICT NINE.

DISTRICT NINE.

COMM.

DISTRICT 10.

DISTRICT 11.

DISTRICT 11.

DISTRICT 12.

ABSENT.

DISTRICT 13 PRESENT.

DISTRICT 14.

DISTRICT 14.

SHE'S ONLINE.

OKAY.

AND PLACE 15.

I'M HERE.

YOU HAVE QUORUMS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS.

[CALL TO ORDER]

UH, COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A LOT TO GET TO.

JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK ANNOUNCEMENTS.

THE, UH, FORWARD DALLAS UPDATE WE'RE GOING TO DO AS A WORKING LAUNCH, SO HOPEFULLY WE'RE GONNA PUNT THAT BACK TO AROUND NOON.

UH, WE DO HAVE A LOT OF CASES TO GET THROUGH, SO WE'RE GOING TO KEEP IT AT A, AT A BRIEF, BRIEF, UH, PACE HERE.

LITTLE QUICK PACE.

I KNOW THAT STAFF, UH, WAS KIND ENOUGH TO SEND OUT ALL THE PRESENTATIONS AHEAD OF TIME.

THAT WAS VERY HELPFUL.

THOSE ARE ALL ON THE WEBSITE ONLINE.

UH, AND WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD

[2. 23-3165 An application for an amendment to and a renewal of Specific Use PermitNo. 1898 for a late-hours establishment limited to a general merchandise orfood store 3,500 square feet or less and a motor vehicle fueling station, onproperty zoned Planned Development District No. 842, the Lower GreenvilleAvenue Special Provision District, with an MD-1 Modified Delta Overlay, onthe southeast corner of Greenville Avenue and Richmond Avenue. (Part 1 of 2)]

AND DR.

UTA, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

UM, I'M GONNA GO QUICKLY, UH, OVER THE PRESENTATION FOR CASE NUMBER TWO Z TWO 12.

3 52 IS A RENEWAL OF AN EXISTING SUP 1898 FOR A LATE HOURS ESTABLISHMENT, LIMITED TO AGER MERCHANDISER FOOD, FOOD STORE, NOT FEED STORE THREE 3,500 SQUARE FEET OF OR LESS.

AND A MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING STATION THAT'S LOCATED ON GREENVILLE AND RICHMOND AVENUE IN PD NUMBER 8 42.

AND IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0 38 ACRES.

IT'S IN EAST DALLAS.

AS I WAS SAYING, THIS IS THE AERIAL MAP.

THE CORNER OF THE MAJOR STREETS IS SURROUNDED BY RESTAURANTS.

MULTIFAMILY A LITTLE BIT, UH, BEHIND OR TO THE EAST OF THE SITE.

COFFEE SHOP IN A BIG GROCERY STORE ACROSS, UM, ON THE ZONING MAP.

IT'S RIGHT WITHIN PD 8 42.

IT ALREADY HAS AN SUP.

THERE ARE SIMILAR S SUVS ACROSS THE STREET AND FURTHER SOUTH.

AND THEN THERE IS A, A DIFFERENT, A PD PD 180, UH, 1 67 THAT ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY TO THE EAST.

UM, THIS PD DEFAULTS TO CR COMMUNITY RETAIL, BUT IN ADDITION TO A CR UM, REGULATIONS, IT ALSO REQUIRES FOR, UM, BUSINESSES OR OPERATIONS BETWEEN BE, THAT ARE OPERATING BETWEEN MIDNIGHT AND 6:00 AM AN SUP AND CALLS THEM LATE HOURS ESTABLISHMENTS.

THIS SUP WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2018, UH, 2011 DECEMBER, UH, FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD.

IT HAD AUTO RENEWALS.

THEY DIDN'T SUBMIT IN TIME.

UH, IT WAS AUTO RENEWED ONCE AND THEN THEY DIDN'T SUBMIT IN TIME AND THEY CAME IN FEBRUARY, 2022.

THEY WERE APPROVED FOR ONE YEAR.

THEREFORE, THEY'RE IN FRONT OF US TODAY HOLDING THIS CASE.

UH, JUST ONE QUICK LITTLE PAUSE.

UH, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, WE'RE ARE, WE ARE HOLDING THIS CASE, IS THAT CORRECT, MR. WE ARE JANUARY 18TH.

JANUARY 18TH.

SO THEN LET'S JUST GO AHEAD AND GO TO, YEAH, WE'LL GO TO QUESTIONS ON THIS CASE.

COMMISSIONERS, WE'RE GONNA HOLD THIS CASE TO JANUARY 18TH, 2024.

ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? I DO HAVE A QUESTION, COMMISSIONER, ABOUT, UH, MR. DREA, ABOUT THE, UH, RECOMMENDATION.

IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SUBJECT TO A REVISED SITE PLAN, I MEAN AMENDED SITE PLAN AND AMENDED CONDITIONS? YES.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE A POST-IT HERE.

THANK YOU.

JUST TO NOT, UH, FORGET TO DO IT WHILE I BRIEF.

YES.

UH, WE REVISED A LITTLE BIT THE SITE PLAN TO UPDATE THE TABLE, BUT NO OTHER CHANGES.

AND THEN OBVIOUSLY THE CONDITIONS TO CHANGE THE TIMEFRAME.

THANK YOU.

YES, THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, WE'LL GO TO CASE NUMBER THREE.

THANK YOU DR.

.

NO, WE TAKE, WAIT.

YEAH, UH, COMMISSIONERS, WHILE WE WAIT FOR OUR PLANNER, UM, CASES 2, 4, 6, 13 AND 16 HAVE COME OFF CONSENT AT THIS POINT.

[00:05:02]

WE'LL GO TO CASE NUMBER

[3. 23-3167 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2019 for a bar, lounge, or tavern and an inside commercial amusement limited to a live music venue on property zoned Tract A within Planned Development District No. 269, the Deep Ellum/Near East Side Special Purpose District, on the southeast line of Elm Street, southwest of North Crowdus Street.]

GOOD MORNING.

GOOD MORNING.

I'M GONNA TRY TO ADJUST THIS 'CAUSE IT'S TOO TALL.

THIS IS CASE NUMBER D 2 23 DASH 23 5.

THIS IS A RENEWAL FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2019 FOR A BAR, LOUNGE TAVERN AND INSIDE COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT LIMITED TO A LIVE MUSIC VENUE.

THIS IS A LOCATION MAP AND IT IS LOCATED IN DEEP EL, OUTLINED IN BLUE IS THE LOCATION ON THE AREA MAP.

THIS IS THE ZONING MAP IS SURROUNDED BY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS, PERSONAL SERVICES AND MEDICAL USES.

AGAIN, THIS IS THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT 2019.

THE, IT WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST OF 12TH, 2020 FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD.

