[00:00:01]
[Dallas Davis Garden TIF District Board of Directors Special Called Meeting on January 8, 2025.]
LIKE TO CALL THE DAVIS CARD AND TIFF DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL CALLS MEETING TO ORDER ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 8TH.THE TIME IS 3:00 PM 3:09 PM IN THE AFTERNOON.
LET'S GO AHEAD WITH AGENDA ITEM TWO, INTRODUCTION OF MEETING PARTICIPANTS.
FOUR CAN TAKE A MINUTE TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES.
THERE'S THREE OF US, SO IT SHOULD BE QUICK FOR THE ROOM.
AND THEN ANYONE THAT'S ONLINE AS WELL, I JUST ENCOURAGE TO ALSO DO AN INTRODUCTION.
WE HAVE ONE NEW MEMBER, PETER, IF YOU WANNA TALK US ABOUT PETER, BUT MAYBE TELL US A BIT MORE ABOUT YOURSELF AND YOUR, YOUR CONNECTION WITHIN, YOU KNOW, TO, TO TODAY.
UM, I WAS APPOINTED TO THE BOARD LATE LAST YEAR.
UM, BEEN A RESIDENT OF NORTH OAK CLIFF FOR 10 YEARS, UM, AND A REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL.
AND THAT'S HERE I AM SO GLAD YOU'RE HERE.
I'M MEAN, GO NEXT IF THAT WORKS.
UM, SO MY NAME'S WILLIAM ZERMAN.
I'M THE CHAIR OF THIS, UM, OF THE DAVIS GARDEN, TIF FORD.
I ALSO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD I LIVE IN AKA HEIGHTS.
BEEN THERE FOR FOUR YEARS, UM, RIGHT NEXT TO THE DAVIS GARDEN, UM, TIF ZONE.
AND BEFORE THAT WAS KINGS HIGHWAY FOR PROBABLY ANOTHER SEVEN YEARS.
I'VE BEEN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR ABOUT 13 OR 14 YEARS.
UM, REALLY, REALLY LIKED DAVIS.
I I VISITED A LOT OF BUSINESSES ALONG.
I REALLY LIKED THE COFFEE SHOP, WHICH RECEIVED FIFTH FUNDING.
I ENJOYED GOING TO CONCERTS AT THE KESLER.
I LIKE SOME OF THE NEW RESTAURANTS THAT HAVE COME IN AND I'M GONNA GO, YOU KNOW, OLD MONK JUST DEVELOPED IT JUST OPENED UP, WHICH IS A PRETTY EXCITING SPOT TOO.
UM, AND I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT SOME OF THE PROJECTS WE HAVE IN IN MOTION AND ALSO SOME OF THE BOND FUNDING.
YOU KNOW, WE, I KNOW LAST YEAR A COUPLE DIFFERENT REASONS WE DIDN'T GET TO MEET NEARLY AS MUCH AS WE MAYBE WANTED TO, BUT REALLY EXCITED TO SEE BOND FUNDING FOR, FOR DAVIS AND JUST HOW THAT WILL KIND OF SYNERGIZE WITH KIND OF OUR VISION FOR, FOR THIS TIF ZONE.
UM, LESLIE, MAYBE YOU WANNA DO IT ANY CORRECTIONAL AS WELL AND ABSOLUTELY.
AND LES, LIKE I AM THE DISTRICT MANAGER FOR THE DAVIS GARDEN TIFF DISTRICT.
I ALSO MANAGE TO MAKE ONE MOCKINGBIRD TIFF DISTRICT AND THE SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL DISTRICT.
AND THEN I THINK I THIS PASS BATON JENNIFER.
I'VE BEEN IN DALLAS FOR ABOUT NINE YEARS NOW, AND I MOVED TO ABOUT THREE BLOCKS SOUTH OF, TO WAL CLATON AND HAMPTON.
I'VE BEEN THERE NOW SINCE 2020.
YOU SAID CLARITON AND HAMPTON.
MY NAME IS LUIS DAM, MAY AND I AM THE TIF R REPRESENTATIVE FOR DALLAS COUNTY WHO PARTICIPATES IN THIS TIFF.
I, UM, DON'T LIVE IN THE DISTRICT, BUT I AM CLOSE BY, UH, AND ENJOY THE AREA QUITE A BIT, INCLUDING THE KESSLER
YOU WANT TIFF? UH, IT ELSE BERMUDA.
JUST BE AWARE OF WHO'S ON FROM STAFF.
UM, IF WE HAVE THE TIME, THAT'D BE GREAT.
WHY DON'T WE START WITH THE, THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
SEE IF I CAN GET MY VIDEO TO COME ON.
HI, I AM TAMARA LEE AND I'M THE ASSISTANT, UH, INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, UM, TK.
MY NAME IS TK CASTURI, UH, CAPITAL FINANCE MANAGER OF PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
UM, I CAN'T SEE EVERYBODY ON HERE, BUT I KNOW NATALIA.
I'M THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR.
TANISHA, IF YOU'RE, UM, SPEAKING, YOU'RE ON MUTE.
TANISHA'S A NEW ADDITION TO OUR TEAM AND I, I, OKAY.
I THINK THAT, I BELIEVE THAT'S EVERYBODY WITHIN THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND WE ALSO HAVE OUR, UM, PRESENTERS TODAY.
[00:05:03]
GOOD AFTERNOON.I'M, UH, ONE OF THE PROGRAM MANAGERS WORKING FOR, UH, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS.
AND, UH, WE DO HAVE A COUPLE OF PROJECTS IN THE AREA.
ONE IS, UH, SLOAN, KEVIN SLOAN PARK, AND WEST DAVIS.
AND, UH, WE HAVE, UH, TWO OF OUR ENGINEERS HERE TO PRESENT THOSE PROJECTS.
SO THE, THE GUYS I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH ON ROSEMONT FOR A WHILE NOW, UM, KO AND CAMERON AFTERNOON.
I'M A PROJECT MANAGER, UH, FOR TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
I WORK WITH CAMERON AND I AM THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE ROSE MO ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT.
CAMERON ANDERSON, THE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR INTERAGENCY AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS.
AND WE HAVE, UH, THE ROSEMONT PROJECT AND THE STEVENS FOREST LAST MILE.
UH, ALSO PART OF THE ROSEMONT.
I THINK LAST TIME WE MET MAYBE YOU WERE ON MATERNITY LEAVE.
YEAH, IT'S BEEN QUITE A WHILE.
UM, LET'S SEE THEN ON, UH, THE WEST DAVIS.
IT, IT'S, I HOPE I'M PRONOUNCING YOUR NAME.
YEAH, I'M, UH, NICE TO MEET ALL OF YOU.
I'M A SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER AT PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING AND I MANAGE WEST DAVIS FROM NORTHAMPTON TO CLINTON.
AND THEN WE HAVE, UM, ADAM FRIIS
I'M A PROJECT MANAGER AT TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS AND I'M THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE KEVIN SLOAN PARK, THE JEFFERSON 12 REMOVAL PROJECT.
IF I'M MISSING ANYONE, PLEASE SPEAK UP.
THERE'S ONE MORE PERSON FROM OUR STAFF.
HI, THIS IS CLAUDIA VARGAS AND I WORK UNDER LUIS DE MAYO AND I'M THE PLANNING, UH, IN ECONOMIC IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
I'M THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FOR HERE IN DALLAS COUNTY.
I APPRECIATE THE INTRODUCTION.
IT'S ALWAYS HELPFUL CONTEXT, KNOWING ABSOLUTELY.
LOT OF BOOKS ON TODAY AS WELL.
UM, MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM THREE, PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO ANY AGENDA ITEMS. DON'T BELIEVE ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC, BUT IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA TODAY? ZERO.
AGENDA ITEM FOUR, REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE MEETING RECORD FOR THE DECEMBER 20TH, 2023 MEETING OF THE DAVID
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, I'LL TAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS WRITTEN BY FROM ANYONE ON OUR BOARD.
IF, IF YOU'RE MAKING A MOTION, YOU'RE MUTE.
UH, SO MOTION TO APPROVE THE, UH, MINUTES FROM LEFT MEETING.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
ITEM FOUR IS PRESENTED BY JENNIFER LONG PILLOW.
SHOULD KEEP IT RAISED UNTIL THE VOTE IS FINALIZED.
ALRIGHT, THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM NUMBER FIVE, REVIEW AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR THE DEDICATION OF TAX, INCREMENTAL FINANCING REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER 16, DAVIS GUARD AND TIFF DISTRICT DISTRICTWIDE SETASIDE FUNDS IN TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO E EXCEED $1,053,923 AND 59 CENTS TO SUPPORT THE ROSEMONT SAFE RUST TO SCHOOL PER PROJECT.
MORE SPECIFICALLY TO SUPPORT ONE UNFUNDED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE ORIGINAL PROJECT.
SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $246,000,
[00:10:01]
200, SORRY, $246,286 AND 22 CENTS AND TWO CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT.SCOPE OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $807,637 AND 37 CENTS.
WE HAVE A COUPLE FOLKS ON FROM OUR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT PUBLIC WORKS HERE TO DELIVER THIS PRESENTATION.
SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU GUYS AND ASK THAT YOU BEGIN BY INTRODUCING YOURSELVES A LITTLE BIT MORE WITH YOUR INVOLVEMENT ON THE PROJECT.
AND I'M EXCITED TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE, THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS.
ANA, CAN YOU GO AHEAD AND GO TO THE NEXT PAGE, PLEASE? THE NEXT SLIDE, I'M SORRY.
AND THEN, UM, ANG HALL AND CAMERON, IT'S ALL YOURS.
UM, I'LL, I'LL BE DOING THE PRESENTATION.
UM, I'M, MY NAME IS CHANG HOI.
