Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS.

[00:00:01]

WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.

UH, MS. PINA, CAN YOU START US OFF WITH A ROLL CALL? GOOD, GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS.

DISTRICT ONE, DISTRICT TWO, DISTRICT THREE HERE.

DISTRICT FOUR, VACANT.

DISTRICT FIVE CHAIR.

SHE DID PRESENT DISTRICT SIX.

PRESENT.

DISTRICT SEVEN.

DISTRICT SEVEN.

DISTRICT EIGHT.

PRESENT.

DISTRICT NINE.

DISTRICT 10.

DISTRICT 10.

DISTRICT 11.

DISTRICT 11.

DISTRICT 12 PRESENT.

DISTRICT 13 HERE.

DISTRICT 14 AND PLACE 15.

I'M HERE.

OF COURSE.

I'M SIR.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. SINA.

GOOD MORNING LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.

WELCOME TO THE BRIEFING OF THE DALLAS CITY PLANT COMMISSION.

TODAY IS THURSDAY, JANUARY 18TH, 2024, 9:12 AM UH, HAPPY NEW YEAR COMMISSIONERS, UH, WELCOME BACK TO THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY.

WE HAVE A, UH, 52 CASE DOCKET WAITING FOR YOU.

I HOPE YOU HAVE PLENTY OF REST.

UH, I WANNA START OFF BY THANKING STAFF FOR GETTING ALL THE PRESENTATIONS OUT.

UH, IT IS VERY HELPFUL.

IT'S GONNA BE VERY HELPFUL TO KEEP, UH, A BRISK PACE HERE TODAY.

COMMISSIONERS, I HOPE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK OVER THE PRESENTATIONS.

UH, BUT AS ALWAYS, UH, THIS IS A TIME FOR COMMISSIONERS TO ASK QUESTIONS OF STAFF AND WE WILL KEEP ALL OUR, UH, COMMENTS TO THE HEARING BEGINNING AT 1230.

[3. 24-259 An application for a minor amendment to an existing development plan on property zoned Planned Development District No. 1053, generally located on the northeast corner of Skillman Street and East Lovers Lane. (Part 1 of 2)]

WITH THAT, WE'LL BEGIN WITH MS. MORMAN.

GOOD MORNING AND HAPPY NEW YEAR.

GOOD MORNING.

FIRST OFF, THIS IS ITEM NUMBER THREE ON YOUR AGENDA.

IT IS DONNA, I THINK THE MICROPHONE'S NOT ON.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? NO.

DIDN'T HAVE IT POSTED.

NOT YET.

ALRIGHT.

OKAY.

THIS IS, UH, MISCELLANEOUS ITEM M 2 34 DASH 0 0 3.

I APOLOGIZE, IT'S NOT LOOKING THROUGH IT.

THE REQUEST IS A MINOR IS FOR A MINOR AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON PROPERTY ZONED PD NUMBER 10 53, WHICH IS THE ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SCHOOL.

IT'S 7.29 ACRES AND IT'S IN COUNCIL DISTRICT NINE.

IT IS LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF DOWNTOWN ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SKILLMAN STREET AND EAST LOVER'S LANE.

THE ZONING OR ZONING AND LAND USE AROUND IT IS SINGLE FAMILY, UH, TO THE NORTHEAST SOUTH.

UH, A LITTLE MULTIFAMILY TO THE SOUTHWEST AND MULTIFAMILY TO THE WEST, AN AERIAL VIEW.

AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A PAVED SPORTS GAME COURT.

UH, THERE IS TO BE NO EXTERIOR LIGHTING BEING ADDED AND NEW SCREENING AND HEDGE SCREENING HEDGE AND TREE IS TO BE ADDED, UH, NORTH OF THE PROPOSED GAME COURT, UH, BETWEEN THE, ON THE PROPERTY JUST SOUTH OF THE ALLEY.

THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

CIRCLED IN RED IS WHERE THE, UH, PROPOSED SPORTS COURT IS TO GO.

UM, BEING LOCATED, LET'S SEE, I THINK I'VE GOT IT, UH, IN AN AREA JUST NORTH OF THE PARKING LOT, UH, IN AN, IN A, CURRENTLY IT'S THE EXISTING PLAY FIELDS, UH, AND TO THE LEFT OF THE PLAYGROUND, JUST NORTH OF THE PARKING AREA.

UM, AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE, WHERE THE

[00:05:01]

WORKED COURT IS PROPOSED.

AND THIS IS THE CURRENT EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

THE AREA CIRCLE IS WHERE THE SPORTS COURT IS PROPOSED, AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MS. MORMAN QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

THANK YOU, MS. MORMAN.

WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION, UM, ON THE APPLICANT'S SIDE TO ROTATING THE SPORTS COURT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL, UM, SPACE BETWEEN THE, THE NEW LOCATION AND THE, UM, EXISTING RESIDENCES TO THE PLAN NORTH OF THE SITE? WE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS, UM, AND THEN ULTIMATELY THEY DECIDED TO GO THIS DIRECTION AND I WOULD, UM, SUGGEST THAT YOU MAY WANT TO ASK THAT QUESTION TO THEM DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

AND THEN YOU MENTIONED THE NEW SCREENING AND THE HEDGE.

IS THAT A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER? UM, NO.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER? YES.

COMMISSIONER HALL, UH, MS. MORMAN, YOU KNOW, WE RECEIVED A BIT OF COMMUNITY FEEDBACK, BOTH IN SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION.

UH, ONE OF THEM SENT A PHOTOGRAPH.

IT LOOKED LIKE MAYBE THE COURT HAD THE CONCRETE PAD HAD ALREADY BEEN POURED.

SO, UH, I BELIEVE THAT INITIALLY THEY STARTED CONSTRUCTION, UH, NOT REALIZING THAT THEY NEEDED A, UH, PERMIT TO DO SO.

AND ONCE THEY FOUND OUT THEY DID GO FOR THE PERMIT, WHICH IS AT THE TIME WHEN, UH, PERMITTING SENT THEM TO US FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO SHOW THE, UH, SPORTS COURT.

BUT, BUT THERE IS A PAD OR SOMETHING THERE.

I BELIEVE THAT THEY STARTED CONSTRUCTION BUT DID NOT FINISH.

DID NOT FINISH.

OKAY.

BECAUSE THEY WERE SENT TO US FOR A MINOR AMENDMENT RIGHT.

TO THE, UH, DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

RIGHT.

UH, THANK YOU MR. CAN STEP.

YEAH.

I'M STRUGGLING WITH HOW THIS IS A MINOR AMENDMENT.

'CAUSE UNDER OUR STANDARDS, THIS SEEMS LIKE IT'S GONNA ADVERSELY IMPACT THE NEARBY PROPERTY OWNERS.

CAN YOU EXPLAIN? SO SURE.

WHEN WE WERE LOOKING AT THIS, UM, IT IS, THIS IS A, AN A USE AN ACCESSORY USE INCIDENTAL TO THE MAIN USE OF THE SCHOOL.

AND, UM, IT WAS RELOCATING OR BASICALLY RIGHT NOW THEY PLAY BASKETBALL IN THE NORTH SECTION OF THAT, OF THE PARKING LOT.

AND THEN THEY WERE JUST, THEY WERE INTENDING TO PAVE AN AREA FOR THE SPORTS COURT THAT IS ALREADY EXISTING, UH, PLAY FIELDS.

UH, SO TO JUST GO FROM THE BRAS FIELD TO A PAVED PORT.

AND THE, THE AREA IS ALREADY USED FOR PLAY AND FIELDS, FIELD PLAY, COMMISSIONER SPER, UM, MS. MORMAN, UH, WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS CASE AND I I KNOW THAT, UM, STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS IS A, A LEGAL USE WITHIN THE, THE PD.

