* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:02] ALL RIGHT. [BRIEFINGS:] GOOD MORNING EVERYONE. IT IS 10:35 AM ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2026, AND THIS IS THE BRIEFING OF THE DALLAS CITY PLAN COMMISSION. CAN WE START OUT WITH THE ROLL CALL, PLEASE? GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS. DISTRICT ONE, COMMISSIONER SIMS, DISTRICT TWO. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. PRESENT, DISTRICT THREE. VICE CHAIR HARBERT. DISTRICT FOUR. COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH. PRESENT. DISTRICT FIVE. COMMISSIONER SERRATO. PRESENT? DISTRICT SIX. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. PRESENT? DISTRICT SEVEN. COMMISSIONER WHEELER. REAGAN. PRESENT? DISTRICT EIGHT. COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN PRESENT? DISTRICT NINE. COMMISSIONER C***S. HERE. DISTRICT 10. COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT. DISTRICT 11. COMMISSIONER COX HERE. DISTRICT 12. COMMISSIONER KAUFMAN. WHAT HERE? DISTRICT 13. COMMISSIONER HALL HERE. DISTRICT 14, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON AND PLACE 15 CHAIR RUBIN? I'M HERE. YOU HAVE QUORUM, SIR. GREAT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. GOOD MORNING EVERYONE. UM, JUST A BRIEF HOUSEKEEPING NOTE. THIS IS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR, UM, MEMBERS OF THE STAFF TO BRIEF THE COMMISSION ON CASES AND FOR COMMISSIONERS TO ASK QUESTIONS OF STAFF, THE PUBLIC COMMENT AND ALL OF THAT. AND DEBATE ON THESE ITEMS WILL COME THIS AFTERNOON DURING OUR PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO START AT 12:30 PM AND WITH THAT WE WILL DIVE INTO OUR, UM, ZONING CONSENT DOCKET. AND THAT WAS NOTICED FOR CASES ONE THROUGH EIGHT AND SEVERAL HAVE COME OFF ALREADY. UM, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 5 AND SIX HAVE ALL COME OFF. SO AT LEAST FOUR, SEVEN, AND EIGHT ON CONSENT AT THE MOMENT. YEAH. REMAINING ON CONSENT ARE FIVE, OR I'M SORRY, FOUR, SEVEN AND EIGHT OFF OF CONSENT ARE 1, 2, 3, 5, AND SIX. OKAY. UM, AND I UNDERSTAND NUMBER ONE IS GOING TO BE HELD TO OUR NEXT, IS OUR NEXT MEETING. OKAY. SO NO NEED TO BRIEF THAT ONE, I ASSUME. UM, COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, WOULD YOU LIKE NUMBER TWO BRIEF YOUR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO, THAT'S GONNA BE HELD. OKAY. ALRIGHT, THEN WE WON'T BRIEF THAT ONE EITHER. UM, NUMBER THREE, ALSO GOING TO BE HELD UNTIL OUR NEXT MEETING, SO I ASSUME NO NEED FOR A BRIEFING THERE? NO, MR. CHAIR. OKAY. NUMBER FOUR. UH, COMMISSIONER WHEELER. REAGAN, DO YOU NEED THAT ONE BRIEFED? NO. OKAY. ANYONE ELSE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR WANT A BRIEFING ON THAT ITEM? OKAY, NUMBER FIVE. THAT'S IN D 14. AND, UH, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON HASN'T JOINED US, AND I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT ONE IS LIKELY TO BE HELD, SO WE'LL FOREGO THE BRIEFING FOR NOW, UNLESS SHE WOULD LIKE THAT. UM, NUMBER SIX, THAT'S ALSO D 14. SO WE WILL GIVE COMMISSIONER KINGSTON A MOMENT, UM, TO JOIN US. I KNOW SHE'S GONNA BE A LITTLE LATE THIS MORNING. NUMBER SEVEN, COMMISSIONER COX. NEED A BRIEFING. OKAY. ANYONE ELSE BRIEFING QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? AND NUMBER EIGHT, COMMISSIONER SIMS IS GOING TO BE OUT, UM, THIS MORNING WILL LIKELY WILL BE JOINING US FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING THIS AFTERNOON, SO UNLESS ANYONE HAS QUESTIONS FOR OKAY, GREAT. UH, MR. AGUILERA, UM, I DON'T THINK WE NEED A FULL BRIEFING ON THIS ONE, BUT IF, IF AT LEAST ONE COMMISSIONER HAS QUESTIONS FOR YOU, WHICH ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. JUST, JUST QUESTION I I'M SORRY, GEORGE. I'M, I'M HAVING SOME PROBLEMS LOGGING IN. DO YOU THINK YOU CAN, UH, UM, DISPLAY, UH, A PD, UH, AND MR. MR. AGUILAR? I THINK IT'S JUST QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW. OKAY. SO IF, IF YOU NEED YOUR SLIDE DECK FOR THAT, LET'S GET IT PULLED UP. BUT OTHERWISE, LET'S JUST DIVE INTO THE QUESTIONS. YES. GOOD MORNING, MR. AGUILERA. I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. THE, UM, CASE REPORT SEEMED TO INDICATE THAT THIS SITE HAS HAD A CONSIDERABLE PROBLEM WITH STAYING IN COMPLIANCE WITH ITS SITE PLAN. UM, IT MENTIONS JUST NOT BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN ITSELF, NOT BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, NOT BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARKING REQUIREMENTS, HAVING ADDED ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES. COULD YOU, UH, YOU KNOW, GIVEN THAT TRACK RECORD OF NON-COMPLIANCE, UH, I'M QUESTIONING THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF 10 YEARS WITH TENURE AUTO RENEWAL. CAN YOU ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT YOU FOUND OUT THERE? YES. SO, UM, THE, THE SITE HAS BEEN, UM, THE MINI WAREHOUSE HAS BEEN IN, IN, UH, ESTABLISHED, UH, FOR, FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW. [00:05:01] AND, UH, IF MY MEMORY DOES NOT, UH, FAIL ME, IT IS BEEN, UH, RENEW, UM, A FEW TIMES ALREADY AND EVERYTHING WAS UH, UH, CORRECT. AND THEN, UM, ON THE LAST, UM, UM, ON, ON MY SIDE VISIT, UM, I NOTICED SOME, UH, UH, DEFICIENCIES AND, UH, I MENTIONED THAT TO THE, TO THE APPLICANT. AND SO WHAT HAPPENED TOO IS THAT THE, THE PREVIOUS OWNER SOLD, SOLD THE PROPERTY. SO THESE, UH, ISSUES MAY HAVE HAPPENED DURING, DURING THIS TIME. SO ONCE THE, THE NEW OWNER, UH, UH, HAD, UH, THE, THE SITE, THEY WENT, THEY WENT IN AND, AND ACTUALLY I WENT IN AND, AND DID A, UM, I WAS WORKING WITH THEM AND THEY WERE ABLE TO ADDRESS THE DEFICIENCIES AND NOW EVERYTHING IS, IS IN COMPLIANCE. UH, THE SITE PLAN IS REFLECTIVE OF WHAT, WHAT IS ACTUALLY ON THE SITE. AND THEN THEY HAD SOME ISSUES WITH THE TREES AND, UH, UM, THEY ACTUALLY HAVE THE TREES NOW, SO THEY, THEY PLANTED ALL THE TREES AND, UH, THEY WERE A COUPLE OF, UM, UM, CONTAINERS THAT, THAT WERE THERE, BUT THEY WERE REMOVED TOO. SO I WAS WORKING WITH, WITH THEM TO GIVE THEM TIME, UM, IF, UH, YOU, IF YOU GO WITH COMPLIANCE, THAT THAT, THAT, UH, THEY TOOK CARE OF THAT AND, AND, UH, BASED ON MY PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE, WHEN PEOPLE COMPLY THAT THEY'RE GOING TO FOLLOW THAT. HENCE THE REASON WHY'RE RECOMMENDING, UH, A APPROVAL FOR, FOR THE, OKAY. THANK YOU. I UNDERSTAND IT A LITTLE BETTER NOW THAT I SEE THAT THERE'S A NEW OWNER AND THEY'VE BROUGHT IT INTO COMPLIANCE. I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER EIGHT? OKAY, WE WILL MOVE ALONG TO ITEM NUMBER NINE. UH, COMMISSIONER WHEELER. DOES THAT ONE NEED A BRIEFING OR A OKAY. DOES ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER NINE? OKAY, ITEM NUMBER 10. UM, COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH. I KNOW THAT WAS, I BELIEVE IT WAS BRIEFED LAST TIME. ARE THERE ANY UPDATES THAT WE NEED TO BE BRIEFED ON? OH, WE DIDN'T BRIEF IT. OKAY. WOULD YOU LIKE A BRIEFING ON IT? OKAY. GOOD MORNING. THIS IS CASES E 26 1 46. IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR DA DUPLEX DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ZONE R 10, A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SETON DRIVE, WEST OF HUMPHREY DRIVE, ABOUT 1.3 ACRES IN SIZE, LOCATED IN DISTRICT FOUR IN SOUTHERN DALLAS, UH, NEAR, UH, NEAR, UH, 9 45. UH, THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE SITE IN QUESTION. UM, IT'S A RATHER WIDE LOT. UH, THIS IS THE, UH, SETON DRIVE FRONTAGE, AND THEN HUMPHREY DRIVE IS ONE OF THOSE ROADS THAT SPLITS, SO HUMPHREY IS OVER HERE, AS WELL AS OVER HERE. THE ZONING IN THE AREA, IT'S PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY, OF COURSE, IT'S R 10 A FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. AND EVERYTHING ON THE SOUTHERN END OF SETON GOING NORTH, UH, PAST SETON GOES TO R SEVEN FIVE. THE AREA OF REQUEST IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. THE APPLICANT WISHES TO BUILD DUPLEXES AND AS SUCH, REQUESTS REZONING TO DA DUPLEX. UH, HERE'S SOME SITE PHOTOS OF THE AREA. THIS IS ON SETON AND HUMPHREY LOOKING, SORRY, LEMME GET THIS WINDOW OUT OF THE WAY. LOOKING WEST, THEN LOOKING NORTH, THEN LOOKING EAST WITH THE SITE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE PHOTO, LOOKING MORE TOWARDS THE SITE, THEN LOOKING SOUTH TOWARDS THE SITE, LOOKING SOUTHWEST AWAY FROM THE SITE, OR SORRY, TOWARDS THE SITE. THEN LOOKING NORTH AWAY FROM THE SITE. THAT'S HUMPHREY ROAD IN THE PHOTO, THEN LOOKING SOUTH ON HUMPHREY TOWARDS THE SITE. THEN ON HUMPHREY AND SETON. SO THIS IS WHERE IT JOGS DOWN ON THE SIDE AND LOOKING NORTH AWAY FROM NORTHEAST, AWAY FROM THE SITE. UH, THEN THESE, THERE'S SOME AERIALS I [00:10:01] TOOK. THIS IS OF THE SITE LOOKING SOUTH, THEN LOOKING SOUTHEAST, LOOKING EAST, LOOKING NORTH, NORTHWEST, AND THEN LOOKING NORTH, THIS IS WITH THE DRONE WAR ON THE SITE ITSELF. THAT'S HUMPHREY DRIVE, AGAIN ON THE NORTH THERE. THEN LOOKING WEST, SOUTH AND EAST, UH, THIS IS A COMPARISON OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SO THE SETBACKS, UH, THEY DO VARY A LITTLE BIT. UH, THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR DAS 25 RATHER THAN 30 FEET. HOWEVER, BLOCK FACE CONTINUITY WOULD IMPOSE A 30 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK. THE SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS CHANGE SLIGHTLY, WHERE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY USE, THEY'RE FIVE FEET ALL AROUND. FOR DUPLEX USE, IT'S FIVE FEET ON THE SIDE AND 10 FEET IN THE REAR. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE DOES DECREASE TO 6,000 SQUARE FEET. AND HEIGHT INCREASES 36 FEET AND LOT COVERAGE INCREASES TO 60%. IT IS, UH, IN FORWARD DALLAS 2.0. IT'S DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL. AND SO SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED ARE CONSIDERED PRIMARY USES WITHIN THAT, UH, DUPLEXES. AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT'S SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE, TWO OF THEM THAT ARE JOINED AT THE HIP. TYPICALLY, UH, THE USE IS APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE PLACE TYPE. UH, THE SETBACKS DO GENERALLY MIRROR THE R 10 A REQUIREMENTS, ESPECIALLY WITH THAT BLOCK FACE CONTINUITY REQUIREMENT. THERE ARE GREATER REAR YARD SETBACKS AND A ONE FOOT SMALLER SIDE YARD SETBACK. THE HEIGHT WOULD BE THE MAIN DEVIATION FROM THE PREDOMINANT ZONING AS WELL AS OF COURSE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE. UH, IT IS LOCATED ON A CORNER LOT, SO THAT INCREASES IN COMPATIBILITY IN OUR VIEW. UH, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL AND HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH, DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS? WELL, WE SPOKE YESTERDAY AND I, I DID ASK DID YOU HEAR BACK FROM, UM, MATTHEW? UH, I DID HEAR FROM THE, UH, APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE AND, UH, THEY HAD NOT PROVIDED ANY, UH, PROPOSALS FOR DEED RESTRICTIONS OR, UH, OTHER, UH, CHANGES TO THE APPLICATION. SO THEY HAVEN'T YET RECOMMENDED ANY NEW CHANGES. NO, MA'AM. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. BATE? COMMISSIONER CARPENTER? YES, MR. BATE. UM, THE STAFF REPORT MENTIONS THE WOODED EDGES OF THE SITE THAT REDUCE THE RISK OF INCOMPATIBILITY AS COMPARED WITH A MORE HEAVILY DEVELOPED AREA. IS THERE ANYTHING IN BASE CODE OR ANYTHING WITH THE CONDITIONS ON THIS SITE THAT WOULD DICTATE THAT THE THIS, UH, WOODED BUFFER IS GOING TO REMAIN? UH, UNFORTUNATELY THERE, THE WAY THAT ARTICLE 10 IS WRITTEN, THERE'S NOT A LOT THAT PROHIBITS THE CLEARING OF CERTAIN TREES ON THE SITE WHEN IT'S NOT, WHEN IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT. IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. UM, I WOULD POINT OUT THAT APPLIES WHETHER IT REMAINS AS R 10 OR IS REZONED TO DA. UH, THERE JUST AREN'T SUBSTANTIAL RULES THAT WOULD PREVENT, UH, REMOVAL OF TREES PRIOR TO FILING A BUILD PERMIT. IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, ONCE THEY FILE A BUILD PERMIT, THEY WOULD NEED TO COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 10 AND ANY, UH, TREE REMOVAL NEEDS TO BE MITIGATED. UH, BUT I BELIEVE THAT'S A CORRECT ASSESSMENT THAT THERE'S NOT A LOT IN THERE FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING LOTS, UM, BELOW A CERTAIN SIZE, UM, THAT INHERENTLY RESTRICTS, UH, TREE REMOVAL. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON ITEM NUMBER 10? OKAY, WE MOVE ON TO ITEM 11. UM, LOOKS LIKE COMMISSIONER KINGSTON'S GONNA BE JOINING US A LITTLE LATER, SO LET'S SKIP OVER THAT FOR RIGHT NOW. ITEM NUMBER 12, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DO YOU WANT A BRIEFING OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? UM, THERE, I'VE LEARNED THIS WEEK THAT THERE IS GOING TO, UH, BE A REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT TO HOLD THIS UNDER ADVISEMENT AND I'M DETERMINING THE DATE. OKAY, GREAT. THEN WE WILL FOREGO BRIEFING. UM, AND YOU'RE NEXT UP ON ITEM 13 AS WELL. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ANYONE ELSE QUESTIONS ON ITEM NUMBER 13? OKAY, ITEM NUMBER 14 IS GOING TO BE HELD TILL NOVEMBER 19TH, SO WE WILL FOREGO BRIEFING. ITEM NUMBER 15 IS, UM, ANOTHER DISTRICT 14 ITEM. SO WE WILL BRIEF THAT WHEN COMMISSIONER KINGSTON JOINS US AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND COMMISSIONER HALL ITEM NUMBER 16. WOULD YOU LIKE THAT ONE BRIEFED OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I DO HAVE QUESTIONS FOR. OKAY. [00:15:03] OH, I DON'T, I THINK HE MAY JUST HAVE QUESTIONS IF, YEAH. OKAY. OH, YOU READY FOR MY QUESTION? COMMISSIONER HALL, WHENEVER YOU'RE READY TO GO. SORRY. UH, THIS SEEMS LIKE A FAIRLY SIMPLE CASE. UH, JUST WAS SORT OF CURIOUS WHY IT WASN'T PUT ON CONSENT. I, IT, I UNDERSTAND IT'S BECAUSE STAFF RECOMMENDED, UM, LIKE ALL OF OUR SCHOOLS, UH, NO EXPIRATION ON IT, AND THE APPLICANT, UM, WANTED TO REQUEST A FIVE YEARS WITH FIVE YEAR AUTO RENEWAL. SO IT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN OPINION ON THE TIME PERIOD. OKAY. THAT WAS MY SECOND QUESTION. UH, THE APPLICANT ONLY ASKED FOR FOR FIVE YEARS, BUT STAFF RECOMMENDED, UH, NO, NO, NO DATE. UH, IT, IT IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL CASE AND I KNOW THAT THE TREND NOW IS TO GO TO NO, NO EXPIRATION DATE. UH, ANY, ANY REASON WHY THE APPLICANT WOULD WANT ONLY FIVE WHEN THEY COULD GET MORE? I WILL, UH, UH, PASS THAT, UH, QUESTION TO, TO THE APPLICANT. OKAY. I I'LL ASK MR. BALDWIN THIS AFTERNOON THEN. OKAY. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK, THANK YOU. AND COMMISSIONER KINGSTON'S JUST JOINED US AT 10 51. UM, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, DID YOU NEED ANY OF YOUR CASES UP TO DATE? BRIEFED. OKAY, GREAT. ALRIGHT, ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS? ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS ON ITEM 16? OKAY. UM, ON THE AUTHORIZATION OF A HEARING, I JUST HAD A COUPLE, IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL IF I JUST WALK US THROUGH THE MECHANICS, SO WHY THIS IS BEING DONE REAL QUICK. UM, AND IF, I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED A FULL BRIEFING THERE UNLESS COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN THINKS WE DO, BUT SINCE IT'S A LITTLE BIT UNUSUAL, SIR, HE'S SORRY, I WAS REFERRING TO 14 CASES. OH, IT'S OKAY. UM, MR. BLADES, I KNOW WE'RE RECONSIDERING THE AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN HEARINGS AND AUTHORIZING A NEW HEARING. CAN YOU JUST GIVE A ELEVATOR PITCH ON WHAT, WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? UH, YES. UH, CHAIR, UM, PATRICK BLADES, UH, CHIEF PLANNER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PLANNING. UM, IN SHORT, UH, TWO DIFFERENT AUTHORIZED HEARINGS. UM, UH, WERE AUTHORIZED IN THE KLEBERG AREA OF DALLAS, THAT'S FAR SOUTHEAST OF DALLAS. THEY WERE THE EAST AND THE WEST KLEBERG, UM, AUTHORIZED HEARINGS. UH, ONE STAFF WENT DOWN THERE TO HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE COMMUNITY. UM, THE COMMUNITY, UM, VOICED AN OPINION TO TAKE IT ALL TOGETHER AS ONE AUTHORIZED HEARING, UH, KIND OF LIKE WE DID IN SOUTH DALLAS WHERE WE'RE NOT DOING 14 DIFFERENT THINGS, WE'RE JUST DOING ONE, THE WHOLE COMMUNITY. UM, AND SO WE HAD CONVERSATIONS, UM, UH, WITH THE COMMISSIONER, UM, WITH THE ELECTED OFFICIALS. UM, EVERYBODY'S PRETTY MUCH ON THE SAME PAGE TO SAY YES. LET'S DE AUTHORIZE THE TWO SEPARATE ONES AND THEN AUTHORIZE ONE FOR THE, ALL, THE WHOLE AREA FOR ALL OF KLEBERG. GREAT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BLADES? FANTASTIC. AND THEN DID ANYONE WANT THE STREET NAME CHANGED? BRIEFED. OKAY. IT IS 10:53 AM AND THAT CONCLUDES THE, OH, COMMISSIONER WHEELER. OH, YOU CAN JUST TELL ME ABOUT YOUR CONFLICT OFFLINE. WE'RE, WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. ALRIGHT. IT IS 10:54 AM AND THAT CONCLUDES THE, UM, BRIEFING OF THE DALLAS CITY PLAN COMMISSION. WE'LL BE BACK AT 1230 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. ALRIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. IT IS [CALL TO ORDER] 12:30 PM ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2026. AND THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE DALLAS CITY PLAN COMMISSION. CAN WE START WITH A ROLL CALL PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS. DISTRICT ONE, COMMISSIONER SIMS, DISTRICT TWO. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. PRESENT DISTRICT THREE. VICE CHAIR HERBERT, DISTRICT FOUR. COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH. PRESENT DISTRICT FIVE. COMMISSIONER SERATO. PRESENT? DISTRICT SIX. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. PRESENT. DISTRICT SEVEN. COMMISSIONER WHEELER REAGAN. PRESENT? DISTRICT EIGHT. COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN PRESENT? DISTRICT NINE. COMMISSIONER C***S HERE. DISTRICT 10. COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT. PRESENT? DISTRICT 11. COMMISSIONER COX HERE. DISTRICT 12. COMMISSIONER KAUFMAN. HERE. DISTRICT 13. COMMISSIONER HALL HERE. DISTRICT 14. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON HERE AND PLACE 15 CHAIR RUBIN HERE YOU HAVE QUORUM, SIR. GREAT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. UM, JUST A FEW HOUSEKEEPING NOTES, PARTICULARLY FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVEN'T JOINED US TODAY. UH, BEFORE, UM, [00:20:01] WE GIVE, TYPICALLY OUR RULES ALLOW FOR THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER ON EACH CASE AND IF THERE IS OPPOSITION ON A CASE, OUR RULES ALLOW A TWO MINUTE REBUTTAL PERIOD FOR THE APPLICANT, ALTHOUGH WE DO HAVE THE ABILITY TO ADJUST THOSE TIMES AS NEEDED. UM, WHEN YOU DO GIVE YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE DO START WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND THERE ARE SOME YELLOW CARDS TO MY LEFT, YOUR RIGHT AT, UM, TO THE RIGHT OF THE PODIUM. AND PLEASE FILL THOSE OUT, UM, FOR ANY CASES THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING ON. SO WE HAVE A RECORD OF WHO'S, UM, GIVEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON A CASE TODAY. AND WITH THAT, WE [APPROVAL OF MINUTES:] WILL GET INTO OUR AGENDA. UH, COMMISSIONER HALL, CAN I GET A MOTION ON THE MINUTES? YES, MR. CHAIR. UM, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 20TH, 2026 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AS REVISED AND POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 2ND, 2026. