[00:00:02]
[Ad Hoc Committee on Administrative Affairs on October 14, 2025.]
IS OCTOBER 14TH, 2025.THE TIME IS 4 0 5, AND I'M CALLING THE AD HOC COMMITTEE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS TO ORDER.
TODAY, WE HAVE ONE ITEM, AND THAT IS TO GO OVER THE, UH, SEARCH FOR A FULL-TIME INSPECTOR GENERAL SAYS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISIONS THAT THIS COUNCIL IS ASSIGNED WITH, AND WE WANNA MAKE SURE WE ARE DOING THIS IN A TIMELY MANNER.
AND SO WE DO HAVE CITY STAFF WITH US TODAY TO GO OVER A FEW OPTIONS ON HOW TO PROCEED WITH THAT.
UM, YES, I AM HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEMORANDUM THAT WAS SENT, UH, LAST WEEK.
SO, UM, ANY, ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THE DIFFERENT OPTIONS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS, I, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN.
BEFORE I DO THAT, UH, WE DO NEED TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 21ST MEETING.
IS THERE A MOTION THAT'S BEEN MOVED IN SECOND? ANY CORRECTIONS, ANY EDITS? SEEING NONE.
NINA, I WAS ACTUALLY HOPING IF YOU COULD POSSIBLY GO OVER THE VARIOUS DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT WERE PRESENTED TO US FOR THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS.
I'M SORRY, I JUST HAVING SOME PROBLEMS IN MY COMPUTER, SO I WONDER IF IT'S POSSIBLE TO, UM, SHOW THE MEMORANDUM.
THANK, AND I'M GONNA BE GOING TO, UH, CHAIR STEWART FIRST.
I KNOW THAT SHE, UM, HAS SOME, UH, TIME LIMITATIONS WITH US, SO I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT SHE'S ABLE TO ASK HER QUESTIONS FIRST.
UM, SO IN THE MEMORANDUM THERE WAS AN OUTLINE FOR, UH, FOR POTENTIAL APPROACHES FOR CONDUCTING THE RECRUITMENT.
UM, AND I WOULD LIKE TO, UM, IDENTIFY OR, OR HIGHLIGHT THE ATTACHMENT IN PARTICULAR THAT TALKS ABOUT THE 12 WEEK RECRUITMENT TIMELINE IS THE VERY END OF THE MEMORANDUM, AND IT TALKS ABOUT JUST A STANDARD PROCESS.
UM, WHAT WOULD, THAT WOULD BE FOLLOWED EITHER BY A RECRUITMENT FIRM OR IF WE DECIDE TO DO IT INTERNALLY OR IF, YOU KNOW, ANY RECRUITER WILL UNDERTAKE A SEARCH OF THIS NATURE.
THIS IS TYPICALLY THE STEPS THAT WE WILL GO THROUGH.
SO IT'S DIVIDED INTO, YOU KNOW, THE, THE, THE WEEKS FOR EACH ONE OF THE PHASES, THE PHASE, AND THEN THE KEY TASKS.
AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A GENERAL, UH, GUIDELINE OF WHAT A STANDARD RECRUITMENT, UH, PROCESS LOOKS LIKE IN PARTICULAR.
ONE IS, UM, AN EXECUTIVE LEVEL POSITION.
SO THERE'S SOME PARTICULARS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO THIS POSITION, BUT THIS IS JUST THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE GENERAL STEPS.
SO TAKING THAT INTO CONSIDERATION, UM, THERE ARE SEVERAL OPTIONS.
OPTION ONE WOULD BE TO ENGAGE A SEARCH FIRM UNDER THE CURRENT CONTRACTS.
THE CITY HAS CONTRACTS WITH RECRUITING FIRMS. THOSE CONTRACTS ARE READY TO GO.
BASICALLY, WE WILL NEED, UH, THEY WILL HAVE A RAPID STORM WITH MINIMAL ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP.
UH, THE TWO FIRMS THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE ARE POLY HIRE AND KORN FERRY, WHICH WORKS UNDER SENSA.
UM, AND AGAIN, THEIR RECRUITMENT WOULD TAKE 12 WEEKS FOLLOWING THAT STANDARD PROCESS THAT IS OUTLINED.