AND AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THE, THE ONLY BASIS THAT, UH, YOU'VE BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE TO, TO DENY THIS WOULD BE IF IT HAD, UM, A SOMEWHAT ILL-DEFINED ADVERSE IMPACT ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.

IS THAT BASICALLY CORRECT.

IF PLANNING COMMISSION WERE TO DECIDE THAT THIS WAS NOT, DID NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR BEING A MINOR AMENDMENT, THAT WOULD BE, UH, WHAT YOU WOULD DETERMINE THAT YOU WANTED TO DENY IT ON THE BASIS UP.

AND, UM, I DO HAVE, I CAN SHOW YOU THAT CRITERIA.

UH, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, COMMISSIONER, AND TO YOUR POINT, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, IT'S NOT ADVERSE EFFECT.

IT'S ALTERED THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

SO SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE, BUT THAT'S THE, THAT'S THE STANDARD.

CAN CAN YOU REPEAT? SURE.

SO IT'S, UM, THAT IT, A BASIS TO DENY WOULD BE TO ALTER THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALTERS THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

SO I DO HAVE IT ABOVE THE, THE CRITERIA ON THIS SLIDE.

SO ALTER THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP, AND, UH, SO IT

[00:10:01]

INCREASE THE HEIGHT THAT DOESN'T APPLY, DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT DOESN'T APPLY, OR REDUCE BUILDING SETBACKS THAT DOESN'T APPLY.

SO REALLY IT'S, IT'S, IT'S ALTER THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP IS THE, IS THE ONLY CRITERIA ON UPON WHICH IT COULD BE DENIED? THAT'S CORRECT.

NER YES.

OKAY.

CAN I, CAN I ASK THIS QUESTION? I, I, I KNOW THAT, UH, WE HAD A CASE EARLIER THIS YEAR, MAYBE JUST A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, THAT AND INVOLVED A, A PROPERTY IN NORTH DALLAS THAT WAS LOOKING AT PUTTING IN A PICKLEBALL COURT AND SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS WERE UNHAPPY ABOUT THAT.

AND, UH, SAME BASIC ISSUES APPLIED THE CONCERN ABOUT THE PROXIMITY AND, AND NOISE.

UM, AND SOMEONE REMIND ME OF HOW THAT CASE GOT RESOLVED.

COMMISSIONER IT, I, I, I DON'T SEE THE, THE STANDARD IS THE, WHAT THE STANDARD IS AND SORT OF WHAT CPC DID IN THE PAST WITH OTHER PROPERTIES, I DON'T THINK IS NECESSARILY RELEVANT.

I THINK THE QUESTION FOR THE BODY IS WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, UH, ALTERS THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP.

SO I WOULD, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK AT THAT AND NOT WHAT CTC CONSIDERED IT OTHER SITES USING, UH, A, A MINOR AMENDMENT IN THE PAST.

WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT ANSWER.

I THINK, UM, UH, MAYBE IF I WERE TO NOT ASK STAFF, BUT ASK IF ANYBODY ELSE AROUND HERE SORT OF REMEMBERS BECAUSE IT WASN'T THERE SOME DIRECTION TO HAVE THE PARTIES MEET AND DISCUSS THIS EVEN AFTER THE CASE WAS DECIDED.

AM AM I REMEMBERING THAT CORRECTLY? I, I, I KNOW WE, I, I'LL, I'LL TRY TO STAY WITHIN THE BOUND.

IF I GO OUT, YOU'D SLAP ME DOWN AGAIN.

BUT, UH, UM, DOES ANYONE RECALL THAT, UM, THAT RESOLUTION OR FEEL, RECALL IT AND FEEL COMFORTABLE DISCUSSING IT WITHOUT GETTING IN TROUBLE WITH, UM, THE STAFF? I GUESS THE ANSWER TO THAT IS NO.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

THERE'S THE CPC FOG.

I'M SORRY, I, I DON'T REMEMBER THAT.

JUST DON'T KIND OF BLEND TOGETHER AFTER COUPLE.

YOU'VE, YOU'VE SEEN A FEW CASES BETWEEN NOW AND THEN.

YEAH, IT'S JUST THE, UM, WELL, OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

WELL, UH, THANK YOU FOR THAT.

AND, UM, I GUESS WE'LL, UM, WE'LL WAIT FOR THE DISCUSSION TO TAKE PLACE AT THE, UH, END OF, AT THE .

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

I LOOK FORWARD TO THAT.

COMMISSIONER KINGSTON.

OH, WHERE ARE YOU GOING, DANIEL? ALTER THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP.

DO YOU HAVE ANY, UM, SUPPORT FOR WHAT THAT MEANS? UM, IN TERMS OF, I, THE, THE PHRASE IS NOT DEFINED IN CHAPTER 51 A, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING.

WELL, HOW, SO IT COULD BE NOISE, UH, AN INCREASE IN NOISE OR AN INCREASE OF HOURS OF USE.

THOSE COULD ALL ALTER THE BASIC RELATIONSHIP, RIGHT? I, I SUPPOSE, YES.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? OKAY,

[4. 24-260 An application requesting relief from the street frontage requirements along Parker Street per the site plan on property zoned Subdistrict 3 within Planned Development District No. 317, the Cedars Area Special Purpose District, located along the west line of Parker Street between Parnell Street and Botham Jean Boulevard. (Part 1 of 2)]

WE'LL KEEP GOING FORWARD.

THANK YOU MR. MOORE.

WE'LL GO TO CASE NUMBER FOUR.

MR. SALU.

GOOD MORNING COMM COMMISSIONERS.

HAPPY NEW YEAR.

UM, LEMME SHARE MY SCREEN.

CAN YOU SEE MY PRESENTATION? YES, WE CAN.

ALL RIGHT.

THIS IS M 2 23 DASH 0 3 6.

UM, IT'S FOR, IT'S A REQUEST FOR A CPC RELIEF TO THE STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS ALONG PARKER STREET DUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS, UH, PER SECTION 51 P DASH THREE, 17.12 C, LITTLE C FOUR LITTLE V.

IT'S IN PD THREE 17, SUB AREA THREE.

UM, IT'S AROUND 6.7577 ACRES IS IN COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER TWO.

IT IS LOCATED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF PARKER STREET BETWEEN PARNELL AND HAM JEAN BOULEVARD.

HERE'S DETAILS OF THE SECTION THAT I CALLED OUT EARLIER.

IT'S BASICALLY SAYING THAT CPC CAN APPROVE A SITE PLAN AT A PUBLIC HEARING THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STREET FRONTAGE REGULATIONS.

IF THESE THREE THINGS, UM, APPLY OR IT, YOU KNOW, SO MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IMPARTIAL DUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS, MEANING THE REQUIREMENTS WILL RESULT IN A SUB SUB SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP AND, UH, THE RELIEF WILL NOT AFFECT THE SURROUNDING

[00:15:01]

PROPERTY.

AND THEN ALSO, UM, WHATEVER THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING, IF, IF FURTHERS THE PURPOSE OF ACTUALLY THE DISTRICT, WHICH IS, UM, TO ENCOURAGE HIGH DENSITY OFFICE LODGING, RETAIL, AND RESIDENTIAL USE ALONG THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 30 FRONTAGE TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT THAT TAKES ADVANTAGE OF THE REGIONAL HIGHWAY, UM, ACCESS AND THE EXCELLENT DOWNTOWN VIEW, WHILE PRESERVING THE VIEW FOR OTHER SUB-DISTRICTS IN THE CEDARS AREA OF SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT.