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HALL FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KONZ FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE [Zoning Cases - Consent:] TO OUR ZONING CONSENT DOCKET. UH, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVEN'T, UM, AREN'T FAMILIAR WITH THAT, THAT IS, UM, A LIST OF ITEMS THAT WOULD BE TAKEN UP AND APPROVED OF PER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IN A SINGLE MOTION UNLESS ANY OF THEM ARE REMOVED. SO OUR DOCKET HAD EIGHT CASES, ITEMS ONE THROUGH EIGHT ON CONSENT, BUT SEVERAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED. SO OFF CONSENT RIGHT NOW AND THERE'LL BE CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 5, AND SIX. SO THAT LEAVES FOUR, SEVEN, AND EIGHT ON THE CONSENT DOCKET AND THEY'LL BE, UM, TAKEN UP AND APPROVED OF IN A SINGLE MOTION UNLESS THERE'S ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THOSE ITEMS, PARTICULARLY IN, IN OPPOSITION. DID DID YOU WANT ONE OF THEM TO BE PULLED OFF? CONSENT MR. RIG? OKAY, PERFECT. THEN MR. LEE, CAN YOU READ THE CONSENT DOCKET INTO THE RECORD? YES. UH, ITEM FOUR, AN APPLICATION FOR ONE TERMINATION OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 5 48 FOR INSTITUTION FOR A CHARITABLE AND PHILANTHROPY NATURE. AND TWO, A NEW SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE RECREATIONAL CENTER, CLUB OR AREA ON PROPERTY ZONE R FIVE, A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ON THE NORTH CORNER OF FELLOWS LANE AND WHOLE AVENUE STAFF. RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SITE PLANNING CONDITIONS. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, AND APPLICATION FOR A NEW SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A SELF SERVICE STORAGE ON PROPERTY ZONE SUBDISTRICT FOUR A WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT NUMBER 8 87 VALLEY VIEW, GALLERIA AREA SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MONFORT DRIVE, VALLEY VIEW AND VALLEY VIEW TRAIL, ALSO KNOWN AS 1 3 7 0 5 MONFORT DRIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL FOR A 30 YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO A SITE PLANNING CONDITIONS. AND ITEM EIGHT, AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 1606 FOR A MINI WAREHOUSE USE ON PROPERTY ZONE RR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT BETWEEN WALTON WALKER BOULEVARD AND DUNCANVILLE ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS 28 25 SOUTH WALTON WALKER BOULEVARD. STAFF RECOMMENDATION, APPROVAL FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR AUTO RENEWAL FOR ADDITIONAL FIVE YEAR PERIODS SUBJECT TO A SITE PLANNING CONDITIONS. THANK YOU MR. LEE. UH, SPEAKERS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. ANDREW REIG, 1341 WEST MOCKINGBIRD, UH, HERE TODAY TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER FOUR, UH, THE SUP FOR THE PRIVATE RECREATION CENTER IN PY. UM, OBVIOUSLY THIS IS ON A CONSENT AGENDA, SO YOU TYPICALLY NOT HEAR SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT, BUT I AM, UH, REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT AND WANTED TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS CASE AND LET THE COMMISSION KNOW. UM, THE, UH, PLAN FOR THIS. SO THIS IS, UH, OWNED BY THE MELISSA PIERCE PROJECT. UH, THIS IS A, UH, THERE WAS AN OLD HISTORICAL SCHOOL ON THIS SITE IN THE PY NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, MELISSA PIERCE PROJECT IN WORKING WITH SA RECYCLING, WHO IS ANOTHER, UH, COMMERCIAL OPERATOR IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, AND THE FUNDER FOR THIS, UH, PARTICULAR REC CENTER PROJECT. UM, WE'VE WORKED ON A PLAN WITH THEM AND A DESIGN FIRM, ARCO MURRAY, UH, TO PROVIDE THE JOI COMMUNITY WITH A NEW RECREATION CENTER, UM, AT THIS LOCATION. I HAD A COUPLE SLIDES, BUT WE DON'T HAVE TO GET INTO THOSE IF UNLESS THERE ARE QUESTIONS, I'M CERTAINLY HAPPY TO ANSWER 'EM. UM, BUT I DID JUST WANT TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT UM, THIS IS A [00:25:01] LONG TIME COMING FOR THE CHOPPY NEIGHBORHOOD AND UH, WITH SA RECYCLING AS THE, UM, INVESTMENT PARTNER IN THIS, UH, WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO A, UH, NEW REC CENTER FOR THE COMMUNITY COMING SOON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA? I THINK YOU NEED TO TURN ON. THERE YOU GO. OKAY, I GOT IT. GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M ANDREA GALLIMORE, 7 8 2 2 WHOLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS 7 5 2 1 6. UH, I'M HERE TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM, UH, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR. I AM THE FOUNDER AND CEO OF THE MELISSA PIERCE PROJECT, THE PRESIDENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IN JAPI AND FOURTH OF FIVE GENERATION RESIDENT OF JAPI. WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT, UM, THIS CASE. I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF THE SUP. IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING. LIKE ANDREW SAID, THE COMMUNITY IS 154 YEARS OLD, WE'RE CELEBRATING 155 YEARS NEXT YEAR AND WE'VE NEVER HAD A MULTIPURPOSE CENTER SLASH COMMUNITY CENTER. SO, UM, I WILL SAY THAT WITHOUT THIS ANGEL INVESTOR, UH, THIS WOULDN'T BE POSSIBLE. AND SO, UM, WE'VE HAD THE PROPERTY ABOUT FIVE YEARS NOW. WE'VE GONE THROUGH THE BROWNSVILLE'S GRANT WITH THE CITY OF DALLAS, FOUR YEARS, KIND OF HELD UP ON DIFFERENT THINGS, BUT I JUST WANT TO SAY THE IMPORTANCE OF, UM, GETTING THIS ZONING. WE, THE COMMUNITY, WE HAVE COMMUNITY MEMBERS HERE WITH US AND FULL SUPPORT AND, UH, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS YOLAND THOMAS. ADDRESS IS 46 47 LUON, UM, THREE OR FIVE GENERATIONS, UH, FROM JAPI. UM, WAS RAISED THERE. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT JAPI HAS BEEN GIVEN A MASSIVE AND A TREMENDOUS DONATION FOR THIS MULTIPURPOSE CENTER AND FOR 154 YEARS, THE CITY OF DALLAS HAS CONSISTENTLY OVERLOOKED JY. YOU GUYS HAVE NOT GIVEN US A GIFT, BUT WE HAVE SOMEONE THAT IS WILLING TO GIVE US A GIFT. SO I'M ASKING YOU GUYS IF YOU WILL ALLOW US TO ACCEPT THIS GIFT FOR A MULTIPURPOSE CENTER FOR JAPE TO BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD. UM, MY ONLY OTHER THOUGHT IS THAT FEEL TO ACT WHEN YOU HAVE THE POWER TO DO SO, CARRIES A MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. SO I DO HOPE AND I PRAY THAT YOU WOULD VOTE IN UH, SUPPORT OF THE MULTIPURPOSE CENTER. THANKS. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY. UH, AND WE WILL MOVE ON TO A MOTION ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA. CONSTITUENT ITEMS FOUR, SEVEN, AND EIGHT. COMMISSIONER WHEELER. YES. IN THE MATTER OF Z DASH 2 6 0 0 1 54 Z DASH 20 60 0 0 0 6 1 AND MATTER SEVEN DASH 2 5 0 0 1 7 1. I MOVE TO FOLLOW STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS OF APPROVAL, UM, SUBJECT TO THE, UM, CONDITIONS WITHIN THE DOCKET. OKAY, THANK YOU COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER REAL FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? UM, NO. OKAY. UM, NO, NO, NOT AT ALL. ALRIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL MOVE BACK TO ITEM ONE. ITEM ONE [1. 26-2841A An application for MF-2(A) Multifamily District on property zoned CR Community Retail District and R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the north line of Scyene Road and west line of N. Prairie Creek Road, AKA 3125 N. Prairie Creek Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Kittle Property Group / Jana Darmon Representative: Baldwin Associates / Robert Baldwin Planner: Wayne Powell Council District: 5 Z-26-000158] IS Z 2 6 0 0 0 1 5 8. IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR MF TWO, A MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ZONED CR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT AND R SEVEN FIVE, A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ON THE NORTH LINE OF S ROAD WEST AND THE WEST LINE OF NORTH PRAIRIE CREEK ROAD, UH, ALSO KNOWN AS 3 1 2 5 NORTH PRAIRIE CREEK ROAD. STAFF. RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL. THANK YOU MR. PEPE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER ONE? OKAY. ALRIGHT. NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER SERRA, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? YES, MR. CHAIR IN THE MATTER OF CASE Z 2 6 1 5 8. [00:30:01] I MOVE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AND PLACE THIS CASE UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL S SEPTEMBER 17TH. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER SARDA FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER COX FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSIONS SAYING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER TWO. [2. 26-2842A An application for a new Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a general merchandise or food store 3,500 square feet or less on property zoned RR Regional Retail District with D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, on the Southwest corner of Great Trinity Forest Way and Murdock Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a site plan and conditions. Applicant: Karim Pirani / Enigma Enterprises Inc. Representative: Robert Nunez Planner: Jason Pho Council District: 8 Z-26-000092] ITEM NUMBER TWO IS Z 2 6 0 0 0 0 9 2. IT'S AN APPLICATION FOR A NEW SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GENERAL MERCHANDISER FOOD STORE. 3,500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS ON PROPERTY ZONE RR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT ON THE ON D WITH D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GREAT ATTORNEY FOREST WAY AND MURDOCH ROAD STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SITE PLANNING CONDITIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU MR. PEPE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF ITEM TWO? ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? YES, MR. CHAIR IN THE MATTER OF Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 0 9 2. I MOVE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AND HOLD THIS MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL OCTOBER THE EIGHTH, 2026. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER THREE. UH, ITEM THREE, AN APPLICATION [3. 26-2843A An application for a new Specific Use Permit for an accessory community center (private) on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the northeast corner of Catalonia Drive and Galicia Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to site plan and conditions. Applicant: Tisha Vaidya Representative: Stephanie Murphy Planner: Justin Lee Council District: 8 Z-26-000122] FOR A NEW SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY COMMUNITY CENTER PRIVATE ON PROPERTY ZONE R DASH 7.5. A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CATA DRIVE IN GALACIA LANE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SITE PLANNING CONDITIONS. THANK YOU MR. LEE. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT ON ITEM NUMBER THREE? OH, COME ON DOWN. GOOD MO. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS ELLEN SIMPSON AND I'M SPEAKING REGARDING THE PROPOSED REZONING OF HACIENDA DEL. SO I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT THERE FOR 20 YEARS. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR FAMILY HOUSING, IF THAT IS CORRECT. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY REZONING IS NECESSARY AND CLARIFY PRECISELY WHAT ACTION THE CITY IS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE. WHAT SPECIFIC LAND USE CHANGE NECESS NECESSITATES THE PROPOSED RECKONING REZONING. DOES A PROPOSAL INCLUDE A COMMUNITY CENTER? IF SO, WHAT ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES WOULD IT PROVIDE? WOULD THE COMMUNITY CENTER SERVE ONLY HACIENDA DEL SOUL RESIDENTS? UH, WOULD IT BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC? WHAT CHANGES SHOULD NEIGHBORING RESIDENTS ANTICIPATE REGARDING TRAFFIC, PARKING, NOISE, SECURITY, AND HOURS OF OPERATION? WOULD THE PROPOSAL ALTER THE NUMBER TYPE OR DENSITY OF HOUSING UNITS? WHAT SAFEGUARDS WOULD ENSURE THAT THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED AND OPERATED AS REPRESENTED IN THE PROPOSAL? PLEASE, PLEASE CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON CURRENT RESIDENTS. WE DESERVE A CLEAR AND COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROPOSAL BEFORE BEING ASKED TO SUPPORT A ZONING CHANGE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. AND COULD YOU PROVIDE YOUR ADDRESS FOR OUR RECORDS? MY ADDRESS IS 1 1 4 0 LA RIOJA DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. YOU'RE SO WELCOME. ALRIGHT, ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? OKAY, NO SPEAKERS. WE'LL GO TO COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN FOR A MOTION. UH, THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. UH, IN THE MATTER OF Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 1 22, I MOVE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AND HOLD THIS MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 17TH, 2026. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN? UH, JUST REAL QUICKLY, I I DO APPRECIATE THE THE COMMENTS IN QUESTION, UH, BY THE SPEAKER. I MET WITH THE APPLICANT LAST WEEK VIA, UH, A PHONE CALL TO ASK THOSE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS AND TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF, UH, WHAT THEY WANNA DO HERE WITH THIS SUP. SO THE SUP IS SPECIFICALLY FOR A, A COMMUNITY CENTER WITHIN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. UH, THIS ISN'T A APARTMENT COMPLEX. THIS IS A COMMUNITY OF, I GUESS, BUILT TO RENT HOMES, [00:35:01] UH, THAT GUESS HAS BEEN OPERATIONAL FOR, FOR A WHILE NOW. AND, AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT HAS BEEN OPERATING AS A COMMUNITY CENTER, UM, BUT THEY'VE BEEN NON-COMPLIANT AND SO I JUST NEED TO GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. I NEED TO, YOU KNOW, GO VISIT THE SITE AND WE'RE COORDINATING THAT RIGHT NOW. GREAT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER TO HOLD THE CASE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 17TH. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER FIVE. ITEM NUMBER [5. 26-2845A An application for an amendment to and expansion of Tract 2 and Tract 3, and a new subdistrict within Planned Development No. 931 on property zoned MF-2(A) Multifamily District Planned Development No. 842 and Planned Development No. 931, on the north line of Bryan Street, between Greenville Avenue and Matilda Street, and on the southeast corner of N. Munger Boulevard and Bryan Street, AKA 5200 Bryan Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to amended conceptual plan and amended conditions. Applicant: Alaina Livingston / Munger Place Church Inc. Representative: Laura Lee Gunn / Masterplan Planner: Liliana Garza Council District: 14 Z-26-000131] FIVE IS KZ 26 DASH 0 1 3 1. AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TWO AND EXPANSION OF TRACK TWO AND TRACK THREE AND A NEW SUBDISTRICT WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT 9 31 ON PROPERTIES ZONE MF TWO A MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT 8 42 AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT 9 31 ON THE NORTH LINE OF BRYAN ST. STREET BETWEEN GREENVILLE AVENUE AND MATILDA STREET AND ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH MAGIR BOULEVARD AND BRYAN STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS 5,200 BRIAN ST. STREET. RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND AMENDED CONDITIONS. THANK YOU MS. GARZA. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM? OKAY, ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? I DO IN THE MATTER OF Z 2 6 0 0 0 1 3 1. I HAVE BEEN ASKED BY THE APPLICANT TO HOLD THIS UNTIL OCTOBER 8TH AND I AM SUPPORTIVE OF THAT REQUEST. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER KINGSTON FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KAUFMAN FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SAY NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER SIX. ITEM NUMBER [6. 26-2846A An application for amendments to Division 51A-7.900 of the Dallas Development Code to create a new subdistrict within the Downtown Special Provision Sign District (SPSD) and a reduction in area of the Downtown Perimeter Subdistrict within the Downtown SPSD on property zoned Subarea A, B, C, D and E of Subdistrict 68 within Planned Development No. 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on property bounded by McKinney Avenue, North Harwood Street, Olive Street and Woodall Rodgers Fwy., AKA 2000 McKinney Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. SSDAC Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: Catherine Zalatoris/ Texas Capital Representative: Laura Lee Gunn / Masterplan Planner: Liliana Garza Council District: 14 Z-26-000116] SIX, HIS KZ 26 0 0 0 1 1 6. AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO DIVISION 51 87 POINT 900 OF THE DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CODE TO CREATE A NEW SUBDISTRICT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN SPECIAL PROVISION SIGN DISTRICT AND A REDUCTION IN AREA OF THE DOWNTOWN PERIMETER SUBDISTRICT WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN SPSD ON PROPERTY ZONE SUB AREA. A-B-C-D-N-E OF SUBDISTRICT 68 WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT 1 93. THE OAK LAWN SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTY BOUNDED BY MCKINNEY AVENUE, NORTH HARWOOD STREET, OLIVE STREET AND WOOD ROGERS FREEWAY. ALSO KNOWN AS TWO 200 NO. 2000. 2000. 2000, SORRY. 2000 MCKINNEY AVENUE STAFF. RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU MS. GARZA. MR. CROWLEY, UH, CARL CROWLEY, 1341 WEST MOCKINGBIRD, SUITE 1 0 7. I'VE HAD TOO MANY ADDRESSES IN MY HEAD OVER THE YEARS. UM, UM, WE HAVE LOTS OF SPEAKERS BUT THEY DECIDED THEY DON'T WANT TO SPEAK AND THAT'S PROBABLY FINE WITH Y'ALL. UM, WE ALSO HAVE A SPEAKER LINE THAT HE DOESN'T NEED TO SPEAK 'CAUSE HE'S A TECHNICAL GUY. I WANT TO THANK MS. KINGSTON. IS IS GONNA HAVE A DIFFERENT MOTION, NOT NOT A DIFFERENT MOTION, BUT SOME CLARIFYING MOTIONS, SOME DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS AND STUFF. AND WE'VE, WE, WE PULLED THE SKIN OFF WHERE WE WANT TO ATTACH THIS SIGN TOO. AND WE NEED TO RAISE THE HEIGHT TWO FEET BECAUSE WE NEED TO ATTACH IT TO SOMETHING A LITTLE MORE SOLID. SO THAT'S PART OF HER MOTION AND STUFF. BUT OTHERWISE WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM TEXAS CAPITAL WHO'S THE APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE FROM CRESCENT, WHO IS THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING. AND THEN WE HAVE LOTS OF TECHNICAL PEOPLE THAT CAN EXPLAIN WONDERFUL THINGS ABOUT, UH, LUON, WHICH IS A SIGHTING AND TICKER SIGNS OR MOTION CHANGEABLE. MESSAGE SIGNS PLEASE. THEY'RE NOT REALLY TICKER SIGNS, SO OTHERWISE WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU MR. CRAWLEY. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT? SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION. OKAY. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? I DO. AND IT, IT'S A LITTLE BIT LENGTHY. WE'RE TRYING TO GET THROUGH THE TECHNICAL STUFF WITH THESE NEW TYPES OF SIGNS. SO, UM, IN THE MATTER OF Z 2 6 0 0 0 1 1 6, I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, APPROVE THE SIGN SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING. CHANGES IN SUBSECTION B SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ IN GENERAL, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION. THE PROVISION OF THE DOWNTOWN PERIMETER SUBDISTRICT APPLY IF THERE'S A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TEXT OF THIS, THIS TEXT OF THIS SECTION CONTROLS, UM, SUBSECTION D SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ SIGN PERMIT PERIOD. A CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN REQUIRES A PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBSECTION PERIOD. SUBSECTION E TWO SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ A CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN MAY BE ATTACHED TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE BUILDING FACADES AND MAY WRAP AROUND THE BUILDING CORNER. A CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN THAT WRAPS AROUND A BUILDING CORNER [00:40:01] IS CONSIDERED ONE SIGN. SUBSECTION FOUR SHOULD BE CHANGED 20 FEET TO 22 FEET IN HEIGHT. ADD SUBSECTION SIX. NO SIGN MAY BE USED FOR OFF-PREMISE ADVERTISING. ADD SUBSECTION SEVEN. ONLY ONE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN IS PERMITTED IN THIS DISTRICT UNDER SUBSECTION EIGHT, A SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ IN CASE OF MALFUNCTION. A CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN MUST CONTAIN A DEFAULT MECHANISM THAT FREEZES THE IMAGE IN ONE POSITION. SUBSECTION B ONE SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ FROM DAWN UNTIL DUST NO ILL ILLUMINATED, CHANGEABLE MESSAGE, SIGN MAY HAVE LUMINANCE GREATER THAN 6,500 NETS. THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE LUMINANCE SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ANY PREMISE OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OTHER THAN AN ALLEY. SUBSECTION TWO SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ FROM DAWN UNTIL DUST, NO ILLUMINATED, CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN MAY HAVE AN ILLUMINANCE GREATER THAN 300 NETS. THE MESSAGE, SORRY. THE MEASUREMENTS OF ILLUMINANCE SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ANY PREMISE OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OTHER THAN AN ALLEY OUTSIDE THIS DISTRICT, UH, SUBSECTION, I'M SORRY, SUBSECTION EIGHT E SHOULD BE DELETED. SUBSECTION EIGHT C 11:00 PM SHOULD BE CHANGED TO 10:00 PM AND THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER KINGSTON? I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. YES. YOU MADE A COUPLE REFERENCES TO A DISTRICT, INCLUDING ONLY ONE CHANGE OF MESSAGE SIGN MAY BE, UM, ALLOWED IN THIS DISTRICT. SHOULD THAT BE REFERRING TO A SUB-DISTRICT? YES, IT SHOULD. OKAY, THANK YOU. HARD TO DO THIS ON THE FLY SOMETIMES WITHOUT READING. ALRIGHT, SO YOU'LL TAKE THAT AS A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT. I WILL DO THAT. OKAY. AND I'LL GET THAT CHANGED TO STAFF. GREAT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? MS. MORRISON, DO YOU HAVE WHAT YOU NEED THERE? I MEAN, I THINK I, I'VE LISTENED TO IT ALL AND I I UNDERSTAND IT ALL, BUT YOU KNOW, IF YOU COULD SEND IT TO US, UM, SEND IT TO ME AND STAFF, THAT'D BE GREAT. I WILL. OKAY. OKAY, GREAT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ALL ITEM NUMBER NINE. [9. 26-2849A An application for a new subdistrict for specified non-residential uses within Planned Development No. 605, on the south line of Samuell Boulevard, east of Freestone Circle. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Andrew Ruegg / Masterplan U/A From: June 25, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 7 Z-26-000059] GOOD AFTERNOON. ITEM NINE IS CASE Z 26 0 0 0 5 9. AN APPLICATION FOR NEW SUBDISTRICT FOR SPECIFIED NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT. 6 0 5 ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAMUEL BOULEVARD EAST TO FREESTONE CIRCLE. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWING A SCREENING WALL ON THE NORTHWESTERN PART OF THE SITE, SEPARATING THE PARKING LOT FROM THE FIRE LANE AND SETBACK AND CONDITIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU MR. BATE. MR. RIG. GOOD AFTERNOON. ANDREW RIG 1341 WEST MOCKINGBIRD. UM, REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT, MAVIS TIRE ON THIS. UM, THIS IS A SITE, UH, NEAR THE JOVI'S DEVELOPMENT AT BUCKNER AND SAMUEL. UM, WE'RE PROPOSING AN AUTO SERVICE CENTER USE, WHICH IS PRETTY MUCH LIKE A MINOR AUTO REPAIR USE IN THE DALLAS CODE. UH, JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND ON MAVIS TIRE. THEY'RE AN EXPANDING NATIONAL BRAND. UM, THEY'VE RECENTLY ACQUIRED NTB UM, TIRES AND HAVE REBRANDED SEVERAL, SEVERAL OF THEIR STORES IN DFW AND ALSO DONE, UM, SOME NEW CONSTRUCTION, UH, STORES AS WELL. UM, THEY HAVE A VERY, UH, AESTHETICALLY PLEASING PRODUCT. WE'VE HAD SEVERAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS ON THIS ITEM AND UM, ADDED SOME ADDITIONAL SCREENING WALL SINCE, UH, AN ADDITIONAL SCREENING WALL SINCE WE ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL. UM, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. RIG. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT ON ITEM NINE? SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, COMMISSIONER WHEELER, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION IN THE MATTER OF EACH DASH 2 6 0 0 5 9? I MOVE TO CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND IT'S CALLED STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, UH, SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITION LISTED IN THE DOCKET. [00:45:01] UM, DOES THAT AS MR. BATE READ INTO THE RECORD AS HE READ INTO THE RECORD? PERFECT. THANK YOU. UH, COMMISSIONER WHEELER FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER HALL FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? YES. UM OH, OH GREAT. OKAY. YOU FIRST THEN WE'LL GO TO COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. UM, WE, WE WERE, WE HAD A COMMUNITY MEETING, UM, FOR THE MOST PART. UH, MAVIS TIRE EXPRESSED TO US THAT THEY, UM, THE OPERATIONS AND ALSO, UH, THEIR WILLINGS TO WORK WITH SOME OF THE SCHOOLS. UM, SKYLINE HAS A PROGRAM THAT ACTUALLY OFFERS AUTO MECHANIC. EASTFIELD ALSO HAS, IT HAS ONE CLOSE BY THAT ACTUALLY, UM, SOME OF THE STUDENTS GO OVER AND THEIR INTEREST IN ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN BEING A PART OF THE COMMUNITY, UM, UM, GAVE US GREAT HOPE BECAUSE AS WE TOLD THEM THAT THE COMMUNITY NEEDS MORE THAN JUST AGREEMENTS. WE NEED THOSE TO, TO PUT INTEREST INTO OUR STUDENTS AND OUR KIDS AND OUR FUTURE. AND THEY WERE WILLING TO DO, DO THAT ALSO. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER WHEELER. UH, COMMISSIONER CARPENTER? YES. I HAD A QUESTION FOR MR. RUAG IF I UNDERSTOOD YOU CORRECTLY. UM, YOU WERE SAYING THAT YOU HAD ENHANCED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SCREENING WALLS AFTER A COMMUNITY MEETING. I DON'T SEE ANY CHANGE TO THE LANGUAGE IN THE PD. WE HAVE THE, UH, CHANGE, UH, LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS CIRCULATED. SO THERE'S A, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING, WE HAVE AN ADDITIONAL SCREENING WALL AND THEN THERE'S ALSO A SCREENING WALL REQUIRED ON THE PERIMETER. OKAY. UH, THAT'S NOT BUILT YET, BUT IT'S REQUIRED WHEN ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT COMES THROUGH. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WHEELER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER 10. ITEM [10. 26-2850A An application for D(A) Duplex District on property zoned R-10(A) Single Family District, on the southwest corner of Seaton Drive and Humphrey Drive. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Juan Rankin [KJBJ Enterprises LLC], Antonio Everette [AE Equity Group LLC] Representative: Matthews Meals / Verdunity U/A From: August 20, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 4 Z-26-000146] 10 IS CASE Z 2 6 0 0 0 1 46. AN APPLICATION FOR DA DUPLEX DISTRICT AND PROPERTIES OWNED. R 10, A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SETON DRIVE AND HUMPHREY DRIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVAL. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT? CAN YOU TURN THE MICROPHONE ON? THERE WE GO. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME'S ANTONIO EVERETT, 500 FOREST STONES, LOUISVILLE, TEXAS. UM, I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND I JUST CAME TODAY TO JUST ASK FOR IT TO BE APPROVED AS ORIGINALLY STATED. UH, IT'S A GREAT PIECE OF PROPERTY. UM, I'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN HOUSING IN DALLAS FOR A LONG TIME. UH, IT'S ZONED RTN, WE WANT TO GET IT REZONED TO R FIVE SO WE CAN DO FIVE DUPLEXES AND WE WANT SPECIFICALLY TO DO FRONT ENTRY. UH, REAR ENTRY GARAGES WILL ON A DUPLEX ON A 50 WIDE LOT WILL LEAD TO NO BACKYARD. SO IT'LL BE A LOT OF FAMILIES WHO WOULDN'T WANNA BUY PROPERTY WITH NO BACKYARD, WITH LOSS OF BEING ABLE TO HAVE FAMILY EVENTS. UM, AND THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT, JUST ASKING FOR IT TO SUPPORT IT AS IS, UH, ORIGINALLY WRITTEN. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM? ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? I BELIEVE THERE'S ONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ONLINE. ARE THEY THERE? NOT ONLINE. OKAY. THEN WE WILL GO TO COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH FOR A MOTION IN THE MATTER OF CASE NUMBER Z 26 0 0 0 1 46. I MOVE TO DENY THE APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. GREAT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH, UH, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT, ANY COMMENTS? MY CONCERN IS NOT NECESSARILY WITH THE, UH, DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL, BUT THAT THE SURROUNDING AREA HAS SMALLER LOT SIZES AND ALLOWING THE DUPLEX HERE WOULD GRANT GREATER DWELLING UNIT DENSITY THAN WHAT IS PREDOMINANT PREDOMINANT IN THE AREA. AND IN ADDITION TO SOME DESIGN CONCERNS, I HAVE A DUPLEX DISTRICT WILL ALLOW GREATER MAXIMUM HEIGHT THAN WHAT IS PREDOMINANT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. I FEAR THAT THIS PROPOSAL WOULD HAVE A NET NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE HOMES IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? UM, I, I'LL JUST BRIEFLY COMMENT. I THINK THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A CHALLENGING CASE AS WE SEE THESE SOMETIMES WHERE PEOPLE COME IN WITH AN APPLICATION [00:50:01] FOR DUPLEXES AND AN AREA THAT YOU KNOW, IS PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY. MY CONCERN IS NOT NECESSARILY THE, THE LOT SIZE BEING SMALLER, BUT IT'S THAT THERE IS SOME THINGS THAT ARE DUPLEX WHERE, YOU KNOW, THAT ARE ALLOWED THAT JUST AREN'T VERY, UM, THAT ARE PROBLEMATIC WHEN IT COMES TO FRONT LOADING AND SORT OF HOW THE DUPLEXES ARE ORIENTED AND SOME HEIGHT ISSUES. ALTHOUGH THAT'S NOT SUPER SIGNIFICANT TO ME AND I AM REALLY HOPEFUL THAT IN OUR CODE REWRITE WE WILL WORK HARD ON DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DUPLEXES AS WELL AS OTHER, YOU KNOW, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SO WE FIGURE OUT A WAY TO ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS. UM, I THINK THEY DID A VERY NICE JOB ON IT IN PD 5 95, UM, WHEN WE DID THAT AUTHORIZED HEARING. AND I WOULD HOPE THAT WE, WE TREND IN THAT DIRECTION WHEN WE DO THE CODE REWRITE BUT WITHOUT, YOU KNOW, DEED RESTRICTIONS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO ADDRESS IT. UM, I'M NOT THRILLED TO SUPPORT THE MOTION JUST BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE THE APPLICANT WANTS TO DEVELOP SOME HOUSING ON A VACANT LOT, BUT I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE A LITTLE MORE ADJUSTMENT THERE. I'D ALSO, YOU KNOW, BE FINE IF THERE IS ROOM TO NEGO, YOU KNOW, GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD TO, TO HOLD IT. BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S BEEN DISCUSSIONS AND THERE HASN'T BEEN MUCH MOVEMENT. SO THAT'S WHERE I LAND. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER WHEELER? UM, I, I WOULD WANNA OFFER A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT OR A POSSIBLE, UM, IF, IF ABLE SO TO HOLD IT BECAUSE IT IS HOUSING. UM, BUT I, I DO UNDERSTAND WHEN IT COMES TO GROSSLY INCOMPATIBLE HOUSING OR HOUSING THAT DOESN'T FIT THE CURRENT COMMUNITY, UM, AND WE, WE DO NEED ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS. UM, AND SEEING IS THERE A OPPORTUNITY TO, BEFORE WE, ARE YOU MAKING A MOTION TO HOLD? YES MA'AM. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION. ALRIGHT, WE ARE ON THE MOTION TO HOLD. IS THERE FURTHER, DO YOU HAVE A DATE IN MIND? COMMISSIONER WHEELER? UM, HOLD JUST ONE MORE MEETING TO SEE IF WE CAN OKAY. THE, THE APPLICANT CAN, CAN KIND OF COME TO SOME CONCLUSIONS. I MEAN COME TO SOME, SOME TYPE OF RESOLVE WITH WHAT THE COMMUNITY WANTS. I DON'T THINK THAT THE COMMUNITY DOESN'T WANT IT. I THINK THEY JUST DON'T WANT THE DESIGN. ALRIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION TO HOLD UNTIL SEPTEMBER 17TH. ANY ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER HAMPTON? I'M TRYING TO RECONCILE THE REQUEST BEFORE US AS DUPLEX. I HEARD THE, UM, OWNER SAY THAT HIS INTENT WAS R FIVE. I THINK IF I'M UNDERSTANDING THE SUGGESTION TO HOLD IS TO SEE IF THERE'S SOME ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THOSE TWO ADJUSTMENTS THAT COULD BE MADE. BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD, UM, POTENTIALLY REQUIRE A REIFICATION FOR THE CASE. I JUST MAY THAT AS A QUESTION FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY. I'M GONNA, I DON'T BELIEVE SO BECAUSE I THINK R FIVE WOULD BE LESS INTENSE. BUT I DID HEAR HIM SAY HE WANTS, ACTUALLY CAN WE BRING HIM DOWN TO, TO CLARIFY? I'M JUST GIVE CLARIFY. THANK YOU. THAT'S AN EXCELLENT POINT. MR. CHAIR. SIR, YOU WANNA I'M, I'M SORRY I MISSPOKE. IT'S R 10 AND WE WANNA GET IT REZONED FOR DUPLEXES. OKAY, SO NOT NOT SINGLE FAMILY WITH A FIVE? NO. OKAY. BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY ZONED R 10. OKAY, SOUNDS GOOD. AND THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION 'CAUSE I THOUGHT I HEARD A DIFFERENT ZONING TYPES, SO THAT'S HELPFUL. ALRIGHT, ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION TO HOLD? I DO. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, I'D LIKE TO ASK COMMISSIONER GILBERT SMITH HA HAS THERE BEEN DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT ABOUT ANY POTENTIAL DESIGN, UH, ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS ABOUT DESIGN STANDARDS? YES. WERE WAS WAS IT REFUSED? YES. OKAY, THEN I WON'T BE SUPPORTING THE MOTION TO, UM, PUT IT UNDER ADVISEMENT. I, I'M GONNA JUST FOLLOW UP WITH THE, THE APPLICANT. I, I JUST, WOULD IT BE FRUITFUL TO HOLD THIS AND HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSIONS FOR THE NEXT TWO WEEKS OR IT, IT WOULD BE FRUITFUL BECAUSE THE DISCUSSION WASN'T, WASN'T ABOUT THE DESIGN, IT WAS ABOUT REAR ENTRY VERSUS FRONT ENTRY GARAGE AND REAR ENTRY GARAGE CAUSES A COMPLETE ISSUE ALSO WITH SANITATION. LIKE IT'S NOT IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE CITY'S DALLAS MOVEMENTS OF HAVING TRASH PICKED UP IN THE FRONT. SO IT'S REALLY ABOUT FRONT VERSUS REAR ENTRY GARAGE, NOT ABOUT THE DESIGN. OKAY. AND I, I UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, I THINK WHEN WE THINK ABOUT IT AROUND THIS HORSESHOE FRONT VERSUS REAR ENTRE ENTRY IS A DESIGN CRITERIA AND THAT WE CONSIDER, YOU KNOW, OTHER THINGS THAT WE CONSIDER, YOU KNOW, WHERE [00:55:01] THE, I'M NOT GONNA GIVE A COMPREHENSIVE LIST, BUT LIKE WHERE THE FRONT DOORS ARE AND WHETHER THE FRONT DOORS ARE ACTUALLY FACE THE STREET OR OFTENTIMES THEY'RE TUCKED AWAY. ARE THOSE, YOU KNOW, IS, IS THAT AN ITEM YOU'D BE WILLING TO DISCUSS AND ABSOLUTELY CONSIDER? ABSOLUTELY. AND THINGS LIKE HEIGHT? ABSOLUTELY. OKAY. MY MAIN PROPONENT WAS NOT TAKING ON ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR REAR ENTRY GARAGES AND THEN THE ISSUES THAT IT WILL CAUSE AND THEN THE LACK OF HOMEOWNERS WANTING TO BUY A HOUSE WITH NO BACKYARD. OKAY. I WILL SAY PERSONALLY I AM, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES FRONT ENTRY GARAGES ARE NEEDED, BUT I AM NOT A FAN OF THEM AND YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANNA SPEAK FOR ANYONE ELSE IN THIS BODY, BUT IT DOES SOUND LIKE THERE MAY BE ROOM FOR, FOR DISCUSSION ON, ON OTHER ITEMS. YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT THE PERFECT TO BE THE ENEMY OF THE GOOD HERE, SO I AM COMFORTABLE WITH WITHHOLDING IT FOR AN ADDITIONAL TWO WEEKS TO SEE WHERE WE CAN GET COMMISSIONER WHEELER. I CAN SAY THAT DURING OUR DESIGN PHASE, THAT WAS SOMETHING BROUGHT IN BECAUSE TRADITIONALLY IN MOST OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS THE, OUR LOTS WIDTH IS ABOUT 50 TO 55, UM, SQUARE, UH, FEET WIDE. AND SO, UM, THAT'S WHY MAYBE WORKING DIRECTLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER AND THE APPLICANT, UM, TO KINDA GIVE THAT KINDA INSIGHT. BUT THAT WAS DEFINITELY ONE OF OUR CONCERNS IN OUR DUPLEX DISTRICTS. HOW DO WE MAKE THAT COMPROMISE? AND WE DID, DID, WHEN WE WERE ABLE TO DO THAT, AND I DON'T NECESSARILY WANNA JUST THROW THE CASE AWAY BECAUSE MEAN DENY BECAUSE WE COULDN'T COME TO SOME TYPE OF RESOLVE BECAUSE WE DO NEED THAT. BUT, UM, YEAH, AND WE HAVE, WE HAVE UM, UM, MR. UM, BLADE HERE WHO HELPED US CREATE THAT, THAT THAT HELP COME TO RESOLVE. AND I THINK THE FRONT DOOR IS, UM, ON A 50 FOOT WIDE LOT, IT IS VERY HARD TO HAVE, UM, REAR FACE ANYWHERE IN THE CITY. IT'S HARD TO HAVE REAR FACING WITHOUT ALLEY AND THAT EXTRA COST OF HAVING TO PUT THAT ALLEY IN IT IS VERY HARD TO DO THAT. UM, BECAUSE MOST OF OUR ALLEYS IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE UNAPPROVED. AND SO, UM, I I WOULD, I WOULD LOVE TO WORK WITH HER AND WITH THE APPLICANT TO SEE WHAT THAT IS. ALRIGHT, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM OR I GUESS WE'RE ON THE MOTION CHAIR? UH, YES. COMMISSIONER HERBERT? YES. UM, I THANK YOU. UM, THERE WAS A, IT'S A VERY UNIQUE SPOT AND I DON'T EVEN THINK THE ALLEY IS AVAILABLE. UM, OR COULD BE BUILT LOOKING AT THE SURROUNDING USES. UH, AND SOME USES USES THAT MAY NOT EVEN BE, UH, BEING USED AS RESIDENTIAL. UM, THAT WOULD BLOCK ACCESS TO ANY TYPE OF ALLEY BEING BUILT. UM, SO I WOULD SUPPORT TO MOTION TO HAVE A BETTER LOOK AT IT WITH, UM, THE COMMISSIONER. OKAY, THANK YOU VICE CHAIR HERBERT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION TO HOLD IT UNTIL OUR NEXT MEETING BY COMMISSIONER WHEELER THAT I SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER 10. ITEM NUMBER [11. 26-2851A An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2576 for an alcoholic beverage establishment limited to a bar, lounge, or tavern and commercial amusement (inside) limited to a dance hall, on property zoned Planned Development District No. 619 with H/48 Harwood Historic District Overlay, on the southwest corner of N. Harwood Street and Pacific Avenue, AKA 1930 Pacific Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Approval for a ten-year period, subject to amended conditions. Representative: Deborah Kelley-Hill / Club Vivo U/A From: July 23, 2026 and August 20, 2026. Planner: Liliana Garza Council District: 14 Z-26-000118] 11 IS CASE Z 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 18. AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT 25 76 FOR AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT LIMITED TO A BAR, LOUNGE OR TAVERN AND COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INSIDE, LIMITED TO A DANCE HALL ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED ALONE, DISTRICT SIX 19 WITH A HISTORIC 48 HARWOOD HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH HARWOOD STREET AND PACIFIC AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN AS 1930 PACIFIC AVENUE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONDITIONS. THANK YOU MR. MARTINEZ. THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN SANTOS MARTINEZ 24 89 CAMINO PLATA LOOP, NORTHEAST RIO RANCHO, NEW MEXICO, 8 7 1 4 4 HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THIS CASE. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT? ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION IN THE MATTER OF Z 2 6 0 0 0 1 1 8? I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UM, APPROVE THE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING, CHANGE THE TIME LIMIT FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL EXPIRE IN TWO YEARS INSTEAD OF 10 AND THERE ARE NO AUTOMATIC RENEWALS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON FOR YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER COX. ANY DISCUSSION? JUST BRIEFLY? UM, THIS CASE WAS BEFORE US, UH, ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO. UM, IT WAS FAIRLY [01:00:01] CONTROVERSIAL. THE OPERATOR HAD A LOT OF, UM, CRIMINAL INCIDENTS HAPPENING AT AND AROUND THE SITE. IN MY ESTIMATION, THE OPERATORS MADE SOME GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO IMPROVE ITS OPERATIONS, UM, INCLUDING SOME ADDITIONAL SECURITY MEASURES AND THE STATISTICS BEAR THAT OUT. AND SO I'D LIKE TO GIVE THEM SOME TIME TO SEE THAT THOSE, TO HAVE THOSE CHANGES REMAIN IN EFFECT AND SEE HOW THEY DO OVER A COUPLE YEARS BEFORE WE LOOK AT ANY KIND OF LONGER TERM SUP. THANK YOU. GREAT, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS? ITEM COMMISSIONER CARPENTER? IS THIS SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONDITIONS? THERE WERE SOME TEXT CHANGES IN THE SUP CONDITIONS. YES, EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOR THE TIME PERIOD. TIME PERIOD, YEAH. THANK YOU. GREAT, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COX TO APPROVE, BUT FOR A TWO YEAR PERIOD, NO AUTOS SUBJECT TO AMENDED CONDITIONS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. ITEM NUMBER [12. 26-2852A An application for a new Specific Use Permit for a bar, lounge, or tavern on property zoned Tract A within Planned Development District No. 269, Deep Ellum/Near East Side District, on the south line of Elm Street, west of N. Crowdus Street, AKA 2650 Elm Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a site plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Sweet Bar Dallas / Marvin Regalado U/A From: August 6, 2026 and August 20, 2026. Planner: Justin Lee Council District: 2 Z-26-000135] 12, UH, AN APPLICATION FOR A NEW SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A BAR, LOUNGE OR A TAVERN ON PROPERTY ZONE. TRACK A WITH PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 6 9 DEEP ELM SLASH NEAR EAST SIDE DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF ELM STREET, WEST OF NORTH CRAUS STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS 26 50 ELM STREET STAFF. RECOMMENDATIONS, APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONS. THANK YOU MR. LEE. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT OF ITEM NUMBER 12? SIR, ARE YOU HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM IN THE COWBOYS HAT? IN THAT'S, THAT IS OSCAR'S CASE SO HE CAN TALK TO HIM ABOUT IT. OKAY. THEY'RE GONNA GO. OKAY, GREAT. ALRIGHT, UM, NO SPEAKERS ON ITEM NUMBER 12. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DID YOU HAVE A MOTION? I DO AND I HAVE BRIEF COMMENTS IF I HAVE A SECOND IN THE MATTER OF Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 3 5 I MOVE TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN IN, UM, HOLD THIS MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 17TH. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HAMPTON FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KAUFMAN FOR YOUR SECOND, YOUR COMMENTS. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. UM, WE HAD HELD THIS CASE, UM, FROM OUR LAST MEETING TO ALLOW FOR SOME FOLLOW UP, UM, DISCUSSION WITH THE COMMUNITY THAT MEETING WAS HELD. UM, SUBSEQUENT TO THAT THE APPLICANT TEAM, UM, HAS NEW REPRESENTATION ON BOARD AND TO ALLOW THEM TIME, UM, TO UM, GET UP TO SPEED ON THE CASE AND UM, HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE COMMUNITY. WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THIS BE HELD. UM, I HOPE MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, UM, WILL SUPPORT THE MOTION AND WE, UM, ARE CERTAINLY HOPEFUL THAT WHEN WE COME BACK THIS WILL BE MOVING FORWARD. THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. UM, HAMPTON, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? WE HAVE A MOTION TO HOLD TILL NINE 17. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY OF THE MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 13, ITEM [13. 26-2853A An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2019 for a bar, lounge, or tavern and an inside commercial amusement limited to a live music venue, on property zoned Tract A within Planned Development District No. 269, the Deep Ellum/Near East Side District, on the south line of Elm Street, west of N. Crowdus Street, AKA 2640 Elm Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Danny Balis Representative: Audra Buckley Planner: Jacob Rojo Council District: 2 Z-26-000157] 13, CASE Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 1 57. AND APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2019 FOR A BAR, LOUNGE OR TAVERN AND AN INSIDE COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT LIMITED TO A LIVE MUSIC VENUE ON PROPERTY ZONE. TRACK A WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 69, THE DEEP ELM NEAR EAST SIDE DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF ELM STREET, WEST OF NORTH CROWDED STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS 26 40 ELM STREET. THANK YOU MR. ROHO. MS. BUCKLEY. HELLO, AUDRA BUCKLEY. 1414 BELLEVUE STREET, SUITE ONE 50, DALLAS, TEXAS 7 5 2 1 5. WE APPRECIATE [01:05:01] THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE SUP, BUT WE'RE GONNA ASK THAT IT FOLLOW THE LEASE LENGTH, WHICH IS FOUR YEARS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M AVAILABLE. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT? SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? I DO. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR IN THE MATTER OF Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 5 7. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT'S, UM, RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR A FOUR YEAR PERIOD. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HAMPTON FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER COX FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NATHAN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 14, ITEM 14 AND APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC, OH, SORRY. ITEM [14. 26-2854A An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2021 for a motor vehicle fueling station on property zoned NMU Neighborhood Mixed Use Subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 595, the South Dallas/Fair Park Special Purpose District, on the south corner of S. Central Expy and Elsie Faye Heggins Street, AKA 4707 S. Central Expy. Staff Recommendation: Approval for a three-year period, subject to staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Fahmina Pervaiz Planner: Jacob Rojo Council District: 7 Z-26-000114] 14 Z DASH 26 DASH 0 1 14. AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 2021 FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING STATION ON PROPERTY ZONE NMU NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 5 9 5. THE SOUTH DALLAS FAIR PARK SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH CORNER OF SOUTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY IN LC FAY HAGIN STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS 47 0 7 SOUTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. GREAT, THANK YOU MR. ROHO. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 14? GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS IS MAHEEN PURVEY SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. 1302 TOWN COLONY DRIVE. THIS IS A GAS STATION THAT'S BEEN OPERATING FOR MANY YEARS SINCE 2013. IT WAS AN AUTO REMU RENEW PERMIT, BUT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE TENANT WALKED OUT, WE'RE HAVING TO, THE AUTORENEW DATE WAS MISSED AND WE'RE HAVING TO REAPPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. SO WE HOPE THAT THIS, UH, MOTION IS APPROVED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF ITEM 14? ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? COMMISSIONER WHEELER, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION IN, IN THE ITEM Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 1 1 4. I MOVE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN, UM, UNTIL OUR, OUR SECOND MEETING IN NOVEMBER, WHICH IS THE 19TH. THE 19TH IS THERE A SECOND? OKAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. ANY DISCUSSION? UM, YES, WE'RE MOVING TO, TO HOLD OFF FOR THAT LONG BECAUSE, UM, FOR QUITE SOME TIME THE COMMUNITIES HAVE WANTED TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF, UM, COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND, AND GRAVE CONCERN, UM, CONCERNING THE PARTICULAR, THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION AND THE OPERATIONS OF THIS LOCATION. AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME AN OPPORTUNITY THAT THE COMMUNITY IS ABLE TO HAVE SOME MEETINGS. WE REGULATE THOSE MEETINGS, UM, AS WE SPEAK, UM, TO COORDINATE WHEN OUR MEETING'S GONNA HAPPEN. BUT THIS, THIS PARTICULAR, UM, LOCATION HAS BEEN, UM, NOT A GOOD COMMUNITY PARTNER FOR, FOR THE LAST OVER 10 YEARS. SO WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT IT'S BEEN ON AUTO RENEWAL AND SO WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO BRING IT BACK BEFORE THIS IN THIS BODY. AND WE HAVE. SO NOW ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? I DO HAVE JUST A QUESTION FOR, FOR STAFF. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS IS A RENEWAL OF THE SUP FOR THE MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING STATION, IS THAT RIGHT? THAT IS CORRECT. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR THREE YEARS WITHOUT AUTOMATIC RENEWAL. OKAY. AND IT WAS TIMELY SUBMITTED. THEY JUST MISSED THE DATE FOR THE AUTO RENEWAL. TIMELY SUBMITTED FOR THIS RENEWAL, BUT NOT TIMELY SUBMITTED FOR THE AUTO RENEWAL. THAT'S A DIFFERENT, THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. OKAY. SO THEY CAN NO LONGER BE AUTOMATIC RENEWAL. OKAY. AND WITH THE TIME THE SUBMISSION OF THE NON-AUTO RENEWAL EXTENSION APPLICATION CITY POLICY ALLOWS THEM TO KEEP OPERATING THE USE COVERED BY THE SUP UNTIL THE UM, SUP APPLICATION IS FINALLY RESOLVED. IF IT'S APPROVED, THEY CAN KEEP OPERATING IT. IF IT'S ULTIMATELY DENIED, THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO STOP OPERATING AT THAT TIME. IS THAT CORRECT? SUP LAND USES ARE NOT PERMITTED IN DISTRICTS THAT ARE BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT BY RIGHT. SO IT'S NOT AN, IT'S CURRENTLY NOT AN OPERATION. OH YES. SO THE, THE ANSWER TO YOUR PRIMARY QUESTION IS WE GENERALLY DO LET THEM [01:10:01] CONTINUE IN OPERATION, BUT AS JACOB WAS SAYING, HEY, UH, UPON OBSERVATION OR NOT ACTUALLY IN OPERATION, UM, I THINK AS COMMISSIONER STATED, SO REQUIRE A NEW CO WITHOUT, WITHOUT THE THE SUP THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO GET THE CO YES. SORRY THAT, THAT'S, UM, I'M TRYING TO THINK THROUGH THE SEQUENCE ON THAT. THEY HAVE AN OPEN SUP RIGHT NOW. UM, THEY TYPICALLY WOULDN'T GET CITED FOR CONTINUING THE USE. WHILE THE SUP IS OPEN, IT'S IN A BIT OF A GRAY AREA BECAUSE THE USE IS BUILT OUT. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S ONE TYPE OF BUILDING FOR A GAS STATION, BUT, UM, I, I CAN'T SAY IF THEY WOULD BE ISSUED A NEW CO IF THEY TRIED TO APPLY FOR IT TOMORROW, UM, YOU KNOW, WITH THE SUP BEING IN PROCESS, BUT TYPICALLY YOU'RE, YOU KNOW, DEFENDANT AGAINST BEING CITED OKAY. IN THESE SITUATIONS. BUT, BUT YEAH, NO, AS AS HE STATED, THEY ARE NOT ON THE RECORD ON OBSERVATION. OKAY. COMMISSIONER WHEELER, CAN I ASK YOU ANOTHER QUESTION? WHEN, WHEN THE SUP FOR A, UM, A FUELING STATION, DO THEY ALSO REQUIRE SECOND SUP FOR THE, UH, CO THE CONVENIENCE STORE OR THEY'RE ALL IN ONE? BECAUSE IN, IN, IN THE NMU ZONING, A CONVENIENCE STORE IS REQUIRED. A, A FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A SUP ALSO. SO, OR DO THEY RUN TOGETHER SIMULTANEOUSLY BECAUSE THEY ARE ABUSED? THAT'S A GOOD, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I DON'T REMEMBER OFF OF THE TOP OF MY HEAD ABOUT THE, UH, THE NEW, YEAH, WITH THE NEW ZONING, I WOULD NEED TO, I WOULD NEED TO CHECK, BECAUSE WHEN THIS FIRST CAME IN, IT WAS, IT WAS BEFORE THE NMU, SO I NEED, I NEED TO GO CHECK. SO THE N ONLY THING DIFFERENCE IN THE NMU IS THAT IT, IT'S ALL OUR DISTRICTS ARE MIXED USE, BUT IN PD 5 95 FROM THE, THE CONCEPTION, A FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE UNDER 3,500 SQUARE FEET IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A SUP. UM, AND THEY ARE NOT TOGETHER. WE ARE THE ONLY DISTRICT THAT HAS FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND GENERAL MERCHANDISE SEPARATED. AND SO THEY ARE NOT, SO THE, BUT IT DOES REQUIRE, ESSENTIALLY CONVENIENCE STORES NEED THE SUP AND PD 5 9 5, RIGHT? RIGHT. YES. UM, IF THEY, I, PATRICK IS BEHIND THE EXISTING SUP, THE EXISTING SUP DOES NOT, UM, INCLUDE FOOD AND AND BEVERAGE STORE ON IT. SO IF THEY WANTED TO OPERATE THAT, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY'D NEED A NEW ONE, UH, OR THEY COULD PUT IT ON THIS SUP OR, OR NOT. UM, BUT THAT HASN'T BEEN IN FRONT OF US AT, AT THIS POINT. SO MY, MY CONCERN NOW IS WHEN THIS, DURING THE TIME AT THIS GR GAS, THIS GAS STATION WAS VACANT FOR 10 PLUS YEARS. WHEN, WHEN THIS GAS STATION WAS GIVEN A SUP BACK IN 2013, WHY WASN'T A SUP ALSO REQUIRED FOR THE FOOD AND BEVERAGE? BECAUSE THE FOOD AND FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE, UM, A FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE IN 2013 ALSO REQUIRED A SUP IN 2013. I CAN'T SAY, I DON'T KNOW, UM, BUT I CAN DO MY RESEARCH IN ON THAT FOR YOU. CAN, CAN WE ASK, UM, MR. UM, BLADES, SO THAT CAN BE, AND, AND, AND, AND ALSO DURING THAT TIME, IT HAD BEEN CLOSED WELL OVER SIX MONTHS. UH, SO WE CAN DO THAT RESEARCH BECAUSE AT THE TIME THAT THE, THE, AT THE TIME THE PD WAS PASSED, THE STORE MIGHT HAVE BECOME NON-CONFORMING AND THEN IT CAN EXIST IN THAT NON-CONFORMING STATUS AS A STORE THAT SELLS FOOD AND BEVERAGES. UM, PROVIDED AGAIN THAT IT DOESN'T VIOLATE ANY OF THE NON-CONFORMING, UM, PART OF OUR CODE. UM, AND SO IT MAY NOT NEED, MAY NOT HAVE NEEDED A SUP FOR A FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE AT THE TIME. IT GOT AN SUP FOR THE, FOR THE, UH, FOR THE FUELING STATION BECAUSE IT WAS NON-CONFORMING. IT COULD HAVE BEEN NON-CONFORMING IN 2013. IT, IT, SO IT WAS, IT WAS TEXACO AND TEXACO HAD BEEN CLOTHED FOR WELL OVER FIVE YEARS PRIOR TO VALEROS COMING IN. SO AT THE TIME THAT THIS WAS ISSUED, THAT SUP WOULD'VE HAD BEEN REQUIRED AND WAS NOT. SO I'M TRYING TO ENSURE THAT JUST FOR THE FUTURE, IF A FUEL BEVERAGE STORE THAT ALSO HAS A GENERAL MER, I MEAN, HAS FOOD AND BEVERAGE, WOULD IT GO FOR GOING FORWARD ALSO NEED TWO SUVS OR A SUP WITH A SECOND CONDITION? YES. UM, IF MOVING FORWARD, IT WOULD REQUIRE TO DO THOSE, BOTH THOSE TWO LAND USES AND SUP THAT WOULD GRANT BOTH OF THOSE LAND USES. AND SO DO WE, WHILE THIS CASE IS BEING OPENED UP, DOES IT ALSO NEED TO BE MODIFIED SO THAT IF THEY'RE GOING TO OFFER FOOD AND BEVERAGE, THAT IT ALSO NEEDS TO INCLUDE IT IN THIS SUP BEFORE, [01:15:01] BEFORE, UH, APPROVAL OR DENY BOTH. DOES THIS APPLICATION ALSO NEED MODIFICATION? UH, THAT I BELIEVE OUR STAFF IS WORKING WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO, TO UNDERSTAND THAT QUESTION? YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. YEAH, I MEAN, WE WERE DISCUSSING, YOU KNOW, IT, IF THEY WERE NON-CONFORMING, THEN THEY WOULDN'T, YOU WOULDN'T WANNA PUT IT IN THE SUP, UM, VERY, WITHOUT DIGGING DEEPER, IT MAYBE SOUNDS LIKE THEY'RE NOT NON-CONFORMING. IF THE USE HAS BEEN OUT OF COMMISSION FOR A WHILE, UM, TO THAT, I WOULD SAY, I WOULD SAY IT SHOULD BE RE IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT THE APPLICANT WANTED TO ADD ONTO THE APPLICATION, IF FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE IS GONNA BE PART OF, PART OF THEIR OPERATION, THEY SHOULD PROBABLY RE NOTIFY TO ADD THAT AS A COMPONENT BECAUSE WE'VE ADVERTISE, THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE FUELING STATION, BUT WE DID NOT NOTICE THAT IT WAS ALSO FOR, UH, FOOD AND BEVERAGE STORE. UM, AND, AND YOU KNOW, APPLICANT HASN'T STATED THAT NEEDS TO BE, BUT IF YOU KNOW THE FACTS YOU'RE TELLING US, MAKE IT SOUND LIKE THAT'S MAYBE THE CASE. IT IS DEFINITELY THE CASE. THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT SOUTH DALLAS COMMUNITY IN THE ORIGINAL PD, PD 5, 9 5 IN 2001 CONVENIENCE STORES WERE A ISSUE. AND WE HAVE SEEN THIS POP UP OVER THE YEARS WHERE THESE SUVS ARE NOT BEING APPLIED FOR AND THEY'RE GIVEN BY WRIGHT. AND WE SPECIFICALLY SEPARATED FOOD AND BEVERAGE IN GENERAL MERCHANDISE FOR THIS REASON. AND, AND WITHOUT DOING RESEARCH AND BEING A OF A COMMUNITY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, LIVING IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR OVER 40 YEARS, I CAN TELL YOU THAT AT THE TIME THAT THE VALEROS WAS OPEN, IT WAS WELL PAST SIX MONTHS, WHICH MADE IT NONCONFORMING. AND THIS WAS ISSUE AND ERROR. AND WE NEED TO RECTIFY THIS, UM, UH, UH, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. UN UNDERSTOOD. UM, WE'LL DO ALL, ALL OF OUR DUE RESEARCH TO CONFIRM ANY OF THAT. THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION. UM, IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WANTED TO BE ADDED INTO THE SUP OR THE GENERAL ZONING OR THE, THE APPLICATION AT LARGE, UM, WE PROBABLY WOULD, WOULD WANT TO RE NOTIFY THAT. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WHEELER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HAMPTON TO HOLD THIS MATTER MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT TILL NOVEMBER 19TH. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ALL ITEM NUMBER 15. ITEM [15. 