THE ESTIMATE, THE ESTIMATED COST WILL BE UP TO 75,000, BUT MOST LIKELY IT WILL BE MORE IN THE 50,000 RANGE DEPENDING ON WHO WE SELECT, HOW, YOU KNOW, WHAT, WHAT KIND OF, UM, I, ACTIVITIES OR, UH, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS YOU WANT.
IF YOU DON'T WANT TESTING, YOU WANT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
BUT IT WILL DEFINITELY NOT EXCEED 75,000.
THE OPTION NUMBER TWO IS TO ISSUE A BRAND NEW RFP OR TO UTILIZE A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT.
UH, AGAIN, THE SEARCH PROCESS WILL BE 12 WEEKS.
HOWEVER, YOU WILL NEED TO ALSO CONSIDER THE 30 TO 45 DAYS THAT WILL TAKE TO DO THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS.
UH, I, SORRY, THE VENDOR'S IDENTIFICATION IN THE CONTRACT EXECUTION.
SO IF WE WERE TO START RIGHT AWAY, THAT WILL TAKE US TO MID-NOVEMBER.
UM, YOU KNOW, AND, AND, AND IT WILL ADD 30 TO 45 DAYS TO THOSE STANDARD 12 WEEKS.
THE THIRD OPTION IS TO EXERCISE THE WARRANT, THE GU THE
[00:05:01]
WARRANTY, UH, UNDER THE GOV HR AND GT CONTRACT, UH, IN THEIR CONTRACT.AND, YOU KNOW, IT, IT ACTUALLY, AND, AND OUR, UM, ATTORNEYS CAN SPEAK IN MORE DETAIL ABOUT THE CONTRACT.
IT INDICATES THAT THEY ARE, UM, TO CONDUCT A FULL SEARCH, UH, TO, YOU KNOW, IF, AS IF, IF THE PERSON THAT THEY SELECTED IN THE FIRST ROUND, UH, DID NOT STAY WITH US FOR A YEAR OR WAS LET GO FOR SOME REASON.
SO BASICALLY UN UNDER THOSE TERMS, THE COST WOULD ONLY BE LIMITED TO ADVERTISING AND LOGISTICS.
WE WILL BE ABOUT 2,500 TO $5,000.
UM, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO DO THIS, UH, FULL RECRUITMENT, UM, WITH NO ADDITIONAL COST.
UM, AND OF COURSE THE FOURTH OPTION IS ALWAYS TO CONDUCT AN IN-HOUSE SEARCH.
UH, WE WILL DO IT INTERNALLY AS WE RECRUIT MANY OF OUR EXECUTIVES.
AGAIN, WE WILL TAKE THE FOUR, THE 12 WEEKS THAT A STANDARD PROCESS REQUIRES.
UM, AND THE COST WILL BE, YOU KNOW, WITHIN THE EXISTING STAFF AND SALARIES.
SO NO ADDITIONAL COST, SO IT WILL BE THE MOST COST EFFICIENT APPROACH.
UM, I ALSO LISTED THE POSTING STRATEGY, WHICH, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE SOME OF THE PLACES WHERE THIS, UH, SEARCH WILL BE POSTED REGARDLESS OF THE APPROACH.
AND THEN A LITTLE BIT OF A OVERVIEW OR COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT OPTIONS IN TERMS OF TIMELINE, UM, AND COST.
AND THAT IS ALL THE INFORMATION.
IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT A PARTICULAR OPTION, I, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER.
UM, WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE MEMO AND OUTLINING THE VARIOUS OPTIONS.
I'D LIKE TO START BACKWARDS AT FOUR AND MOVE FORWARD.
UM, FOUR, CONDUCTING AN IN-HOUSE SEARCH.
AGAIN, DEFINITELY NOT INTERESTED IN THAT.
MOVING TO OPTION ONE, ENGAGING A SEARCH FIRM UNDER CURRENT CONTRACTS.
NOT INTERESTED IN THAT, WHICH LEADS ME WITH OPTION TWO, WHICH YOU HAVE BOTH ISSUE A NEW RFP OR UTILIZE A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT.