AND IT ALLOWS, THE FOLLOWING USES A BAR, LOUNGE, TAVERN, AND INSIDE COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT LIMITED TO A LIVE MUSIC VENUE.

IT EXPIRED ON AUGUST THE 12TH, 2023.

THE APPLICANT APPLIED FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE SUP ON MARCH THE 21ST, 2023.

AND THE APPLICANT REQUESTED RENEWAL OF SUP NUMBER 2019 FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD TO CONTINUE THE USE OF THE PROPERTY AS A BAR, LOUNGE OR TAVERN AND INSIDE COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT LIMITED TO LIVE MUSIC VENUE EXCEPT FOR THE TIME LIMIT.

THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PROPOSE ANY CHANGES TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OR SITE PLAN OF SUP NUMBER 2019.

THE NEXT FEW SLIDES WILL BE PICTURES OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING SITES.

THIS IS, UH, 20 6:40 AM STREET AND I'M LOOKING DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.

THIS IS A SURROUNDING USE NEXT, NEXT DOOR, AND IT DOES APPEAR TO BE VACANT.

THIS IS A NOTIFICATION SIGN THAT THEY HAD PROPERLY, UH, PLACED OUT FRONT.

THIS IS SURROUNDING USES ON M STREET AND I'M FACING GOOD LAIR ALSO SURROUNDING USES ON M STREET, SURROUNDING USES ON M STREET.

AND THIS IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.

THESE IS THE, UH, USES NEXT DOOR, NEXT DOOR AS WELL.

AND THESE ARE THE SPECIFIC USE CONDITIONS.

RYAN, DO I NEED TO GO INTO DETAIL ABOUT THOSE? OKAY.

THAT'S THE SITE PLAN.

AND AGAIN, NOTHING ABOUT IT CHANGED AND STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? THANK

[4. 23-3169 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 1695 for a bar,lounge, or tavern and an inside commercial amusement limited to a livemusic venue on property zoned Tract A within Planned Development DistrictNo. 269, the Deep Ellum/Near East Side Special Purpose District, on thenorthwest corner of Exposition Avenue and Canton Street.Staff Recommendation: Approval for a five-year period with eligibility forautomatic renewals for additional five-year periods, subject to amendedconditions. (Part 1 of 2)]

WE'LL GO TO CASE, UH, NUMBER FOUR.

I HAVE A WELCOME FIRST.

YEAH.

UM, GOOD MORNING EVERYONE.

UM, I DID WANT TO SORT OF REINTRODUCE, UM, ONE OF OUR NEW SENIOR PLANNERS.

THIS IS LAQUAN CLINTON'S.

UM, FIRST TIME PRESENTING TO CPC.

WE ACTUALLY HAVE TWO NEW PLANNERS TODAY.

UM, SO EVERYONE PLEASE GO ON YOUR WAY TO MAKE HIM FEEL WELCOME.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

WELCOME MR. CLINTON.

WE ALL LOOK FORWARD, FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU, SIR.

[00:11:12]

HOW YOU DOING? GREAT.

GOOD MORNING.

THIS IS CASE Z 2 23, 2 41 AND IT IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RENEWAL, UH, SUP 1 6 9 5.

UH, RENEWAL FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ZONE PD LOCATED ON CORNER OF INTERSECTION AT CANTON STREET SOUTH EXPOSITION AVE WITH COMMERCE STREET BEING A CROSS STREET.

UM, THIS SUP RENEWAL IS FOR, UH, PROPERTY TO MAINTAIN BAR LOUNGE OR TAVERN AND LIVE MUSIC VENUE USE.

AND IT'S APPROXIMATELY, UH, 5,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

HERE'S OUR LOCATION MAP.

HERE'S OUR ZOOM IN, UH, AERIAL.

A BRIEF, UH, ZONING MAP TO THE NORTH.

WE HAVE COMMERCIAL RETAIL, UH, TO THE EAST, ALSO COMMERCIAL RETAIL.

UH, PRETTY MUCH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD IS COMMERCIAL RETAIL.

UM, UNDER PD 2 6 2 6 9, EXCUSE ME.

UM, AGAIN, CURRENTLY ZONED UNDER PD 2 6 9.

UH, THIS LOT HAS FRONTAGE ON CANTON STREET AND SOUTH EXPOSITION AVE.

UH, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE LAND USE OR THE SITE PLAN HERE.

WE'RE GONNA GO THROUGH A FEW, UM, SITE VISIT PHOTOS.

THIS IS ON PROPERTY, UH, SOUTH EXPOSITION AVE, LOOKING NORTHEAST.

THIS IS ON CANTON STREET LOOKING NORTHEAST.

THIS IS ALSO ON PROPERTY LOOKING EAST, UH, DIRECTLY ADJACENT.

THIS IS ON PROPERTY LOOKING SOUTHWEST HERE WE ARE ON SOUTH EXPOSITION AVE, LOOKING NORTHWEST ALSO ON, SO EXPOSITION AVE LOOKING SOUTHEAST HERE IS THEIR, UM, EXISTING, EXISTING SITE PLAN.

AGAIN, NO OTHER, UH, NO CHANGES ARE BEING PROPOSED.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS, UH, APPROVAL FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWAL.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, CAN YOU, UH, THANK YOU MR. CLINTON FOR THE PRESENTATION.

UH, TWO QUESTIONS.

I DIDN'T SEE, UM, ANY CRIME STATISTICS IN OUR CASE FILE, WERE THOSE RECEIVED BY STAFF? YES.

CRIME STATISTICS WERE RECEIVED.

OKAY.

AND, AND I APOLOGIZE, DID I OVERLOOK THEM OR I DON'T SEE THEM IN THE CASE REPORT? I CAN, UM, GET THOSE SENT OUT.

THEY SH SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE CASE REPORT, SO MY APOLOGIES FOR THAT.

OKAY.

AND THEN, UM, IN YOUR SITE REVIEW AND UM, CONSIDERATION OF THIS REQUEST, THERE'S UM, SOME RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT ARE JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THIS AND, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF COMING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, UM, AS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWALS.

WAS THAT A FACTOR, UM, IN YOUR CONSIDERATION? NO.

SO, UM, WE, I DID TAKE A LOOK AT THE UPCOMING RESIDENTIAL, UM, USES, UM, TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.

HOWEVER, UH, THE RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTOMATIC RE RENEWAL WAS BASED ON PREVIOUS APPROVALS.

OKAY.

SO, UM, I THINK IT WAS ORIGINALLY A, I THINK A THREE YEAR.

WE HAD ANOTHER THREE YEAR.

THE MOST RECENT ONE WAS FIVE MM-HMM.

.