UM, SO AS OF RIGHT NOW, THE CODE CALLS OUT FOR A MEN MAX.

IT'LL BE A MEN, UH, FIVE FEET AND A MAX OF EIGHT FEET, WHICH MEANS THE STREET FRONTAGE FACADE OF THE BUILDING HAS TO BE WITHIN THAT, BUT 70%.

UM, SO HERE'S A COUPLE OF RESPONSE FROM THE APPLICANT'S SITE RESTRAINTS.

UM, FRONTAL ALONE, PARKER SITE ONLY RUNS 117 POINT 0.47 FEET, UH, DUE TO ADJACENCY TO A DART OFFICE.

AND THEN ALSO FRONT STREET FRONTAL ALONE.

PARKER IS NOT FEASIBLE DUE TO MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE ACCESS AND ALSO THE MAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS ONTO THE PROPERTY.

HERE ARE SOME DETAILS FROM THE APPLICANT CALLING OUT THEIR RESPONSE.

UH, AS FAR AS MEETING THE STANDARDS FOR THE THREE THINGS THAT WERE CALLED OUT IN THE CODE, UM, THE FIRST THING I TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, AS FAR AS THE FIRE ACCESS INGRESS AND EGRESS, IT'S NOT FEASIBLE.

THAT'S WHY THEY CAN'T MEET THE STREET FRONTAGE.

THE SECOND ONE TALKS ABOUT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OF THE DART, UM, STREET FRONTAGE ALONG PARKER WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES DUE TO THE ADJACENCY TO THE BUSY DART RAIL AND ALSO THE SMALL SERVICE OFFICE.

ALSO TRAFFIC ALONG PARKER STREET WILL BE MINIMUM AND WILL SERVE FIRE RESCUE WHEN NEEDED IN THE SMALL DART OFFICE AND ALSO ACCESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO FOR NUMBER THREE, HERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT THE APPLICANT ACTUALLY PUT IN THAT SAID THEY CAN DO TO KIND OF, UM, BEAUTIFY OR RESERVE THE AREAS ALONG CORINTH AND HAM GENE SINCE THEY DON'T HAVE AN INGRESS AND EGRESS GOING ON TO THE PROPERTY ON THOSE STREETS.

SO THE FIRST THING THEY'RE PROPOSING, UM, SO THEY'RE PROPOSING TO RESERVE PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTRIAN WALKABLE EXPERIENCE ALONG HAM GENE AND CORINTH BY NOT INTERRUPTING THE PEDESTRIAN FLOW WITH ANY INGRESS AND EGRESS ONTO THE PROPERTY ON THESE TWO STREETS.

THEY'RE ALSO, UH, PROPOSING TO, UM, ACTUALLY UPDATE THE SIDEWALKS ON BOTTOM JEANS AND CORIN, UM, UP TO CURRENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR SMOOTH WALKABLE JOURNEY FOR THE PEDESTRIANS.

UM, THEY'RE ALSO WANNA CREATE A WELCOMING STREET SCAPE, UH, ALONG BOTTOM GEN COR, UH, BY INCORPORATING LANDSCAPE ALONG BOTH STREET FRONTAGE.

UM, THIS WILL BE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE FROM WHAT THE CODE IS REQUIRE.

AND THEN THEY'RE ALSO PROPOSING TO ADD SOME BENCHES ON BOTTOM JEANS AND CURRENT.

UM, SO THE TENANT AND ALSO PEOPLE WAITING FOR THE DART WILL BE COMFORTABLE, UH, AND IT'LL BE A CONVENIENCE FOR THEM ALONG THOSE TWO STREETS.

HERE IS THE NUMBERS.

UH, SO HERE'S THE NUMBERS FOR PARKER IS ONLY, AS I SAID EARLIER, 117.7 FEET.

SO WITH THE 70%, 82.22 FEET, SUPPOSED TO BE IN THE MEN MAX.

AND RIGHT NOW THE APPLICANT IS ONLY PROPOSING 34 POINT 10 FEET.

UM, SORRY, I HAD INCHES INSTEAD OF FEET THERE.

AND SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, ONLY 29% OF THE REQUIRED, UH, FACADE IS IN THE MEN MAX.

AND SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A RELIEF OF 41% TO ACTUALLY BRING THEM UP TO CODE AND COMPLIANCE.

SO THEY CAN ONLY HAVE THAT 29% WITHIN THE MINMAX.

HERE IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN WITH THE AREA REQUEST.

HERE'S THE BOTTOM GENE RUNNING HERE.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE MY MOUSE OR NOT.

AND THEN THE AREA REQUEST IS A LOAN.

PARKER.

HERE'S ENLARGED AREA REQUESTS.

HERE'S A AREA VIEW WHICH CALLS OUT PARKER.

HERE'S THE BUSY DART STATION AND UP NORTHEAST YOU CAN SEE, UM, WHERE THE PROPERTY IS KIND OF CUT OUT CLOSE TO THE DART STATION.

THERE'S WHERE THE DART OFFICE IS.

AND SO I ALSO HAVE SOME PICTURES OF THE SITE.

SO THIS IS AT BOTTOM, JEAN AND PARKER AT THAT CORNER.

THIS IS AT THE OTHER CON CORNER OF BO PARKER AND PARNELL.

UM, YOU CAN SEE THIS LITTLE METAL BUILDING HERE.

THAT'S THE DART OFFICE, UH, SERVICE OFFICE HERE IS LOOKING WEST DOWN.

BOTTOM JEAN HERE IS LOOKING NORTHEAST DOWN, COR.

UM, AND HERE'S JUST SOME PHOTOS OF THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY.

UH, THIS TOP ONE IS SHOWING THE DART STATION, UM, THAT RUNS BEHIND THE PROPERTY.

AND THEN THIS ONE SHOWS THE CORNER OF, UH, PARNELL AND HAM JEAN.

UM,

[00:20:01]

AND SO STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. BLUE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? OKAY, THANK YOU MS. BLUE.

UH, LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET INTO OUR, UM, WELL, LET'S DO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

UM, WHY DON'T WE TABLE THAT JUST FOR THE MOMENT.

COMMISSIONER WHEELER IS, IS ON HER WAY.

SO LET'S, LET'S SKIP OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND, UH, AGAIN, OUR ZONING

[ZONING CASES – CONSENT (Part 1 of 4)]

CASES.

AND HERE'S WHERE WE ARE WITH THE DOCKET COMMISSIONERS, UM, UH, TO THE SURPRISE OF NO ONE, SOME CASES HAVE COME OFF CONSENT.

UH, ALL D FOUR CASES WILL COME OFF CONSENT.

THERE ARE FIVE OF THEM AND ALL WILL BE HELD TO FEBRUARY 15TH.

ALL OF THEM, THE ALL D FOUR CASES.

YEAH, UH, I'LL GIVE YOU THOSE NUMBERS.

UH, BUT AT THIS POINT, UH, THESE ARE THE CASES THAT HAVE COME OFF.

CONSENT NUMBER 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16.

OKAY.

17, 8, 18, 23 AND 25.

AND OF, OF COURSE, NOT ALL OF THOSE WILL BE HELD UNDER ADVISEMENT.

SOME OF THOSE, UH, A COUPLE OF US HAVE CONFLICTS.

UH, SOME OF SOME OF THOSE ARE AS OPPOSITION AND SOME OF THEM, UH, THERE WERE SOME, UH, A NEED TO TAKE 'EM OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA TO CORRECT SOME LANGUAGE.

BUT, UM, WE'LL GET TO, UH, ONE AT A TIME.

UH, THE, THE ONES THAT ARE GONNA GET HELD, WE WILL BRIEF, UM, AT A FUTURE DATE.