AND, UM, CHAIR, MY INTEREST IS IN UTILIZING A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT.
ONE OF THE, UM, THERE'S A NUMBER OF FIRMS THAT ARE AVAILABLE AND I WOULD LOVE IT IF WE COULD MAYBE GET AN OUTLINE OF THE VARIOUS ONES THAT ARE AVAILABLE.
I KNOW TECH SHARE, UM, HAS AT LEAST TWO UNDER CONTRACT THROUGH THE COG.
WE USED ONE OF THOSE FIRMS TO SELECT THE NEW COG DIRECTOR.
IT WAS A FLAWLESS, EFFICIENT, VERY QUICK PROCESS.
AND HAVING BEEN THROUGH A CITY MANAGER SEARCH HERE AND AN IG SEARCH HERE, I WOULD HAVE STRONG OPINIONS ABOUT WHO WE SELECT BECAUSE THAT FIRM DID A FABULOUS JOB AND THEY'RE ALREADY UNDER CONTRACT AS A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT VENDOR, AND WE COULD BE READY TO ROLL VERY QUICKLY.
SO THAT IS MY STRONG PREFERENCE, UM, OF THE OPTIONS PRESENTED.
OKAY, UM, WE'LL ROLL BACK TO CHAIR STEWART.
UM, THANK YOU CHAIRMAN EMON FOR YOUR COMMENT.
I THINK THAT IS PRETTY MUCH WHERE I CAME OUT.
UM, I HATE TO START FROM SCRATCH, BUT I BELIEVE THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, DOES THAT MOVE US FORWARD A LITTLE BIT OR IS IT, IS IT BASICALLY STOPPING STARTING FROM SCRATCH? UH, I WOULD SAY THAT IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO DOING AN RFP BECAUSE IT'S UNDER A HUNDRED THOUSAND.
SO THE PROCESS WILL BE VERY SIMILAR.
AND SO IF THERE'S PARTICULAR, YOU KNOW, WE'LL DEFINITELY REACH OUT TO THE CALL.
AND IF THERE'S ANY OTHERS THAT, YOU KNOW, MAYBE RECOMMENDED IT, WE'LL REACH OUT TO THEM IMMEDIATELY AND START WORKING ON, UM, WITH OUR INSURANCE AND PROCUREMENT AND LEGAL TEAM TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE IN PLACE.
SO I WOULD SAY 30 TO 45 DAYS MAXIMUM TO, TO SET IT UP AND IN PARTICULAR, IF IT'S A FIRM THAT IS ALREADY WORKING WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, AND THEN THEY'LL JUST START THEIR PROCESS AND, AND AT THE, FROM THAT POINT ON FORWARD, THEY, THE 12 WEEKS ASSUME THAT, YOU KNOW, ALL MEETINGS HAPPEN IN A TIMELY MANNER THAT, YOU KNOW, WE, WE RUN THIS A VERY EFFICIENT PROCESS, UM, THAT ALL FIRMS BASICALLY HAVE THE SAME TIME NOW.
I JUST, UM, I I WANTED TO, UH, CLARIFY.
I TOO WOULD NOT HAVE WANTED TO USE THE SAME, UH, SEARCH FIRM THAT WE USED BEFORE.
I JUST, THAT JUST FEELS LIKE THAT'S NOT THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
UM, WE, WE, THAT WAS DEFINITELY A FAIL, SO I'M NOT SURE THAT IT MAKES ANY
[00:10:01]
SENSE TO DO THAT.UM, SO A NEW RFP WITH A COOP WITH A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OR GETTING, AND JUST MAYBE USING SOMEBODY THAT WE KNOW IN THE REGION WHO'S USED AFFIRM AND, AND HAS HAD A GOOD EXPERIENCE, I THINK I JUST WANT IT TO BE EFFICIENT AND I WANT IT TO BE EFFECTIVE AND PROFESSIONAL.
AND I THINK THOSE ARE MY, MY THREE TOP CRITERIA.
UH, THIS QUESTION ON OPTION THREE IS GONNA BE PROBABLY FOR LEGAL AND IT MIGHT REQUIRE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
IF THAT'S THE CASE, PLEASE LET US KNOW.