26-2855A An application for a Planned Development Subdistrict for MF-3 Multiple Family Subdistrict uses on property zoned MF-3 Multiple Family Subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on the east corner of Gillespie Street and Welborn Street, AKA 3618 Gillespie Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Preston Cheng / 3618 Gillespie LLC Representative: Karl Crawley / Masterplan Planner: Liliana Garza Council District: 14 Z-26-000043] 15 IS CASE Z 26 DASH 0 0 0 0 4 3. AN APPLICATION FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT SUBDISTRICT FOR MF THREE MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBDISTRICT CASES AND PROPERTIES ON MF THREE MULTIPLE FAMILIES SUBDISTRICT WITHIN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1 93, THE OAK OAKLAND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT ON THE EAST CORNER OF GLEI STREET AND WALBORN STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS THIRTY SIX EIGHTEEN GYPSY STREET STATE CONDITION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STATUS RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU MS. GARZA. ANY SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT? HI GUYS. HELLO COMMISSIONERS. UH, MY NAME IS PRESTON CHANG. I'M THE DEVELOPER OF THIS PROJECT. UM, WE'RE EXCITED TO DO A PROJECT LIKE THIS. WE HAVE GREAT AMBITIONS FOR IT. UM, OUR, UH, OTHER PROJECT IN THE AREA IS A LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CALLED THE ROSEWOOD RESIDENCES. UH, IT'S A 33 UNIT PROJECT. YOU KNOW, WE ARE FOR SALE, NOT FOR LEASE, AND, UH, WE LOOK FORWARD TO BRINGING ANOTHER KIND OF FIVE STAR LUXURY CONDO FOR SALE PROJECT HERE FOR THIS SITE. UM, THE DENSITY IS NOT GONNA BE HUNDREDS OF UNITS. UM, THE CURRENT DENSITY ON THE SITE IS 12. WE'RE LOOKING TO INCREASE THAT BY AROUND 38, SO A TOTAL OF 50 UNITS. UM, WE LOOK FOR YOUR SUPPORT TODAY. WE WANNA BUILD BEAUTIFUL BUILDINGS. WE ENGAGE WITH AWARD-WINNING ARCHITECTS THAT MAKE BEAUTIFUL PROJECTS TO ENHANCE THE CITY AND BRING MORE, UM, [01:20:01] UM, APPRECIATION AND FINE ARCHITECTURE TO THE TOWN. UM, APPRECIATE YOUR YOUR TIME TODAY AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS AND SUPPORT. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. ADAM MURPHY, 26 15 ALCO AVENUE, AND I SERVE AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE OAK LAWN COMMITTEE. THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM CAME BEFORE OUR COMMITTEE AND WE VOTED OVERWHELMINGLY TO SUPPORT THE PROJECT AS PRESENTED, AND WE ARE EXCITED TO HAVE THEM IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS AND SUPPORT. I'M NOT THAT TALL. I SHOULD HAVE LEFT IT UP FOR DALLAS, I GUESS. UH, CARL CROWLEY, 1341. UH, WEST MOCKINGBIRD. WE HAVE A PRESENTATION, I THINK SOMEWHERE IN THERE, BUT, UH, DO I, DO YOU WANT ME TO GO THROUGH THE SLIDES OR NOT? IT'S UP TO YOU. OKAY. IT'S UP TO YOU IF YOU'D LIKE TO. OKAY. UM, I'LL, I'LL, IS IT THERE? I GOT IT. OH, TAG TEAM. I'M SORRY. NO, NO, NOT AT ALL. I NEED, I NEED THE ACTIVITY. . WE ALL NEED THE STEPS. . NO, THIS IS COUNT. YOU GOT LITTLE KIDS AT HOME, YOU DON'T NEED TO ACTIVITY. YOU NEED REST. ALL MY EXERCISES IN THE BACK. LIFTING. LIFTING. MM-HMM . IT'S ELECTRONIC. THE PH, RIGHT? YES. YES, SIR. FORWARD BACKWARDS. UP AND DOWN. IT WILL BE, BUT I NEED TO HIT SHARE CONTENT. SHARE THIS, SHARE THAT. OH MY GOODNESS. HERE WE GO. YES. OKAY. I'M GONNA GO THROUGH JUST SOME QUICK SLIDES. UM, PRESTON AS MENTIONED, UH, HERE'S THE SITE, GILLESPIE AND WELBURN. UM, THERE ARE 12, UH, TOWN HOMES THAT WERE BUILT IN THE, UH, SEVENTIES THAT ARE THERE. THEY PURCHASED ALL 12. UM, HERE'S THE, UH, DEVELOPMENT PLAN. UM, AS MENTIONED, UH, WHAT, WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR IS A PDS BASICALLY TO GET 10% MORE LOT COVERAGE. THE LOT COVERAGE WILL BE ON THE FIRST TWO LEVELS, UH, UH, A LOBBY LEVEL, A CALL THAN AN AMENITY DECK ABOVE IT. THEN THE TOWER WILL BE, UM, A, A MUCH GREATER SETBACK, UM, WHICH IS PRETTY MUCH THE NORM OF WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE, IN THE WHOLE OAK LAWN AREA. UM, UH, ALL PARKING WILL BE INSIDE THE BUILDING AND UNDERGROUND THE LOADING WILL BE INSIDE THE BUILDING. UM, AT ONE POINT WE HAD TWO LOADING DOORS, BUT WE'VE NOW ELIMINATED THAT. SO THERE'S JUST ONE DRIVEWAY ONTO, UM, A GILLESPIE. UM, ALL THE TURNING RADIUSES WORK, SO THE, EVERYTHING WILL BE INSIDE. WE'VE ADDED ON WELBURN, A SMALL SORT OF PULL IN AREA FOR DROP OFF AND STUFF FOR GUESTS AND THINGS. UM, AGAIN, THE ONLY THING WE'RE ASKING FOR IN THE, IN THE PDS WOULD BE, UH, THE ADDITIONAL COVERAGE BETWEEN 60 AND 70%. THE TOWER, UM, IS ABOUT A 35% LOT COVERAGE. UM, HERE'S THE, UH, RENDERING OF THE BUILDING. UM, YOU CAN SEE THE AMENITY DECK AT THE VERY BOTTOM, AND THEN IT GOES UP. IT'S, IT'S A VERY WELL DONE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING. I DON'T KNOW IF PRESTON MENTIONED, UH, THEY'RE NOW WORKING ON THE ROSEWOOD JOINT VENTURE, JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM THAT. UM, HERE'S THE, UM, THE, UH, CROSS SECTION. YOU CAN SEE THE TWO AMENITY LEVEL DECKS ON THE GROUND PARKING. UM, AND THIS IS, UH, THE ACTUAL, THE ACTUAL FIRST FLOOR LEVEL. YOU CAN SEE THE TEASER PARKING, I'LL CALL IT ON THE GROUND LEVEL. IT'S ALL ENCLOSED. IT'LL HAVE A DOOR THAT HAS TO STAY CLOSED, YOU KNOW, UNLESS THERE'S SOMEONE COMING OR GOING. AND THEN YOU SEE THE LOADING DOCK, AND AGAIN, ALL THE TURNING RADIUSES WORK. AND THEN BELOW THAT IS, UH, TWO, UH, TWO AND A HALF LEVELS OF PARKING. UM, LANDSCAPING IS COMPLIES WITH 1 93. UM, AND WITH MY LIMITED TIME, ALL THAT'S THE AMENITY DECK. YOU CAN SEE IT'S GOT A POOL, A LITTLE DOG, A DOG WALKING AREA, A DOG PARK I GUESS, OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE, SOME FITNESS AREAS. AND THEN, UH, THERE'S A RENDERING OF IT. AND THEN WE GO UP THROUGH THE FLOORS. UM, THREE THROUGH FIVE HAVE THREE, UM, THREE UNITS ON THE FLOOR. YOU GO HIGHER UP, THERE'S LESS UNITS. AND THEN WHEN YOU GO TO THE PENTHOUSE, THERE'S A PENTHOUSE FLOOR. THEN THE, THE PENTHOUSE PENTHOUSE, IF THAT MAKES SENSE, IS A TWO LEVEL, UH, PENTHOUSE AND STUFF. UM, AGAIN, UH, 50 UNITS, UM, PD, IT'S ZONED MF THREE, WHICH ALLOWS ANY LEGAL HEIGHT. AND BASICALLY YOU COULD PROBABLY GET, I DON'T KNOW, A FEW HUNDRED UNITS ON THERE IF YOU BUILT BY CODE AND STUFF. UM, AND THEN SB EIGHT 40 HAS NO LIMITATIONS ON THAT IN THAT SENSE. SO, UM, AGAIN, WE'RE HERE FOR THE 10% EXTRA LOT COVERAGE. WE'RE NOT HERE FOR ANY OTHER ISSUES. [01:25:01] AND THEN WE'VE A A, THAT'S YOUR TIME DISTRICT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. CROWLEY DALLAS, CATHERINE 1341 WEST MOCKINGBIRD. UH, CARL WAS FINISHING UP WITH, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY, IT'S JUST THE ADDITIONAL LOT COVERAGE. WE'VE RESTRICTED THE UNITS, YOU KNOW, ON A, I MEAN, WE HAD WIDESPREAD SPREAD SUPPORT FOR THIS FROM OKLAHOMA COMMITTEE, AS ADAM SAID, AND IT'S 180 PLUS MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT. SO IN HUMAN TERMS, THAT'S LIKE 15 ADDITIONAL PE POLICE OFFICERS WILL BE PAID FOR JUST BY THIS PROJECT AND 27 DISD BEGINNING TEACHERS. SO, AND THIS IS A SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT FOR, YOU KNOW, FIF 50 UNITS, UH, WITH GREAT ARCHITECTURE. SO WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. UH, YOU KNOW, WE'VE, OUR TEAM'S WORKED HARD ON DESIGNING SOMETHING THAT'S NOT REAL IMPACTFUL IN TERMS OF LOTS OF PEOPLE. THESE ARE EXPENSE, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY VERY EXPENSIVE UNITS AND, UH, THERE HAVE NOT BEEN A WHOLE LOT OF FOR SALE PROJECTS DONE OVER THE KIND OF THE LAST END OF THIS MORE CHALLENGING ECONOMIC CYCLE. SO WE'RE EXCITED TO, UH, HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT ON THIS ITEM? ANY SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS EUGENE HANH. I LIVE AT 3 6 1 0 GILLESPIE STREET, UNIT 13 DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHERE I'VE RESIDED SINCE THE COMMUNITY WAS BUILT IN 2005. I SERVE AS THE HOA PRESIDENT OF THE ENCLAVE TURTLE CREEK TOWN HOMES. AND I'M SPEAKING TODAY, BOTH FOR MYSELF AND ON BEHALF OF OUR COMMUNITY. I WANNA STATE PRELIMINARY OPPOSITION TO THIS APPLICATION AS CURRENTLY PRESENTED, THOUGH I'M OPEN TO RECONSIDERING IF MY CONCERNS TODAY ARE ADDRESSED. MY PRIMARY CONCERN IS SCALE AND COMPATIBILITY. OUR COMMUNITY IS A THREE STORY TOWN HOME COMPLEX BASED ON REPORTING FROM THE DALLAS BUSINESS JOURNAL. THE PROJECT PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE, A 23 STORY LUXURY CONDO TOWER CALLED ONE WELLBORN WITH ROUGHLY 50 UNITS AND A TWO STORY PENTHOUSE REPRESENTS AN EXTRAORDINARY JUMP IN SCALE, IMMEDIATELY ADJUST ADJACENT TO OUR HOMES. THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED FOR LOW RISE MULTIFAMILY USE, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY THIS REZONING REQUEST IS BEFORE THE COMMISSION TODAY. I DON'T SEE IN THE MATERIALS HOW THIS SCALE WAS RECONCILED WITH PD ONE 90 THREE'S OAK LAWN SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS, OR WITH THE CHARACTER OF OUR EXISTING COMMUNITY SITTING DIRECTLY BESIDE IT. I'D ASK THE APPLICANT TO CONFIRM THE FINAL PROPOSED HEIGHT UNIT COUNT AND MASSING TODAY, AND I ASK THE COMMISSION TO REQUIRE A CLEAR EXPLANATION OF HOW A 23 STORY TOWER FITS THE INTENT OF THIS SUBDISTRICT NEXT TO A THREE STORY NEIGHBORHOOD. SECOND, I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT STREET PARKING AND CONGESTION. GILLESPIE STREET IS ALREADY NARROW AND STREET PARKING IS LIMITED FOR RESIDENTS WHO CURRENTLY LIVE THERE. REPORTING INDICATES THE PROJECT PLANS ROUGHLY 120 UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES FOR ABOUT 50 UNITS, WHICH MAY LOOK ADEQUATE FOR RESIDENTS ON PAPER, BUT I'D ASK WHETHER THAT FIGURE ACCOUNTS FOR VISITOR PARKING, STAFF DELIVERIES, CONSTRUCTION PERIOD PARKING, NONE OF WHICH APPEARED TO HAVE ANYWHERE TO GO BUT ARE ALREADY TIGHT STREET. I'D ASK WHETHER A TRAFFIC STUDY WAS CONDUCTED FOR THE GILLESPIE WELLBORN INTERSECTION SPECIFICALLY, AND WHETHER IT ADDRESSES TURNING CONFLICTS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. THIRD, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION REFERENCES, QUOTE, RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS WITHOUT LISTING THEM. IN THIS AGENDA SUMMARY, I'D ASK THAT THOSE CONDITIONS BE READ INTO THE RECORD TODAY BECAUSE APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS THAT SUGGESTION RESIDENTS HAVEN'T SEEN IS DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE OR SUPPORT. FINALLY, GIVEN OUR PROXIMITY, I'D ASK FOR CLARITY ON CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE AND MITIGATION NOISE GUST IN CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, INCLUDING TOWER CRANE OPERATION OVER MULTIPLE UNDERGROUND PARKING LEVELS SINCE THAT WOULD DIRECTLY AFFECT OUR RESIDENTS DURING THE BUILD. HAVING LIVED NEXT TO THIS SITE FOR OVER 20 YEARS, AND GIVEN THE SCALE OF WHAT'S PROPOSED AGAINST OUR THREE STORY COMMUNITY, I RESPECTFULLY ASK THE COMMISSION TO EITHER CONTINUE THIS ITEM OR REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATIONS, ADDRESSING HEIGHT, PARKING, AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY BEFORE GRANTING APPROVAL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS KELLY MITCHELL. I LIVE AT 36 15 GILLESPIE STREET, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS PROPOSED SITE. UM, [01:30:01] I'M ASKING YOU TO LOOK VERY CAREFULLY AT WHAT IS BEING, BEING APPROVED HERE, NOT SIMPLY AS ANOTHER MULTIFAMILY PROJECT, BUT AS A PROJECT REQUESTING MULTIPLE EXCEPTIONS TO THE EXISTING STANDARDS. FOR THIS PARTICULAR SITE, THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR CHANGES TO LOT COVERAGE, LANDSCAPING, PARKING, AND DESIGN STANDARDS, AND THOSE EXCEPTIONS HAVE VERY REAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE HERE. FIRST SIX, LARGE MATURE SCHU MAR OAKS ARE BEING REMOVED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THEY ARE ESTABLISHED TREES, NOT LANDSCAPING THAT CAN SIMPLY BE REPLACED WITH SMALLER PLANTINGS. AFTER CONSTRUCTION, THEY PROVIDE SHADE AND CHARACTER TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO REQUIRE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO PRESERVE THEM. SECOND, THE PARKING SITUATION IS A SERIOUS CONCERN. THE PROPOSAL SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT NO ADDITIONAL GUEST PARKING IS REQUIRED, PLUS THERE IS ESSENTIALLY ONLY A TWO CAR PULL OFF IN THE ENTRANCE FOR THE DELIVERIES, PICKUPS, GUESTS, AND OTHER SHORT TERM ACTIVITIES. WHERE EXACTLY ARE THOSE VEHICLES SUPPOSED TO GO? WHEN THESE SPACES ARE OCCUPIED, THE SURROUNDING STREETS ARE NARROW AND EVEN THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SAYS IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED TO MITIGATE THE DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACT. FINALLY, WE WILL HAVE TO LIVE THROUGH CONSTRUCTION ON THE SIDE OF THE SCALE. CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC, STAGING NOISE, DUST, AND STREET CONGESTION ARE NOT MINOR ISSUES. I HAVE TO WALK BY THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT DICKINSON AND HOOD, ALSO BY ROSEWOOD, UH, EVERY DAY. AND I'M APPALLED BY THE INCITELY BARRICADES, THE MESSY SITE, THE TRASH AND SIGN STREWN ABOUT THE ENTIRE BLOCK. IT'S BEEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR THREE YEARS ALREADY AND STILL HAS SEEMINGLY A LONG WAY TO GO. I'M NOT ASKING YOU TO STOP DEVELOPMENT. I'M ASKING YOU TO MAKE SURE THE BURDENS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS NOT SIMPLY SHIFTED ONTO THE PEOPLE WHO ALREADY LIVE HERE. PLEASE REQUIRE MEANINGLY MEANINGFUL TREE PRESENT PRESERVATION, A REALISTIC SOLUTION FOR GUEST AND SHORT-TERM PARKING, CAREFUL TREATMENT OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE, AND A DETAILED CONSTRUCTION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN BEFORE APPROVING THESE MODIFICATIONS. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS SEAN GARMAN. I LIVE AT 36 15 GILLESPIE STREET AS WELL. AND I AM JUST IN OPPOSITION OF THE, UH, 10% GROWTH OF THE, OF WHAT'S ALLOWED, UM, IN THE PLANNING. THE PARKING ISSUE, I CAN'T OVERSTATE THIS ENOUGH. UM, OUR COMPLEX OF EIGHT UNITS, WE HAVE FOUR SPACES OF OFF STREET PARKING IN FRONT OF OUR COMPLEX, AND I FREQUENTLY, AT LEAST ONCE A QUARTER, MAYBE EVEN TWICE A QUARTER, ARE CONFRONTED BY PEOPLE THAT ARE PARKING IN OUR OFF STREET PARKING AND WHETHER IT'S LANDSCAPING PEOPLE FOR THE PROPOSED SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING, UM, MAINTENANCE PEOPLE, JUST WHOEVER GUESTS, UM, THEY'VE HAD RA RAVE PARTIES GOING ON ACROSS THE STREET AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN PARKING ON OUR, ON OUR SIDE. I'VE BEEN IN ALMOST PHYSICAL CONFRONTATIONS WITH PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY DON'T, THEY GET MAD WHEN I TELL THEM THAT THEY'RE PARKING ON, ON OUR PROPERTY, EVEN THOUGH WE, WE HAVE SIGNS POSTED THAT IT'S FOR RESIDENCE ONLY, WE HAVE SIGNS POSTED THAT THEIR CARS WILL BE TOWED. UM, IT'S, IT'S A VERY BIG CONCERN. THE STREETS ARE VERY NARROW WHEN THERE'S ANY KIND OF DELIVERY TRUCK LIKE AMAZON OR UPS OR WHATEVER THAT BLOCKS THE, THE TRAFFIC FLOW ALREADY. UM, AND AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT ROSEWOOD IS DOING ON THE OTHER CORNER, UM, IS ONE OF THE WORST CONSTRUCTION SITES I'VE EVER SEEN. UM, I TWO, AND I'M AN ARCHITECT, SO I, I'VE BEEN ON LARGE PROJECTS SITES AND IT IS A HORRIBLE DISASTER. THE TRAFFIC FLOW IS TERRIBLE. PEOPLE ARE CONSTANTLY GOING THE WRONG DIRECTION. UM, THE TRASH IS SPREADING ALL ACROSS THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, FROM THAT SITE. IT'S JUST ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE AND IT'S BEEN ALMOST FOUR YEARS AND THERE'S STILL, ANYWAY, UM, I JUST REALLY QUESTION THE 10%, UH, ADDITIONAL THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR. UM, PEOPLE WANT TO MOVE TO OAK LAWN BECAUSE IT'S REALLY PRETTY AND NICE AND THEY'RE GONNA MOW DOWN THE TREES THAT MAKE IT PRETTY AND NICE. SO I'M JUST WOULD ASK THAT YOU GUYS PAUSE AND ASK FOR THEM TO RETHINK THE, THE GROWTH THAT THEY HAVE AND RETHINK THE PLANNING THAT THEY HAVE AND KEEP THOSE TREES AND THEN ADDRESS THE PARKING ISSUE. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS AND OPPOSITION? [01:35:02] OKAY, UH, TWO MINUTE REBUTTAL FOR OUR APPLICANT, CARL CROWLEY AGAIN, UM, ONE OF THE COMMENTS I WROTE DOWN, UH, ADJACENT ZONING. THE ADJACENT ZONING IS THE SAME AS OURS, WHICH IS MF THREE, UH, WHICH WOULD ALLOW ANY LEGAL HEIGHT AND LOTS OF EVERYTHING OBVIOUSLY. UM, PARKING, WE, UH, WE HAVE PROVIDED IN, IN OUR BUILDING, UH, GUEST PARKING INSIDE THE TWO, THE TWO SPACES ON WELBURN ARE REALLY JUST FOR DROP OFF THE POSTMAN TO BRING MAY ON THINGS, I GUESS NOT FOR GUEST PARKING. AND THEY'RE NOT, THEY'RE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO BE FOR GUEST PARKING. UH, WE'RE GONNA OVER PARK WHAT, UM, WHAT PD 1 93 SAYS AND ALSO WHAT SB EIGHT 40 SAYS. UM, WE'RE ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH PUTTING IN THE PD CONDITIONS. WE HAVE TO ASK FOR IT. THE CITY MAY DENY IT, BUT NO PARKING ON OUR SIDE OF GILLESPIE, NO PARKING SIGNS THERE. WE HAVE NO ISSUE WITH THAT, ALTHOUGH THAT CAME UP IN THE OAK LAWN COMMITTEE AND THERE WAS SOME PEOPLE PUSHING AGAINST THAT BECAUSE THAT MAKES IT A LITTLE QUICKER TO GO UP AND DOWN. GILLESPIE, IF YOU HAVE MORE, IF YOU DON'T HAVE CARS ON BOTH SIDES, BUT, BUT IF THAT'S WHAT'S WANTED, WE CAN DO THAT. TREES, I DON'T, I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER TREES. I'M SORRY GUYS, WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING, I REALLY CAN'T REALLY SAVE TREES, IT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. OBVIOUSLY, WE'RE GONNA MITIGATE EVERYTHING WE HAVE IN THE WAY OF TREES. OAK LAWN REQUIRES US TO DO THAT. I, I JUST WISH I COULD SAVE TREES, BUT SOME OF THOSE TREES WILL BE WHERE THE UNDERGROUND PARKING IS IN THE BUILDING IS, WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY BREAKS ON SETBACK. UM, IT'S JUST THE LOT COVERAGE THAT 10%, WHICH IS ABOUT 3000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING. IT'S A, IT'S A SMALL SLIVER AND STUFF, BUT THE SETBACKS ARE STILL THE SAME. WE'VE EVEN OFFERED A BIGGER SETBACK ON THE TOWER THAN OAK LAWN AND PD 1 93 REQUIRES. SO, UM, I THINK THAT COVERS PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING IN OPPOSITION. SO HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. UM, AND AS MENTIONED, PRESTON IS HERE. HE'S THE OWNER DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY, SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CROWLEY. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, YOUR MOTION, THANK YOU. IN THE MATTER OF Z 2 6 0 0 0 0 4 3. I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE MATTER SUBJECT TO A DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. UM, WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES, UM, ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON SECTION IN SECTION 1 0 8, REJECT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDATION IN SECTION ONE 11. IN SECTION ONE 13, MAKE THE FOLLOWING. CHANGES IN SUBSECTION B SHOULD READ ALL LANDSCAPING MUST MEET THE HABITAT GARDEN STANDARDS. THE LANDSCAPING MUST BE MAINTAINED WITH INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES TO PROMOTE THE HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE OF POLLINATOR HABITS HABITATS. SUBSECTION D SHOULD READ IRRIGATION. SUB SUBSECTION ONE, DRIP IRRIGATION MUST BE UTILIZED FOR MAINTENANCE OF PLANTING. ADD SUBSECTION TWO CONDENSATE FROM BASE BUILDING HVAC COOLING COILS THAT ARE GREATER THAN FIVE TON AND THAT ARE NOT RECAPTURED AND REUSED IN THE EQUIPMENT SYSTEM MUST BE REUSED FOR COOLING TOWER MAKEUP OR IRRIGATION. EXCESS CONDENSATE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO SANITARY SEWER IF THE AMOUNT OF THE CONDENSATE WASTEWATER EXCEEDS THE IRRIGATION AND COOLING TOWER MAKEUP NEEDS OF THE PROJECT. IN SECTION ONE 15, ADD SUBSECTION E, WHICH WE'LL READ RECYCLING CONTAINERS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL RESIDENTS AND ONSITE WORKERS. AND IN SUBSECTION, I THINK THIS IS IN 15 OH, SUBSECTION 16, UM, ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, BUT CHANGE IT FROM 61 TO 80% TO 80 TO A HUNDRED PERCENT. OKAY, THANK YOU. THAT'S IT FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON. WE HAVE A SECOND, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. ANY DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER KINGSON? I DO HAVE SOME, I DO HAVE SOME COMMENTS. UM, I WANNA THANK ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO CAME DOWN HERE TO SPEAK. UM, I TOO LIVE IN TURTLE CREEK, SO I UNDERSTAND THE [01:40:01] PAIN OF CONSTRUCTION OVER THERE. UM, THERE'S A LOT OF THE THINGS THAT YOU ALL RAISE THAT, FRANKLY, OUR HANDS ARE TIED WHEN IT COMES TO STATE LAW. THEY ARE PROVIDING FAR MORE PARKING THAN WE CAN REQUIRE UNDER SB EIGHT 40. THEY'RE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ONE SPOT. NO, WE ARE ALLOWED TO REQUIRE THEM ONE PARKING SPOT PER UNIT. THEY'RE, THEY'RE ACTUALLY PROVIDING FAR MORE PARKING THAN WE ARE REQUIRE, WE ARE ALLOWED TO REQUIRE. UM, THERE ARE A LOT OF OTHER, UM, LIMITATIONS IN THAT NEW LAW THAT HAS BEEN CODIFIED IN THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE THAT THE CITY CANNOT, UM, MANDATE AROUND. AND THIS IS IMPACTING A LOT OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE'RE GONNA SEE IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AS WELL AS OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY. AND THAT'S JUST THE REALITY OF IT. UM, THE CITY DID ADOPT, UH, LAST YEAR A CONSTRUCTION PROCESS THAT PROJECTS ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW IN TERMS OF STAGING AND EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES AND STUFF. AND I THINK THAT THAT WILL HELP ALLEVIATE SOME OF WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN SOME OF THE PROJECTS IN, IN THIS PART OF TOWN. UM, AND, UH, AS THE APPLICANT POINTED OUT, WHILE I REALIZED THIS PART OF TOWN HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY DEVELOPED AS A RELATIVELY LOW DENSITY, LOW HEIGHT COMMUNITY, THIS AREA, AS WELL AS A LOT OF THE AREA IN THE MANSION, MANSION HEIGHTS, PART OF THE CITY HAS BEEN ZONED MF THREE, WHICH IS ANY LEGAL HEIGHT. SO WHATEVER THE FAA WILL ALLOW, I ANTICIPATE THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE MORE OF OUR OLDER COMMUNITY, UM, BOUGHT AND TURNED INTO MUCH MORE DENSE DEVELOPMENTS, UM, AS A RESULT, BECAUSE THEY DON'T REALLY NEED A ZONING CHANGE FOR THAT. THE ZONING CHANGES THEY'RE ASKING FOR ARE ACTUALLY RELATIVELY SMALL, AND IN EXCHANGE FOR THAT, THEY'RE PROVIDING A LOT OF SUSTAINABILITY IN THIS PROJECT. THEY'RE CONTRIBUTING TO OUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND AND THEY ARE PROVIDING A LOT OF ASPECTS TO THIS PROJECT THAT I THINK WILL ALLEVIATE SOME OF YOUR CONCERNS WHEN IT'S COMPLETE. YOU KNOW, THE SHORT TERM PARKING FOR DELIVERIES, THE GUEST PARKING, THE EXCESS PARKING THAT THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BUT ARE, ARE PROVIDING. I THINK WHEN THE PROJECT'S DONE, YOU'LL SEE THAT IT'S NOT AS BURDENSOME AS, AS YOU'RE CONCERNED THAT IT WOULD BE. UH, AT LEAST THAT'S MY HOPE. UM, AS THE APPLICANT SAID, THERE'S NOTHING TO BE DONE ABOUT THE TREES. I HATE SEEING THE OLD TREES GO AS WELL. UH, WE DO HAVE A TREE MITIGATION FUND, AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT WE, THE CITY HAS A ROBUST TREE PLANTING PROGRAM. COMMUNITIES TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT ALL OF THE TIME. UM, AND BECAUSE OF THE MITIGATION FUND, WE ARE ABLE TO DO REFORESTATION IN A LOT OF PLACES IN THE CITY THAT WE FRANKLY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO AFFORD. SO I KNOW THAT'S NOT EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO HEAR, BUT I HOPE YOU TAKE SOME COMFORT IN THAT. UM, I ALSO AM EXCITED TO SEE THAT WE'RE GONNA HAVE FOR SALE PRODUCT. UM, WE HAVE A LOT OF RENTAL PRODUCT COMING ONLINE. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. UM, BUT I ALSO THINK THAT HAVING FOR SALE PRODUCT IS, IS HEALTHY FOR THIS COMMUNITY. SO WE HAVE A MIX OF HOUSING, UM, AND I'M EXCITED TO SEE THIS DONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON ITEM NUMBER 15? COMMISSIONER HAMPTON? I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS FOR, UM, THE OWNER OR THE APPLICANT TEAM, BUT I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT, UM, CONSTRUCTION. DO YOU, DO YOU WANNA ASK, IT CAN EITHER BE THE OWNER OR FROM THE, UM, APPLICANT TEAM. HOW CAN I HELP YOU? THANK YOU, SIR. UM, I JUST WANTED TO FOLLOW UP ON SOME OF THE COMMENTS WE, UM, HEARD TODAY ABOUT, UM, OTHER CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA. YOU KNOW, IF THIS MOVES FORWARD AND IS APPROVED, IT WILL BECOME AN ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE. I KNOW THAT DISTRICT 14 HAS BEEN VERY FORWARD THINKING, WORKING WITH THE OAK LAWN COMMITTEE ON HOW THEY ARE MANAGING CONSTRUCTION FROM PARKING TO ACTUAL SITE MANAGEMENT. UM, BUT I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU, YOU KNOW, AS, AS, AS YOUR CURRENT SITE AND AS THIS MAY MOVE FORWARD, OR I GUESS I WILL ASK MY QUESTION, UM, HOW DO YOU MANAGE THAT? DO YOU PROVIDE A TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR FOLKS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU WHEN THEY'RE EXPERIENCING ISSUES? CAN YOU JUST SPEAK GENERALLY AT AUDI HANDLE THAT? UM, WE'VE DONE OUR BEST TO WORK WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY AND OUR DIRECT NEIGHBORS. UM, OUR PROJECT MANAGERS ARE ON SITE EVERY DAY, UM, THERE TO ADDRESS THINGS. UH, I MYSELF GO TO THE JOB SITE THREE OUT OF SIX DAYS A WEEK, AND I'VE NEVER HAD AN ISSUE FINDING PARKING. UH, THE MAJORITY OF OUR TEAM PARKS INSIDE THE GARAGE THAT WE BUILT, UM, WHEN YOU START A PROJECT, THERE'S WAY LESS MANPOWER AT THE BEGINNING 'CAUSE IT'S MAINLY HEAVY MACHINERY. SO LIKE, THAT'S NOT AS BIG AN IMPACT. AND THEN ONCE YOU GET YOUR GARAGE DONE, YOU TRY TO MOVE AS MANY PEOPLE IN THERE AS YOU CAN. [01:45:01] AND I THINK THAT REALLY HELPS MITIGATE SOME OF THOSE, UM, CONCERNS. ARE YOU PARTICIPATING ACTIVELY IN THE, UM, CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL PLANS THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE AREA? UM, WELL, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO MAYBE LEARN MORE ABOUT THAT AND YEAH, I, I'M HAPPY TO LOOK INTO THAT. YEAH, AND I WOULD SAY I, I DON'T KNOW IF ALL OF THOSE WERE IN PLACE WHEN WE STARTED OUR CONSTRUCTION. UM, WELL THEY ANYWAY, ENCOURAGE YOU TO, IN INVESTIGATE ON YOUR PROJECTS GOING FORWARD. UM, I KNOW WE HAVE OTHER AREAS THAT ARE REDEVELOPING, UM, AND I THINK HOW CONSTRUCTION SITES ARE BEING MAINTAINED IS A QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUE, UM, AS WE'RE LOOKING AHEAD. SO, UM, THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT I TAKE SERIOUSLY AND WHEN I HEAR QUESTIONS, UM, FROM OUR STAKEHOLDERS COME BEFORE US, SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. COMMISSIONER COX, I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. CAN YOU SPEAK TO US, UM, ABOUT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ON THIS PROJECT? HOW MANY COMMUNITY MEETINGS HAVE YOU HAD? WHAT KIND OF ATTENDANCE DID YOU SEE AT THOSE MEETINGS? UH, PUSHBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT. AND LAST QUESTION FOR YOU. THE PARKING CONCESSIONS THAT YOU'RE MAKING, WAS THAT THE RESULT OF THOSE MEETINGS? UH, NO. WE, WE, WE DIDN'T, UH, WHEN WE PRESENTED TO THE COMMUNITY, I THINK WE DID IT IN WHAT, TWO, TWO MEETINGS? TWO, TWO DIFFERENT MEETINGS. UM, WE HAVE ALWAYS PRESENTED UNDERGROUND PARKING. WE'VE ALWAYS PRESENTED IN EXCESS OF IT. UH, WE FEEL THAT, UM, OUR OWNERS THAT ARE GONNA BE BUYING THERE, THEY TYPICALLY, UM, YOU KNOW, HAVE TWO CARS PER PERSON, BUT YOU KNOW, THEY MAY HAVE GUESTS AND THE BUILDING WILL BE, UH, STAFFED WITH, YOU KNOW, UM, A TEAM THAT WILL ALSO BE ABLE TO BE PARKED INSIDE OF OUR GARAGE. SO WE, WE MAKE THOSE ACCOMMODATIONS TO NOT BURDEN THE COMMUNITY. 'CAUSE WE UNDERSTAND HAVING DONE ONE JUST ACROSS THE STREET, UM, THAT ALSO HAS THE SAME TYPE OF KIND OF OVERLOADED PARKING. I THINK WE HAVE OVER A HUNDRED SPOTS FOR 33 UNITS THERE, YOU KNOW, SO LIKE WE'RE, IT'S KIND OF, IT RHYMES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PRODUCT THAT WE'RE DELIVERING. UM, SO IT WASN'T A CONCESSION, IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE THOUGHT THROUGH AND WE FELT LIKE WAS APPROPRIATE. OKAY. WHAT ABOUT COMMUNITY MEETINGS? UH, YOU KNOW, WE, WE, WE HAD MULTIPLE MEETINGS AND I WOULD SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, MORE PEOPLE SUPPORTED IT. YOU KNOW, WE, WE BRAILLE THE LUXURY PRODUCT. IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S BEAUTIFUL IN THE COMMUNITY. UH, WE HAVE AWARD-WINNING ARCHITECTS. UM, WE'RE CONSIDERATE OF WHAT GOES AROUND US AND, UH, I I THINK IT'S A, A COMMUNITY ENHANCING DEVELOPMENT. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT, UH, A SQUARE BRICK, LITTLE SQUARE, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S A BEAUTIFUL BUILDING, YOU KNOW, IT'LL ENHANCE THE VALUE OF THE COMMUNITY. UM, I THINK IT'S A, SOMETHING THAT'S THE CITY SHOULD BE PROUD OF. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER TO APPROVE WITH, UM, SUBSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF LOTS OF MODIFICATIONS, THE CONDITIONS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 16. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON, ASK GREG GERA. ITEM 16 [16. 26-2856A An application for an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2420 for a private school use on property zoned RR Regional Retail District and MU-2 Mixed Use District, between N. Central Expy, Twin Hills Connection, and Park Lane, AKA 9330 N. Central Expy. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to an amended site plan, traffic management plan, and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Rob Baldwin / Baldwin Associates Planner: Oscar Aguilera Council District: 13 Z-26-000110] IS AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 24 20 FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL USE ON A PROPERTY ZONE RR UH, REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT AND MU TWO MIXED USE DISTRICT BETWEEN NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, TWIN HILLS, UH, CONNECTION AND, UH, PARK LANE, UH, ALSO KNOWN AS, UH, 93 30 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE. JUST WANNA CLARIFY THAT THE, UH, UM, SUP FOR THE USE OF THE SCHOOL WILL ALSO INCLUDE, UH, UH, GRADE, UH, PRE, UH, K FOUR, UM, AS WELL I, I BELIEVE I HAVE IT IN THE REPORT, UH, AS WELL. SO, APPROVAL SUBJECT, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO AN AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN, TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND A STAFF RECOMMENDATION. UH, CONDITIONS. MR. BALDWIN? GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIRMAN. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ROB BALDWIN, 3 9 0 4 ELM STREET, SUITE B IN DALLAS. I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE CLASSICAL SCHOOL IN THE REQUEST TO RENEW THEIR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL. THIS IS A INTERESTING LOCATION. IT'S BEHIND TOTAL WINE AND BEST BUY, IF YOU KNOW WHERE THAT IS. OFFICE CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. ORIGINALLY, UH, IN 2021 WE DID AN SUP TO ALLOW THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL TO OPERATE THERE WHILE THEY WERE REBUILDING THEIR SCHOOL THAT WAS DAMAGED IN THE TORNADO WHEN THEY MOVED INTO THE NEW SCHOOL, CLASSICAL SCHOOL CAME IN AND, UH, TOOK OVER THIS SUP. IT'S TIME TO RENEW IT. WE'D LIKE TO RENEW IT. UH, WHAT WE'RE DOING IS, UH, ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS AND IT'S FOR A PRE-K THROUGH, UH, HIGH [01:50:01] SCHOOL CLASSROOMS. THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY. WE HAVE SEVERAL WAYS TO GET IN AND OUT OF THE PLACE OFF TO PARK, UH, OFF TO WALNUT HILL, OFF TO CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY. UH, NO, NO ISSUES. NO, NO NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS. AND I HOPE YOU CAN SUPPORT THIS REQUEST. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU MR. BALDWIN. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT ON ITEM NUMBER 16? SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION. OKAY. COMMISSIONER HALL, YOUR MOTION? I DO. MR. CHAIR. EXCUSE ME. ? PARDON? ALRIGHT, MR. CHAIR, I MOVE TO IN THE, UH, MATTER OF, UH, ITEM NUMBER 16 Z 26 0 0 0 4 3, THE CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THIS CASE AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO CONDITION. UH, ITEM THREE, TIME LIMIT FOLLOW STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. THIS SPEC, THIS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT HAS NO TIME LIMIT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT, UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER HALL, DID YOU HAVE COMMENTS? OH, NO, I'M SORRY. I HAVE, UH, THIS IS, UM, SEEMS LIKE A FAIRLY SIMPLE CASE TO ME. IT'S, IT'S NOT ON CONSENT BECAUSE, UH, THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY REQUESTED FIVE YEAR SUP STAFF RECOMMENDED, UH, NO EXPIRATION DATE. I'M HAPPY WITH THAT. UH, AS, UH, MR. BALDWIN SAYS THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL NEARBY. IT'S, IT'S A VERY SORT OF BUSY, UH, UH, COMMERCIAL AREA THAT, UH, WE ARE DRIVING PAST ALL THE TIME. SO I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE. UH, PROBABLY EVEN GETTING LOST IN THEIR MASSIVE PARKING LOT ON THE NORTH SIDE AT ONE TIME. UH, BUT REALLY, NO, I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO ADD ON THAT. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, IS THIS SUBJECT TO AN AMENDED SITE PLAN AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN? UH, YES. YES. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HALL, SECOND COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY? THE MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE UP, UM, ITEMS NUMBER 17 AND 18 AT THE SAME TIME AND I BELIEVE I NEED A MOTION TO SUSPEND COMMISSIONER CARPENTER? YES. FOR ITEM 17 AND 18, I MOVE TO SUSPEND, EXCUSE ME, SECTION FOUR C TWO OF THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE, WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT THAT A MOTION TO RECONSIDER MAY NOT BE MADE LATER THAN THE NEXT MEETING. OKAY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? THANK YOU FOR YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. THIS IS NOT DEBATABLE AND REQUIRES HIS TWO THROUGH ITS VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, BACK TO YOU COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR ANOTHER MOTION FOR ITEM 17 AND 18. I MOVE TO RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN ON DECEMBER 3RD, 2020, WHICH AUTHORIZED INITIATION OF THE EAST KLEBERG AND WEST KLEBERG AUTHORIZED ZONING CASES. OKAY, THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON FOR YOUR SECOND. UM, THIS IS DEBATABLE DISCUSSION. I'D JUST LIKE TO ADD THAT I'M THE PERSON MAKING THIS MOTION BECAUSE THE RULES OF PROCEDURE REQUIRE THAT A MOTION TO RECONSIDER MUST BE MADE BY A MEMBER WHO VOTED WITH A PREVAILING SIDE. AND I'M THE ONLY PERSON SITTING HERE WHO WAS HERE IN LATE 2020. I DON'T THINK THAT'S RIGHT. I THINK I WAS HERE. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON WAS HERE. I JOINED IN LATE 2019 AND COMMISSIONER HAMPTON JOINED A FEW MONTHS BEFORE ME AND MY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ON HIS FIRST TWO OF DUTY HAMPTON. I'M NOT SURE. HE LEFT IN SOMEWHERE IN 2020 AND CAME BACK SOMEWHERE IN 2022 SOMEWHERE. OKAY, WELL ANYWAY, THAT SAID, I'M ONE OF THE FEW PEOPLE HERE. HOW ABOUT THAT? I HAVE A, A COUPLE GRAY HAIRS MYSELF. ALRIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, UH, I THINK MR. POCHE NEEDS TO READ THEM IN. OKAY. HOW QUICKLY CAN YOU READ? OKAY. ALRIGHT, AND HERE, ITEM NUMBER [17. 26-2857A Consideration of authorizing a public hearing to determine the proper zoning on property zoned Planned Development District Nos. 672 and 969, an A(A) Agricultural District, a CR Community Retail District with Specific Use Permit (SUP) No. 1301 for a Tower / Antenna for Cellular Communication and SUP No. 2297 for Mini-warehouse, a CR Community Retail with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, a CS Commercial Service District, an MF-1(A)(SAH) Multifamily District, an MH(A) Manufactured Home District, an R-1/2ac(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-10(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-16(A) Single Family Residential District, and an R-7.5(A) Single Family Residential District in an area generally bound by Interstate Highway 20 and City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the north, City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the east and south, Seagoville Road on the southwest, and Beltline Road on the west and containing approximately 1,418 acres with consideration being given to appropriate zoning for the area to include but not limited to use, development standards, and other appropriate regulations. This is a hearing to consider the request to terminate the hearing and not the rezoning of property at this time. (This item was previously approved by the City Plan Commission on December 3, 2020. The commission will consider the item again on September 3, 2026, if the commission first approves a motion to reconsider the item.) Planner: Jalyn Porchay Council District: 8 Z-26-000189/Z201-145] [18. 