I'M THE, UH, PROJECT MANAGER FOR ROSEMONT RAS, THE SCHOOL PROJECT.
AND, UH, THANK YOU LYN, THE STAFF AND BOARD MEMBERS, UH, FOR SCHEDULING THIS MEETING AND JUST BEING AVAILABLE, UH, AS WE REQUEST THE, FOR THE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROSE MAS SAFE, SAFE ROUTE SCHOOL PROJECT.
UM, I'LL GO AHEAD AND GET START STARTED WITH THE PRESENTATION.
UM, IF WHOEVER'S CONTROLLING THE SLIDES CAN MOVE TO THE NEXT SLIDE.
SO I'LL START WITH THE ROSE MAS SAFE ROUTE SCHOOL.
THE ORIGINAL SCOPE, UH, QUICK OVERVIEW, UH, FROM THE ADVERTISEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.
UH, ON AUGUST 23RD, 2024, TDOT ISSUED THE FEDERAL AND STATE LETTERS OF AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ADVERTISE THE ROSEMONT SAFE HOUSE SCHOOL PROJECT.
AFTER, UM, HAVING REVIEWED THEIR OUR PLANS ON ALL OUR SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS, UH, THIS ALLOWED US TO OFFICIALLY ADVERTISE THE PROJECT TO RECEIVE BIDS, UH, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.
UM, THIS PROJECT WAS ADVERTISED FOR THREE WEEKS, UH, AS PER THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 11TH TO OCTOBER 11TH, UH, WITH SOME TIME FOR QUESTIONS FROM THE BIDDERS.
UM, AND THE BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND READ ON OCTOBER 11TH.
UH, AFTER REVIEWING ALL THE BID SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS, THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WAS DETERMINED TO BE MECCA CONSTRUCTION LLC, WITH A BID AMOUNT OF $887,791.
AND THAT IS JUST FOR THE, UH, ORIGINAL SCOPE.
UM, THE DUE DILIGENCE WAS PERFORMED, UH, AFTER WE'VE DETERMINED THIS, UH, LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER TO VERIFY THEIR, UH, QUALIFICATIONS, UH, FOR CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT.
AND, AND, UH, THEY WERE, UH, QUALIFIED.
WE'VE THEN REQUESTED A LETTER OF CONCURRENCE FROM TXDOT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE ON BOARD.
DECEMBER 17TH, UH, WE RECEIVED THE CONCURRENCE LETTER TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FROM TXDOT, UH, AND THEN THEY ALSO APPROVE THAT BASE BID AMOUNT AS WELL.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SLIDE FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE.
COVERING STEVENS FOREST ON, UH, JUNE 21ST, 2023, UH, I BELIEVE WAS WHEN THE PRESENTATION WAS MADE FOR THIS PROJECT.
UM, THAT SCOPE FOR THAT PROJECT AT THE TIME INCLUDED ASPHALT STREET RESURFACING, UH, IN ADDITION TO THE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO-WAY CYCLE TRACKS, UH, SOME SIDEWALKS, UH, IN MISSING AREAS, UH, MID BLOCK CROSSING IN FRONT OF THE, UH, ROSEMONT SCHOOL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND A DA COMPLIANT BARRIER FREE RAMPS.
UH, DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS, UH, WE DISCOVERED THAT ON THE CITY'S PAYMENT CONDITION INDEX MAP, UH, IT INDICATED A FAILING PAVEMENT CONDITION FOR, FOR THE WHOLE STRETCH OF THE STEVENS FOREST DRIVE REQUIRING POTENTIAL SUBSURFACE BASED CONCRETE PAVE REPAIR.
AND SO SOME ADDITIONAL, UH, SCOPE WAS ADDED AS WELL AS THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT COM.
UH, COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION THAT WE HAD MADE, UM, NOVEMBER 15TH, UH, WE COORDINATED WITH ONE OF OUR PROGRAM AND ADMINISTRATORS WHO'S ACTUALLY GOING TO BE, UM, BEING IN CHARGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, UH, OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE PROJECT, AND RECEIVED A COST ESTIMATE FOR, FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING ROADWAY TO CONCRETE STREET, UH, WITH THE AMOUNT, UH, OF 759,700, $732.
[00:15:02]
THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, UH, WITH THE FINAL DESIGN PLANS, THE, UH, COST ESTIMATE THAT WE RECEIVED, WHICH INCLUDES THE, THE ORIGINAL SCOPE ASPHALT, UH, RESURFACING, UH, AND AS WELL AS THE, UH, CONCRETE BASE REPAIR FOR ONLY, UH, FOR ABOUT 25% OF THE STREET, THAT AMOUNT CAME OUT TO BE $756,780.SO THE PRICE WAS VERY COMPARABLE, UM, FOR BOTH SCENARIOS.
AND, UM, FOR TODAY'S REQUEST, WE, WE ARE MAKING THAT REQUEST TOWARDS THE FULL CONCRETE REPAIR, UM, OR SORRY, FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET TO CONCRETE, UM, BECAUSE IT JUST MAKES A BETTER, UH, SENSE COST WISE AND FOR THE PRODUCT, PRODUCT THAT WE'LL BE RECEIVING.
UH, THE PROJECT SCOPE FOR THE ORIGINAL, UM, SCOPE INCLUDES THE STREETS THAT WE HAVE HERE, UM, MONTCLAIR AVENUE, SEVENTH STREET, RAINIER STREET, WEST CANTE STREET WEST, UH, NORTH WINDERMERE AVENUE, NORTH WINKA AVENUE.
AND FOR MOST OF THESE WE'LL HAVE, UH, BIKE LANES, A DA RAMPS, UM, BEING PART OF ALL, ALL OF THESE STREETS.
UM, WE'LL HAVE SIDEWALK AND SOME MISSING AREAS.
WE'LL HAVE, UM, PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AT ALL THE INTERSECTIONS.
UH, WE'LL HAVE SPEED HUMPS IN SELECT AREAS, UH, THAT INCLUDES MONTCLAIR, UM, WINDOW MIRROR, UM, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE NECK DOWN AND CURVE, WHICH, UH, ESSENTIALLY REDUCES THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT TWO OF THE INTERSECTIONS.
AND THAT'S, UH, BOTH ALONG KING'S HIGHWAY.
UH, THAT'S AT WINDHAM MIRROR AND KING'S HIGHWAY AND WINKA AND KING'S HIGHWAY.
UM, AND THEN WE'LL ALSO HAVE FOUR STOP SIGNS ACCOMPANY THOSE INTERSECTIONS AS WELL.
THE CONSTRUCTION COST BASED ON THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WAS $887,791.
AND THEN FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE, UH, WHICH COVERS SIEMENS FOREST AND A LITTLE BIT OF, UH, MARY CLIFF, UH, THIS INCLUDES THE TWO-WAY, UH, CURB SEPARATED CYCLE TRACK, A BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TWO, A LEFT TURN LANES ASPHALT RESURFACING.
UH, BUT IN THIS CASE WE'LL, WE'LL REQUEST A FORWARD RECONSTRUCT CONCRETE RECONSTRUCTION.
AND THEN, UH, THERE IS AN EXISTING INLET THAT WE'RE GOING TO, UH, REPLACE TO RE TO A RECESS INLET BECAUSE IT'S, UH, RIGHT ADJACENT TO THE CYCLE TRACK.
SO, UH, IT'LL HELP NOT BE A, A NUISANCE IN, IN FOR THE RIDERS.
UH, MARY CLIFF WILL HAVE SOME RAMP IMPROVEMENTS, CONCRETE BUFFER FOR THE BIKE LANE AND SOME ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK IN MISSING AREAS AS WELL.
THE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THAT, UM, IS $759,732.
THE TIMELINE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, UM, ARE ANTICIPATED DATES ARE HERE.
UM, ECO DEV APPROVAL WITH THE ANTICIPATED CITY COUNCIL, UM, BRIEFING ON THE FEBRUARY 3RD, 2025 OF THIS YEAR.
UM, ANTICIPATING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH MECCA CONSTRUCTION ON MARCH 26TH.
THEN WE WILL COORDINATE WITH LIKE A CONSTRUCTION, THE, OUR BIDDER, OUR CONTRACTOR FOR A PRE-CON MEETING.
UM, WE'RE ANTICIPATING THE CONSTRUCTION TO START IN, UH, MAY 22ND ISH TIME, AND THEN ANTICIPATING ABOUT EIGHT TO NINE MONTHS OF CONSTRUCTION.
AND SO THE ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION IS IN, UH, FEBRUARY 23RD, 2026.
SO PRESENTING THE MATH FOR THE CONSTRUCTION FOR BOTH THE, THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF ROSE MA CRAFT SCHOOL AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE COVERING STEVENS FOREST, WE HAVE THE ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT, UM, CONTRIBUTING TOWARDS THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ORIGINAL SCOPE IN THE AMOUNT OF $689,410.
UM, AND THE PORT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR BOTH TOGETHER IS, AS YOU SEE THERE, TOTAL $1,647,522 AND 35 CENTS.
UM, SUBTRACTING THE FEDERAL FUNDING, UM, FROM THE FIRST BULLET AND THEN ADDING 10% CONTINGENCY.
UH, SINCE THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HUNDRED, A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OVERRUNS AND TO ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL CHANGES TO CONSTRUCTION DUE TO UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONFLICTS THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, UH, WE WILL, UH, BE ADDING THE 10% CONTINGENCY SO THAT WE HAVE, UM,
[00:20:01]
LESS CHANCE OF HAVING TO COME BACK AND, AND REQUEST ADDITIONAL FUNDING.UM, AND SO THE TOTAL AMOUNT, EXCLUDING THE FEDERAL FUNDING, UH, THE REQUEST THAT WE'RE MAKING IS TOTAL $1 MILLION $53,923 AND 59 CENTS.
SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
UM, AGAIN, AND I JUST, I WANNA MAKE SURE I PRONOUNCING CORRECTLY.
IS, IS CHAO PAN? I, I'M, I'M SORRY.
AND TAM, I APPRECIATE IT AS WELL.
UM, I GUESS FOR OUR BOARD, DOES ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE SITE FOR STAFF? I DO HAVE, THIS IS LISA MEYER.
I COULD BE REMINDED WHY THIS ISN'T COMING OUT OF WHY, WHY THIS IS APPROACHING THE TIFF BOARD AND NOT BEING FUNDED BY, FUNDED THE CITY AS A PART OF REGULAR STREET RECONSTRUCTION.
THIS IS NOT A BOND PROJECT AND IT WAS NEVER SCOPED AS A BOND PROJECT.
I GUESS THAT'S THE QUESTION IS, IS WHY, WHY THAT WAS NOT PART OF THE BOND PROJECTS AND WHY, UM, ROUTED, SO THE TIF BOARD, WELL BOND PROJECTS ARE SCOPED, YOU KNOW, EVERY FIVE OR SO YEARS.
UM, THE CALL FOR PROJECTS, UH, FROM NCT COG HAPPENS, YOU KNOW, TWO TO FOUR YEARS JUST DEPENDING ON, UH, AVAILABLE FUNDING.
SO IN AN EVENT WHERE A SAFE ROUTE SCHOOL PROJECT COMES AVAILABLE, OR A CALL FOR PROJECTS, LIKE, THERE'S CALL FOR PROJECTS RIGHT NOW, UH, WITH NCT CO.
UH, WE DON'T HAVE, UH, AT THE TIME, I GUESS PUBLIC WORKS DOESN'T HAVE FUNDING TO SPEND ON LIKE, UH, PROJECTS LIKE THIS.
SO WE APPROACH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE TIF DISTRICTS TO FUND, UH, SET OF PROJECTS.
SO, UH, WHEN WE, THIS PROJECT WAS SELECTED AND THEN SENT TO COUNCIL, UH, THE COMMITMENT WAS MADE BY THE TIF DISTRICT TO BE OUR 20% PARTNER.
SO THIS IS JUST TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE COGS FUNDING, UH, TO DO MORE THAN IS IN THE BOND PROJECT, BUT JUST BECAUSE WE CAN USE THE TIF FUNDING.
IS THAT, IS THAT WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING? THIS IS A SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE COLLEGE FUNDING? CORRECT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? IF NOT, STAFF IS REQUESTING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE BOARD FOR THIS ITEM, BUT A CHANGE REGARDING THE FUND NEEDS TO BE MADE TO THE MOTION STAFF IS REQUESTING RECOMMENDATION IN THE FORM OF THE MOTION THAT I'LL READ INTO THE RECORD.
THE DAVIS GUARD AND TIFF DISTRICT BOARD OF RECORDS BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL OF A REQUEST BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS FOR THAT EDUCATION OF TAX AND CRIMINAL FINANCING REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER 16, TIFF DISTRICT FUNDS INTO, IN A TOTAL AMOUNT, NOT TO EXCEED $1,053,923 59 CENTS TO SUPPORT THE ROSEMONT SAFE FOR US TO SCHOOL PROJECT, OR SPECIFICALLY TO SUPPORT ONE UNFUNDED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $246,286 AND 22 CENTS AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 807 800 7,000 6, 630 $7 AND 37 CENTS.
AT THIS POINT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM FIVE.
THIS JENNIFER, I'LL PUT TO A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS, UH, ROSEMONT PROJECT AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL JENNIFER, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM FIVE AS PRESENTED BY JENNIFER FEL.
[00:25:01]
SECOND.ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND AND PLEASE KEEP IT RAISED UNTIL THE VOTE IS FINALIZED.
I'M SHOWING THAT THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
UM, AND MUCH APPRECIATED WITH ALL YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS PROJECT AND LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING UPDATES AS IT PROGRESSES.
AND WE APPRECIATE THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION FOR THIS PROJECT.
ALRIGHT, ON ITEM SIX, WE'RE GONNA REVIEW, UM, AN INFORMATIONAL UPDATE REGARDING PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ADDED TO THE SCOPE OF THE CITY'S WEST DAVIS STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
WE HAVE ANOTHER PRESENTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKSPACE ITEMS. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU IF YOU CAN INTRODUCE YOURSELF AGAIN, IF YOU'D LIKE.
MY NAME IS DIA TOOMI AND I'M THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR WEST DAVIS FROM NORTH HAMPTON TO CLINTON.
DO WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION THAT I SENT, UH, THIS MORNING? YES.
UM, ELIANA, CAN YOU PULL UP THE NEXT PRESENT? THERE WE GO.
AND IT'S THE ONE I SENT IN THE MORNING, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM.
SO LET ME GIVE YOU A QUICK, UM, UH, CAMERON, WOULD YOU PLEASE TURN YOUR VOLUME? I HEAR MY ECHO.
SO LET ME, LET ME GIVE YOU GUYS A BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT.
SO AS PART OF THE CITY, 2020, UH, 20, UH, 12 BOND PROGRAM VOTERS APPROVED WEST DAVIS CORRIDOR AS A COMPLETE STREET PROJECT.
LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT, UH, SLIDE PLEASE.
AND TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APPROVED IN 2014, THE REMOVAL OF WEST DAVIS STREET BETWEEN STATE HIGHWAY 12 AND I 35 FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.
THE CITY OF DALLAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS IN COORDINATION WITH DALLAS COUNTY, CONDUCTED THE CORRIDOR STUDY AND HOSTED TWO ROUNDS OF MEETINGS, UH, IN 2020 AND 2021.
THE GOAL OF THE STUDY AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WAS TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF WEST DAVIS, UH, STREET CAPITAL PROJECT AS A PRODUCT OF WEST DAVIS CORRIDOR STUDY.
WEST DAVIS STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM COCKRELL HILL TO NORTH CLINTON WAS ADDED TO THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
THE PROJECT WILL BE BUILT IN THREE SEGMENTS WITH SEGMENT ONE BEING DAVIS FROM NORTH HAMPTON TO NORTH CLINTON, WHICH IS THE ONE I'M MANAGING NOW.
THE TOTAL COST ESTIMATE FOR ALL THREE SEGMENTS IS 82 MILLION.
SEGMENT ONE IS A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DALLAS, WITH THE CITY BEING THE LEAD TO IMPLEMENT THE PROJECT SEGMENT ONE PROJECT COST IS ESTIMATED TO BE 21 MILLION, AND IT'LL BE FUNDED IN PART BY 2024 BOND PROPOSITION A.
WOULD YOU PLEASE TURN THE PAGE? THANK YOU.
ON SEPTEMBER 20, 20, 23, DAVIS GUARDIAN THEFT DISTRICT BOARD DISCUSSED WEST DAVIS STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO DETERMINE IF THE PROJECT ADEQUATELY COVERED THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT.
AS A RESULT OF THE DISCUSSION, THE BOARD IDENTIFIED ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF WEST DAVIS AT MARY CLIFF AND NORTH CLINTON.
THE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WERE COORDINATED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORK AND ADDED TO SEGMENT ONE OF WEST DAVIS.
ON APRIL, 2024, CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACT WITH BURGESS AND BEL TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST DAVIS FROM NORTH HAMPTON TO NORTH CLINTON FOR A COST NOT TO EXCEED $1,388,620.
FUNDING SOURCES INCLUDE 2023 CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION, UH, FUND, WATER AND WASTEWATER FUND AS WELL.
THE DEPARTMENT OF, UH, TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS INCLUDED THE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTED BY DAVIS GARDEN TE IN SEGMENT ONE.
SO NOW LET'S DIVE IN INTO WEST DAVIS.
SO THE SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES SCHEMATIC DESIGN OF WEST DAVIS STREET FROM NORTH HAMPTON TO NORTH CLINTON, VARIOUS SEPARATED BICYCLE LANE, ONE
[00:30:01]
IN EACH DIRECTION FROM NORTH HAMPTON TO MARY CLIFF, WHERE WE HAVE A HUNDRED FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY ENHANCED SIDEWALK WHERE POSSIBLE THE SCHEMATIC AND THE FINAL DESIGN ALSO WILL INCLUDE BICYCLE CONNECTION FROM WEST DAVIS TO WEST SEVENTH STREET.THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN WILL ALSO INCLUDE TWO LANE STREET WITH A CONTINUOUS LEFT LANE, LEFT TURN LANE FROM MARY CLIFF TO NORTH CLINTON, WHERE THE RIGHT OF WAY IS LIMITED TO 60 FEET.
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR PHASE ONE ALSO INCLUDE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY.
ALSO, THE STAFF WILL HAVE UP TO THREE PUBLIC MEETING MEETINGS TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION.
THE SCOPE WILL INCLUDE PARKING ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE THE PARKING SITUATION AT ST.
CECILIA CHURCH AND DAKOTA DEPARTMENT.
PHASE ONE ALSO INCLUDES TRAFFIC COUNTS 24 TURNING MOVEMENT TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS WITH BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES AT THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTION INTERSECTIONS, NORTH HAMPTON ROAD, NORTH MONTREAL AVENUE, NORTH MARLOW AVENUE, MARY CLIFF ROAD, NORTH EDGEFIELD AVENUE, AND NORTH CLINTON AVENUE.
ALL THE TRAFFIC DATA HAVE BEEN ALREADY COLLECTED WHEN SCHOOL WAS IN SESSION ON TUESDAY, MAY 21ST.
SAFETY AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS, WHICH ALSO INCLUDE FUTURE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT, AM AND PM, PEAK CAPACITY ANALYSIS, CRASH ANALYSIS AND COLLISION DIAGRAM, SAFETY PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UP TO TWO BUILT ALTERNATIVES.