SO THAT TAKES US TO CASE NUMBER SIX WILL BE HELD UNDER ADVISEMENT OF FEBRUARY SEVEN 15TH.

SO THAT TAKES US TO CASE

[7. 24-229 An application for an MU-1-D Mixed Use District with a D Liquor Control Overlay on property zoned a CR-D Community Retail District with a D Liquor Control Overlay, on the southeast corner of Prichard Lane and Scyene Road. (Part 1 of 2)]

NUMBER SEVEN.

MR. PEPE, CAN YOU SEE MY PRESENTATION ONLINE? LOOKS LIKE IT.

YES.

SO THIS IS Z 2 2 3 2 1 2.

AND THIS IS LOCATED, UH, UH, NEAR BUCKNER ROAD, SOUTH BUCKNER.

AND IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR AN MU 1D MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH A D LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY ON PROPERTY ZONED A CRD COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT WITH A D LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PRITCHARD LANE AND SAE ROAD AT 6.49 ACRES.

AND THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST IS TO PERMIT HER RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE SITE.

HERE'S THE SITE AS IT EXISTS TODAY, AND IT'S GENERALLY UNDEVELOPED.

SO TO THE NORTH THERE'S CEMETERY, THERE'S ANOTHER, UH, PORTION OF THE CEMETERY TO THE EAST, UH, AS WELL AS TO THE EAST.

THERE'S A, UH, RETAIL STRIP WITH A GROCERY STORE, OTHER PERSONAL SERVICE USES.

UM, THERE'S MULTI-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH.

UH, IT BUILT OUT UNDER CR UH, TO THE WEST, THERE'S AN OPEN ENROLLMENT CHARTER SCHOOL.

AND TO THE NORTHWEST THERE'S A CHURCH.

SO IT IS CURRENTLY THAT CR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED.

THEY'RE PROPOSING RESIDENTIAL USES, UM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SURROUNDED GENERALLY, UH, BY CR THAT'S, UM, EITHER BUILT OUT OR UNDEVELOPED, UM, BUT COULD EASILY BE DEVELOPED AS COMMERCIAL.

UH, THEY WERE REQUESTING MU TO PERMIT THOSE RESIDENTIAL USES TO, UH, NOT TO FORM THAT APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONING.

WHEN I GET DOWN TO THE SITE REALLY QUICK, HERE WE ARE ON SINE AND MOVE WEST, FURTHER WEST, TURNING THE CORNER ON PRITCHARD AND LOOKING, IT'S ACTUALLY LOOKING EAST.

UM, YEAH, A LITTLE FARTHER DOWN ON PRITCHARD.

THERE'S THE MULTIFAMILY THAT'S BUILT OUT UNDER THE CR OR THE SOUTH.

THEN TURNING AROUND, LOOKING WEST AT THE OPEN ENROLLMENT CHARTER SCHOOL TO THE WEST OR

[00:25:01]

ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS SIDE.

THEN TO THE NORTH IS CEMETERY, MORE CEMETERY TO THE NORTHEAST.

AND THEN THAT'S AS YOU RIGHT HEADED TOWARDS BUCKNER BY ABOUT A BLOCK.

YEAH, AND THAT'S, UH, THERE'S MORE CEMETERY ON MY RIGHT HERE.

SO JUST QUICKLY, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, UH, BETWEEN CR AND MU, UM, HAVE SOME SIMILARITY.

UM, BUT THE USES THAT THEY'RE GONNA DO ARE GONNA BE RESIDENTIAL.

UH, HOWEVER, THE MU IS NOT GONNA IMPOSE, UM, CERTAIN ADJACENCY ISSUES ON THE ADJA CR AS WOULD MAYBE A RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

AND HERE'S THAT ADJACENCY THAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, JUST TO, TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.

THE, UH, THE D DRY OVERLAY, LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY WILL REMAIN IN PLACE.

AND MOVING ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.

THANK YOU, SIR.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS, MR. HALL? COMMISSIONER HALL, PLEASE.

UH, DO WE KNOW WHAT TYPE RESIDENTIAL THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT? THEY INITIALLY PROPOSED, UH, TOWNHOME USES, WHICH IS NOT A USE, THAT WOULD BE A SINGLE FAMILY, UH, WHICH WOULD BE ALLOWABLE UNDER THE MU ONE, BUT THEY'D HAVE SOME OPTIONS UNDER NEW ONE AS WELL.

ANY, SO IT COULD, COULD BE SINGLE FAMILY A APART, COULD IT BE APARTMENTS OR ANYTHING LIKE MIXED USE WOULD ALSO ALLOW MULTI-FAMILY? YEAH.

OKAY.

BUT NOT, NOT TOWN HOMES.

WELL, TOWN HOMES ISN'T A USE IS WHY I SAY THAT I'M BEING PARTICULAR, BUT THEY PROPOSED TOWN HOMES.

HOMES.

SO WHAT THAT REALLY MEANS IS MAYBE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED WITH SMALL LOTS, UM, IN A ROW.

THAT'S WHAT WHAT, WHAT NORMAL PEOPLE WILL CALL TOWN HOMES.

WE CALL SINGLE FAMILY IN THE CODE.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

YES, MR. PLEASE.

IS THE CEMETERY ACTIVE AND HOW INTRUSIVE IS THE COMMUNITY GOING TO BE ON THE CEMETERY? WELL, THE CEMETERY IS MOSTLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD.

I THINK THE, UH, THE FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CEMETERY ON THE SOUTH SIDE, UM, MIGHT BE SOME OF THE, UH, CREMATORIUM USE KIND OF ON THE SOUTH PART.

SO MAINLY THE CEMETERIES ON THE NORTH PART, AND THEY'RE SEPARATED BY A PRETTY, PRETTY WIDE ROAD.

I CAN'T REMEMBER THE, THE REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY, BUT THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO IMPROVE, UH, THE SOUTH SIDE AND OF THE ROAD TO, UH, BRING IT UP TO STANDARD, UH, AS THEY BUILD OUT.

UM, AND SO THAT'S A PRETTY, PRETTY SIGNIFICANT, UH, DISTANCE CEMETERY.

ALSO ABUTS BUCKNER ON THE EAST SIDE, SO IT'S, IT'S NOT EXACTLY IN A, UM, IN AN ISOLATED OR, OR RURAL AREA OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

SO, UH, COMPARED TO CR YOU MIGHT SEE SOME LOWER INTENSITY OR TRAFFIC USES COMPARED TO WHAT'S BUILT OUT OR COULD BE BUILT OUT UNDER THE CR.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, SIR.

UH, MR. PIPPI, AS, AS YOU KNOW, THIS IS A, A GENERAL ZONING CHANGE AND UH, I THINK AT ONE POINT THE APPLICANT HAD A, UH, A POTENTIAL SITE PLAN FLOATING AROUND.

WERE YOU AWARE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS MADE A COMMITMENT TO GO BEYOND THE, THE GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT AND UM, AND SHAVE OFF SEVERAL UNITS TO ADD MORE GREEN SPACE? I WAS NOT AWARE.

SOUNDS GOOD.

OKAY, SIR.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, WE'LL KEEP GOING TO, UH, CASE

[8. 24-230 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2325 for an alcoholic beverage establishment limited to a microbrewery, microdistillery, or winery on property zoned Subarea A within Planned Development District No. 741, on the northeast corner of Olympus Boulevard and Wharf Road. (Part 1 of 2)]

NUMBER EIGHT.

NUMBER EIGHT HAS COME OFF CONSENT AND WILL BE, UH, HEARD INDIVIDUALLY.

IT'S, NO, IT'S HAS COME OFF CONSENT.