26-2858A Consideration of authorizing a public hearing to determine the proper zoning on property zoned Planned Development District Nos. 162, 258, 399, 512, 566, 752, 789, 797, and 777 with Specific Use Permit (SUP) No. 1886 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages and a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an A(A) Agricultural District with SUP No. 1031 for a Radio, Television or Microwave Tower, SUP No. 2232 for Placement of Fill Material, SUP No. 798 for Mining of Sand & Gravel, SUP No. 799 for Mining of Sand & Gravel, and SUP No. 84 for a Sewage Treatment Plant, a CR Community Retail District with SUP No. 1838 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages, SUP No. 2146 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Conjunction with a General Food Store greater than 3,500 square feet, SUP No. 2272 for Mini-warehouse, SUP No. 2378 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Conjunction with General Merchandise or Food Store 3,500 square feet or less, and SUP No. 2393 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Conjunction with General Merchandise or Food Store 3,500 square feet or less, a CS Commercial Service District with SUP No. 1111 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages, SUP No. 1837 for Commercial Amusement (Inside) limited to a Dance Hall, SUP No. 1843 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages, SUP No. 1851 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages, SUP No. 1883 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages, SUP No. 2242 for a Tower / Antenna for Cellular Communication, SUP No. 2262 for Commercial Amusement (Inside) Limited to a Dance Hall, SUP No. 2282 for Outside Sales, and SUP No. 2332 for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Conjunction with General Merchandise or Food Store greater than 3,500 square feet, a CS Commercial Service District with D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, a D(A) Duplex District, an IM Industrial/Manufacturing District, an IM Industrial/Manufacturing District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an IR Industrial/Research District, an IR Industrial/Research District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an LO-1 Limited Office District, an MF-1(A)(SAH) Multifamily District, an MF-2(A)(SAH) Multifamily District, an MH(A) Manufactured Home District, an MU-1(SAH) Mixed Use District, an MU-1(SAH) Mixed Use District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an NO(A) Neighborhood Office District, an NS(A) Neighborhood Service District, an NS(A) Neighborhood Service District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an R-1ac(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-1/2ac(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-1/2ac(A) Single Family Residential District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an R-10(A) Single Family Residential District with SUP No. 800 for a Cemetery and SUP No. 801 for a Water Tower, an R-16(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-7.5(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-7.5(A) Single Family Residential District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, an R-5(A) Single Family Residential District, an R-5(A) Single Family District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay, and a TH-1(A) Townhome District in an area generally bound by Beltline Road and Seagoville Road on the east, City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the south and west, St Augustine Road, Haymarket Road, and Ashwood Drive on the northwest, and City of Dallas Corporate Limits, Rylie Crest Drive, Ravenview Road, and Fish Road on the north and containing approximately 7,002 acres with consideration being given to appropriate zoning for the area to include but not limited to use, development standards, and other appropriate regulations. This is a hearing to consider the request to terminate the hearing and not the rezoning of property at this time. (This item was previously approved by the City Plan Commission on December 3, 2020. The commission will consider the item again on September 3, 2026, if the commission first approves a motion to reconsider the item.) Planner: Jalyn Porchay Council District: 8 Z-26-000188/Z201-146] 17, CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC HEARING. TO DETERMINE THE PROPERTY ZONING ON PROPERTY ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 6 72 AND 9 69 AN A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, A CR COMMUNITY [01:55:01] RETAIL DISTRICT WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 1301 FOR A TOWER ANTENNA FOR CELLULAR COMMUNICATION AND SUP NUMBER 2297 FOR MINI WAREHOUSE, A CR RETAIL WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY, A CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT, AN MF ONE MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT, AN MH MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT, AN R HALF ACRE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, A R 10 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, A R 16 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND AN R SEVEN FIVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 20 IN THE CITY OF DALLAS. CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE NORTH CITY OF DALLAS. CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE EAST AND SOUTH SEVILLE ROAD ON THE SOUTHWEST AND BELTLINE ROAD ON THE WEST AND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,418 ACRES WITH CONSIDERATION BEING GIVEN TO APPROPRIATE ZONING FOR THE AREA TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND OTHER APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, ITEM AND HEARING. ITEM NUMBER 18, CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE THE PROPER ZONING ON PROPERTY ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. DISTRICT NUMBER 1 62 2 58 3 9 9 5 12 5 66, 7 52, 7 89 9 7 97 AND 7 77 WITH SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 1886 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY IN A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT WITH SUP NUMBER 10 31 FOR RADIO, TELEVISION AND MICROWAVE TOWER SUP NUMBER 2232 FOR PLACEMENT OF FIELD MATERIAL SUP NUMBER 7 98 FOR MINING OF SAND AND GRAVEL SEP NUMBER 7 99 FOR MINING OF SAND AND GRAVEL AND SEP NUMBER 84 FOR A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. A CR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT WITH THE SEP FOR NUMBER 1838 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. SEP NUMBER 2146 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A GENERAL FOOD STORE GREATER THAN 3,500 SQUARE FEET. SEP NUMBER 2272 FOR A MINI WAREHOUSE, SEP NUMBER 2378 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL MERCHANDISE OR FOOD STORES, 3,500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS. SEP NUMBER 2393 FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL MERCHANDISE OR FOOD STORE 3,500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS A S COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT WITH SEP NUMBER 1111 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. SEP NUMBER 1837 FOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INSIDE LIMITED TO A DANCE HALL. SEP NUMBER 1843 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. SEP NUMBER 1851 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. SEP NUMBER 1883 FOR CELL OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. SUP NUMBER 2242 FOR, FOR A TOWER ANTENNA FOR CELLULAR COMMUNICATION. SEP NUMBER 2262 FOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INSIDE LIMITED TO A DANCE HALL SEP NUMBER 2282 FOR OUTSIDE SALES. SEP NUMBER 2332 FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL MERCHANDISE OR FOOD STORE GREATER THAN 3,500 SQUARE FEET. A CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY. A D DUPLEX DISTRICT AN IM INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT, AN IM INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY, AN IR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT AND IR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY AND LO LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT ONE AND MF ONE MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT AND MF TWO MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT AND A MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT AND U ONE MIXED USE DISTRICT AND MU ONE AND MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH THE D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY AND NO NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT AND NS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE DISTRICT AND N NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE DISTRICT WITH THE D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY AND R ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. AN R HALF AN ACRE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R HALF AN ACRE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY. AN R 10 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH SUP NUMBER 804 CEMETERY AND SUP NUMBER 8 0 1 4 WATER TOWER AND R 16 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R SEVEN FIVE, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R 7.5 A UH, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY AND R FIVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND R FIVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH A D ONE LIQUOR CONTROL OVERLAY AND A TH ONE TOWN HOME DISTRICT IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY BELTLINE ROAD AND SEVILLE TO THE EAST CITY OF DALLAS. CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE SOUTH AND WEST ST. AUGUSTINE ROAD, HAYMARKET ROAD IN ASHEVILLE, DRIVE ON THE NORTHWEST AND CITY OF DALLAS CORPORATE LIMITS RILEY CREST DRIVE, RAVEN VIEW ROAD AND FISH ROAD ON THE NORTH CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 7,002 ACRES WITH CONSIDERATION BEING GIVEN TO APPROPRIATE ZONING FOR THE AREA TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND OTHER APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. DO YOU NEED A, A GLASS OF WATER OR ANYTHING? YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. WE ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC SPEAKERS ON ITEMS NUMBER 17 OR 18? I'M GUESSING NOT, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW. ALRIGHT, NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, YOUR [02:00:01] MOTION IN THE MATTER OF CASE NUMBER Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 180 9. THE EAST CLAYBROOK AUTHORIZATION AND Z DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 180 8. THE WEST CLAYBROOK AUTHORIZATION I MOVE TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE. OKAY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER HOUSEWRIGHT, ANY DISCUSSION WE'RE DENIED. THIS IS SO WE ARE DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE SO THEY CAN BE COMBINED IN A SUBSEQUENT ITEM WHICH IS COMING UP AND UM, THE AREA OF REQUEST IS ACTUALLY EXPANDING FOR THE AUTHORIZED HEARING. YEAH. YEAH, WE WE DON'T WANT OVERLAPPING AUTHORIZED HEARINGS. WE'RE DENYING THE PREVIOUS TWO. YES. SO THAT WE CAN WE, OKAY, WE GOOD? ALRIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ONTO ITEM NUMBER 19. [19. 26-2859A Consideration of authorizing a public hearing to determine the proper zoning on property zoned an A(A)-Agricultural District, a CR-Community Retail District, a CS-Commercial Service District, a D(A) Duplex District, an IM-Industrial Manufacturing District, an IR-Industrial Research District, an LO-1-Limited Office District, an MF-1(A)-Multifamily District, an MF-1(A)(SAH)-Multifamily District with Standard Affordable Housing, an MF-2(A)(SAH)-Multifamily District with Standard Affordable Housing, an MH(A) Manufactured Home District, an MU-1-Mixed Use District, an MU-1(SAH)-Mixed Use District with Standard Affordable Housing, an NO(A)-Neighborhood Office District, an NS(A)-Neighborhood Service District, an R-1/2ac(A) Single District, an R-10(A)-Single Family District, an R-16(A)-Single Family District, an R-1ac(A)-Single Family District, an R-5(A)-Single Family District, an R-7.5(A)-Single Family District, a TH-1(A)-Townhouse District , a TH-3(A) Townhouse District, and Planned Development Districts 162, 258, 399, 512, 566, 672, 752, 777, 789, 797, 819, 969, 1042, 1055, 1075, 1096, and 1100 in an area generally bounded by Interstate Highway 20 and City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the north; Seagoville Road and City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the east; C.F. Hawn Freeway and City of Dallas Corporate Limits on the south; and Kleberg Road, Lyndon B. Johnson Freeway, and Dowdy Ferry Road on the west, and containing approximately 7,722.543 acres. This is a hearing to consider the request to authorize the hearing and not the rezoning of property at this time. Planner: Jalyn Porchay Council District: 8 CPR-26-000360] LAST ONE. AND HERE, ITEM NUMBER 19, CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE THE PROPERTIES ZONING ON PROPERTIES ON A AGRICULTURE DISTRICT, CR COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT, A CS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, A D DUPLEX DISTRICT AND IM INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT AND IR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH DISTRICT, AN LO LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT AND NF MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT AND MF, SAH MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT WITH STANDARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MF TWO MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT WITH STANDARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING. UH, MH MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT AND MU ONE MIXED USE DISTRICT. UH, MU ONE MIXED USE DISTRICT WITH STANDARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING. UH, NO NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT NS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE DISTRICT, AN R HALF AN ACRE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AN R 10 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AN R 16 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AN R ONE ACRE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AN R FIVE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AN R 7.5 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, TH ONE TOWN HOME DISTRICT, A TH THREE TOWN HOME DISTRICT AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS INCLUDING 1 62, 2 58 3 9 9 5 12 5 6 6 6 7 2 7 52, 7 77, 7 89, 7 97 8 19, 9 69, 10 40, 10 55, 10 75, 10 96, AND 1100 IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 20 AND CITY OF DALLAS CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE NORTH SEVILLE ROAD ON THE CITY OF DALLAS. CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE EAST C OF HAN FREEWAY AND THE CITY OF DALLAS CORPORATE LIMITS ON THE SOUTH AND CLEAVER ROAD. AND LYNDON B JOHNSON FREEWAY AND DOWDY FERRY ROAD ON THE WEST CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 7,722 ACRES. IT'S 10 42, NOT 10 40. OH YEAH. UH, IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 10 42. GREAT, THANK YOU MR. PORSCHE. THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON ITEM NUMBER 19? NO SPEAKERS. UH, COMMISSIONER FRANKLIN, DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER MOTION? YES, MR. CHAIR IN THE MATTER OF CPR DASH 26 DASH 0 0 3 6 0 I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE OF THE AUTHORIZED HEARING FOR THE CASE AS DESCRIBED. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FRANKEN FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES AUTHORIZED HEARINGS ARE FUN. ALRIGHT, WE'VE GOT OUR SUBDIVISION [SUBDIVISION DOCKET:] CONSENT DOCKET IS THERE'S MS. RETA. UM, AND ITEM NUMBER 25 IS GONNA COME OFF BECAUSE OF A, UH, COMMISSIONER WHEELER HAS A CONFLICT. I AM SORRY MY VOICE IS NOT GOOD TODAY. GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR AND GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. UH, THE CONSENT IS IN THAT CONSISTS OF, UH, 16 ITEMS. ITEM NUMBER 20, ITEM 21, ITEM 22, ITEM 23, ITEM 24, ITEM NUMBER 25, ITEM NUMBER 26, ITEM NUMBER 27, ITEM NUMBER 28, ITEM NUMBER 29, ITEM NUMBER 30, ITEM NUMBER 31, ITEM NUMBER, ITEM NUMBER 32, ITEM NUMBER 33, ITEM NUMBER 34 AND ITEM NUMBER 35 ON ITEM NUMBER 26 PLA DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 93 PER PAVING AND DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, UH, CONDITION [02:05:01] 15 THROUGH 18 NEED CORRECTION TO READ S CONDITION NUMBER 15 ON THE FINAL PLAT, DEDICATE 25 FEET OF RIGHTWAY VIA FEE. SIMPLE OR STREET IS MAIN FROM THE ESTABLISHED CENTRAL LINE OF WATKINS AVENUE. CONDITION NUMBER 16 ON THE FINAL PLA DEDICATE 25 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY VIA FEE SIMPLE OR STREET EASEMENT FROM THE ESTABLISHED CENTER LINE OF FLOY STREET. CONDITION NUMBER 17. UH, ON THE FINAL PLA DEDICATE 25 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY VIA FEE SIMPLE OR A STREET EASTMAN FROM THE CENTER, UH, FROM THE ESTABLISHED CENTER LINE OF CORAN STREET. CONDITION NUMBER 18 ON THE FINAL PLAN, DEDICATE 20 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY VIA FEE SIMPLE FROM THE ESTABLISHED CENTER LINE OF HOLLY STREET. ALL CASES HAVE BEEN POSTED FOR A HEARING AT THIS TIME. AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION LISTED IN THE DOCKET AND OR AS AMENDED AT THE HEARING. THANK YOU MS. SCH. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON ANY OF OUR SUBDIVISION CONSENT ITEMS? 25 IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED ON, ON CONSENT. IT'S BEING TAKEN OFF. SO DULY NOTED FOR THE RECORD, IT'S ITEMS 20 THROUGH 24 AND 26 THROUGH 35. AND COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, I BELIEVE YOU HAD SOMETHING YOU NEEDED TO DISCLOSE ON THE RECORD. YES. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. I JUST WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I RECEIVED COMMUNICATIONS. ACTUALLY BOTH OF MINE ARE FOLLOWING THE CONSENT AGENDA, SO I'LL MAKE THOSE DISCLOSURES WHEN WE GET THERE. GREAT. ALRIGHT, SO NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? I DO IN THE MATTER OF THE SUBDIVISION CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS C 20 THROUGH 24 AND 26 THROUGH 25, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE PER SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCKET OR READ AS READ INTO THE RECORD. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HAMPTON FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KAUFMAN FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SAY NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL [25. 26-2865A An application to replat a 0.266-acre tract of land containing a part of Lot 10 and all of Lot 11 in City Block B/1147 to create one lot on property located on Peabody Avenue, southwest of Cleveland Street. Applicant/Owner: Kaminski Custom Builders, LLC Surveyor: Texas Heritage Surveying, LLC Application Filed: July 28, 2026 Zoning: PD 595 (FMU-3) Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 7 PLAT-26-000192] MOVE TO ITEM 25 AND COMMISSIONER WHEELER WILL BE STEPPING OUTTA THE ROOM BECAUSE SHE HAS A CONFLICT. ITEM NUMBER 25 PLAID 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 92. IT IS AN APPLICATION TO REPLY AT A 0.266 ACRE TRACK OF LAND CONTAINING A PART OF LOT 10 AND ALL OF LOT 11 IN CITY BLOCK B OVER 1147 TO CREATE ONE LOT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON PEABODY AVENUE SOUTHWEST OF CLEVELAND STREET. STAFF. RECOMMENDATIONS, APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION LISTED IN THE DOCKET. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MS. RETA. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS ON ITEM 25? NO SPEAKERS. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, YOUR MOTION IN THE MATTER OF PLAT DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 1 9 2. I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND FOLLOWS STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCKET. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR MOTION COMMISSIONER HOUSE. FIGHT FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. LET ME OPPOSE ANY, THE MOTION CARRIES. WE MOVE ALONG TO ITEM [36. 26-2876A An application to replat a 0.252-acre (10,988-square foot) tract of land containing a part of Lot 8 in City Block D/8343 to create one lot on property located on Stillwell Boulevard, west of Walton Walker Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Ernesto Rodriguez and Sonia Rodriguez Surveyor: Keeton Surveying Company Application Filed: August 6, 2026 Zoning: R-7.5(A) Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 3 PLAT-26-000196] 36. ITEM NUMBER 36, UH, PLAT 26 DASH 0 0 1 96. IT IS AN APPLICATION TO REP PLAT A 0.252 ACRE THAT IS 10,988 SQUARE FOOT TRACK OF LAND CONTAINING A PART OF LOT EIGHT IN CITY BLOCK D OVER 83 43 TO CREATE ONE LOT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON STEELVILLE BOULEVARD WEST OF WAL, UH, WALTON WALKER BOULEVARD. 11 NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY IN AUGUST 18TH, 2026 AND WE HAVE RECEIVED ZERO REPLY IN FAVORS DUE TO REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCKET AND OR AS AMENDED AT THE HEARING. GREAT. THANK YOU MS. ESTA. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM 36? OKAY. VICE CHAIR HERBERT, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? UH, YES SIR, I DO. IF YOU GUYS GIMME, UM, IN THE CASE OF, UH, BLACK NUMBER 2 6 0 0 0 1 9 6, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE OF THE MATTER, UM, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCK. GREAT, THANK YOU. UM, VICE CHAIR HERBERT FOR YOUR MOTION COMM. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM 37, [37. 26-2877A An application to replat a 0.275-acre (12,000-square foot) tract of land containing all Common Area A in City Block 28/2280 to create three 0.092-acre (4,000-square foot) lots on property located on Knight Street, northeast of Harry Hines Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Kavyan Corporation Surveyor: Bowman Consulting Group, LTD Application Filed: August 10, 2026 Zoning: PD 193 (TH-3) Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 2 PLAT-26-000200] ITEM NUMBER 37 PLAT DASH 26 [02:10:01] SAYS 0 0 0 200 HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. OKAY. IT'S WITHDRAWN. SO DO WE NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION ON IT? OKAY. WELL AND IF I MAY ACKNOWLEDGE THIS IS ONE THAT I DID RECEIVE A COMMUNICATION, I DID NOT RESPOND OR OTHERWISE ENGAGE IN ANY COMMUNICATION OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. GREAT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALRIGHT. ITEM, I THINK THERE WAS A SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION, BUT SINCE IT'S WITHDRAWN WE WON'T BE HEARING FROM THEM. ITEM 38, ITEM NUMBER 38 [38. 26-2878A An application to replat a 0.241-acre (10,503-square foot) tract of land containing all of Lot 19 in City Block D/5678 to create one lot and to reduce an existing 30-foot platted building line, which varies from 25 feet to 28.4 feet, on property located on Caruth Boulevard, west of Preston Park Drive. Applicant/Owner: Vanessa Redman Surveyor: Texas Heritage Surveying, LLC Application Filed: August 7, 2026 Zoning: R-7.5(A) Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 13 PLAT-26-000191] PLAT DASH 26 DASH 0 0 1 91. IT IS AN APPLICATION TO PLAT A 0.241 ACRE THAT IS 10,503 SQUARE FOOT TRACK OF LAND CONTAINING ALL OF LOT 19 IN CITY BLOCK D OVER 56 78 TO CREATE ONE LOT AND TO REDUCE AN EXISTING 30 FOOT PLANTED BUILDING LINE, WHICH VARIES FROM 25 FEET TO 28.4 FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON CARRUTH BOULEVARD WEST OF PRESTON. PRESTON PARK DRIVE 19 NOTICES WAS SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY ON AUGUST 18TH, 2026. AND WE HAVE RECEIVED ONE REPLYING FAVOR AND ONE REPLYING OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST. UM, THIS REQUEST, UH, REQUEST TWO MOTION BECAUSE IT IS REPLIED AND IT INVOLVES THE REDUCTION OF THE PLA BUILDING LINE. THE FIRST MOTION IS TO APPROVE A DENIAL, UH, REDUCTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING LINE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BUILDING LINE REDUCTION APPROVAL. THE SECOND MOTION IS TO APPROVE OR DENY THE REPLA STAFF STAFF RECOMMENDATION REPLAT APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION LISTED IN THE DOCKET AND OR AS AMEND AT THE HEARING. MR. CHAIR? YES, I WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I WAS COPIED ON COMMUNICATION REGARDING THIS AND DID NOT RESPOND OR OTHERWISE COMMUNICATE OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU SO MUCH, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. ALRIGHT, MR. BALDWIN. GOOD AFTERNOON. ROB BALDWIN 3 9 0 4 ELM STREET, SUITE B. UH, I'M HERE REPRESENTING VANESSA REDMOND ON THIS REQUEST. UH, SHE'S THE OWNER OF 54 23 CARRUTH AVENUE AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE IT IS. IT'S KIND OF UP IN, UH, WEST OF UNIVERSITY PARK, SOUTH OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY. UM, IT'S A HOUSE IN THE CARRUTH HAVEN AREA. UM, THIS IS HER HOUSE OUTLINED IN GREEN. SO SHE WAS DOING A, UM, A RENOVATION TO THE PROPERTY, ADDING A GARAGE, GOT BUILDING PERMITS. YOU CAN SEE THAT HER BUILDING PERMIT WAS, WAS APPROVED. AND HERE'S A, HER, HER STAMPED PLANS APPROVED. SHE POURED THE FOUNDATION FOR THE, THE GARAGE GOT A STOP WORK ORDER BECAUSE THE CITY ISSUED THE PERMIT AND ERROR. THERE'S A PLATTED 30 FOOT BUILDING LINE ON THE PROPERTY AND SHE ENCROACHES INTO IT SLIGHTLY. UH, YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE PLATTED BUILDING LINE HERE. THIS IS THE ENCROACHMENT THAT, UH, IS HAPPENED. UH, WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS TO HAVE THE 30 FOOT PLATTED BUILDING LINE GO AROUND THIS SMALL ENCROACHMENT SO SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO RIP OUT THE GARAGE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN, UH, FRAMED UP AND BUILT. UH, THAT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT. IF IT WAS AN ERROR ON DOCK TECH SIDE IS AN ERROR ON THE CITY SIDE. WE'RE JUST TRYING TO RECTIFY IT AND WE THINK THIS IS THE EASIEST WAY TO GO ABOUT DOING THAT. SO I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND HOPE YOU CAN SUPPORT THIS REQUEST. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. BALDWIN. OKAY, ARE THERE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON ITEM NUMBER 38? SEEING NONE, UH, COMMISSIONER HALL. OH WAIT. WORKING ON A MOTION. JUST ONE MOMENT PLEASE, MR. CHAIR. OKAY, MR. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. UH, IN CASE NUMBER PLAT PLAT 26 DASH 0 0 1 91, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE EXISTING 30 FOOT PLATTED LINE BUILDING LINE. WITH THE FINDING OF FACT THAT REDUCTION OF THE BUILDING LINE WILL NOT REQUIRE A MINIMUM FRONT SIDE OR REAR YARD SETBACK LINE LESS THAN REQUIRED BY THE ZONING REGULATION BE CONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST, ADVERSELY AFFECT NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PLAN FOR THE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF DIVISION. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HALL FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. UH, SECOND MOTION. COMMISSIONER HALL? YES, MR. CHAIR IN THE MATTER OF CASE PL LT 26 0 0 0 1 91. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE STAFF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM, SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. GREAT. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HALL FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER FOR YOUR SECOND. [02:15:02] ANY DISCUSSION? NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM NUMBER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ITEM 39, ITEM NUMBER [39. 26-2879A An application to replat a 0.881-acre tract of land containing all of Lots 5 through 14, and a part of Lot 15 in City Block 21/2005 to create one lot and to remove an existing 40-foot platted building line on property located on Belmont Avenue, northeast of Peak Street. Applicant/Owner: 3328 Shepherd, LLC, Owen Malloy Investments, LLC, Brayne Ventures, LLC Surveyor: MMA, Inc. Application Filed: August 7, 2026 Zoning: CS Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 2 PLAT-26-000206] 39 PLAT DASH 26 DASH 0 0 2 0 6. IT IS AN APPLICATION TO PLAT IS 0.881 ACRE TRACK OF LAND CONTAINING ALL OF LOTS FIVE THROUGH 14 AND A PART OF LOT 15 IN CITY BLOCK 21 OVER 2 0 0 5 TO CREATE ONE LOT AND TO REMOVE AN EXISTING 40 FOOT PLATY BUILDING LINE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BELMONT AVENUE NORTH EAST OF PEAK STREET. THIS REQUEST, UH, REQUEST TWO MOTION BECAUSE IT IS A RELA AND IT INVOLVES, INVOLVES THE REMOVAL OF THE PLATTED BUILDING LINE. THE FIRST MOTION IS TO REMOVE OR DENY REMOVAL OF AN EXISTING BUILDING LINE STAR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BUILDING LINE REMOVAL APPROVAL. THE SECOND MOTION IS TO APPROVE OR DENY THE RE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REPLY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCKET AND OR AS AMENDED AT THE HEARING. GREAT. THANK YOU MS. RES. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 39? OKAY. UH, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? UM, IF I MAY, MAY I ASK A QUESTION OF STAFF FIRST BEFORE I MAKE MY MOTION? UM, I KNOW IT'S OUT OF ORDER. I'M HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION. DOES SOMEONE BUT I TO SUSPEND THE RULES? YES, IF I MAY. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, THANK YOU MR. ISSA, I, ON THE BUILDING LINE REMOVAL, IT APPEARS THAT THIS SITE IS PART OF AN OVERALL BLOCK DEVELOPMENT THAT ALL HAS THE 40 FOOT BUILDING LINE, AND THIS IS A MID-BLOCK LOCATION. ALL OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES APPEAR TO FOLLOW THAT 40 FOOT BUILDING LINE. AND SO I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS WOULD NOT BE CONTRARY TO THAT ESTABLISHED BUILDING LINE AND STAFF'S EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION. YES, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S A COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. UH, AND ALSO IT'S TAKING THE MAJOR PORTION OF THE BLOCK, UH, TO REMOVE THAT EXISTING 44 BUILDING LINE. THAT'S WHY, UH, STAFF, UH, STAFF THOUGHT THAT THAT'S NOT GONNA, UH, UH, IT, IT'S NOT GONNA BE IN CONTRARY WITH THE OVERALL BECAUSE, UH, THE PRO, THE REQUEST IS TAKING THE MAJOR PORTION OF THE BLOCK ITSELF, AND IT'S IN COMMERCIAL ZONING WHERE THE FRONT YARD SIT BACK IS, UH, IS 15 FOOT IF IT'S, UH, ADDITION TO THE THOROUGH FRAME. BUT SINCE IT'S NOT ADDITION TO THE THOROUGHLY, IT'S GONNA BE ZERO ZERO FOOD SET, UH, FRONT YARD SETBACKS. THERE IS NO ANY SETBACKS. AND I JUST, AND I REALIZE, YEAH, WE HAVE A, WE HAVE A, THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE ONLINE, MS. TAYLOR, I'M, I APOLOGIZE. THAT'S WHAT, THAT'S OKAY. I HAVEN'T DONE THIS BEFORE, SO I DIDN'T KNOW IF I SHOULD SPEAK UP, BUT MY NAME IS ANDREA TAYLOR WITH MMA. UH, MY ADDRESS IS FIVE 19 EAST BORDER STREET, ARLINGTON, TEXAS 7 6 0 1 0. AND I'M HERE TRULY IF YOU JUST HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY, GREAT. UH, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? UM, I DO, AND THEN I'M GOING TO HAVE QUESTIONS. SO, UM, IN THE MATTER OF, UH, CASE NUMBER PLAT DASH TWO FIVE DASH 0 0 0 2 0 6, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND DENY THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE EXISTING 40 FOOT PLATTED BUILDING LINE WITH THE FINDING OF FACT THAT THE REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING LINE WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, YOUR COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. AND IF I, SINCE WE HAVE THE APPLICANT, UM, HERE, AND I THINK YOU MAY HAVE HEARD OTHER REPRESENTATIVE, I THINK YOU MAY HAVE HEARD MY QUESTION TO STAFF. UM, IT BASED ON THE PLAT THAT'S BEFORE US, THIS 40 FOOT BUILDING LINE IS CONTINUOUS ACROSS THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE OF THIS BLOCK FACE AND AS A MID-BLOCK LOCATION. UM, CAN YOU SPEAK TO, YOU KNOW HOW I, I'M TRYING TO RECONCILE WHAT'S ON THE GROUND TODAY VERSUS WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED AND IT APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT, UM, IN MY EVALUATION OF THE CASE, WHICH WAS MY, MY MOTION, BUT I WANTED TO, UM, HEAR IF, IF THERE'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SURE. I CAN ALSO SAY THE SETBACK AS IT IS TODAY. YOU KNOW, THE, THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE TALLER THAN 30 FEET. AND SO DUE TO FIRE CODE, THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO BE, UM, NO MORE THAN 30 FEET AWAY FROM THE FIRE LANE, WHICH IS BELMONT. AND SO THAT IS THE FACE OF CURB. SO WITH THE BUILDING LINE AS IT SITS TODAY, PLACING A BUILDING AT THAT LOCATION WOULD NOT MEET FIRE CODE [02:20:01] ANY, I GUESS I'M NOT SURE THAT I, UM, UNDERSTAND YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE FACE OF THE BUILDING, UM, IS, IS A FURTHER DISTANCE THAN WOULD BE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE WITH THE PROPO WITH THE PROPOSED BUILDING. RIGHT. SO THE PROPOSED IS TO, TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS WITHIN THESE PLOTTED LOTS AND TO BUILD A NEW BUILDING. AND DUE TO THE HEIGHT, THE FIRE CODE REQUIRES THE BUILDING TO BE NO MORE THAN 30 FEET AWAY FROM THE CURB LINE OF BELMONT. ALRIGHT, MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY WITHDRAW AND AMEND MY MOTION AND I WILL HAVE COMMENTS. OKAY. MOTION IS WITHDRAWN AND THE PERSON WHO SECONDED IS GOOD WITH THAT. SO BACK TO YOU FOR A NEW MOTION. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. IN CASE NUMBER PLAT DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 2 0 6, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE EXISTING 40 FOOTED PLA PLATTED BUILDING LINE WITH THE FINDING OF FACT, UH, REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING LINE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PLAN OF THE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION. OKAY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION COMMISSIONER, UM, HAMPTON SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? WELL, UM, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS AREA FROM PRIOR, UM, COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORTS. UM, WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD ZONING CASES IN THIS NEARBY VICINITY OUTSIDE OF THIS PLAT. UM, IT IS AN UNUSUAL DEVELOPMENT AND THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL REDEVELOPMENT OCCURRING ALONG THERE, BUT THIS IS, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THOSE, THEY'VE BEEN THERE AT THEIR ACTIVE USES. THEY ARE, UM, ENGAGED COMMUNITY MEMBERS. AND SO I JUST WANTED TO ENSURE THAT AS WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS, BECAUSE IT WILL EFFECTIVELY PROJECT IN FRONT OF, AND THESE ARE, UM, THERE, THERE ARE NO SETBACKS, , AND SO THE BUILDINGS ARE LOT TO LOT TO LOT AND I JUST WANTED TO ENSURE THAT THERE WAS NOT AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE, CONSEQUENCE TO REMOVING THE BUILDING LINE. HEARING THAT THERE WILL BE DEVELOPMENT FURTHER DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS OF HAVING THIS ON WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT. UM, IT SEEMS APPROPRIATE THAT THIS, UM, BE APPROVED. SO I ASKED MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE REQUEST. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. A ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES TO BELIEVE YOU MAKE A SECOND MOTION ON. YES SIR. THIS ONE I IN THE MATTER OF PLAT DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 2 0 6. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE PLAT, UH, PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE DOCKET. THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER CARPENTER. ANY DISCUSSIONS? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT, LAST ITEM. I BELIEVE. ITEM NUMBER 40, ITEM NUMBER [40. 26-2880A An application to change the name of N. Harwood Street, between Woodall Rodgers Freeway and Harry Hines Boulevard, to “Exchange Place.” Applicant: City of Dallas Application Filed: June 4, 2026 Notices Sent: 115 notices sent on August 3, 2026 Staff Recommendation: Approval. SRC Recommendation: Approval. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 14 STNAME-26-000006] 40 ST UH, S-T-N-A-M-E DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 0 0 6. IT IS AN APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE NAME OF NORTH HARDWOOD STREET BETWEEN WOOD ROGERS FREEWAY AND HARRY HANS BOULEVARD TOONS PLACE THE EVER ITEM HAS BEEN ADVERTISED FOR A HEARING AT THIS TIME. HUNDRED ONE 50 NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE ABIDING PROPERTY OWNERS ON AUGUST 3RD, 2026. WE HAVE RECEIVED THREE REPLY IN FAVOR AND TWO REPLY IN TWO REPLIES IN OPPOSITIONS. NEWSPAPER NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED ON AUGUST THREE, UH, AUGUST 3RD, 2026, AND NOTIFICATIONS SIGNS WERE POSTED ALONG HAR ROAD STREET ON JUNE 29TH, 2026. WAIVER IS NEEDED FOR, UH, THIS REQUEST REQUESTS A WAIVER. SECTION 51 A DASH 9.34 C ONE. A HISTORIC STREET NAME MAY NOT BE CHANGED. UM, ON JULY 23RD, 2026, THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE BY UNANIM UNANIMOUS VOTE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. AND THIS REQUEST REQUIRES WAIVER OF SECTION 51 A DASH 9.34 C ONE AND AMENDMENT TO THE TAR FAIR PLAN. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST PROVIDED, PROVIDED THAT THE REQUIRE WAIVER IS ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU MR. VINCENT. THERE WE GO. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. UH, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JONATHAN VINCENT, 2323 ROSS AVENUE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE TEXAS STOCK EXCHANGE, JUST, UH, REGISTERING OUR SUPPORT FOR THIS CITY INITIATED STREET NAME CHANGE. UM, I NOTE THAT IT'S RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE, UM, AND REALLY LOOKING [02:25:01] AT THE NOTICE LIST, THE ONLY CHANGE OF THE STREET NAME OF THE, UH, AT LEAST IN THE NOTICE AREA WOULD AFFECT THE ONE PROPERTY THAT'S CURRENTLY ADDRESSED IS 1919 WOOD ALL ROGERS. UM, SO WE'RE HERE TODAY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE AND OTHERWISE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. VINCENT. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS ON ITEM 40? DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT SINCE YOU'RE THE LAST PERSON LEFT IN THE ROOM. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, YOUR MOTION IN THE MATTER OF T-N-A-M-E DASH 26 DASH 0 0 0 0 6 MOVE WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE MEASURE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, YOUR SECOND COMMISSIONER REALER, ANY DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, NO DISCUSSION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, MR. CHAIR? AYE. OH, COMMISSIONER HAMPTON. WELL, I JUST WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MANY TIMES, PARTICULARLY WHEN WE TALK ABOUT HISTORIC STREET NAMES, WE MAKE A POINT OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE IMPACT IS. THIS IS A REMAINDER OF HARDWOOD SUITE STREET THAT WAS, UM, BISECTED WHEN CLYDE WARREN PARK, UM, WAS BUILT. SO WE STILL DO HAVE THE, UM, CORE PART OF THE STREET. UM, AND I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK STAFF FOR THEIR REVIEW THAT ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED A CEREMONIAL STREET TOPPER AS A CONSIDERATION. AND THAT'S BEEN AN ONGOING DIALOGUE, SO I JUST WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE, UM, THAT REVIEW BY STAFF. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION MR. CARPENTER? UM, I WON'T BE SUPPORTING THE MOTION, YOU KNOW, FOR MY USUAL REASONS, I DON'T THINK THAT HISTORIC STREET NAMES SHOULD BE CHANGED AND THAT'S SEE THAT THE ARCHIVIST DID RECOMMEND, UM, CEREMONIAL SIGN TYPERS, WHICH I AGREE WITH. AND, UM, THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ALSO RECOMMENDED DENIAL BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE CONFUSION WITH EMERGENCY DISPATCH. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KINGSTON, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WHEELER TO APPROVE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY ONE OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. IT IS 2:38 PM AND THIS MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION IS ADJOURNED. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.