AND SO YOU JUST FEEL LIKE THEY'VE HAD A, A TRACK RECORD, SO THAT GOES WITH THE CURRENT OWNER, BUT AS THIS, UM, RENEWAL WILL GO WITH THE LAND, IF WE HAD A NEW OPERATOR, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT, UM, WAS CONSIDERED, UM, A, AGAIN, KNOWING THAT THIS USE AND THIS APPROVAL WILL GO WITH THE LAND, EVEN IF THERE WAS A FUTURE CHANGE IN AN OPERATOR? WAS THAT ANYTHING THAT WAS CONSIDERED?

[00:15:01]

SO THE OPERATOR CLEARLY HAS A, A DEMONSTRATED, UM, YOU KNOW, GOOD OPERATION BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR, ENGAGED WITH THE COMMUNITY.

MM-HMM.

, HOWEVER, THERE'S NO GUARANTEE THAT THEY WILL CONTINUE TO BE HERE THROUGH THE DURATION OF, OF THE SUP? NO.

SO EVERYTHING, UH, BASED, UH, SO MY RECOMMENDATION WAS SOLELY BASED ON LAND USE, UM, NOT NECESSARILY THE OPERATOR.

UM, BUT AGAIN, GIVING THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS THAT KIND OF ACTUALLY HELPED WITH THE, UM, RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS CASE OR FOR THE, THE RENEWAL.

OKAY.

WELL I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE AND I'LL ASK THEM SOME ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.

SURE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? AGAIN, THIS CASE HAS COME OFF CONSENT, WHAT WE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH MR. CLINTON.

THIS GO TO CASE NUMBER

[5. 23-3170 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2421 for a commercial amusement (inside) limited to a dance hall on property zoned Planned Development District No. 498, the Harry Hines Corridor Special Purpose District, on the northwest corner of Harry Hines Boulevard and Joe Field Road.]

HE'S ONE OF OUR OTHER NEW SENIOR PLANNERS THAT WILL BE PRESENTING FOR THE FIRST TIME TODAY.

GOOD MORNING AND WELCOME MR BATE.

GOOD MORNING COMMISSION.

MY NAME IS MARTIN BATE AND I'M PRESENTING CASE Z 2 23 DASH 2 42.

THIS IS AN AMENDMENT FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2 4 2 1 FOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INSIDE LIMITED TO A CLASS A DANCE HALL, A PROPERTY ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 4 98, THE HARRY HINES CORRIDOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT.

IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HARRY HINES BOULEVARD AND JO FIELD ROAD AND IT'S APPROXIMATELY FOUR TO 900 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

HERE'S OUR LOCATION MAP, SHOWING IT IN THE FAR NORTHWESTERN SECTION OF THE CITY.

THE AERIAL MAP HERE, YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S PART OF A LARGER DEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES A LOT OF SORT OF WAREHOUSE LOOKING TYPE BUILDINGS.

IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IT OCCUPIES A SUITE ON THIS BUILDING HERE, HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE.

THE ZONING MAP AS WE SEE IT, IS PD 4 98 THROUGHOUT THE AREA.

UH, THAT IR THERE IS, UH, UH, THERE ERRONEOUSLY.

THE MAJORITY OF THE USES SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY, BOTH ON THE SITE ITSELF AND THEN ACROSS FROM THE ROAD ARE LARGELY OFFICE SHOWROOM SLASH WAREHOUSE USES AND WAREHOUSE USES.

IT SEEMS LIKE A LOT OF SORT OF WHOLESALE TYPE STORES.

THERE'S SOME ELECTRONICS AND CLOTHING TYPE SHOPS.

AGAIN, ALL WHOLESALE THAT FALL UNDER THESE OFFICE SHOWROOM SLASH WAREHOUSE USES.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AT THE DANCE HALL AND THE REQUEST SITE IS AN EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING WITH 4,900 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA.

CITY COUNCIL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUP NUMBER 2 4 2 1 FOR A TWO YEAR PERIOD FOR A COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INSIDE LIMITED TO A CLASS A DANCE HALL ON AUGUST 11TH, 2021.

THE SUP EXPIRED ON AUGUST 11TH, 2023 AND THEY FILED FOR AMENDMENT IN MARCH 29, ON MARCH 29TH OF THIS YEAR.

AND SO THEY ARE REQUESTING THE AMENDMENT OF THIS SUP FOR A TWO YEAR PERIOD TO CONTINUE OPERATION OF THE DANCE HALL.

UH, THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PROPOSE ANY CHANGES TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR THE SITE PLAN OF SUP NUMBER 2 4 2 1.

HERE WE ARE ON JOE FIELD ROAD LOOKING NORTH TOWARDS THE SUBJECT SITE THAT IS THERE ON THE LEFT PART OF THE PHOTO.

AND THEN FURTHER OFF FROM THE, THE SUBJECT SITE.

LOOKING NORTH WE SEE MORE OF THE PROPERTY OVERALL AND HOW IT APPEARS HERE.

WE'RE LOOKING WEST ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF AND THEN LOOKING WEST ON JO FIELD ROAD HERE WE ARE LOOKING EAST ON THE PROPERTY.

AND THEN ON JO FIELD ROAD LOOKING EAST ACROSS FROM THE PROPERTY LOOKING SOUTH, THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE PLAN FOR THE AREA.

OVERALL IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE, BUT WHERE MY CURSOR IS CURRENTLY RIGHT ABOVE THAT, THAT'S WHERE THE SVP WOULD APPLY FOR THE DANCE HALL AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS AN APPROVAL FOR TWO YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU SIR.

QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, NO QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

WE WILL KEEP MOVING COMMISSIONERS TO CASE

[6. 23-3171 An application for the termination of deed restrictions [Z978-150 andZ190-168] on property zoned a CS Commercial Service District, on thenorth corner of South Fitzhugh Avenue and Haskell Avenue. (Part 1 of 2)]

NUMBER SIX HAS COME OFF CONSENT AND WILL BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY.

[00:20:26]

UM, TERMINATION OF D RESTRICTIONS Z 9 78, 1 50 AND Z 91 68 ON PROPERTY ZONE COMMERCIAL SERVICE LOCATED ON CORNER OF SOUTHVIEW AVENUE AND HASKELL AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 34,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

HERE'S OUR LOCATION MAP.

HERE'S A, UH, ZOOM IN, UH, AERIAL OF THE SITE.

HERE IS OUR ZONING MAP.

UH, WE HAVE SINGLE FAMILY USES TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE.

UH, GENERAL MERCHANDISE, UH, COMMERCIAL RETAIL TO THE WEST AND UM, SINGLE FAMILY AS WELL AS MULTIFAMILY TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.

UH, BRIEF BACKGROUND ON THIS CASE.

UM, IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL SERVICE, UM, UNDER THE D RESTRICTIONS Z 9 7815.

UM, AREA OF REQUEST IS, UH, YEAH, SORRY.

APPLICANT PROPOSES A VEHICLE OR ENGINE ENGINE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE ON THE SITE.