I CAN TALK ABOUT THOSE ALTERNATIVES IF YOU GUYS ARE INTERESTED.
LATER ON EFFECTS ON PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY ON THE CORRIDOR BASED ON CURRENT INDUSTRY STANDARDS ALONG WITH THE TWO ITEMS THAT WERE REQUESTED BY THE PIT OR THE TIFF, SORRY, SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS AT NORTH MARLBORO AVENUE AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WARRANT ANALYSIS AT MARY CLIFF AND CLINTON AVENUE.
PHASE TWO WOULD WILL INCLUDE STREET LIGHTING DESIGN AND FABRIC OPTIC, UH, SIGNAL INTERCONNECT DESIGN.
SO WE WILL PUT STREET LIGHTS WHERE WE HAVE RIGHT OF WAY OF A HUNDRED FEET.
AND WHEN WE HAVE A RIGHT OF WAY OF ONLY 60 FEET, WE'LL PUT PEDESTRIAN, UH, LIGHTS ALONG THE SIDEWALKS.
AND, UH, THE, THE SPACING BETWEEN THIS SLIDE WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS THAT WILL BE PERFORMED IN PHASE TWO TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN.
THE PLANS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL REMOVAL AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTION IS INCLUDED IN PHASE TWO.
THERE ARE ALREADY TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON NORTH HAMPTON ROAD ON MONCLAIR AND EDGEFIELD, SO THEY WILL BE REPLACED.
AND, UM, WE PUT NORTH MARBLE AVENUE.
IT WOULD BE A BRAND NEW IF WARRANTED BASED ON THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
IT WOULD, UH, A HAWK SIGNAL ON MARY CLIFF IF WARRANTED.
AND ALSO A HAWK SIGNAL ON NORTH CLAN, A HOC SIGNAL ON NORTH CLINTON AVENUE AFFORDED BY THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND THE SAFETY ANALYSIS.
PHASE TWO ALSO INCLUDES PAVING DESIGN.
THE PAVING DESIGN WILL COMMENCE AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN.
PHASE TWO ALSO INCLUDES WATER AND WASTEWATER.
WE HAVE 3,460 LINEAR FEET OF WATER MAINS AND 1,460 LINEAR FEET OF WASTEWATER, UH, MAINS AS WELL.
THERE IS A POSSIBILITY TO HAVE A SEPARATE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IF NEEDED.
IT'LL BE FOR SIOUX, WHICH IS SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING FOR LANDSCAPE AND FOR STREETSCAPE AND FOR IRRIGATION.
OKAY, NOW I WANNA GIVE YOU THE UPDATE OF WHAT WE, THE SAFETY AND THE CAPACITY ANALYSIS HAVE BEEN ALREADY PERFORMED.
SO, UM, A SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WAS COMPLETED FOR THE INTERSECTION OF WEST DAVIS AND MARLBORO AVENUE TO ASSIST THE NEED FOR SIGNALIZATION.
ALSO, TRADITIONAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WARRANTS PER CD WARRANT FOUR WERE ALSO COMPLETED FOR MARY CLIFF AND NORTH CLINTON ALONG WEST DAVIS.
AND A PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON, WHICH IS PHB WARRANT, WAS COMPLETED FOR MARY CLIFF.
NEITHER OF THESE INTERSECTIONS THAT I WE REFERENCED HAVE SATISFIED THE WARRANTS CONDUCTED.
SO BASED ON THE, UH, TRAFFIC COUNTS, N NONE OF THESE, UH, INTERSECTIONS WOULD NEED THE IMPROVEMENT THAT WAS PROPOSED BY THE TIFF.
WHILE MARY CLIFF ROAD DOES NOT SATISFY
[00:35:01]
WARRANT FOR, OR THE PHB WARRANT, A-P-H-B-A PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON COULD BE FURTHER CONSIDERED DUE TO ITS PROXIMITY TO NEARBY SCHOOL AND THE PRESENCE OF A BICYCLE FACILITY.UH, HERE IS OUR, UM, TIMELINE.
SO WE ALREADY STARTED THE DESIGN IN MAY OF LAST YEAR.
WE ARE ANTICIPATING TO FINISH MAY OF NEXT YEAR AND TO CON AWARD THE CONSTRUCTION IN SEPTEMBER OF 2026 AND END CONSTRUCTION IN JANUARY OF 2029.
THAT CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION.
DO THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR D? SO THE, SO YOU HAVE ENGAGED THE ENGINEER TO BEGIN THIS.
THE MILLION DOLLARS WAS FOR, FOR THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN OF ALL OF THOSE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.
WOULD YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION FOR ME PLEASE? THE, I'M TRYING TO FIND THE PAGE.
CITY COUNCIL WAS APPROVED AND IS IN THE MILLION DOLLARS HAS BEEN FUNDED FOR THE DESIGN, CORRECT? THAT ALREADY HAPPENED? YES.
YES, IN, IN APRIL OF LAST YEAR.
AND HOW FAR ALONG ARE THEY WITH THE DESIGN? SO THEY FINISHED THE ANALYSIS, THE SAFETY AND THE CAPACITY ANALYSIS, AND THEY FINISHED THE PARKING STUDY.
AND, UH, WE'VE BEEN BO WORKING, UH, BACK AND FORTH ABOUT THE PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS.
WE ARE VERY CLOSE TO FINALIZING THAT.
AND WHEN WE DO THIS, WE WILL ASK, UH, WE ALREADY ASKED THEM TO PROVIDE US WITH A SCHEMATIC LAYOUT AND, UM, WE'RE VERY CLOSE TO GETTING ALL THE PIECES AND PRESENTING THEM TO COUNCIL MEMBER WEST AND TO THE PUBLIC.
BUT THE, THE TWO PIECES THAT, OR THE THREE PIECES THAT YOU GUYS ASKED US TO DO THAT REQUIRED STUDY, TRAFFIC STUDY AND WE HAD DONE THEM AND THE NUMBERS, THE VOLUMES, THE PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES AND THE BICYCLE VOLUMES THAT ARE THERE DID NOT WARRANT ADDING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL OR A HAWK ON EITHER ONE.
AND I CAN PROVIDE THAT REPORT.
JUST FOR MY BENEFIT FOR THE, YOU SAID THE ANALYSIS WAS DONE ON THE 21ST OF MAY, SO IT'S JUST ONE DAY WHERE THE TRAFFIC COUNT WAS TAKEN? NO, NO.
IT'S, IT'S MORE, IT'S MORE THAN ONE DAY.
BUT I WANTED TO SPECIFICALLY MENTION THIS BECAUSE WE ALL WERE EMPHASIZING THAT IT HAS TO BE DONE ON A SCHOOL DAY.
SO IT'S, BUT IT WAS NOT ONE DAY.
UH, AND, AND THE REPORT WILL SHOW ALL OF THAT.
I THINK 'CAUSE LIKE THE NORTH CLINTON CROSSING, THIS IS ONE THAT, UM, LIKE A NEIGHBOR HAD RAISED TO CITY COUNCILMAN WEST.
WHERE LIKE THE KESSLER THEATER IS LIKE, THERE'S A LOT, THERE ARE, LIKE, DEPENDING ON THE NIGHT, THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE CROSSING THE STREET.
THEY GET TO THE, TO THE THEATER OR JUST FROM THE, THE BUSINESSES.
THAT'S WHERE I WAS CURIOUS HOW THAT WARRANT ANALYSIS WAS CAPTURING.
I'LL CALL IT LIKE EVENING ACTIVITY AND MAYBE NOT SCHOOL ACTIVITY IN THAT AREA.
'CAUSE I THINK IF, IF ANYONE TO DRIVE 9:00 PM DOWN DAVIS, IT, YOU KNOW, IT CAN BE A LITTLE TREACHEROUS SO YOU CAN TRY TO CROSS 60 FEET.
I I I GUESS IT'S 60 FEET, UM, WHICH IT'S REALLY JUST TOO LATE EACH WAY WITH A MIDDLE TURN WAY.
SO I WAS KINDA SURPRISED THERE ISN'T ANYTHING WARRANTING A A, A SAFER CROSSING THERE, BECAUSE I THINK IF YOU CATCH IT ON A, A NIGHT THAT THERE'S AN EVENT, IT'S PRETTY, UM, IT'S PRETTY BUSY.
THERE IS A CHANCE THAT THEY WERE NOT THERE WHEN THERE WAS AN EVENT, BUT FOR SURE THEY DID AN AM AND A PM PEAK CAPACITY ANALYSIS.
BUT I BACK UP A COUPLE OF SLIDES PLEASE.
UM, WANTED TO LOOK, UH, ONE MORE RIGHT THERE.
SO THE, THE LAST BULLET DIA TALKS ABOUT THAT, UM, MARY CLIFF DOESN'T SATISFY PHB, BUT IT COULD BE FURTHER CONSIDERED.
HOW, HOW, HOW COULD WE EXPLORE OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT, AT
[00:40:01]
THESE TWO INTERSECTIONS? WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS? SUCH AS WHAT, LIKE WHAT KIND OF ALTERNATIVES YOU ARE THINKING OF? I, I DON'T KNOW.I'M JUST WONDERING IF THE, THE WARRANT ANALYSIS STUDY, THESE, THE PHB SPECIFICALLY, ARE THERE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING THAT MIGHT SOMEHOW HELP WITH, WITH PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN CROSSING? I'M NOT A TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF DEVICES THAT COULD HELP WITH THAT.
FIRST ONE IS A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, WHICH WE KNOW THAT WE'RE NOT GONNA GET THE VOLUMES TO ACHIEVE TO WARRANT IT.
THE SECOND ONE IS THE HAWK WHERE THIS REPORT SHOWED THAT WE DID NOT EVEN MEET THE HAWK.