MR. ROBERTS? YES.

GOOD MORNING, COMMERS.

CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? YES, WE CAN.

WONDERFUL.

THANK YOU.

GIMME ONE MOMENT HERE.

I'LL GET THIS PULLED UP.

WELL, CONNOR IS PULLING UP, I'M GONNA TAKE A MOMENT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT.

UH, CONNOR, ROBERTS AND WILSON KERR ARE, UM, ACTUALLY STAFF AUGMENTATION AND THEY'RE PART OF OUR TEAM.

UM, AND THEY'RE DOING, HELPING US TO BRING UP THE CASE LOAD.

SO YOU WILL SEE THEM PRESENTING AT CPC AND YOU'LL SEE THEIR NAMES, UH, FOR REACHING OUT TO YOU ON CASES.

WONDERFUL.

THANK YOU, ANDREA.

AND CAN EVERYONE SEE MY SCREEN? HOPEFULLY THIS WORKS.

WELL, WE CAN.

THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

WONDERFUL.

THANK YOU CHAIR.

APPRECIATE THAT.

AND LET'S SEE, IS IT IN PRESENTATION MODE OR IS IT STILL IN DISPLAY MODE? IT'S, IT'S NOT IN PRESENTATION MODE.

YOU COULD ZOOM IN A LITTLE.

IT'S MICHAEL.

YEAH, THANKS MICHAEL.

GIMME ONE MOMENT.

APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.

[00:30:01]

STILL LEARNING THIS WEBEX.

GO.

HOW ABOUT NOW? BETTER.

AWESOME.

THANK YOU.

UH, THANK YOU CHAIR.

THANK YOU COMMISSION, UH, FOR HAVING US THIS MORNING.

UH, THIS IS CASE, UH, Z 2 2 3 215.

UH, IT IS AN AMENDMENT TO SEP 2325 ALLOWING FOR THE CONTINUATION AND EXPANSION OF AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE, UH, ESTABLISHMENT LIMITED TO A MICROBREWERY MICRO DISTILLERY OR WINERY.

UH, IN THIS CASE, IT IS A WINERY.

UH, IT'S LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF OLYMPUS BOULEVARD AND WHARF ROAD THAT'S IN THE CYPRESS WATERS DISTRICT.

UH, THE EXPANSION IS FROM A 900 AND WHERE 901 SQUARE FOOT, UH, UNIT TO A COMBINED 3,173 SQUARE FOOT UNIT, UH, WITHIN, UH, A BUILDING.

UH, THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING IS, UH, 19,580 SQUARE FEET.

IT IS WITHIN, UH, COUNCIL DISTRICT SIX, UH, SOME ZONING CONTEXT FOR YOU.

IT IS WITHIN SUB AREA A OF PD 7 41.

AGAIN, THAT'S THE CYPRESS WATERS.

UH, THE EXISTING SUP 2325 WAS ADOPTED IN, UH, MARCH OF 2019.

I CAN SEE ITS RELATIONSHIP THERE TO THE REST OF THE CITY, CYPRESS WATERS DISTRICT, UH, FAR NORTHWEST.

AND ON THE RIGHT YOU'LL SEE, UH, THE SITE SPECIFICALLY.

UH, THAT SITE DOES ENCOMPASS THE FULL BUILDING, UH, AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO, UH, CYPRESS BOULEVARD AND MORPH ROAD.

THERE.

UH, YOU'LL SEE ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING LAND USES HERE ON THE AERIAL, UH, THE PRIVATE RECREATION SPACE SOUTHEAST.

UH, AS FAR AS ZONING DISTRICTS, IT'S, UH, ALL WITHIN SUB AREA.

A, UH, THE USE BREAKDOWN, UH, YOU CAN SEE IT'S SURROUNDED ON, ON SEVERAL SIDES BY OFFICE USES, UH, MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTHWEST.

UH, SO RESTAURANT USES TO THE NORTH.

AND AGAIN, THAT, UH, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE OR RECREATION CENTER IS THE WAY THE CODE LISTED, UH, TO THE SOUTHEAST.

UH, DURING OUR SITE VISIT.

UH, THIS IS A VIEW OF THE UNIT, UH, LOOKING TO THE NORTHWEST FROM A PEDESTRIAN PATH.

UH, JUST FURTHER UP THAT PEDESTRIAN PATH.

LOOKING FURTHER SOUTHWEST BACK AT THE UNIT, UH, THIS IS FROM THE, UH, REAR OF THE BUILDING, UH, SOME OFF STREET PARKING LOOKING, UH, TO THE SOUTHEAST AT THE UNIT.

UH, AGAIN, THIS IS A, AN AMENDED SITE PLAN.

SO YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK.

THIS IS THE, UH, EXISTING SITE PLAN.

YOU'LL SEE THE 901 SQUARE FEET HIGHLIGHTED IN RED THERE, UH, ON THE LEFT, AND THEN ZOOMED IN ON THE RIGHT.

FOR CONTEXT, UH, YOU'LL SEE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN HERE, UH, WITH THAT SAME 901 SQUARE FEET, UH, THE LOWER OF THOSE RED BLOCKS, UH, THEN THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FEET ADDED BY THIS APPLICATION, UH, JUST NORTH OF THAT IN THE SAME BUILDING.

UH, WITH THAT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL, UH, FOR THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD, UH, WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWAL, UH, FOR ADDITIONAL FIVE-YEAR PERIODS.

THAT IS SUBJECT TO ADMITTED SITE PLAN AND AMEND CONDITIONS.

UH, AND WITH THAT, UH, CHAIR I HAVE, I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS AS I CAN.

THANK YOU, SIR.

QUESTIONS MR. CARPENTER? UH, MR. PEPE? OH, I'M SORRY.

IT'S NOT MR. PEPE'S CASE.

I APOLOGIZE.

UM, AGAIN, MR. MULKEY, I SUPPOSE I'M ASKING THIS QUESTION.

THE ONLY REASON THIS WAS TAKEN OFF CONSENT IS BECAUSE WE HAD TO CHANGE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO ACCOMMODATE AN AMENDED SITE PLAN.

IS THERE ANY REASON WHY IT CAN'T STAY ON CONSENT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AS IN THE DOCKET AND BRIEFED? UH, CAN EVERYONE HEAR ME WITH MY MASK ON? OKAY.

OKAY.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I COULDN'T FIND.

YEAH, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS YESTERDAY, DANIEL AND I, UM, AND WE AGREED THAT IT WOULD, UH, ESSENTIALLY BE CLEANER TO TAKE IT OFF CONSENT.

OKAY.

AND, UH, HEAR IT INDIVIDUALLY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, WE'LL KEEP GOING.

CASE NUMBER NINE.

UH, COMMISSIONERS HAS COME OFF CONSENT AND WE'LL BE HELD UNDER ADVISEMENT TO MARCH 7TH.

[10. 24-232 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 1464 for a refuse transfer station on property zoned IM Industrial Manufacturing District, on the south line of California Crossing Road, east of Wildwood Drive. (Part 1 of 2)]

WE'LL BRIEF IT THEN TAKES US TO CA TO CASE NUMBER 10.

IT'S ALSO COME OFF, CONSENT WILL BE HEARD TODAY.

SO THE LANGUAGE, UH, ALSO SUBJECT TO AMENDED SITE PLAN AND, UH, AMENDED LANDSCAPE PLANNING CONDITIONS.

SO THERE'S JUST A LITTLE WORDING THERE.

COMMISSIONER ONLY REASONS COMING OFF CONSENT.

ZA, GOOD MORNING.

HAPPY NEW YEAR.

GOOD MORNING.

[00:35:29]

ITEM NUMBER 10 S KZ.