UH, THESE D RESTRICTIONS WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED, UH, SEPTEMBER 8TH, 1999 AND RESTRICTED USES TO THOSE PERMITTED IN A CR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT, UH, PLUS A HEAVY PLUS A MACHINERY HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE USE, UH, WITH OPERATING HOURS BETWEEN 7:00 AM AND 7:00 PM ALL OTHER USES PERMITTED IN A STANDARD CSS DIS DISTRICT WORK PROHIBITED BY THESE DEED RESTRICTIONS.

UM, DEEDED RESTRICTION Z 1 90 0 1 68, UH, WAS APPROVED MAY 27TH, 2020 TO TERMINATE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS FROM DED RESTRICTION Z 9 7815, UH, WHICH WAS THE REMOVAL OF THE 40 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE NORTHEASTERN PROPERTY LINE.

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THE TERMINATION OF THE EXISTING D RESTRICTIONS, Z 9 7815 0 AND Z 1 9 0 1 68 TO OPERATE UNDER THE STANDARD REGULATIONS OF A CSS, UH, COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT.

HERE WE HAVE SOME SITE VISIT PHOTOS.

UH, THIS IS ON FITZ HU AVENUE LOOKING NORTHEAST ON FITZ HU AVENUE LOOKING SOUTHEAST.

LOOKING SOUTHEAST AGAIN, THIS IS ON FITZ HU AVENUE LOOKING SOUTHWEST, SOUTHWEST AGAIN, UH, ON FITZ HU FITZ HUE AVENUE LOOKING NORTHWEST.

UM, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE TERMINATION OF D RESTRICTIONS Z 9 78 1 1500 AND Z 1 9 0 1 68.

UM, IS VOLUNTEERED BY THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU SIR.

QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER HAMPTON? THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

UM, MR. CLINTON, UM, DO YOU KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY COMMUNITY OUTREACH ON THIS REQUEST? YES, I BELIEVE SO.

UM, NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT OUT, UM, PRIOR TO THIS CASE HAS ACTUALLY HAS BEEN A LITTLE, UH, I WOULD SAY CONVOLUTED.

UM, AND THERE HAVE BEEN SOME ISSUES PREVIOUS TO IT BEING ASSIGNED TO ME.

UM, BUT TO MY KNOWLEDGE THERE WAS A NOTIFICATION SENT OUT.

YES.

SO THOSE WOULD BE THE PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONS, BUT THERE'S UM, I THINK AS YOU NOTED, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIRECTLY, I'M GONNA CALL IT NORTH OF THE SITE.

MM-HMM.

IT DIRECTLY ABUTS, UM, YOU KNOW, RESIDENTIAL, UM, YOU KNOW, ZONING AND USE THAT'S ON THE GROUND TODAY.

MM-HMM.

.

UM, I WILL SAY I REACHED OUT TO THE APPLICANT AND I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO, UM, BE IN TOUCH WITH THEM.

MM-HMM, AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THE COMMUNITY, UM, JULIE PARK IS QUITE ACTIVE THAT THEY'RE DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE REQUEST.

SO DO YOU KNOW IF THAT COMMUNITY LEVEL, NOT JUST THE PUBLIC NOTICES, UM, MAY HAVE HAPPENED? UM, TO MY KNOWLEDGE I, NO.

OKAY.

AND IN THE DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT, ARE YOU, I MEAN, WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS TO ADDRESS THIS CHANGE IN USE VERSUS REMOVING THE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS? YES, THERE WAS CONVERSATION, UM, REGARDING AMENDING IT.

UM, THE APPLICANT, IT WAS ADAMANT ABOUT TERMINATING IT BECAUSE OF THE SPECIFIC USE THAT HE IS, UH,

[00:25:01]

OKAY.

AND WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION IN YOUR REVIEW BECAUSE OF THAT DIRECT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY, THE PROP, IT'S PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE, THERE'S NOT AN ALLEY SEPARATION.

MM-HMM.

, THERE'S NOT ANY OTHER, UM, BUFFER THAT'S EVIDENT OTHER THAN, UM, THE MASONRY FENCE.

MM-HMM.

, UM, BETWEEN THE TWO USES, WAS THAT ANYTHING THAT, YOU KNOW, STAFF HAD OTHER, UM, RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE APPLICANT OR CONSIDERATIONS THAT THIS BODY SHOULD BE AWARE OF AB ABSOLUTELY.

SO THAT WAS ACTUALLY THE FIRST THING THAT I BROUGHT UP.

UM, THE APP APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO ENSURE THAT THE PROPERTY WAS MEETING CERTAIN, UM, REQUIREMENTS, SETBACKS, BUFFERS, EX, ET CETERA, THAT FALL UNDER THE, UM, CSS DISTRICT.

AND I RECOMMENDED TO THE APPLICANT THAT THEY COME TO, UH, THE MEETING WITH THOSE, UH, SPECIFIC, UH, RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THEY WOULD UPHOLD, UM, IF THE, IF THE DE RESTRICTION, EXCUSE ME, IF THE DE RESTRICTIONS WERE REMOVED.

OKAY.

UM, SO DO YOU ANTICIPATE THEY MAY BE HERE AT TODAY'S MEETING? HONESTLY, I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT.

OKAY.

THAT'S, WELL HOPEFULLY WE WILL SEE THEM HERE.

AS I SAID, I I HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN, UM, GETTING A RESPONSE, SO, UM, THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

NO PROBLEM.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER? UH, YES, MR. CLINTON, UM, THE DE RESTRICTIONS THAT EXIST AT LEAST GIVE THE ADJOINING NEIGHBORHOODS SOME PROTECTIONS FROM, YOU KNOW, UM, A A GREAT MANY OF THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED IN A, A STRAIGHT ZONING CHAIN, UH, STRAIGHT ZONING CATEGORY OF CS, UH, REMOVING THE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS AND ALLOWING A STRAIGHT ZONING CHANGE WOULD OPEN UP THE USE OF THAT PROPERTY TO ANY OF THE BY USES.

UH, DO YOU GENERALLY CONSIDER IT TO BE GOOD LAND USE POLICY TO HAVE CSS ZONING ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL? AS LONG AS THE APPLICANT IS ABLE TO UPHOLD, UM, THE REQUIREMENTS THAT CSS DISTRICT FOR THAT PROPERTY FALL UNDER, THEN I BELIEVE IT IS GOOD.

UH, PRACTICE.

UM, I SPOKE WITH THE APPLICANT, HE, HE ENSURED ME THAT THE SPECIFIC USE THAT HE IS GOING FOR, UH, WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL IN ANY WAY TO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES.

UM, AGAIN, I I UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT.

YEAH, MY, MY CONCERN IS JUST THAT, YOU KNOW, REGARDLESS OF THE SPECIFIC USE THAT THE APPLICANT SAYS HE'S INTENDING TO DO A STRAIGHT ZONING CHANGE ENABLES ALL THE USES ALLOWED IN A HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, YOU KNOW, GOING FORWARD.