AND THEN THERE IS THE PHB, WHICH EVEN THE NUMBERS DID NOT MEET THE PHB, BUT THERE ARE OTHER CONSIDERATION, WHICH IS THE PROXIMITY OF THE SCHOOL AND THE BIKE LANES.
UM, WE CAN, WE CAN ASK OUR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS TO FURTHER EVALUATE THESE, UH, INTERSECTIONS AND GET BACK WITH YOU.
IS THAT SOMETHING WE WANT TO REQUEST? I THINK SO.
I'D LIKE TO MAYBE JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THE REPORT TOO AND JUST OKAY.
UM, AND JUST KIND OF UNDERSTAND A LITTLE BIT MORE OF WHAT GOES IN.
AND AGAIN, I, I THINK JUST FOR ME, OR LIKE A CHICKEN AND AN EGG, RIGHT? THESE ACROSS A HUNDRED FEET TO GET TO SCHOOL, IT'S A CONVENIENT CROSSING FOR A LOT OF, YOU KNOW, NEIGHBORS AND, BUT THEY'RE NOT GONNA DO IT RIGHT NOW.
BUT WHEN IT'S RECONSTRUCTED RIGHT? AND IT'S BROUGHT DOWN TO TWO LANES EACH WAY AND IT'S, YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY LITTLE BIT MORE FEASIBLE ACROSS, RIGHT? THAT'S GONNA, WE'RE MOVING OUT AT LEAST ONE LANE EACH WAY.
UM, IT MIGHT BE MORE FEASIBLE FOR THAT TO ACTUALLY BE A CROSSING SPOT.
SO AGAIN, I THINK FOR ME IT IS, IT'S THE WARRANT LOOKING AT LIKE WHAT'S ACTIVITY THERE RIGHT NOW.
IT MIGHT BE DIFFERENT ONCE IT GETS RECONSTRUCTED VERSUS IS TODAY, RIGHT? IF YOU'RE CROSSING AGAIN A HUNDRED FEET VERSUS CALL IT 80 FEET TO BE REMOVED, TWO LANES.
IT'S, IT'S KIND LIKE A CHICKEN AND AN EGG, RIGHT? IT IS IN MY MIND AS A NON EXPECTATION EXPERT.
AND I REALLY STILL WOULD LIKE TO EVALUATE LIKE CLINTON DURING MORE OF LIKE, I'LL CALL IT LIKE A, LIKE WHETHER IT'S LIKE'S LIKE A WEEKEND OR IN, IN THE LATER EVENINGS WHEN THERE IS A LOT MORE ACTIVITY.
'CAUSE I THINK, AND I, I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT CAN BE MEASURED ON LIKE PEDESTRIAN UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMEBODY OUT THERE COUNTING.
RIGHT? I, I NOTICED I, I'VE SEEN, SEEN SOME OF THE COUNTS, RIGHT? WHERE YOU HAVE LIKE, IT'S GOT THE SENSOR YOU DRIVE OVER, BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WORKS UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMEBODY OUT THERE MONITORING, BUT THEY'RE NOT OUT THERE ON A NIGHT WHERE THERE'S NOT ACTIVITY AND THE KESLER HAS CONFERENCE LIKE EVERY OTHER NIGHT, RIGHT? LIKE, IT, IT CAN GET REALLY BUSY.
I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE FROM THET BOARD HAS EXPERIENCED THAT, BUT FOR ME, I LIKE, I THINK THAT'S AN AREA WHERE WE THINK ABOUT OUR BUSINESSES AND, AND WHAT MAKES DAVIS SPECIAL IS IT IS A WALKABLE AREA.
IT'S AN AREA THAT, UM, I THINK DOES BRING IN A LOT OF TRAFFIC.
AND I DO THINK AS THE INVESTMENT CAN USE FROM FISH PARTS DOWN, DAVIS HAVING THAT WALKABILITY, HAVING THE ABILITY TO CROSS TO A BUSINESS IN A SAFE MANNER, IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT.
AND THAT'S GONNA BE RIGHT IN BETWEEN THE EDGE FIELD AND POLE ACTUAL TRAFFIC LIGHTS.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TO HAVE THAT MAYBE JUST REASSESS OR JUST, UM, MAYBE IT MAKES US LOOK AT THE REPORTS FIRST LEFT AND THEN RECUR.
BUT, AND, AND, AND YOU ARE RIGHT ALSO WHEN THIS IS NOT TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT, BUT NOR ALSO CAN ALSO COMPLETE STREETS TEND TO REDUCE THE SPEED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE ARE DIFFERENT MODE OF TRANSPORTATION.
NOW WE'RE INTRODUCING BIKE LANE.
SO THAT SHOULD HAVE A POSITIVE, UH, CALMING EFFECT TO THE WHOLE STRETCH.
AND WHEN YOU GUYS, WHEN YOU GUYS READ THE, THROUGH THE REPORT, WE CAN GO BACK AND DISCUSS OTHER OPTIONS.
SO THERE WASN'T A REQUEST MADE BY THIS PROJECT, PER SE, TO THE BOARD.
IT'S JUST, IT WAS MORE THE OTHER WAY AROUND WHERE IT WAS LIKE, HEY, WE KNOW AS A TIP BOARD, WE'VE GOTTEN FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT THESE ARE SOME NATURAL CROSSING POINTS THAT ARE DANGEROUS.
AND WHAT WE LEARNED IS THAT THERE WAS SO MUCH, YOU KNOW, WE LEARNED, I LEARNED THAT THIS LARGER PROJECT BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY AND THE CITY, WERE BASICALLY RECONSTRUCTING A LARGE SECTION OF COMPLETE STREETS FOR DAVIS.
SO THE QUESTIONS THEN, OKAY, WELL IF WE'RE WANTING TO SEE SOME OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AS IF WE'RE GETTING FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY OR AS THESE AS, AS THESE ARE SOME AREAS THAT ARE, ARE NOT SAVED ACROSS MM-HMM
[00:45:01]
UM, THE EXISTING WORK AND THE BOND WORK THAT'S BEEN APPROVED, RIGHT.FOR THE DAVIS RECONSTRUCTION MM-HMM
WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? SO THAT WAS KIND OF MY MEMORY OF KIND OF WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY.
WAS WE IDENTIFY THESE POINTS, WE THEN REALIZE IT'S COMING INTO THE BOND.
NOW IT'S, YOU KNOW, ASSESSING, I GUESS ARE THERE, THE ENGINEERING AND IT ALL BASED ON THE STUDIES, IS THIS ACTUALLY WARRANTED FROM A TRANSMUTATION PERSPECTIVE? GOT IT.
UM, I DO WANNA BE RESPECTFUL TIME.
I THINK MAYBE, MAYBE THE ACTION I WAS WILL REVIEW THE REPORTS, RIGHT? AND WE CAN PICK UP THE DISCUSSION.
IF YOU WANNA SEND THE REPORT TO ME AND THEN I CAN, UM, REGROUP THE BOARD AND WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT, AT WHAT WE SEE AND SURE.
IF WE DID WANNA GO THROUGH WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, IF YOU, IF YOU, IF YOU SPECIFY THAT MARY CLIFF COULD BE FURTHER CONSIDERED, HOW, HOW DO WE GO ABOUT FORMALIZING THAT? CAN WE JUST SAY YES, WE WANT THAT TO BE FURTHER CONSIDERED AT THIS POINT? OR, OR WHAT THE QUESTION IS TO ME? RIGHT? YES.
WE WOULD MAKE THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADD THE PHB AND I ASSUME IT WOULD BE ADDED TO SCOPE PHASE TWO SCOPE OF WORK.
I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THE FUNDING SOURCES IF YOU GUYS CAN PARTICIPATE IN THAT OR NOT, BUT WE CAN LOOK INTO THAT.
H SHOULD BE, PARDON? WHAT IS A PHB? PHB? IT'S, IT'S AN ABBREVIATION FOR PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON.
IT'S KIND OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON DEMAND, LIKE THE PEDESTRIAN PUSH IT AND IT'S, IT FLASHES THE LIGHT TO DIRECT THE DRIVERS TO STOP.
KIND OF LIKE ON CEDAR SPRINGS, THE WAY THEY HAVE SOME BEACON, JENNIFER, YOUR QUESTION WAS, IS THAT, WAS IT THE CROSSING AT TYLER PO, UM, NEAR KID SPRINGS AT THE CROSS STREET? UM, IS IT CANDY? UM, I, I DIDN'T HEAR THE QUESTION.
COULD YOU REPEAT IT PLEASE? I THINK JENNIFER, YOU, YOU, YOU WERE CLARIFYING THIS SIMILAR TO THE SIGNAL AT CEDAR KID SPRING, IS THAT RIGHT? UM, I WAS THINKING CEDAR SPRINGS, BUT YEAH, I MEAN IT'S, IT'S LIKE A FLASHING LIGHT.
YOU SAID NEAR CEDAR SPRINGS? I'M SORRY.
THEY HAVE THIS LIKE, UM, FLASHING LIGHT, BUT THEY PROBABLY, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE ONE AT OUR CEDAR PI SPRINGS OR WHATNOT.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE ONE THERE.
UM, SO D WILL SEND ME THE REPORT AND THEN WE'LL WE'LL REGROUP AND TALK ABOUT OPTIONS.
REVIEW AN INFORMATIONAL UPDATE REGARDING THE PLAN, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT AT ADJACENT TO SLOAN PARK.
WE HAVE, I THINK IT'S ADAM WILL BE PRESENTING CORRECT ON, ON THE
I'LL, I'LL, I'LL DO THE PRESENTATION.
UH, THANK, THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR YOUR TIME.
UH, SO THIS, LIKE HE SAID, IT'S, UH, IT'S, UH, FOR THE PLAN PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS.
SO THOSE ARE THE CROSSWALKS AT, UH, JEFFERSON BOULEVARD AND WEST 12TH STREET.