UH, DO WE HAVE A STATUS WITH MGT ON THE, UH, CONTRACT THAT WE, UH, JUST WENT THROUGH A FEW MONTHS AGO? IT, UH, SO THE QUESTION IS, DO WE HAVE A STATUS UPDATE WITH MGT ON THE LAST RECRUITMENT THAT THEY DID FOR THE CITY OF DALLAS, WILLOW SANCHEZ, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY? I'M SORRY, COULD YOU JUST PLEASE REPEAT THE QUESTION? SURE, NO, NO WORRIES.
SO THE QUESTION IS, AND I'M NOT SURE IT MIGHT REQUIRE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, BUT WAS WANTING TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE DUT CONTRACT, UM, THAT WE WENT WITH FOR THE LAST IGI AM NOT FAMILIAR IF STACK DECIDED TO DO ANYTHING REGARDING THE STATUS OR EXISTENCE OF THAT CONTRACT.
UM, FOR OPTION TWO, NINA, THE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT, WOULD THAT STILL REQUIRE THE, THE SELECTION PROCESS TO GO THROUGH COMMITTEE AND THEN THE SCORING, JUST AS, AS IT IS FOR A NEW RFP? IT WOULD BE AT YOUR DISCRETION IF THEIR RECOMMENDATION IS TO SELECT A, A STAFF COULD MAKE THE SELECTION OR WE COULD BRING THE DIFFERENT FIRMS TO YOU AS WE HAVE DONE.
AND SO TYPICALLY WE BRING TWO, THREE FIRMS, COULD BE FIRMS UNDER THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR SELECTING, YOU KNOW, ONE FIRM, BUT I THINK THAT, UH, HAVING INPUT FROM THE COMMITTEE WILL BE THE MOST APPROPRIATE.
YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT I HAVE RIGHT NOW WITH AN ONGOING, UH, SELECTION IS THAT IT'S TAKEN QUITE SOME TIME TO GET MY COLLEAGUES TO, UH, SCHEDULES TO COORDINATE TO ACTUALLY MOVE FORWARD.
AND SO I'LL STOP THERE TO SEE IF STAFF HAS ANY, OR SORRY IF COUNCIL HAS ANY, UM, THOUGHTS OR FEEDBACK ON THAT CHAIR.
SO J JUST TO, UH, GO BACK TO WHAT YOU JUST MENTIONED, UM, YOU KNOW, MY CONCERN WAS THE SELECTION PROCESS AND THE GRADING, AND WE HAVE NOT EVEN BEEN ABLE TO DO THAT FOR ONE OF OUR, UM, RFPS THAT'S CURRENTLY OUT.
AND SO STAFF AND COUNSEL COULD IDENTIFY A, UH, COOPERATIVE SEARCH FROM A TODAY AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THEM.
IS THAT CORRECT? I DON'T ACTUALLY, I'M, I'M GETTING SOME FEEDBACK FROM OUR CITY ATTORNEYS.
HI, BUR VANDENBERG, UH, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
UM, THIS IS JUST A RECOMMENDING BODY.
UH, I DON'T BELIEVE COUNCIL AUTHORIZED YOU GUYS TO DO ANY, UM, AND I'M NOT EVEN SURE IT'S REALLY POSTED TO MAKE A RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION TODAY.
THAT'S, SO TODAY WOULD JUST BE DISCUSSION AND WE COULD POST SOMETHING FOR YOU GUYS TO SEND A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNSEL.
SO I JUST WANNA MAKE, MAKE, GIVE CLARITY, UH, THIS, THIS, UH, COUNCIL CAN RECOMMEND AND, AND THEN IT GOES TO THE GENERAL BODY.
SO, UH, YOU KNOW, MY, MY HOPE IS NOT THAT THIS BODY, BODY MA, THIS COMMITTEE MAKES A, A, UH, FINAL DETERMINATION, BUT THAT WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL COUNCIL ON WHICH OPTION TO MOVE FORWARD
[00:15:01]
WITH.AND SO I GUESS RIGHT NOW, WHAT WOULD IT BE HELPFUL, NINA, IS TO HAVE A LIST OF THE CURRENT COOPERATIVE, UH, AGREEMENTS THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO, UH, PARTNER WITH? ABSOLUTELY.