AND THERE ARE A GREAT MANY OF THEM THAT INVOLVE, YOU KNOW, HEAVY MACHINERY, DIESEL PARTICULATES, THAT SORT OF THING.

THEY GIVE ME CONCERN ABOUT ADJACENCY WITH A, UM, A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO I, BECAUSE MY QUESTION IS, THERE WAS NO DISCUSSION OF ANY ADDITIONAL RESTRICTION.

WELL, NEVERMIND, I THINK YOU ANSWERED THE QUESTION EARLIER WHEN YOU SAID HE WAS AVERSE TO ANY MODIFICATIONS THAT NEED RESTRICTIONS.

THANK YOU.

NO PROBLEM.

I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT, UM, ALL OF THE OTHER PROPERTY ALONG THIS STRETCH OF HASKELL, BOTH ON THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH SIDE, IS ZONED TO STRAIGHT CSS DISTRICT TODAY.

UH, AND THAT ZONING DOES A BUT IMMEDIATELY, UM, R FIVE A MF TWO A, YOU KNOW, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND USES, THIS IS THE ONLY PROPERTY ALONG THE STRETCH OF HASKELL THAT IS DEEDED RESTRICTED FROM MORE THAN WHAT THE CSS DISTRICT ALLOWS.

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT UM, ARE YOU AWARE THAT WE SPEND A GREAT DEAL OF TIME IN THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE COMMITTEE, UM, TALKING ABOUT HOW TO REDRESS INCOMPATIBLE ADJACENCIES IN RESIDENTIAL AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL ARE, ARE ONE OF THE PRIME EXAMPLES? I AM NOW .

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU, SIR.

WE

[7. 23-3172 An application for an R-16(A) Single Family District on property zoned an R-1ac(A) Single Family District, on the north line of Park Lane, between Preston Road and Douglas Avenue]

GO TO CASE NUMBER SEVEN.

ALRIGHT, THIS IS CASE Z 2 23 2 46 AND APPLICATION FOR GENERAL ZONING CHANGE TO A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ZONE R ONE A C LOCATED ON THE NORTH LINE OF PARK LANE BETWEEN PRESTON ROAD AND DOUGLAS AVE.

THE ZONING CHANGE, UH, REQUESTED IS, IS FROM R ONE AC TO R 16, UH, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF SECTION 51, A 4.1 HUNDRED AND UH, IT'S APPROXIMATELY 34,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

HERE'S OUR LOCATION MAP, UM, GEOGRAPHICALLY, UH, LOCATED IN NORTH DALLAS.

HERE IS OUR AERIAL MAP

[00:30:02]

UM, THE SURROUNDING USES, AS YOU CAN SEE, UH, THEY'RE ALL R ONE AC, AGAIN, CURRENTLY ZONED R ONE AC, UH, FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS, UH, WITH A MINIMUM LOT ACRE OF, UH, SORRY, A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF ONE ACRE.

UH, THE LOT HAS FRONTAGE ONLY ON PARK LANE.

UH, THE PROPOSED USE IS, UH, FOR THE PROPERTY TO REMAIN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND JUST CHANGE FROM THE R ONE AC TO R 16.

UM, HERE WE HAVE, UM, SITE, SITE PHOTOS.

THIS IS ON PARK LANE LOOKING NORTH.

WE'RE ON PARK LANE LOOKING WEST.

THIS IS PARK LANE LOOKING EAST.

THIS IS PARK LANE LOOKING SOUTH.

UM, HERE WE HAVE A COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, UH, FOR THE EXISTING R ONE A C DISTRICT.

UM, AND THE PROPOSED R 16 DISTRICT STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? YES, SIR.

COMMISSIONER HALL.

YEAH.

MR. CLINTON, THANK YOU FOR ALL THE EMAIL EXCHANGES WE'VE BEEN DOING THE PAST FEW DAYS.

THIS, THIS CASE REALLY HAS ME SORT OF PUZZLED ABOUT WHY ANYBODY WOULD WANNA, THEY, THE OWNER HAS TWO LOTS ADJACENT LOTS.

THEY'RE BOTH ZONED ONE ACRE.

THERE'S A 8,400 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE ON ONE, THERE'S A BASKETBALL COURT ON THE OTHER.

UH, IS THERE ANY SPECULATION ABOUT WHY THEY WANT TO REZONE TO R 16? I THINK THE SPECULATION TO THE ZONING CHANGE IS TO, UH, FIT THE, UH, LOT ACREAGE, UH, THAT IS ALSO SIMILAR TO SOME OF THE SURROUNDING LOTS.

UM, MY GUESS IS, BUT AGAIN, THIS IS SPECULATION.

THEY WANT TO, UM, COMBINE THE LOTS, POSSIBLY REPLANT LATER, UM, OR COMBINE THE LOTS TO BE ABLE TO, UM, DO ANY TYPE OF ADDITIONS TO THE HOME AT A LATER DATE.

YEAH, I, I COULD SEE WANTING TO, TO REPLANT IT TO MAKE IT, YOU KNOW, ONE LOT.

UM, WOULD THEY BE ALLOWED TO BUILD ANOTHER HOUSE ON, ON THE, THEY, THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO BUILD ANOTHER HOUSE, UH, ADJACENT TO THEM, I GUESS BECAUSE THEY OWN THE TWO LOTS AND UNTIL IT'S REPLANTED INTO ONE, I GUESS MAYBE THEY, THEY WOULDN'T, BUT, YOU KNOW, JUST SORT OF FUZZY TO ME ABOUT WHAT THE OWNER REALLY WANTS.

IT SEEMS TO ME AN ODD REQUEST I COULD SEE REQUESTING THAT IT BE REPLANTED INTO ONE BIG LOT, BUT NOT CHANGING THE ZONING FROM ONE ACRE TO, TO R 16.

I, I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS.

MAYBE SOMEBODY KNOWS THAT THERE'S AN ADVANTAGE TO DOING THAT.

I, OKAY.

YEAH, THIS, THIS MIGHT BE ONE THAT, UH, IF YOU DID WANT TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT, UH, IT COULD BE TAKEN OFF CONSENT.

I'M ACTUALLY INTERESTED TO HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY AS WELL.

.

WELL, THIS CASE JUST POPPED UP.

I MEAN, I, I HADN'T HEARD ABOUT IT UNTIL A FEW DAYS AGO WHEN IT POPPED UP ON THE AGENDA.

SO WE, I'VE, I'VE HAD A CHANCE TO GO BY A COUPLE OF TIMES AND LOOK AT THE PROPERTIES, BUT I'VE NOT TALKED TO THE OWNERS OR, OR TO THEIR REPRESENTATIVE, WHICH IS A SURVEYING FIRM, NOT A CONSULTING COMPANY.