SO A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THE PROJECT.
JANUARY, 2019, AN ORDINANCE PASSED TO REMOVE THE JEFFERSON 12TH STREET CONNECTED FROM THE THIRD FRONT PLAN.
UM, OCTOBER, 2022, CITY STAFF WENT OUT, UH, PUT SOME BARRICADES, UH, OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL, UH, PLANS.
SO, UH, IT WAS OFFICIALLY CLOSED ON OCTOBER, 2022.
AND ON MAY, 2023, COUNCIL AUTHORIZED A CONSTRUCTION SERVICE PROJECT AND, UH, IN A NUMBER OF $4.6 MILLION.
AND, UH, THIS INCLUDED REMOVING THE CONNECTOR, UH, PAVING CLINTON, WINNETKA AND
[00:50:01]
AND ALSO KEVIN SLOAN PARK.SO IN SHORT, WE'RE REMOVING THE JEFFERSON 12 CONNECTOR PROJECT AND REPLACING IT WITH KEVIN W. SLOAN PARK.
SO, UH, SCOPE OF WORK INSIDE OF THE PARK, IT INCLUDES HARDSCAPE, LANDSCAPE LIGHTING CROSSWALKS AT CLINTON AND WINKA, UH, TRASH RECEPTACLES, BENCHES, TR PATHS.
AND THEN, UH, WE INCLUDED A PAVEMENT FOR CLINTON AVENUE, WINNET AVENUE, WILLETTE AVENUE IN AREAS WHERE THE NET CONNECTOR WAS REMOVED.
AND WE ALSO HAVE SOME WATER AND WASTEWATER LINES THAT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.
SO THEN NOW WE GET TO THE, UH, THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE THAT WE'RE GONNA IMPLEMENT.
CHAIRMAN ZIMMERMAN APPROACHED STAFF, AND, UH, HE WANTED TO ADD SOME CROSSWALKS, WHICH SURE.
WHICH WOULD BE AT JEFFERSON BOULEVARD AND 12TH STREET TO HELP ACCESS THE PARK.
SO, UH, SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER OF 2024 STAFF MET WITH, UH, CITY DEPARTMENT AND, UH, THEY REQUESTED THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE BE ADDED TO THE PROJECT.
AND BOTH THE CROSSWALK HAVE BEEN, UH, WE, WE ARE AT 60% PLANS AND WE HAVE HAD A CONSULTANT, UH, SUBMIT THOSE TO US.
AND WE HAVE AN ESTIMATE COST OF ABOUT THREE POINT 387,000 RIGHT NOW.
SO THAT WILL INCLUDE ALL THE FLASHING BEACONS, ALL THE ALTERATIONS PAID TO THE, TO THE MEDIANS AND, UH, ANY PAVEMENT MARKINGS THAT WE WOULD NEED FOR THE PROJECT AS WELL.
SO HERE'S, UH, THE TIMELINE OF THE PROJECT SO IT GETS ANYTHING FROM DESIGN START CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE.
AND THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION.
DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? UM, THIS, JENNIFER, WHEN YOU SAY THERE'S GONNA BE TRACK RECEPTACLES, IS THAT GONNA INCLUDE KIND OF A RECYCLE OPTION? UH, I BELIEVE IT'S JUST FOR TRASH.
SO THEY JUST HAVE A, I'M NOT TOO SURE EXACTLY HOW THEY SPLIT IT, BUT I KNOW THERE'S RECEPTACLES AND THEN IT IS JUST ONE OF EACH.
SO I, I DON'T BELIEVE, I'M NOT TOO SURE HOW THE PARTS DEPARTMENT DOES IT, BUT I'M, I'M NOT TOO SURE IF THEY SPLIT IT UP BETWEEN RECYCLABLES AND, UH, REGULAR TRASH.
I THINK WHERE THIS ADAM IS PARTICULARLY RELEVANT FOR THIS BOARD WAS JUST LOOKING AT, UM, YOU KNOW, THE ADDITIONAL CROSSING, RIGHT? TO JUST MAKE SURE THEY'RE SAFE.
LIKE AGAIN, PART OF OUR, UM, YOU KNOW, FRAMEWORK IS TO ENSURE RELATIVE TO THE TIFF SO THAT THERE'S ACCESS TO GREEN SPACES, PUBLIC SPACES.
AND SO IT IS EVALUATING IF THE TIFF NEEDED TO ASSIST.
BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE THE CITY HAS OTHER FUNDS.
IT'S NOT REQUIRED THE TIP AT ALL, BUT IT IS ONE OF THESE AREAS THAT'LL ENHANCE, UH, THERE'LL BE ANOTHER GREEN SPACE THAT'S CONNECTED TO THE DATA SQUARE TIF.
RIGHT? MOST OF THE PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE BOND PROGRAM, SO THAT'S THAT 4.6 MILLION.
AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM TIFF WAS FOR THE CROSSWALKS AT JEFFERSON BOULEVARD AND 12TH STREET.
MAY I'M WRONG, IS THE TIF FUNDING BER NOT FUNDING THOSE? RIGHT.
UM, I THINK IT'S FROM THE 2012 AND 2017 BOND PROGRAM.
UH, THE PRESENTATION SAID IT, BUT, OH, I'M SORRY.
AND IN 2017, THAT IS THOSE FUNDS THAT ARE BEING USED.
I WANNA THANK ADAM AND THE, UM, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION TEAM AND PARKS TEAM FOR COMING TOGETHER AND, AND, UM, ACCOMMODATING THIS IMPROVEMENT, UM, THAT THEY WERE VERY EASY TO WORK WITH AND AND APPRECIATE Y'ALL BEING SO RESPONSIVE.
IT'S GONNA BE A MUCH BETTER PROJECT TO HAVE THESE THESE MORE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GONNA USE IT.
THANK YOU GUYS FOR HELPING US OUT ALONG THE WAY.
ALRIGHT, UM, WE'RE WRAPPING UP, ADAM, FEEL FREE TO DROP, I GUESS D YOU AS WELL AND, AND YOUR TEAM THAT WORKS WITH YOUR, YOUR CALENDAR AS WE'RE RUNNING A LITTLE LATE.
[00:55:02]
YOU'RE WELCOME.ON ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION WITH THE DAVIS GARDEN TIFF DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT FOR FI 2324.
AT THIS TIME, I'LL OUR STAFF TO PRESENT THE ITEM.
UM, SO EVERYBODY SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THE DRAFT REPORT TO DEVELOP ON MONDAY.
IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE COUNCIL, COUNCIL WILL BE AUTHORIZING THIS HOPEFULLY OR APPROVING THESE AT THE END OF FEBRUARY.
AND BETWEEN NOW AND THEN INTERNAL, UM, REVIEWS ARE HAPPENING.
IN FACT, I GOT EDITS THIS MORNING FROM OUR DIRECTOR ON THIS REPORT, BUT THEY'RE, THEY'RE, UH, HISTORICALLY THEY'RE MINOR IN NATURE.
IF ANYTHING SUBSTANTIAL HAPPENED, WE WOULD COME BACK TO THE BOARD, BUT IT IS IN DRAFT FORM AND ANY MOTION TO APPROVE IT, WE NEED TO MENTION THAT AS A CAVEAT AND THEN WE'LL MOVE ON.
SO WITH THAT, LET'S GO AHEAD AND I'M JUST GONNA HIT THE HIGHLIGHTS.
I KNOW THAT WE'RE, WE'RE OVER TIME HERE, SO I'M GONNA GO THROUGH THIS PRETTY QUICKLY, BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THE END.
UM, THE, LET'S START AT THE MISSION STATEMENT, ELIANA.
UM, JUST FROM THE BEGINNING, UM, A REFRESHER OF THE, THE DISTRICT WAS CREATED IN 2008, SO IT'S 17 YEARS OLD AND WE HAVE 14 YEARS UNTIL EXPIRE.
SO LITTLE MORE THAN, UM, HALFWAY THROUGH IT.
UH, THE NEXT SECTION IS THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
AND I'M ONLY GONNA TALK ABOUT THE IN IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER OF WHAT'S HAPPENED OVER THE LAST 17 YEARS.
I'M JUST GONNA HIT WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS MOST RECENT FISCAL YEAR, AND WE HAD SOME, SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT, UM, DEVELOPMENTS, UH, MAINLY PERTAINING TO THE CANYON.
SO, UM, THE, THE SPOILER ALERT IS THAT WE ARE, WE NO LONGER HAVE AN, UH, AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER FOR THE CANYON.
AND I'M GONNA EXPLAIN ALL THAT TO YOU HERE IN DETAIL.
BUT FIRST, LET'S JUST TAKE A LITTLE DOWN MEMORY LANE.
SOME OF, I KNOW YOU'RE, YOU'RE NEW AND SOME OF YOU MIGHT NOT REALLY KNOW THE HISTORY OF THE CANYON, SO I'M GONNA VERY BRIEFLY WALK YOU THROUGH IT.
UM, IF YOU WANNA GO TO PAGE FIVE, THIS, UH, IMAGE DOWN AT THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF THE PAGE THAT IS THE ORIGINAL, UH, DREAM OF WHAT THE CANYON WOULD BE LIKE.
AND IF, IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE THE CANYON IS, THAT THE NORTHERNMOST BOUNDARY IS INTERSTATE 30 AND THEN THE EAST, UM, RUNNING NORTH TO SOUTH, THAT'S GOING TO BE THE WESTMORELAND.
AND THEN DOWN THE BOTTOM IS WEST DAVIS.
AND THIS WAS A UNDEVELOPED SITE OF A HUNDRED, ABOUT 200, A LITTLE LESS THAN 200 ACRES.
AND A DEVELOPER, UM, CALLED SLF PURCHASED IT BACK IN 2011.