2 2 3 2 4 8.

IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT, UH, TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 1464 FOR A REFUGE TRANSFER STATION ON PROPERTIES ZONED.

IM INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT.

IT'S LOCATED ON THE SOUTHLINE, CALIFORNIA CROSSING ROAD, EAST OF WOOD WOOD DRIVE.

UH, SO SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS, UM, TO THE NORTH IS, IS IT'S AN OFFICE SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE, INDUSTRIAL INSIDE WAREHOUSE USE, UM, TO THE EAST INDUSTRIAL, UM, INSIDE.

AND THEN TO THE SOUTH IS VEHICLE STORAGE LOT.

AND THEN, UH, TO THE SOUTHWEST, UH, COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING.

UM, SO THE AREA REQUIRES AS WELL WITH THE FERENCE, UH, TRANSFER STATION.

UM, IT DOES RE, UH, RAPID REFUSE TRANSFER STATION REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.

ON APRIL 10TH, 2002, CITY COUNCIL APPROVED HIS UNDER REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 1464.

UM, AND THEN, UH, FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD WITH ELIGIBLE FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWALS FOR ADDITIONAL 10 YEAR PERIODS.

THE SEP WAS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 YEARS IN 2012.

AND THEN ON AUGUST, UH, 2018, UH, CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AN AMENDMENT TO SUP FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 YEARS.

AND THEN ON OCTOBER OF 2021, CITY PLAN COMMISSION APPROVED A MINOR AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SITE PLAN.

AND LASTLY, PLAN.

AND THEN THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO AMEND THE SUP NUMBER 1464 TO ALLOW THE FOLLOWING, ADD PROPOSED BAYLOR UH, BUILDING TO ENABLE MORE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF RECYCLED PRODUCTS.

UM, INCREASE THE EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING ON THE WEST SIDE.

UPDATE THE SUP PLANS TO REFLECT COMPLETED, UH, BUILDING STRUCTURES WHICH WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ON SUP PLANS, PROPOSED AND UPDATE OFF AND ONSITE PARKING SPACES AS SUGGESTED FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS.

UH, SINCE, UM, THE DOCKET WAS PUBLISHED, THE APPLICANT IS, UH, NOW REQUESTING A CHANGE TO THE TIME PERIOD OF THE EXISTING SUP.

UH, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TO REMOVE CONDITIONS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL THAT ARE REDUNDANT TO THE EXISTING CODE.

SO THESE, THESE ARE SOME OF THE SITE PHOTOS.

AND THEN AROUND THE, THE AREA, AND THIS IS THE EXISTING SITE PLAN, UM, THAT IS CURRENTLY, AND THEN THIS IS NOW THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN OF WHICH THEY ARE AMENDING AND THEN AS WELL AS THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING PLAN.

UM, AND THEN THEY'RE ALSO UPDATING THE, THE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO SHOW THAT THE NEW BUILDINGS AS WELL.

AND THIS IS A PROPOSED ON SKIPPING PLAN.

AND THEN, UM, SO AS I MENTIONED FROM, UH, THE DOCKET BEING PUBLISHED, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED FOR IT, UH, 'CAUSE RIGHT NOW THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DOES EXPIRE UNTIL 2028.

HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL 10 YEAR, SO A 10 YEAR FROM THE PASSAGE OF THE ORDINANCE.

AND THEN, UM, THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED.

UM, THE PLANNING OBJECT, PARKING AND LOADING SOLID WASTE STORMWATER ORDINANCE, WHICH ARE REDUNDANT TO THE EXISTING CODE.

AND THEN SITE RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 YEAR PERIODS SUBJECT TO AN AMENDED SITE PLAN AND AMENDED LIFESAVING PLAN AND AMENDED CONDITIONS AS BRIEFED.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. GARZA, AGAIN, COMMISSIONERS THIS, THIS CAME OFF CONSENT JUST FOR THE ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE OF AMENDED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND AMENDED CONDITIONS.

QUESTIONS MR. HANTON? THANK YOU MS. GARZA.

JUST ONE QUESTION ON THE REMOVE CONDITIONS.

UM, WHILE I UNDERSTAND REMOVING LISTING OF THE NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED, BECAUSE THAT'S REDUNDANT IN CODE, BUT IT ALSO STATES THE LOCATION WHERE IT IS REQUIRED ON THE PLAN.

UM, WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OF THAT MOVING ON THE SITE TO AN AREA THAT MIGHT NOT BE APPROPRIATE OR DESIRABLE? UH, NO.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. GARZA.

COMMERS, UH,

[00:40:01]

LET'S MOVE TO NUMBER

[11. 24-233 An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2304 for a bar, lounge, or tavern on property zoned Subdistrict 2 within Planned Development District No. 317, the Cedars Area Special Purpose District, on the northeast line of Harwood Street, southeast of Hickory Street. (Part 1 of 2)]

11.

THANK YOU CHAIR AND THANK YOU COMMISSIONS.

SLIDE UP HERE, TRY THAT AGAIN.

CAN ANYONE SEE THAT WE CAN? PERFECT.

THANK YOU.

CHAIR.

UH, THIS IS CASE Z 2 2 3 2 75.

THAT IS A, UH, REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF SEP NUMBER 2304.

UH, THAT'S ALLOWS FOR A ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT, UH, BAR, LOUNGE, OR TAVERN.

IT'S LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 80 FEET SOUTHEAST OF THE CORNER OF SOUTH HARWOOD STREET AND HICKORY STREET.

UH, IT'S APPROXIMATELY A 1700 SQUARE FOOT, UH, UNIT WITHIN A TOTAL 5,075 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.

AND IT IS WITHIN COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO.

IT'S SOME ZONING BACKGROUND, 40 YOU, IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED WITHIN SUBDISTRICT TWO, UH, PD THREE 17.

THAT'S THE CS SPECIAL, SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT.

UH, IT HAS A FEW OVERLAYS APPLICABLE INCLUDING THE, UH, DEMOLITION DELAY, THE AIRPORT HEIGHT OVERLAY FOR LOVE FIELD, UH, AS WELL AS THE, UH, DOWNTOWN PERIMETER.

UM, THE ORIGINAL SEP 2304 WAS ADOPTED, UH, IN OCTOBER OF 2020.

I CAN SEE ITS RELATIONSHIP THERE, UH, DENOTED BY THE STAR.

UH, THEN ON THE RIGHT YOU'LL SEE, UH, ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE BLOCK AROUND IT, INCLUDING, UH, SOUTH HARWOOD HERE.

UH, UH, YOU CAN SEE THAT RELATIONSHIP AGAIN ON THE AERIAL MAP.

IN RELATION TO, UH, THE ZONING, UH, DISTRICTS.

THERE ARE SEVERAL SUBDISTRICTS, UH, TO THE CEDARS, UH, IN THE AREA.

UH, THOSE ARE IN RED FOR REFERENCE.

UH, IN BLUE YOU'LL SEE THE SURROUNDING USES, UM, SOME VACANT, UH, LOTS AND UNITS, UH, NOTED TO THE SOUTH.

UH, SOME MULTIFAMILY ACROSS THE STREET.

UM, SOME LIGHT, UH, INDUSTRIAL ALSO ACROSS, UH, THE WAY SOME, UH, PERSONAL SERVICE USES TO THE NORTH.

AND THEN A, UH, MULTI-TENANT RETAIL BUILDING TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY OVER AN ALLEYWAY.

UH, TAKING A LOOK AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, UM, FROM SOUTH HARWOOD, LOOKING NORTHEAST, UH, LOOKING BACK DOWN SOUTH HARWOOD, UH, TO THE SOUTHWEST, YOU'LL SEE A CLIP OF THAT MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURE, THIS CATTYCORNER.