SO TO ME THERE'S JUST, THERE'S JUST SOME MYSTERY ABOUT IT.

I JUST DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON HERE AND I'M A LITTLE BIT AFRAID, UH, ABOUT WHAT MIGHT COULD HAPPEN.

BUT WOULD YOU LIKE TO, MAYBE NOTHING.

I, I DON'T KNOW.

COMMISSIONER HALL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE IT OFF CONSENT? YES, I THINK I WOULD.

OKAY.

LET'S DO THAT.

MR. CHAIR.

YES.

AS CAN I ASK A, A COUPLE PLEASE FOLLOW QUESTIONS.

SO THESE TWO LOTS, TOTAL 34, ROUGHLY 34,000 SQUARE FEET, RIGHT, WHICH IS LESS THAN AN ACRE, IS THAT RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.

SO THIS IS ZONED R ONE ACRE AND THEY REPRE, PLATTED, YOU WOULD HAVE A LOT OF LESS THAN ONE ACRE.

WOULD THAT BE A LEGAL DOWNSIDE AFTER THAT? REPRE PLATTING? I'M SORRY, CAN YOU REPEAT THAT? YEAH, IT, I MEAN, IF THEY REPRE PLATTED THIS, THIS INTO TWO, INTO A SINGLE LOT, IT WOULD BE A LOT OF LESS THAN ONE ACRE.

WOULD THAT BE A LEGAL BUILD SITE AFTER RELOTTING? UM, IF THE

[00:35:01]

BUT IF THE REZONING WERE NOT APPROVED AND WE HAD A 34,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT OR THEY JUST NEVER CAME IN, IF THE REZONING AND IT WAS STILL ZONED R ONE ACRE, WOULDN'T IT BE A LEGAL BUILD SITE? UH, NOT, IT WOULD NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT.

SO DO YOU THINK WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO HERE IS REPL TO, YOU KNOW, BUILD SOMETHING THAT CROSSES THE, THE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE, BUT, UH, YEAH, THAT, THAT'S, THAT'S CORRECT.

SO, SO CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY IS TWO SEPARATE LOTS.

UM, IT'S POSSIBLE, YOU KNOW, WE, WE DON'T REALLY, UH, CONFIRM NON-CONFORMING USES OR STRUCTURES HERE THAT'S DONE AT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

MM-HMM, .

UM, BUT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THERE MAY BE SOME NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURES ON THE AREA OF REQUEST TODAY.

UM, AND IT'S ALSO POSSIBLE THAT THERE YOU ARE REQUESTING THE REZONING TO R 16, UH, IN ORDER TO ADD NEW STRUCTURES OR, UH, EXPAND EXISTING STRUCTURES, THINGS THAT WOULDN'T BE PERMITTED IF THIS WAS A NON-CONFORMING USE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU MR. MULKEY.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONER BLA AND, AND GO AND FOLLOWING UP WITH WHAT, UM, VICE CHAIR RUBEN WAS, UH, RUBEN WAS SAYING, UM, IT, IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THIS WOULD BE GOING THROUGH A REPL PROCESS.

UM, MY QUESTION WOULD BE IS THIS, WELL, I, I GUESS THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT, BUT THIS SEEMS, THIS SEEMS TO BE THAT IF WE ARE GOING, IF THEY DO TRY TO REPLANT IT, IT WOULD THEN, WELL WITHOUT, I, I GUESS I DON'T HAVE, DON'T KNOW.

I CAN'T FORMULATE MY QUESTION RIGHT NOW AND I DON'T KNOW HOW, I THINK THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I'M AT.

I THINK THAT'S WHERE MOST OF US ARE AT WITH THIS REQUEST.

I THINK, UH, THIS IS A, A CONVERSATION THAT COULD BE KIND OF ROUNDED OUT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE APPLICANT.

UM, AND I WILL JUST REMIND THE COMMISSION, UM, WE CAN'T GET TOO MUCH INTO SUBDIVISION STUFF WITH THE ZONING CASE.

I UNDERSTAND THERE'S SOME CONSIDERATIONS HERE, BUT YEAH, I GET YOU.

HOPEFULLY THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE THIS AFTERNOON.

IF NOT COMMISSIONER HALL, YOU COULD ALWAYS HOLD IT, BUT THERE, THERE ARE NO REGISTER REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM, SO HOPEFULLY THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE.

UH, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, JUST ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION, UM, IN OUR NOTIFICATION, IT'S PAGE SEVEN 11 OF THE CASE REPORT.

IT APPEARS WE HAVE THE PROPERTY LISTING FOR AN EARLIER CASE.

CAN THE CORRECTED, UH, NOTIFICATION LIST BE DISTRIBUTED? YES.

THAT, THAT ACTUALLY WAS SENT OUT EARLIER THIS WEEK, THIS MORNING THE CORRECT, SO NOT THIS MORNING.

IT WAS SENT OUT EARLIER THIS WEEK, I BELIEVE.

ABOUT A DAY AFTER.

OKAY.

SO I HAVE AN EMAIL WITH IT.

EMAIL, YES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONER.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

I JUST HAVE A CLARIFICATION 'CAUSE I ASKED THE SAME QUESTION, UM, BEFORE THE HEARING AND, AND THE EMAIL.

I, I WAS FORWARDED A COPY OF THAT EMAIL, BUT IT WAS NOT DISTRIBUTED TO THE COMMISSIONERS.

IT WENT TO, TO VARIOUS STAFF MEMBERS.

SO THE WHOLE COMMISSION HAS NOT SEEN IT.

OKAY.

WE CAN GET THAT OUT TO YOU.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

WE LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING THAT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? OKAY.

SO, UH, THIS CASE HAS COME OFF CONSENT AND WILL BE HEARD INDIVIDUALLY.

WE'LL GO TO CASE NUMBER EIGHT.

[8. 23-3173 An application for an MU-3 Mixed Use District on property zoned a CR Community Retail District, on the northeast corner of South Lancaster Road and Simpson Stuart Road. (Part 1 of 2)]

GOOD MORNING.

I HAD ITEM NUMBER EIGHT S KZ 2 2 3 2 54.

THE REQUESTS AN APPLICATION FOR AN MU THREE MIXED USE DISTRICT ON PROPERTY.

ZONED A C ARE COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT.

IT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH ON CASTOR ROAD.

AND SINCE STEWART ROAD, IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0.3 2 29 ACRES.

SO THIS IS, UH, WHERE IT'S LOCATED, UH, THE AERIAL OF THE SITE.

AND THEN, UH, SURROUNDING USES IS UNDEVELOPED, UH, TO THE NORTH AND TOWARDS THE WEST.

THERE IS A CHURCH ON THE SOUTH ACROSS

[00:40:01]

AND THEN THERE'S SINGLE FAMILY, UH, TOWARDS THE NORTHEAST.