AND WE ENGAGED IN A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THE AMOUNT OF 129 MILLION TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY TO LOOK LIKE THAT IMAGE THERE.
AND, UM, IT WAS AN AMBITIOUS AND AGGRESSIVE PLAN, AND IT A LITTLE BIT, UH, AHEAD OF ITS TIME, I THINK IS WHAT THE TIME HAS PROVEN.
BUT AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE REPORT, IT WAS MEANT TO BE KIND OF ITS OWN LITTLE NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, DEVELOPMENT THEY WERE LOOKING AT, AT RESIDENTIAL, UH, ABOUT ALMOST 3000 UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL RETAIL AND THEN, UM, FLEX SPACE.
SO, UM, AS TIME WENT ON, THE, THE FIRST PROJECTS THAT CAME ALONG ON THE NEXT PAGE ARE TWO MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS.
THE, UM, TAYLOR FARM, UM, PROJECT CAME UP IN 2012, A YEAR LATER, THE HILLSIDE WEST, WHICH IS A SENIOR FOCUSED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.
UM, SO WE GOT THE AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT PRETTY EARLY IN THE GAME.
AND THEN SLF CONTINUED PUTTING IN THE NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE.
WE HAD TO PUT IN UTILITIES AND ROADS AND SO FORTH TO MAKE THIS PROJECT APPEALING, UM, TO PEOPLE WHO WOULD WANNA COME IN AND DEVELOP THE REST OF THE PROPERTY.
UH, THAT WENT OFF ABOUT FIVE YEARS AND AS ANTICIPATED IT STARTED TO DEVELOP ALONG THE 30 FRONTAGE.
AND WE GOT MAR MARRIOTT RESIDENTS IN, IT'S THERE TODAY.
UM, BUFFALO WILD WINGS AND OLIVE GARDEN.
UM, THEN IN 20, ON NEXT PAGE, I THINK ILEANA IN 2022, WHICH IS RIGHT ABOUT THE TIME THAT I CAME TO THE CITY, THE SLF TRANSFERRED THE AGREEMENT TO, UM, A SUBSIDIARY OF LENNAR CALLED LMC, WHO SUBSEQUENTLY REBRANDED TO ERRA.
AND THEY KIND OF FOLLOWED ALONG THE SAME, UH, DESIGN IDEA.
UH, LET'S JUMP TO THE NEXT PAGE REAL QUICK.
ELIANA, THIS GRAPHIC AT THE TOP, IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE IA, CAN YOU, CAN YOU ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT ON THAT, THAT TOP PICTURE? UM, IT IS, UH, THE, THERE WE GO.
[01:00:01]
AND MOVING ITS WAY BACK, BUT IF YOU LOOK CLOSER, UM, TO THE WEST, THEY ARE, STARBUCKS IS ACTUALLY, UM, BUILT AND I, THEY MIGHT EVEN BE OPEN BY NOW.I I WENT OUT THERE OVER THE HOLIDAYS AND, UM, THEY'RE, THEY'RE THERE.
AND THEN THE, UH, THE GROUP ART IS ALSO WORKING WITH, I THINK THEY HAVE LEASES WITH CHEDDAR DENNY'S AND TEXAS ROADHOUSE, AND YOU SEE THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON A 372 UNIT MULTIFAMILY AND THE HILTON HOTEL.
UM, I, I THINK THEY'RE DOING GRADING RIGHT NOW.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'VE ACTUALLY STARTED CONSTRUCTION, BUT IS CONTINUING THE PLAN TO BUILD THE CANYON AS WAS ORIGINALLY ENVISIONED.
UM, THEY'RE GONNA PHASE IT JUST LIKE, UH, SLF WAS, BUT I, WHEN THEY TOOK IT OVER IN 2022, I THINK THEY ALSO RECOGNIZED THAT THE TIMING PROBABLY WAS NOT REALISTIC BASED ON THE, THE POINTS IN OUR AGREEMENT.
SO THEY, SINCE THEY TOOK OVER THE AGREEMENT, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO, UM, MEET SOME OF THE DEADLINES IN THE BENCHMARKS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
AND AS A RESULT IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR, WE, WE ISSUED A LETTER OF DEFAULT.
UM, THEY HAD A 90 DAY CURE PERIOD, WHICH THEY WEREN'T ABLE TO MAKE.
SO ON, UH, THE LAST DAY OF THE FISCAL YEAR, SEPTEMBER 30TH, THEY WERE ISSUED A TERMINATION NOTICE.
SO WE NO LONGER HAVE A $129 MILLION AGREEMENT AT THE CANYON.
AND HOWEVER, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE ARE ABANDONING OR HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE CANYON AND DEVELOPING THE CANYON PROPERTY.
IT, IT, THAT'S, UM, NOT AT ALL THE CASE.
WE DEFINITELY ARE ENGAGED AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO SEE THAT AREA GROW.
UM, I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF CARERRA TURNED AROUND AND, AND PRESENTED A DIFFERENT KIND OF DEAL THAT WAS MORE, UM, UH, FEASIBLE AND DOABLE.
SO WE ARE ARE WAITING TO SEE WHAT COMES OF THAT, BUT THAT IS GOING TO AFFECT OUR BUDGET AS WE MOVE THROUGH, UM, THE ANNUAL REPORT YOU'LL SEE IN A MINUTE.
SO THAT, THAT IS THE, THE MAJOR WORK THAT HAS HAPPENED WITHIN.
CAN I ASK A QUESTION? OF COURSE.
DID THEY MAKE AN ATTEMPT TO AMEND IT? NO, I, I I THINK THEY UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS NOT A, UM, IT, IT WAS NOT FEASIBLE TO TRY TO, TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT WAS HAD BEEN SET OUT 11 YEARS PRIOR.
SO THESE ARE SOME OF THE EDITS THAT I'M GONNA BE MAKING BEFORE WE GET THIS OVER WITH.
BUT IF YOU WANNA GO BACK TO PAGE SEVEN, PLEASE, RIGHT THERE.
THE, THIS IS A NEW DEVELOPMENT METROCARE BUILT A NINE SIX OR IS BUILDING A $96 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH AND DISABILITY INNOVATION CENTER HILLSIDE CAMPUS.
AND THAT'S RIGHT IN THE, THAT, THAT CANYON AREA AS WELL.
SO CANYON IS DEFINITELY SEEING SOME GREAT NEW DEVELOPMENT AND WE ANTICIPATE WE'LL CONTINUE TO FOR YEARS TO COME.
SO WITH THAT, UM, LET'S MOVE TO THE TIF DISTRICT'S PRO, UH, TIF DISTRICT PROJECTS PAGE ON PAGE NINE.
THIS PAGE IS A LIST OF THE, THE PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN OVER THE YEARS.
UM, YOU'LL SEE THEM LISTED HERE, THE, THE SLS HORIZONTAL DEVELOPMENT.
THIS IS WHEN THEY, THEY TOOK, UM, SOME OBSOLETE PROJECTS DOWN.
AND THE ONES THAT YOU SEE IN BLUE, THERE ARE WHAT REDEVELOPED ON THOSE SITES THAT'S ACTUALLY BEING MOVED INTO A DIFFERENT CATEGORY 'CAUSE THEY WERE NOT DIRECTLY INCENTIVIZED WITH TIF DOLLARS, BUT IT STILL COUNTS.
AND THE, THE TOTAL VALUE, UM, CALCULATION THEN IF YOU, IF WE GO DOWN ONE MORE PAGE PLEASE.
THIS NEXT PAGE SHOWS PROJECTS THAT HAVE COME, UM, TO FRUITION THAT DID NOT TAKE ANY, WERE NOT, UM, INCENTIVIZED BY TIF FUNDING.
AND IT RESULTS IN THE BOTTOM AT A TIF DISTRICT INVESTMENT OVERALL OF ABOUT 8.3 MILLION AND A VALUE WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF 200 AND BASICALLY 222 MILLION OF VALUE.
SO I THINK OUR, OUR MONEY HAS BEEN INVESTED WELL AND IT WILL CONTINUE TO, TO GROW.
IS THAT INCREMENTAL VALUE? THAT'S VALUE? YES.
UM, LET'S SEE THEN ON PAGE 11, CAN GO BACK TO SLIDE NINE REAL QUICK.
SLIDE NINE, PLEASE MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND.
SO WITH THE KEY IN OR THE SLF, THE TPA, WE INVESTED 4 MILLION INTO THAT.
THE, THE, THAT LINE IS SPECIFICALLY A, A PROJECT WE DID WITH, WITH SLF, THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPER TO DEMOLISH THE SITES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY WERE THE BLUE SITES
[01:05:01]
REDEVELOPED SO THAT THAT FUNDING WENT FOR DEMOLITION AND THEN THOSE, EVERYTHING IN THE BLUE WAS REDEVELOPED AS A RESULT OF THAT.THE, THE DEAL THAT WE HAD WITH SLF LAST YEAR, IF YOU LOOK AT LAST YEAR'S REPORT HAS ITS ONLINE ITEM THERE AND HAS BEEN SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED SINCE THAT DEAL ENDED, ENDED THIS FISCAL YEAR CONFUSED.
SO THERE WAS $4 MILLION INVESTED WITH SLF WHO WAS AT THE TIME THE, THE DEVELOPER OF THE CANYON PROJECT.
WAS IT, IT IT WAS A SEPARATE DEAL FROM THE, THE $128 MILLION DEAL THAT WE DID THAT WE'VE SINCE TERMINATED.
LESLIE, IF I CAN MAYBE ADD A LITTLE BIT TO THAT.
WHEN THE TIP DISTRICT WAS ORIGINALLY CREATED, THERE WERE TWO SUBSECTIONS OR TWO SUB-DISTRICTS.
ONE WAS THE CANYON AND THE ONE WAS EVERYTHING NOT IN THE CANYON.