AND THEN LOOKING UP, UH, SOUTH HARWOOD TO THE NORTHWEST THE UNIT JUST TO THE RIGHT OF THAT.

UH, TAKING A LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, UH, NOTED ON SITE.

UH, AND WITH THAT, UH, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL FOR A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD, UH, SUBJECT TO AMENDING CONDITIONS.

AND WITH THAT, I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, MR. ROBERTS.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER? OKAY, THANK YOU MR. ROBERTS.

UH, WE'LL MOVE ON TO CASE NUMBER 12.

THAT WILL BE, UH, HELD UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL FEBRUARY 15TH.

COMING OFF, CONSENT

[13. 24-235 An application for a Specific Use Permit for a bank or savings and loan office with a drive-through on property zoned a GR General Retail Subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on the southwest corner of Oak Lawn Avenue and Avondale Avenue. (Part 1 of 2)]

13 WILL BE HEARD TODAY, BUT IT'S ALSO COMING OFF CONSENT PURCHASE.

GOOD MORNING.

THIS IS CASE NUMBER Z 2 2 3 2 9 7.

IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A BANK OR A SAVINGS AND LOAN OFFICE WITH A DRIVE THROUGH ON PROPERTIES ZONE GR GENERAL RETAIL SUBDISTRICT WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1 93, THE OAKLAND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OAKLAND AVENUE AND AVONDALE AVENUE.

THIS IS THE LOCATION MAP, THIS IS THE AREA MAP AND THE AREA OF REQUEST IS OUTLINED IN BLUE.

THIS IS THE ZONING MAP.

YOU HAVE PERSONAL SERVICE, OFFICE AND RETAIL SURROUNDING THE AREA OF REQUESTS.

IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED PD 1 93, THE GENERAL RETAIL.

UM, THE LOT HAS FURNISHED

[00:45:01]

ON OAK LAWN AND THEY PROPOSE TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING DRIVE-THROUGH AT A BANK OR SAVINGS AND LOAN OFFICE.

AND TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, THEY ARE REQUESTING AN SUP.

THE NEXT FEW, UH, PHOTOS WILL BE OF THE SITES, UM, AND SURROUNDING USES.

THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF AVONDALE AND OAKLAND AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTOMATIC RENEWALS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 YEAR PERIOD, AND IT'S SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

QUESTIONS, MICHELLE? NO QUESTIONS.

UH, THANK YOU.

MS. BRIDGES.

COMMISSIONER'S CASES 14 AND 15 WILL COME OFF.

CONSENT WILL BE HELD IN OUR ADVISEMENT OF FEBRUARY 15TH.

CASE NUMBER 16 WILL BE HEARD TODAY, BUT HAS COME OFF CONSENT.

MR. CLINT, GOOD MORNING.

A NEW TO YOU, SIR.

GOOD DAY.

HOW'S EVERYONE? GREAT, THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, THIS IS CASE Z 2 2 3 3 0 3.

IT IS AN APPLICATION FOR THE RENEWAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2 2 7 8 FOR AN EXTENDED HOURS HISTORIC HOUSE MUSEUM MEETING SPACE AND FUNDRAISING ON A PROPERTY ZONE.

TRACK G WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 63, THE SWISS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT WITH HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SWISS AND PARK MY STREET.

THIS RENEWAL OF, UH, THE SUP WOULD BE TO ALLOW CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE HISTORIC HOUSE MUSEUM AND IT IS APPROXIMATELY ONE POINT 17 ACRES IN SIZE.

HERE'S OUR LOCATION MAP WITH THE SITE.

THIS IS OUR AERIAL ZOOM IN.

HERE'S OUR ZONING MAP WITH THE SURROUNDING USES.

UM, TO THE NORTH WE HAVE SINGLE FAMILY TO THE NORTHEAST, UH, SINGLE FAMILY HISTORIC DISTRICT TO THE EAST, SOUTHEAST.

WE HAVE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT.

NINE NINE.

AND THEN TO THE WEST.

THERE'S ALSO SINGLE FAMILY HISTORIC DISTRICT, UH, PD 63.

UH, BRIEF BACKGROUND ON THIS, UH, PROPOSAL.

SO IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED UNDER PLAN DEVELOPMENT NUMBER SIX THREE, AGAIN WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY.

UM, THIS LOT HAS FRONTAGE ON BOTH SWISS AVENUE AND PARK MOD STREET.

UM, HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD BE, UH, BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 10:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY AT A MAXIMUM TOTAL OF 36 DAYS PER CALENDAR YEAR.

THE APPLICANT PROPOSES NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE LAND USE OR THE SITE PLAN.

AGAIN, IT IS A, UH, SUP RENEWAL.

THE CURRENT SUP EXPIRES, UH, 1 24 OF THIS YEAR AND THEY FILED FOR RENEWAL LAST YEAR, JULY 7TH, UH, FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD.

HERE WE HAVE SOME, UH, SITE VISIT PHOTOS ON PROPERTY.

LOOKING TOWARDS THE, THE SITE HERE, WE'RE ON PROPERTY LOOKING DOWN, UH, SWISS AVENUE.

THIS IS ALSO ON PROPERTY LOOKING, UH, ADJACENT TO THE SITE.

THIS IS ON PROPERTY LOOKING DOWN SWISS AVENUE TO THE WEST HERE.

WE'RE ON THE CORNER OF SWISS AVENUE AND PARK MY STREET LOOKING NORTH NORTHWEST.

UM, AGAIN ON THE CORNER, LOOKING SOUTH ON THE CORNER, LOOKING SOUTH, THIS IS, UH, ADJACENT TO THE SITE TO THE WEST.

THIS IS ON PARK MY STREET.

LOOKING DOWN, UH, THE DRIVEWAY.

[00:50:01]

UH, SO THE BACK ALLEY OF THE SITE.

UM, HERE ARE THE SUP CONDITIONS.

UM, AGAIN, NO OTHER CHANGES.

UM, HERE'S THEIR EXISTING SITE PLAN AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.

THANK YOU, SIR.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON.

THANK YOU.

LOOKING AT THE SUP CONDITIONS, UNDER THE FIRST CONDITION IS USE, ARE ALL OF THOSE USES DEFINED BY THE CODE, HISTORIC HOUSE, MUSEUM, MEETING, SPACE AND FUNDRAISING? YES.

THOSE USES ARE, UM, DEFINED UNDER THEIR BASE, UH, THE BASE ZONING.

WHAT IS THE BASE ZONING? WHAT, SO THEY ARE UNDER THE, UH, PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UH, NUMBER 63.

YEAH.

WHAT IS THAT? IN LOOKING AT THIS, I WAS TRYING TO FIND IN THE CODE THOSE THREE USES SO I COULD UNDERSTAND THE PARAMETERS AROUND THOSE USES.

FOR INSTANCE, WHAT PART OF THE CODE WOULD I GO TO TO DEFINE WHEN THIS, UM, ESTABLISHMENT CAN BE OPEN? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

I WILL HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT ONE.

OKAY.

I'VE GOT A COUPLE OTHERS I CAN ACTUALLY, UH, JUMP IN ON THAT ONE REAL QUICK.

SURE.

UM, SO THE USE HISTORIC HOUSE, MUSEUM AND MEETING SPACE IS SORT OF A CUSTOM USE THAT'S DEFINED WITHIN PD NUMBER 63.

SO IT'S SPECIFIC TO JUST THAT PD.

UH, IT'S NOT A STANDARD USE IN CHAPTER 51 A.