WELL, MY QUESTION WAS IF WE ARE DISCUSSING AND PERHAPS RECOMMENDING A PROCESS TO GO FORWARD, OR ARE WE DISCUSSING AND RECOMMENDING SPECIFIC FIRMS? I'M, I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND.
I, I THINK THE, THE FIRST TASK IS TO GET SOME CONSENSUS ON THE OPTION THAT WE WANNA MOVE FORWARD WITH, AND THEN ALLOW STAFF TO COME BACK WITH THE LIST OF, UH, EXISTING COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENTS.
WELL, THAT WOULD BE MY INTEREST WOULD BE TO SEE THE LIST OF COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT FIRMS THAT DO EXECUTIVE SEARCH.
UM, AND THEN PERHAPS WE COULD SELECT, SELECT AMONGST THEM TWO, NO MORE THAN THREE THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO INTERVIEW.
AND THEN WOULD WE THEN BE RECOMMENDING TO THE BODY WHICH ONE WE THOUGHT WAS, UM, THE BEST FIT, OR WOULD WE BE OFFERING FOR THE WHOLE BODY TO COME TO THAT? HOW DOES THAT WORK, DO YOU KNOW? SO, UH, COLLEAGUES ARE ALWAYS WELCOME TO JOIN OUR COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO DO THAT.
BUT AS FAR AS THE PROCESS, NINA, UH, DO YOU HAVE, UM, A RULING ON WHETHER THIS, THIS COMMITTEE WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR ONE, UH, VENDOR AND RECOMMEND THAT VENDOR TO THE FULL BODY? MM-HMM.
SO WHILE HE'S COMING, DO, SO ADMINISTRATION HAS A FULL OF VENDORS THAT THEY CAN GIVE TO, UH, THIS BODY, AND WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT MCWELL RECOMMENDATION.
AND THEN THOSE RE RECOMMENDATIONS GO TO THE FULL COUNCIL.
WE'RE, WE'RE GONNA TRY TO GET SOME CLARITY FROM THE ATTORNEYS OR CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, BURT VANDENBERG, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
SO YOU GUYS ARE, TODAY WHAT IS POSTED IS A BRIEFING JUST TO DISCUSS THE OPTIONS.
I THINK WE CAN GET A CONSENSUS OF WHERE YOU GUYS ARE LEANING AND BRING BACK A LIST.
I THINK STAFF WILL BRING BACK A LIST OF, UH, SOME, UH, VENDORS THAT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.
THEY'LL PROBABLY BRING A COUPLE OTHER THINGS IN CASE YOU GUYS CAN THEN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME, AND WE'LL POST AN AS AN ACTION ITEM.
DOES EVERYONE HAVE CLARITY NOW? CAN YOU REPEAT THAT ONE MORE TIME? CERTAINLY.
UM, SO IT WAS POSTED AS A BRIEFING TO DISCUSS, UH, OPTIONS AND POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS.
UM, WE CAN REPO, WE CAN, IF YOU, WHEN YOU GUYS COME BACK, I THINK STAFF HAS GOTTEN A CONSENSUS OF WHICH WAY YOU GUYS SEEM TO BE LEANING.
THEY CAN BRING FORWARD SOME VENDORS THAT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.
UM, I, I KNOW YOU MENTIONED SOME, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER, AND WE CAN POST IT AS AN ACTION ITEM SO YOU CAN THEN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL BODY AND MOVE FORWARD.
IS IT, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT WE COULD GET THAT LIST BEFORE A MEETING AND THEN WE COULD MAYBE TELL YOU, OR, OR YOU THAT HERE'S TWO OR THREE THAT I'M INTERESTED IN INTERVIEWING, AND YOU COULD COALESCE THAT SO IT COULD ALL HAPPEN AT THE NEXT MEETING.
CAN WE, I'M, I'M, I THINK THEY PROBABLY SHOULD GET IT ALL TOGETHER AND TRY TO GET IT TO YOU.