AND SO, UM, THE PARTICULAR PRO PROJECT THAT YOU'RE REFERENCING AND RE REFERRING TO THE 4 MILLION AND CHANGE INTO FUNDING WAS FOR, UM, DEVELOPMENT IN WEST DAVIS THAT WAS OUTSIDE OF THE CANYON GEOGRAPHY.
SO, SO SLF WAS THE DEVELOPER OF ALL THOSE PROJECTS.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW IT REFERENCES SL F THOSE, I GUESS THAT'S WHERE I'M GETTING CONFUSED.
SO SLF WAS DEMOLISHED THE, ALL OF THE, UM, APARTMENTS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ON THESE SITES AND THEN THESE APARTMENTS DEVELOPED REDEVELOPED ONCE THAT ALL, THEN THE DEMOLITION.
SO THEN MOVING ON TO, UH, A PAGE 11.
UH, THESE ARE PROJECTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT THAT WERE NOT, ARE NOT PRIVATELY DEVELOPED.
THESE ARE THE WHERE ROSEMONT SAY FROST SCHOOL PROJECTS AND, AND SO ON SO FORTH COMES TO A TOTAL INVESTMENT OF 18.8 MILLION.
BUT 15 MILLION OF THAT IS TEXAS MOBILITY FUNDS.
SO REALLY IT'S MORE AROUND THE LINES ABOUT THREE, TWO AND A HALF TO MILLION FROM, FROM THE, UH, TIF DISTRICT THAT FUNDED THESE PROJECTS.
UH, NEXT PAGE, MIXED INCOME HOUSING SUMMARY.
THE ANY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT THAT THE TIF PARTICIPATES IN IS SUBJECT TO OUR MIXED INCOME HOUSING GUIDELINES, WHICH IS REQUIRES 20% OF ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS BE, UM, 80% OR BELOW OF THE A A MI.
AND THE TWO PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE, THAT WE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN ARE ALMOST A HUNDRED PERCENT, THEY'RE 94 5%, THAT'S THE TWO THAT ARE IN THE CANYON THAT THE TAYLORS FARM AND HILLSIDE WEST LEASED.
PARDON? 94% LEASED? NO, THEY'RE NINE THE UNITS, 95% OF THE UNITS ARE FOR.
UM, THE, THE VALUE INCREMENT REVENUE SUMMARY, THE, I THINK THE, THE, WHAT I WANNA CALL OUT HERE IS THAT THE, AS FAR AS VALUE, THE, THE VALUE WITHIN THE TIF DISTRICT YEAR OVER YEAR WE'RE UP 9%.
AND, UM, THAT WILL RESULT IN COLLECTION OF ROUGHLY 3.6 MILLION IN REVENUE FROM THIS PAST FISCAL YEAR.
IT, IT'S COLLECTED THE FOLLOWING YEAR, SO THAT'S WHY IT SAYS, UH, IN COLLECTION IN 2025 OF 3.6 MILLION.
UH, THE NEXT SECTION IS A LISTING OF THE OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAMS THAT ARE A PART OF OUR PLAN AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN COMPARISON TO THOSE.
UM, THE FIRST SECTION IS, AGAIN, THERE, THIS, THERE'S ALL THIS HISTORICAL INFORMATION AND WHAT IS RELEVANT THIS PAST FISCAL YEAR IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE THAT ALL THE, THE CANYON ACTIVITY THAT, THAT I'VE HIGHLIGHTED, UM, ON THE NEXT PAGE, THE SECOND BULLET OR THE, UM, SECOND FROM THE BOTTOM BULLET, THIS IS TALKING ABOUT CREATING ADDITIONAL TAXABLE VALUE BETWEEN THE NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AT 1.7 BILLION WAS THE GOAL OVER OUR 32 YEAR LIFE SPAN.
AND WE'RE AT 27% OF THAT GOAL, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS LOW AND THAT'S DUE TO THE, THE SLOW PROGRESS IN THE CANYON.
UM, BUT WE OBVIOUSLY HAVE 14 YEARS LEFT AND WE'LL BE RECALIBRATING OUR, OUR, UM, OUR PLAN.
[01:10:01]
OF, OF TIME TO, UH, HAVE AN IMPACT WITHIN THE DISTRICT.AND THEN ALSO ALONG THE SAME LINES, THE, THE ORIGINAL PLAN CALLED FOR 2100 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO REPLACE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 6,000, 600 NEW UNITS.
UM, THEY'RE VERY SPECIFIC IN THE PLAN ABOUT, ABOUT THESE GOALS, 663,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND ABOUT 1.3 MILLION OF COMMERCIAL.
AND AGAIN, UH, ON THE NEXT PAGE, WE ARE BELOW THE GOAL ON THAT DUE PRIMARILY TO THE SLOW GROWTH OF, OF WHAT WAS PROJECTED IN THE UNION.
UM, THE REST OF IT IS ACTIVITY HAS HAPPENED PRIOR TO THIS FISCAL YEAR OR THIS PAST FISCAL YEAR.
SO THEN WE CAN MOVE ON TO, UM, BUDGET AND SPENDING STATUS.
UM, THE, THE CANYON, UM, OFFICIALLY WAS TERMINATED ON THE VERY, VERY LAST DAY OF THIS FISCAL YEAR.
I HAD LEFT IT IN THE BUDGET, BUT MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR THIS MORNING, WE'RE GONNA TAKE THAT OUT.
SO THIS IS GONNA BE RECALIBRATED IN THE BUDGET FOCUSED WITH THE, UH, NEW NUMBERS THAT ARE ABSENT, ABSENT THAT, THAT AGREEMENT.
UM, PAGE 21, OUR WORK PROGRAM REMAINS PRETTY MUCH THE SAME AND THAT IS TO ENCOURAGE OUR DEVELOPMENT, OUR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE REGION, AND THEN WORK TO, UH, MAKE SURE THAT THE, THE CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS HAPPENS ON OUR ROSEMONT PROJECT.
UM, THE NEXT FOUR PAGES ARE THE FINANCIALS THAT OUR FINANCE FINANCE DEPARTMENT PREPARES.
THIS IS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR ANY SHIFT DISTRICT REPORTING.
AND THEN PAGE 26, WE HAD AN OBLIGATION THAT WE HAVE PAID OFF, UM, FOR THE NORTH OAK CLIFF STREET CAR EXTENSION.
ALSO, ANOTHER, UH, DEAL THAT WE HAVE WITH SLF PAID THAT OFF THIS YEAR.
SO AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE NO OBLIGATIONS.
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, OUR DISTRICT WIDE SET ASIDE FUNDS, UM, INCREMENT, ONCE YOU REMOVE OUR, THE ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES AND THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SET ASIDE, THERE'S 5% THAT'S ALLOCATED TO A DISTRICT-WIDE SET ASIDE THAT IT GOES TOWARDS THINGS LIKE ROSEMONT AND OTHER, UM, IMPROVEMENTS THAT AFFECT THE DISTRICT AS A WHOLE.
AND AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE $306,303 IN THAT FUND.
WELL, THOSE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ANNUAL REPORTS.
UM, WHAT QUESTIONS DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? UM, AS I SAID, ONCE WE GO BACK AND, UM, RE RESTRUCTURE THE BUDGET WITHOUT THE THIS $129 MILLION AGREEMENT, I'LL COME BACK TO THE BOARD AND SHOW YOU WHERE WE ARE.
UM, BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I, I DON'T ANTICIPATE ANY MAJOR CHANGES TO THE ANNUAL REPORT BEFORE IT GOES TO COUNCIL.
SO IT'S JUST GONNA MAKE, ESSENTIALLY IT'S JUST GONNA GROW THE UNALLOCATED BALANCE TO 3 15, 3 60 MILLION.
I'M SORRY, YOU, SO IT WOULD JUST GROW THE BALANCE, THE UNALLOCATED BALANCE TO THAT IS CORRECT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, YOU LISTEN.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NINE EIGHT? OH, I'M SORRY.
AT THIS POINT I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM EIGHT.
I, UH, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR ITEM EIGHT TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL, REMOVE THE ANNUAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OUR ENDORSEMENT.
YEAH, I, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
AGENDA ITEM EIGHT IS PRESENTED WITH RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A NOTE THAT THE REPORTS CHANGE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL BY LUIS.
ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND.
[01:15:01]
KEEP IT UP UNTIL THE FINAL VOTE IS FINALIZED.ITEM NUMBER NINE, REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE DAVIS GUARDIAN TIFF DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DURING CALENDAR YEAR BETWEEN FIVE BLAKE, DO YOU HAVE THE PRESENTATION FOR THIS ITEM? UH, YES.
THIS IS, I'M PROPOSING THAT WE HAVE THE, WE KEEP THE SAME MEETING SCHEDULE AS WE'VE HAD THIS YEAR.
AND THAT WOULD BE THE, THE, UM, THIRD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD MONTH AT THREE O'CLOCK.
AND THOSE ARE ALL OF THE DATES RIGHT THERE.
UM, AND IF EVERYBODY IN FAVOR OF THAT, I'LL SEND OUT THE OUTLOOK INVITES AND, AND YOU'LL HAVE THEM ON YOUR CALENDAR.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NINE? I'M SORRY, LOUIS, DO YOU RAISE YOUR HAND? YEAH, I'LL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ADOPT THE SCHEDULE.
HEY, SORRY, I WAS JUST BE LOOKING.
UM, LOOKING AT THE OVERVIEW DATES, I HAVE MOTION.
I HAVE A MOTION BY LUIS TO APPROVE LUIS TO APPROVE THE QUARTERLY MEETING SCHEDULE ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD MONTH OF EACH QUARTER AT 3:00 PM DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND BY PETER.
RAISE YOUR HAND TO KEEP IT RAISE UNTIL THE VOTE IS FINALIZED.
ADJOURNMENT DECLARES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 4:25 PM THANKS EVERYBODY.