AND IS, IS THERE ANYTHING IN THAT DEFINITION THAT DEFINES WHEN THEY CAN OPERATE? I KNOW THAT THERE'S SOME LIMITATIONS ON OPERATIONS, BUT, UH, NO, AND I CAN, I CAN JUST READ THAT DEFINITION ALOUD.

UH, HISTORIC HOUSE, MUSEUM AND MEETING SPACE MEANS A FACILITY THAT OFFERS TOURS AND HOST EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND OFFICIAL MEETINGS OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, EXCEPT FOR THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR PORTRAIT PHOTOGRAPHS AND HISTORIC HOUSE, MUSEUM AND MEETING SPACE DOES NOT INCLUDE COMMERCIAL EVENTS OR RENTING THE SPACE FOR A FEE.

UH, AND THERE'S ACTUALLY A SECOND USE RIGHT ABOVE THAT ONE USE 14.1 FOR FUNDRAISING.

UH, THAT MEANS THE ACT OR PROCESS OF GATHERING VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONS, OR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

FOR POLITICAL CAUSES OR CANDIDATES.

UH, EITHER OF THOSE USES, IT DOES NOT MENTION HOURS OF OPERATIONS SPECIFICALLY.

UM, REALLY THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUP ISN'T REALLY FOR EITHER OF THOSE USES.

IT'S FOR IT TO BE AN EXTENDED HOURS USE, MEANING THE SUP IS TO STAY OPEN PAST 5:00 PM A MAXIMUM OF 36 CALENDAR DAYS PER YEAR.

I SEE THAT, BUT WHERE DO I FIND IN THE CODE THE HOURS THEY CAN OPERATE? COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, IT IS IN THE USE REGULATIONS FOR AREA G.

THAT'S 51 P 63.1 32.

SO FOR A HISTORIC HOUSE AND MUSEUM AND MEETING SPACE, IT IS BY RIGHT BETWEEN 9:00 AM AND 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY BY SUP FROM 5:00 PM UM, LET'S SEE, BY SUP ONLY BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 9:00 AM MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY.

AND THEN FOR THE FUNDRAISING, IT IS ALLOWED BY SUP ONLY.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

AND SO MY NEXT QUESTION IS LOOKING AT, UM, CONDITION FOUR, THE AFTER HOURS OPERATIONS, HOW DO WE TRACK COMPLIANCE WITH THAT? IS THAT A QUESTION FOR ME, COMMISSIONER? OH, NO, IT COULD BE A QUESTION FOR ANYONE.

ANDREA, DO YOU WANNA TAKE THAT ONE? OKAY, SO NUMBER FOUR.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND MY QUESTION? YEAH, BUT DOESN'T, ISN'T IT LIKE, UH, TRACKED BY THE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT? WELL, THAT WAS GONNA BE MY NEXT QUESTION.

WHAT GOES IN THE REPORT? YES.

I THINK THAT'S, THAT'S THE INTENT TO BE TRACKED BY THE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT.

AND WE REACHED OUT TO COUNCIL MEMBER RIDLEY'S OFFICE.

HE CONFIRMED THAT HE RECEIVES THE MONTHLY REPORTS AND I WILL LEAVE THE APPLICANT TO SAY WHAT'S IN THE REPORT.

I DON'T KNOW IF WE RECEIVED ANY OF THE REPORTS TO SEE WHAT'S IN THAT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE AT THIS TIME.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER HAN, PLEASE, IF I CAN JUST ASK ONE.

MR. LAQUAN, I SAW THAT WE RECEIVED SOME, UM, REPLY FORMS AND OPPOSITION, BUT I DIDN'T SEE THAT THERE WAS ANY STATEMENTS.

DID YOU

[00:55:01]

RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATIONS ON THAT, ON WHAT THE CONCERNS WERE? I DID.

I DIDN'T RECEIVE ANYTHING IN TERMS OF OPPOSITION.

I ACTUALLY RECEIVED MULTIPLE SUPPORTING.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, COMMISSIONER KING, STAFF FOLLOWER, COMMISSIONER HALL.

THANK YOU.

UM, DID STAFF RECEIVE ANY OF THE FORMS? BECAUSE WHEN I LOOK AT THE, UM, NOTIFICATION AREA, IT LOOKS LIKE 90% OF THE PEOPLE WHO RESPONDED IN AN OPPOSITION DID.

USUALLY WE GET THE LITTLE BLUE FORMS WITH PART OF OUR PACKET AND I DIDN'T SEE THAT.

I DON'T KNOW.

LET ME LET, OKAY.

IT MAY I, ISN'T IT THE CASE THAT WE ONLY GET THE COPIES OF THE BALLOTS IF THERE ARE COMMENTS? 'CAUSE IT, THEY DON'T INCLUDE THEM IF IT'S JUST CHECKED IN SUPPORT OR IN OPPOSITION, BUT THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTARY.

WE JUST GET THE TOTAL .

WE CAN MOVE ON.

THEY CAN GET THAT TO ME OUTTA BREAK OR SOMETHING.

WE DID SEND ALL THE REPLY FORMS THIS MORNING.

IT WAS A LITTLE BIT, UH, A LOT YESTERDAY.

WE SCANNED THEM TOWARDS THE END OF THE DAY AND WE SENT ALL OF THEM TO THE ENTIRE COMMISSION THIS MORNING.

YOU MIGHT CHECK, I THINK THERE WAS AN EMAIL WITH THREE SEPARATE ATTACHMENTS.

MAYBE IT'S IN THERE.

YEAH, I'LL, I'LL LOOK AT THEM.

WILL YOU CONFIRM COMMISSIONER HALL? YEAH.

I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD.

WE, WE DID RECEIVE A LOT OF, UH, COMMUNITY COMMENT IN SUPPORT, BUT NOW, NOW I'M HEARING WE DID RECEIVE COMMENT IN OPPOSITION IS THAT WE RECEIVED SOME PHONE CALLS, UH, OF PEOPLE ASKING HOW TO SUBMIT REPLY FORMS. THEY DIDN'T SAY IN SUPPORT OF OUR OPPOSITION.

I THINK THEY WERE LEANING TOWARDS OPPOSITION, BUT IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THE REPLY FORMS THAT WE RECEIVED AND SCANNED.

UM, LET ME CHECK AND IF YOU CAN CHECK YOUR EMAILS IF YOU HAVE ANY WAY TO OKAY.

TO SEE WHAT WE RECORDED.

I WILL PUT IT FOR THE RECORD.

UM, OUR DEADLINE TO RECEIVE REPLY FORMS FOR CPC IS AT NO THE DAY PRIOR.

UH, THAT'S WHEN WE COUNT.

THEY ENTER THEM INTO THE SYSTEM AND THEN WE SCAN AND SEND IT TO YOU.

HOWEVER, WE TOLD THE PUBLIC, AND I WANT THIS TO BE ON THE RECORD, I WILL SAY IT A FEW TIMES TODAY.

UH, THE PUBLIC HAS A CHANCE TO SEND THOSE LETTERS, THE REPLY FORMS, CONTINUE TO SEND THEM IN.

IF THE CASE IS RECOMMENDED FOR CCB CITY PLAN COMMISSION, WE WILL COUNT ALL OF THEM, INCLUDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPLY FORMS. SO I WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW THAT, OKAY, IF I MISS MY DEADLINE FOR CBC AND IT DIDN'T MAKE IT INTO THE CBC, UH, TO SEE THE REPLY FORM, THEY WILL SEE IT AT COUNCIL.

CITY COUNCIL IS GONNA SEE IT ANYWAY.

OKAY.

I'LL, I'LL CHECK MY EI DID GET THE EMAIL THIS MORNING.

I JUST, I HAVEN'T LOOKED AT IT YET.