THE AREA REQUEST IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A STRUCTURE AND IS ZONE C OUR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REPURPOSE THE VACANT BUILDING FOR MULTI-FAMILY USE.

THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DO APPROXIMATELY 18 UNIT STUDIO APARTMENTS.

THOSE THEY ARE REQUESTING AN MU THREE MIXED USE, UH, DISTRICT.

UH, THESE ARE SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS ON ONSITE LOOKING TOWARDS THE NORTHWEST, TOWARDS THE NORTHEAST, TOWARDS THE EAST, TOWARDS THE WEST, TOWARDS THE WEST, AGAIN, UM, AGAIN TOWARDS THE WEST SOUTH SURROUNDING USES ON SIDE LOOKING SOUTHWEST TOWARDS THE SOUTH, TOWARDS THE WEST, TOWARDS THE NORTHWEST, AGAIN TOWARDS THE NORTH, TOWARDS THE EAST LOOKING SOUTHEAST.

AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE STANDARDS AND THE EXISTING SCR.

AND THEN THEY ARE PROPOSING MU THREE.

AND THEN THE, THE SIDE IS, UH, WITHIN THE UNT DALLAS AREA PLAN.

THE SIDE IS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL AREA ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH LANCASTER ROAD AND SIMPSON STEWART ROAD, APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE FROM THE CAMP WISDOM DARK STATION.

THE CONCEPT PLAN ENVISIONS ALLOWING USE TYPE TO B URBAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR A MIX OF LAND USES AND BUILDING TYPES THAT ARE GENERALLY LOCATED AROUND THE TRANSIT STATIONS.

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE UNT DALLAS AREA PLAN AND THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.

THANK YOU SO MUCH QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER BLAIR? GOOD MORNING.

UM, I I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD OF LANCASTER, WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED THE, UM, THE FRONT CORRECT.

WILL THERE BE THE REQUIREMENT TO, UM, HAVE THE FIVE FOOT, UM, GREEN SPACE BEFORE A A SIDEWALK? AND HAS THAT BEEN CONSIDERED AT THIS POINT IN TIME? UM, SO I KNOW I DID SPEAK, UH, WITH PHIL, THE, OUR ARBORIST.

UM, HE DID MENTION THAT IF THEY'RE PROPOSING TO RENOVATE, UM, AND REUSE THE PROPERTY, IT WILL NOT TRIGGER, UM, ANY LANDSCAPING.

HOWEVER, IF THEY DECIDE TO LATER ON DEMOLISH THE WHOLE ENTIRE, LIKE, UM, DO A NEW CONSTRUCTION, THEN THAT IS WHEN, UM, THE ARTICLE 10 WOULD APPLY WITH THE RESIDENTIAL AGENCY TO THE EAST AS WELL.

BUT WOULD THAT BE A DEPARTURE FROM OUR STANDARD THAT, UM, WHENEVER WE HAVE ANYTHING THAT WE BRING IT TO, WE, WE DO HAVE THE, THE STANDARD OF THE FIVE FOOT GREEN, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S ON A, A ROAD, ESPECIALLY LANCASTER, IS NOT CONSIDERED A ROAD, BUT A STATE HIGHWAY.

SO IT'S MONITORED, MANAGED BY TDOT.

AND WOULD THAT THEN NOT TRIGGER THE, THE NEED TO HAVE THE BUFFERING THE SIDEWALK BEFORE YOU HAVE THE, THE, THE, UM, THE SETBACK FOR LACK OF A BETTER WAY OF PUTTING IT? I'M NOT AWARE.

UM, THEN I GUESS THAT WOULD BE FOR, UM, MR. NAVAREZ, CAN YOU HELP US OUT ON MR. NAVARRES? AND, AND YOU MAY WANNA, IF YOU NEED TO BRING YOUR LAPTOP, YOU MAY WANNA STAY FOR A MINUTE.

OKAY, PLEASE.

OKAY.

UM, THEN LET ME SEE IF MS. GARZA, IF I CAN, IF I HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.

UM, I ALSO SEE THAT IT IS TAR TARGETED FOR 18 UNITS, UM, BUT THERE'S ONLY PARKING SPOTS FOR 16.

UM, ARE, ARE THERE ANY BENEFITS BEING GIVEN TO THE APPLICANT IN ORDER TO, UM, CHANGE THE, THE, THE RATIO FOR PARKING AND, AND DWELLING UNITS? UM, SO IF THE APPLICANT PROVIDES AFFORDABLE UNITS AS A PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THE AUSTRIA REQUIREMENT FOR MULTIFAMILY IS 0.5 SPACES, UH, PER DWELLING UNIT.

AND AT LEAST 15% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR GUEST PARKING.

THIS WOULD BE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED SPACES THE APPLICANT COULD STILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SPACES IN EXCESS OF THE REQUIRED MINIMUM.

SO, I'M SORRY YOU READ THAT REAL QUICKLY.

CAN YOU, CAN YOU SLOW DOWN A LITTLE BIT?

[00:45:01]

UM, SO IF THE APPLICANT PROVIDES AFFORDABLE UNITS AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE O STREET PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR MULTIFAMILY IS UH, 0.5 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT, ARE YOU AWARE THAT THERE, THAT, THAT, BECAUSE THIS, UH, IS TARGETED STRICTLY FOR UNTD AND THE IT, THERE WILL BE NO AFFORDABLE, UH, UNITS BEING REQUESTED, THE WHOLE THING IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH WHAT, UM, UNTD WILL REQUIRE AS RENT, SO THERE WON'T BE ANYTHING.

SO WITH THAT THEN NOT MEAN THAT, UM, THAT THERE PARKING SPACE TO DWELLING UNITS IS NOT IN ALIGNMENT WITH CITY STANDARDS.

CORRECT.

UM, SO THIS IS JUST A GENERAL ZONING.

HOWEVER, WHEN THEY START DOING THE BUILDING PERMITS, THEN AT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, UH, THEY WILL NEED TO, UM, COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS OF THE, OF THE, THE MU THREE DISTRICT.

OKAY.

UM, THE WHEN IT, YEAH.

YES SIR.

SO IF MR. NAVARRES IS READY, GOOD, GOOD MORNING COMMISSION.

DAVID NAVARRES DEVELOPMENT, TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

UM, THE QUESTION IS WHETHER OR NOT THE, THE, THE PROJECT WOULD BE WOULD TRIGGER UPGRADES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.

CAN YOU REPHRASE? YES.