IT'LL BE POSTED FOR THE PUBLIC, BUT IT'LL POSTED FOR Y'ALL.
WELL, I DEFINITELY CAN BRING FORTH THE LIST.
AND MY QUESTION IS MORE PROCEDURAL IS THAT, UH, ONCE THE LIST IS PROVIDED, DO WE BRING THREE OR FOUR? DO I BRING THE WHOLE LIST? OR CONSIDERATION? IS, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE ENTIRE LIST OF, UH, A FULL LIST, PLEASE.
SO YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM THAT LIST AND THEN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OR PICK THE TWO, THREE FIRMS THAT YOU WANT TO SEE IN PERSON.
WELL, THAT WAS, UH, GO QUICK, QUICK QUESTION, CHAIR.
JUST, UH, ZEL GIBSON, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, JUST TO CLARIFY.
SO WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS THAT I ACTUALLY, UH, UH, PICKED MGT AS THE, THE, UH, RECRUITER, UH, THIS COMMITTEE ACTUALLY SAT IN ON A SERIES OF INTERVIEWS AND THEN DID A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL BODY.
IS THAT, WAS THAT THE PROCESS? DO YOU WANT TO HAVE AN ACTION ITEM WHERE YOU GUYS ACTUALLY JUST PICK AND THEN SUGGEST THAT THE, THIS BODY OF PEOPLE BE INTERVIEWED BY FULL COUNSEL OR BY THIS COMMITTEE?
[00:20:02]
SO FOR THIS PARTICULAR ONE, I, I DO THINK THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LIST, A FULL LIST, YES.AND GET CONSENSUS ON NARROWING IT DOWN TO THREE OR FOUR, TWO TO INTERVIEW, AND THEN MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL COUNSEL.
SO THE NEXT MEETING, YOUR ACTION ITEM WILL BE ACTUALLY CHOOSING THE BODY TO INTERVIEW, AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO HAVE A SUBSEQUENT MEETING WHERE YOU'LL ACTUALLY THEN MAKE A FORMAL, YOU'LL INTERVIEW AND THEN MAKE A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL BODY.
IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THAT WE COULD DO THOSE INTERVIEWS, WHETHER VIRTUAL OR IN PERSON IN EXECUTIVE SESSION THAT SAME DAY? I GUESS IN, IN, IN THEORY, IF YOU WANT TO INTERVIEW EVERYONE THAT'S ON THE LIST, IF YOU'RE GONNA GO THROUGH A PROCESS THAT YOU'RE GONNA CALL THE LIST FIRST AND THEN WANT TO INTERVIEW, I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU CAN DO BOTH ON THE SAME DAY, BECAUSE THAT'D BE SCHEDULING ISSUES FOR US TO BRING THOSE WHO WOULD BE PREPARED TO DO AN INTERVIEW THAT DAY, NOT KNOWING IF THEY WOULD BE CHOSEN OR NOT.
AND, UH, IF I MAY ADD, UH, THOSE OF YOU WHO PARTICIPATED IN ANY OF THE LAST ONES, UH, WE, THOSE INTERVIEWS WOULD NOT BE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
AND SO THEY WOULD BE OUT, IT'D BE PUBLIC.
WE HAVE TO GET 'EM, THERE'S A COUPLE STEPS WE GO THROUGH TO MAKE SURE NO PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OUT THERE.
I THINK YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE REMEMBERED HOW THAT WENT.
CHAIRMAN OLSON, I DON'T THINK THEY WERE ALWAYS FILMED, THOUGH.
I MAY HAVE BEEN PUBLIC, BUT IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FILMED.
SO WHEN WE DID THE CITY MANAGER SEARCH, THOSE WERE DONE IN THE BASEMENT, LITERALLY.
UM, AND THOSE WERE NOT RECORDED.
I WOULD, I, I, I, I WILL LOOK INTO IT.
I DON'T RECALL OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD ON THAT ONE.
UH, ANY FURTHER BUSINESS AND STAFF HAS, UH, DIRECTION? YES.
THE TIME IS NOW 4 28 AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.