IS THAT A CORRECT STATEMENT? AND THE, THE SITE IS A, NOT A PLOTTED LOT, BUT IT'S A BILLABLE SITE IF, UM, AND BECAUSE IT'S A GENERAL ZONING CASE, WE DIDN'T ADD DETAILS IN OUR REVIEW COMMENTS IN THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY CAN COME IN TO YOU NOW LETTING YOU KNOW WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING, BUT THERE'S NOTHING THAT REQUIRES THEM TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN, UM, WHAT WOULD BE ALLOWED IN AN MF DISTRICT IS THAT MU MU OH, MU THREE.

THANK YOU.

AND SO, UH, FROM WHAT I SEE AND WHAT IT HAS BEEN PROPOSED, UM, THEY WOULD TRIGGER PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

UM, SO THAT'S ONE THING THAT WOULD SET A DOMINO EFFECT WHERE THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE THEN TO RESURFACE THEIR PARKING LOT TO COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS.

UM, FROM THERE THEN WE MOVE ON TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A BUILDABLE SITE.

THEY WOULD HAVE TO REPL THE SITE TO ONE LOT.

AND THEN ALSO IN THERE THE COMMISSION HAS THE, THE, THE ABILITY TO ADD ADD CONDITIONS TO THE PLAT.

BUT ALSO, EVEN IF THAT WAS NOT THE CASE, THESE, THE, THE ONLY PURPOSE OF RESURFACING THEIR PARKING LOT WOULD TRIGGER FULL ENGINEERING.

IN THAT CASE, THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS, UH, WHICH INCLUDE, UM, LOCATION OF DRIVEWAYS AND DESIGN OF SIDEWALKS.

WELL WITH YOU SAYING LOCATION OF DRIVEWAYS, THANK YOU FOR GOING ALONG.

MY NEXT TRAIN OF THOUGHT, I NOTICED THAT THE FIRST, THERE'S A DRIVE, THERE'S A CURB CUT, WHICH IS LESS THAN A HUNDRED FEET FROM THE CORNER, AND, AND THERE'S TWO CURB CUTS ON, ON THE STATE HIGHWAY LAND.

LANCASTER, UM, WOOD THAT CUR THE FIRST CURB CUT RIGHT THERE ON THE CORNER, UM, CREATE A HAZARD OR, OR BE, LOOK, WOULD, WOULD THERE NOT NEED TO BE RE-ENGINEERING OF THAT CURB CUT.

THE, THE CONCEPT OF TRAFFIC HAZARD IS SUBJECTIVE.

SO I'LL STATE TO CITY STANDARDS FOR PURPOSES OF ANSWERING MY QUESTION, UH, YOU ARE CORRECT THAT THE SITE WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH DRIVEWAYS A HUNDRED FEET, UH, FROM THE INTERSECTION.

UM, AND WE WOULD THEN HAVE TO RELOCATE AM EYEBALLING THE LOCATION OF THAT ONE DRIVEWAY.

UH, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE RELOCATED TO MEET THE 100 DISTANCE.

HOWEVER, THIS IS A TDOT JURISDICTION.

SO TDOT WOULD ALSO HAVE TO WEIGH IN AND PARTICIPATE IN OUR REVIEW.

TYPICALLY, TDOT WILL NEVER SIGN OFF ON SOMETHING THAT THE CITY DISAGREES WITH.

THAT'S A GENERAL PRACTICE THAT THERE'S NO PROTOCOL.

BUT, UH, TRADITIONALLY IN ALL WORK THAT WE'VE DONE WITH TDO, THEY, THEY FOLLOW CITY'S REVIEW AND THEN WE SIGN AS THE REQUESTER, EVEN THOUGH THIS WOULD BE A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, THE FORM SIGNS THE CITY OF DALLAS AS THE REQUESTER FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT.

IN THEIR JURISDICTION.

UM,

[00:50:01]

OKAY.

UM, WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO THIS PARTICULAR CORRIDOR, UM, WHERE CAMP CAMP WISDOM AND SIMPSON STEWART MEET, BECAUSE, UM, THIS IS WHERE SIMPSON STEWART STARTS AND CAMP WISDOM ENDS.

MM-HMM.

, UM, AND I AM AWARE THAT THAT THAT UNTD WILL, WILL HAVE, HAVE, UM, SHUTTLE SERVICE FROM THE CAMPUS TO THIS LOCATION FOR THE STUDENTS.

'CAUSE THIS, THIS, THIS IS STRICTLY, OR LET ME SAY, DID YOU KNOW THAT THIS LOCATION WAS STRICTLY TO HOUSE INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS FOR UNTD AND SAYING THAT THE STU THE, THE CHANCES THAT THESE STUDENTS HAVE CARS ARE PROBABLY SLIM TO NONE, BUT THAT THERE WILL NEED TO BE CONSIDERATION OF FOOT TRAFFIC TO DARK.

SO WITH THAT BEING ASKED, HAVE, CAN YOU SHARE HOW THE CALMING, UM, THE CALMING THE TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESSES THAT HAVE, THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLACE WOULD IMPACT THIS DEVELOPMENT? UM, AND I KNOW THAT'S A BIG QUESTION.

YES, MA'AM.

AND THAT'S AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO OUR ZAC MEMBERS FOR WHAT THE PARKING RE, UM, WORK IS DOING.

INTRODUCING, UH, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT, UH, REVIEW.

UM, NO MA'AM.

I WAS NOT AWARE.

AND, UH, REGRETFULLY I WAS INVITED BUT NOT ABLE TO ATTEND A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR, UH, THE, UH, ZONING CHANGE, UH, WAS NOT AWARE OF THE DETAILS OF WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE, BUT THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE WOULD BE DISCUSSING AT PERMITTING.

WE ASK, WHAT ARE YOUR PROPOSED PLANS AND, AND OPERATIONS? UH, THAT WOULD BE A CONVERSATION AT PERMITTING.

COMMISSIONER, ER, YOU WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THIS OFF? CONSENT? OH, YEAH.

OKAY.

LET'S TAKE IT OFF CONSENT AND WE'LL, AND, AND, AND I, I WILL LEAVE THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

OKAY.

UM, WELL, BUT THE ONE OTHER THING THAT I DO KNOW, AND I HAVE, I HAVE FOR YOU, GUY FOR STAFF, AND NO, IT'S PROBABLY MORE FOR YOU.

UM, MR. NAVAREZ GO THE, THE DIRECT ACCESS TO DART BECAUSE THIS WOULD BE A VERY DART CENTRIC SITE IF THERE, IF THE RESIDENTS DON'T HAVE TRANSPORTATION OTHER THAN DART AND THERE'S ONLY ONE DART STATION THERE, UM, THERE IS NO SIDEWALK, WHICH MEANS ON CAMP WISDOM GOING TO TOWARDS PATROL WAY, WHICH GOES TO THE DART STATION, IT, I KNOW WE, WE DON'T TYPICALLY REQUEST, UM, AN APPLICANT TO PROVIDE, UH, SIDEWALKS AND OUTSIDE OF THEIR BUILDABLE AREA.